Popular in Social Sciences

Banks and Policy Organisations

Macroeconomic modelling of CBDC: a critical review

European Central Bank Ulrich Bindseil

Social Identities and Divisions

A new explanation of antisemitism: Jew hatred as a civilisational phenomenon

Boston University Liah Greenfeld

Banks and Policy Organisations

Financing Private Credit

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Nina Boyarchenko

Economics

Failing Banks

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Emil Verner

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

American Politics

Keeping the Republic

Boston College Marc Landy

British Politics

Entrepreneurial thinking: the politics and practice of policy impact

University of Sheffield Matthew Flinders

How Black and White Women Innovate with Situationships at Midlife

View more insights in Social Sciences - Sociology

View more figures from University of Michigan

View the page of Elizabeth Armstrong

Read the Study

Next in Social Sciences

Estimated Revenue of the Nonprofit Homeless Shelter Industry in the United States

Dennis P. Culhane | University of Pennsylvania

Financial Crises and the Global Supply Network

Sergi Basco | Universitat de Barcelona

How are midlife women reshaping the bounds of intimacy without the pressures of traditional commitment? Our study uncovers how Black and white women, frustrated with conventional relationships, are innovating with ‘situationships’—a blend of casual and committed liaisons—to maintain autonomy and explore romantic and sexual fulfillment.

Image courtesy of interviewee. November 15, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video discusses the concept of "situationships," which are relationships that exist between casual liaisons and committed partnerships. Defined in the research as sexual or romantic interactions lasting at least six months without expectations of commitment or public acknowledgment, these relationships are often characterized by ambiguity.

The study involved interviews with 53 American women aged 35 to 55, who reported varied experiences in their situationships. While younger women tend to view these relationships negatively, perceiving them as unproductive in the pursuit of traditional goals like marriage and family, older women often saw them as beneficial, allowing them to engage in sexual and romantic experiences without the emotional risks associated with more serious partnerships.

The participants in the study came from diverse backgrounds, with a mix of races and economic statuses. The findings reveal that women who are economically secure may have different dating priorities than those who are less secure, sometimes leading to a state of celibacy among economically disadvantaged women.

Moreover, the research emphasizes that the term "situationship" is not entirely new; rather, it represents a recognition of diverse relationship forms that have existed for a long time. The study highlights the need for further exploration of women's sexual and romantic lives, particularly those outside conventional relationship structures.

Ultimately, the text underscores that while situationships may be preferred by some women for emotional and practical reasons, there remains a desire for more serious relationships when suitable partners are available. The research points to structural changes needed to support diverse family arrangements and the welfare of women and children in modern society.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are five key points from the video about "situationships":

1. **Definition and Characteristics**: Situationships are described as a form of relationship that falls between casual liaisons and committed partnerships. They generally last at least six months without expectations for commitment or public acknowledgment, resulting in a relationship that exists in an undefined space.

2. **Demographics and Perspectives**: The study conducted in-depth interviews with 53 American women aged 35 to 55, revealing diverse experiences and attitudes toward situationships. While younger women often view situationships negatively as a waste of time, older women perceive them pragmatically, valuing the benefits of companionship and intimacy while avoiding less desirable long-term commitments.

3. **Social and Economic Convideo**: The research indicated that economic security and race influenced women's involvement in situationships. Women facing economic precarity were more likely to be celibate, while those with more economic stability engaged in situationships to fulfill emotional and physical needs, viewing them as preferable to being single.

4. **Challenging Traditional Romance Narratives**: The women interviewed often rejected traditional romantic ideals, opting instead to pursue relationships on their own terms. They sought companionship without the pressure of conventional romantic expectations, emphasizing autonomy and the desire to protect their personal and familial interests.

5. **Implications for Future Research and Policy**: The findings suggest a need for better demographic research to capture the evolving landscape of relationships and sexuality. The authors argue that this may require structural changes in society and policy to support various family and relationship forms, particularly as societal norms around marriage and childbearing continue to shift.

Export as PDF
Here are some key quotes extracted from the video regarding the concept of "situationships" based on the convideo :

1. **Definition of Situationship**:
- "Situationship is a relationship form that sort of sits in between a kind of casual liaison and a committed relationship."
- "We define them as a sexual and or romantic liaison lasting at least six months, defined by a lack of expectation on one side or the other, that the relationship will lead to a commitment or be publicly acknowledged."

2. **Perception by Different Age Groups**:
- "Younger women are still hoping being in a situationship could in fact be experienced... as kind of a waste of time or as not leading to that."
- "For the women who were over 35 that we talked to, situationships were experienced somewhat differently... they could avoid some who are not viewed as particularly desirable as life partners."

3. **Study Methodology**:
- "We did quite lengthy in-depth interviews with 53 American women... and there was a lot of variation on both class and race."
- "We ended up writing this paper in part because after we collected the data, we just could not work out... whether they were dating, whether they were looking, whether they were in relationships, whether they were single."

4. **Challenges of Defining Relationships**:
- "We started hearing them talk about what they were doing as situationship."
- "Some of them said, ‘you know, this is sort of like a relationship, but not.’"

5. **Cultural and Economic Convideo**:
- "There’s more opportunity for women especially to live autonomous lives and be economically secure outside of marriage."
- "Women who were highly economically precarious were more likely to be celibate... struggling to access any form of love, sex, intimacy."

6. **Desire for Better Options**:
- "Everything else being equal, if they thought that they could find a man... would treat them well, was respectful... that they would have preferred that, but that was not on the table."
- "A situationship was much better than celibacy, but not as good potentially as marriage, but marriage was not on offer."

7. **Perceptions of Autonomy and Independence**:
- "They were just... over it a bit. They were like, ‘I can live on my own. I can be independent.’"
- "Some of the autonomy was about protecting their children from other men being involved in their lives."

8. **Emotional Boundaries**:
- "They were also engaging in a kind of a bounded investment emotionally as well."
- "It is... emotionally protective for some of them."

9. **Pushing Back Against Romantic Norms**:
- "These women were actually kind of pushing back on that... in ways that I think were probably more radical than they understood."
- "They were just living their best life and doing what they needed to do to protect themselves."

10. **Implications for Policy and Society**:
- "If governments are invested in maintaining fertility... they probably need to make a lot more serious structural changes."
- "It does suggest that given this kind of the range and the declining stigma associated with being single... that governments need to really probably move a lot more assertively towards supporting families."

These quotes encapsulate the primary themes and findings regarding the nature of situationships, the demographic focus of the study, and the broader implications for society.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:00.645 --> 00:00:05.525
Situationship is a relationship form that sort of sits in

2
00:00:05.525 --> 00:00:08.685
between a kind of casual liaison

3
00:00:08.865 --> 00:00:10.285
and a committed relationship.

4
00:00:10.825 --> 00:00:14.485
In the paper, we define them as a sexual and

5
00:00:14.485 --> 00:00:18.445
or romantic liaison lasting at least six months, defined

6
00:00:18.505 --> 00:00:21.925
by a lack of expectation on one side

7
00:00:21.945 --> 00:00:25.565
or the other, that the relationship will lead

8
00:00:25.565 --> 00:00:28.325
to a commitment or be publicly acknowledged.

9
00:00:28.625 --> 00:00:30.005
In other words, it just sort

10
00:00:30.005 --> 00:00:32.605
of sits there in an undefined space.

11
00:00:32.795 --> 00:00:35.685
This particular project was based on interviews with women

12
00:00:35.785 --> 00:00:39.045
who are 35 to 55 years old,

13
00:00:39.705 --> 00:00:42.765
but a lot of like the, well, the little bit

14
00:00:42.765 --> 00:00:43.965
of existing scholarship

15
00:00:44.105 --> 00:00:47.005
and the large amount of social media

16
00:00:47.515 --> 00:00:49.965
attention has been to younger women.

17
00:00:50.545 --> 00:00:54.445
And a lot of the mass media type articles are like, how

18
00:00:54.445 --> 00:00:56.725
to find out if you're in a situationship

19
00:00:56.945 --> 00:00:58.085
so you can get out of it.

20
00:00:58.685 --> 00:01:00.405
Situation ships bad, bad, bad.

21
00:01:00.905 --> 00:01:05.085
And that is because if, if younger women are still hoping

22
00:01:05.305 --> 00:01:09.285
for marriage, families, kids, sort of the whole package

23
00:01:10.055 --> 00:01:14.405
being in a situation ship could in fact be experienced

24
00:01:14.405 --> 00:01:17.485
by some younger women as kind of a waste of time

25
00:01:17.905 --> 00:01:20.005
or as not leading to that.

26
00:01:20.625 --> 00:01:25.365
But for the women who were over 35 that we talked to,

27
00:01:26.525 --> 00:01:29.125
situation ships were experienced somewhat differently.

28
00:01:29.665 --> 00:01:31.365
Not always entirely positively,

29
00:01:31.585 --> 00:01:36.325
but much more so in the sense of being able to avoid some

30
00:01:36.325 --> 00:01:40.285
of the risks of partnering with men, especially men

31
00:01:40.385 --> 00:01:43.005
who are not, they did not view as particularly desirable

32
00:01:43.305 --> 00:01:47.205
as life partners and getting at least some of the benefits

33
00:01:47.425 --> 00:01:50.925
of being in, a sexual romantic relationship.

34
00:01:51.065 --> 00:01:52.885
So it, it allowed to get some

35
00:01:52.885 --> 00:01:54.805
of the good while avoiding a lot of the be.

36
00:01:54.905 --> 00:01:59.805
We did quite lengthy in-depth interviews with 53

37
00:02:00.525 --> 00:02:04.725
American women who were located at all, lived in all kinds

38
00:02:04.725 --> 00:02:06.605
of different places in the United States,

39
00:02:06.785 --> 00:02:08.325
mostly southeast Michigan,

40
00:02:08.425 --> 00:02:11.045
but some of them were located everywhere,

41
00:02:11.225 --> 00:02:15.005
and they were like slightly more than half African American

42
00:02:15.265 --> 00:02:17.565
and the rest were white

43
00:02:17.705 --> 00:02:20.645
and they were mixed in terms of their economic situation,

44
00:02:20.645 --> 00:02:22.925
their degree of kind of economic precarity.

45
00:02:22.925 --> 00:02:24.845
So there was a lot of variation on both class

46
00:02:24.905 --> 00:02:27.445
and race in the interviews were quite lengthy.

47
00:02:27.745 --> 00:02:31.725
We talked about their whole sexual romantic relationship,

48
00:02:31.835 --> 00:02:36.525
history, childhood, what they learned about,

49
00:02:36.705 --> 00:02:39.205
sex and romance, and then just kind

50
00:02:39.205 --> 00:02:41.725
of collected their whole narrative.

51
00:02:41.905 --> 00:02:44.565
And to be clear, also, we, we interviewed people

52
00:02:44.625 --> 00:02:47.645
who were not in an exclusive relationship.

53
00:02:47.715 --> 00:02:49.645
That is, they did not understand themselves

54
00:02:49.665 --> 00:02:50.685
as stably partnered

55
00:02:50.685 --> 00:02:52.805
or if they had one partner, they were looking for more.

56
00:02:52.865 --> 00:02:55.645
So we, we selected on people who were open to

57
00:02:55.825 --> 00:02:58.845
or interested in finding additional partners. So this

58
00:02:58.845 --> 00:03:00.925
Was not just a, you know, random sample of people

59
00:03:00.925 --> 00:03:03.125
who were married and the, like, these were people who were,

60
00:03:03.425 --> 00:03:04.645
who were in fact looking

61
00:03:04.945 --> 00:03:08.605
and we kind of, we ended up writing this paper in part

62
00:03:08.605 --> 00:03:11.565
because after we collected the data,

63
00:03:11.785 --> 00:03:15.445
we were just frankly baffled by what the women were doing.

64
00:03:16.185 --> 00:03:19.325
We just could not work out what

65
00:03:20.035 --> 00:03:22.565
initially just kind of whether they were dating,

66
00:03:22.595 --> 00:03:23.685
whether they were looking,

67
00:03:23.685 --> 00:03:25.325
whether they were in relationships,

68
00:03:25.325 --> 00:03:27.445
whether they were singled or single.

69
00:03:27.445 --> 00:03:31.085
Because, because their situations were well situation chip.

70
00:03:31.305 --> 00:03:33.565
And we didn't have the language for that

71
00:03:34.815 --> 00:03:37.565
until we started listening to the interviews.

72
00:03:37.665 --> 00:03:41.485
And it was actually the interviewees themselves that sort

73
00:03:41.485 --> 00:03:43.365
of gave us the language.

74
00:03:43.625 --> 00:03:45.885
We inductively through the interviews,

75
00:03:45.885 --> 00:03:47.925
started hearing them talk about

76
00:03:48.355 --> 00:03:50.685
what they were doing as situation chip.

77
00:03:50.825 --> 00:03:52.925
Not all of them, in fact, relatively few of them,

78
00:03:53.625 --> 00:03:57.325
but a lot of them were using terms like, you know,

79
00:03:57.325 --> 00:04:01.565
just like, well, it's sort of like a relationship, but not,

80
00:04:01.865 --> 00:04:05.405
or this is my, you know, some of them said, you know,

81
00:04:05.955 --> 00:04:09.805
sort of, just sort of side, side thing

82
00:04:10.145 --> 00:04:12.525
or they just, they struggled to define it,

83
00:04:12.545 --> 00:04:15.125
but some of them use the term situationship.

84
00:04:15.405 --> 00:04:18.405
I don't actually think it's quite as new

85
00:04:18.625 --> 00:04:21.285
as the term would suggest in the sense

86
00:04:21.285 --> 00:04:25.005
that I think people have been engaging in quite complicated

87
00:04:25.025 --> 00:04:27.285
and uncategorized types of like sexual

88
00:04:27.285 --> 00:04:30.005
and romantic liaisons for a long time.

89
00:04:30.185 --> 00:04:34.045
But I do think over the kind of larger span of kind

90
00:04:34.045 --> 00:04:36.805
of history and in the United States and in other, you know,

91
00:04:36.805 --> 00:04:39.205
and actually we've been hearing that this is true in the,

92
00:04:39.205 --> 00:04:40.685
this this is happening in the UK

93
00:04:40.745 --> 00:04:42.205
and other places around the world.

94
00:04:42.325 --> 00:04:44.605
I, I talked to a British journalist a a while back.

95
00:04:44.605 --> 00:04:46.005
It was like, wait, this is happening here.

96
00:04:46.185 --> 00:04:50.085
But I think that because a marriage is no longer compulsory

97
00:04:50.385 --> 00:04:51.405
in many societies

98
00:04:51.785 --> 00:04:56.685
and there's more opportunity for, women especially

99
00:04:56.865 --> 00:04:58.405
to live autonomous lives

100
00:04:58.465 --> 00:05:01.165
and be economically secure outside of marriage,

101
00:05:01.215 --> 00:05:05.525
there just is more space for things to kind of, that are,

102
00:05:05.675 --> 00:05:09.285
that are kind of not in a con in a conventional

103
00:05:09.445 --> 00:05:10.725
structure to, to emerge.

104
00:05:11.065 --> 00:05:14.525
But yes, this, the term has definitely become more prevalent

105
00:05:14.585 --> 00:05:16.805
in the media in the last, in the last few years,

106
00:05:17.065 --> 00:05:20.765
and not as much as we would have maybe expected actually.

107
00:05:21.025 --> 00:05:22.405
So there was both white

108
00:05:22.405 --> 00:05:24.525
and black women were engaging in ships,

109
00:05:24.905 --> 00:05:29.045
and both the women who were more economically secure

110
00:05:29.145 --> 00:05:31.325
and the ones who were more precarious women

111
00:05:31.385 --> 00:05:33.965
who were highly economically precarious,

112
00:05:34.035 --> 00:05:36.765
were slightly more likely than other women that we talked

113
00:05:36.765 --> 00:05:40.045
to, to be celibate, that is doing absolutely nothing at all.

114
00:05:40.355 --> 00:05:42.605
Like it seemed like there was a little, there was a sense

115
00:05:42.605 --> 00:05:46.205
of like having to be sort of, at least some degree

116
00:05:46.205 --> 00:05:48.365
of economic security was required to be able

117
00:05:48.365 --> 00:05:49.845
to get into the mix at all.

118
00:05:50.225 --> 00:05:53.125
And white women, and particularly on the younger end

119
00:05:53.125 --> 00:05:56.485
of the age continuum that we talked to, were more likely

120
00:05:57.085 --> 00:06:00.245
Slightly only slightly to be conventionally dating

121
00:06:00.395 --> 00:06:04.605
that is out on a kind of Bumble or OkCupid

122
00:06:04.605 --> 00:06:07.285
and going on sort of conventional dates.

123
00:06:07.585 --> 00:06:09.645
And women sort of who were older

124
00:06:10.065 --> 00:06:12.245
and black women were less likely to be doing that.

125
00:06:12.505 --> 00:06:14.765
And, and black women ever

126
00:06:14.785 --> 00:06:17.845
so slightly more than white women were in fact currently

127
00:06:18.085 --> 00:06:19.565
involved in situation Chip.

128
00:06:19.745 --> 00:06:22.205
But actually the differences weren't as pronounced

129
00:06:22.225 --> 00:06:23.645
as we might've thought they would.

130
00:06:23.765 --> 00:06:27.005
I think that the differences sort of emerge out of patterns

131
00:06:27.005 --> 00:06:30.165
of privilege and disadvantage in the sense that there's,

132
00:06:30.325 --> 00:06:33.125
I mean, we kind of started the project interested in sort

133
00:06:33.125 --> 00:06:37.365
of inequalities of like intersectional inequalities of love

134
00:06:37.365 --> 00:06:41.445
and romance, and this notion that class race, gender, age,

135
00:06:41.795 --> 00:06:45.565
sort of conventional sort of body views

136
00:06:45.585 --> 00:06:47.605
of attractiveness would mean

137
00:06:47.605 --> 00:06:51.365
that people would have more access to love sex intimacy,

138
00:06:51.365 --> 00:06:53.965
particularly in more conventional forms.

139
00:06:54.145 --> 00:06:56.765
And we did find that to be the case that,

140
00:06:56.765 --> 00:06:59.365
that there are definitely distinct patterns in terms of

141
00:06:59.625 --> 00:07:03.205
who has, who has access to the more socially valued

142
00:07:03.305 --> 00:07:06.245
or higher status ways of doing love, sex intimacy,

143
00:07:06.245 --> 00:07:09.165
and who has access to love sex intimacy at all.

144
00:07:09.465 --> 00:07:13.805
We found for the, the women who were sort of most

145
00:07:14.525 --> 00:07:17.165
economically disadvantaged that they were ended up celibate,

146
00:07:17.165 --> 00:07:20.725
they couldn't, they were struggling to access any form

147
00:07:20.785 --> 00:07:22.325
of love, sex, intimacy.

148
00:07:22.945 --> 00:07:26.165
Um, so yeah, so that was, and Ed,

149
00:07:26.265 --> 00:07:30.365
and also this form, the situation ships itself like a many

150
00:07:30.365 --> 00:07:34.045
of the, kind of the women would have said that

151
00:07:35.265 --> 00:07:38.095
everything else being equal, if they thought

152
00:07:38.245 --> 00:07:42.215
that they could find a man who was,

153
00:07:42.575 --> 00:07:46.175
a decent guy, would treat them well, was respectful, was

154
00:07:46.815 --> 00:07:51.175
employed, was kind of going to be able

155
00:07:51.235 --> 00:07:52.455
to pull his own weight

156
00:07:52.715 --> 00:07:54.655
and was genuinely available

157
00:07:54.875 --> 00:07:58.175
for a fully committed life partnership type of relationship

158
00:07:58.845 --> 00:08:01.615
that they would have preferred that,

159
00:08:02.075 --> 00:08:03.935
but that that was not on the table.

160
00:08:04.395 --> 00:08:07.935
So that they, so that the kind of options that were,

161
00:08:08.085 --> 00:08:11.055
that in other words, a situationship was much better than

162
00:08:11.335 --> 00:08:15.095
celibacy, but not as good potentially as marriage,

163
00:08:15.315 --> 00:08:17.135
but marriage was not on offer.

164
00:08:17.555 --> 00:08:22.215
We were only looking at, women who were open to sexual

165
00:08:22.315 --> 00:08:24.015
and romantic relationships with men.

166
00:08:24.035 --> 00:08:28.375
So the women who were queer identified were sort of bisexual

167
00:08:29.115 --> 00:08:31.295
or kind of questioning

168
00:08:31.635 --> 00:08:35.375
or kind of not fully identifying as lesbian.

169
00:08:35.605 --> 00:08:38.495
Like, I am not having any, anything to do with men.

170
00:08:38.755 --> 00:08:41.135
It would be really, really interesting for future research

171
00:08:41.515 --> 00:08:45.335
to engage more thoroughly across the kind of gender

172
00:08:45.395 --> 00:08:48.375
and sexual identity spectrum in terms of kind

173
00:08:48.375 --> 00:08:50.055
of virginity of relationship forms.

174
00:08:50.565 --> 00:08:52.535
What we would probably expect to see

175
00:08:52.555 --> 00:08:56.725
and what would be consistent with what we found is that, is

176
00:08:56.725 --> 00:09:01.565
that, is that willingness to be, expansive in, you know,

177
00:09:01.565 --> 00:09:04.365
one dimension around sexuality might be associated

178
00:09:04.395 --> 00:09:07.605
with being willing to be expansive on another, in the sense

179
00:09:07.605 --> 00:09:10.965
that the women who that we talked to who were some amount

180
00:09:10.985 --> 00:09:14.925
of non heterosexually identified were,

181
00:09:15.355 --> 00:09:19.485
were I think some somewhat more open to, you know, sort

182
00:09:19.485 --> 00:09:23.005
of more unconventional relationship forms.

183
00:09:23.235 --> 00:09:25.325
Yeah. But most of the women that we, we talked to

184
00:09:25.885 --> 00:09:28.405
actually perceive themselves as, as, as heterosexual

185
00:09:28.505 --> 00:09:32.725
and mean, we would, I mean, definitely tried in every aspect

186
00:09:32.785 --> 00:09:35.845
of the way we conducted the research to be kind

187
00:09:35.845 --> 00:09:38.525
of respectful of ev you know, everyone we talked to,

188
00:09:38.745 --> 00:09:40.605
to really listen and,

189
00:09:40.825 --> 00:09:43.685
and in fact the coming up with the situation, chip

190
00:09:43.685 --> 00:09:46.085
as a term itself was kind of out of our like,

191
00:09:46.475 --> 00:09:49.685
real conviction that we needed to just really hear

192
00:09:50.225 --> 00:09:53.445
and kind of reflect back to, you know, in our publication

193
00:09:53.445 --> 00:09:56.685
and our scholarship, what was, what they were at,

194
00:09:56.685 --> 00:09:58.605
what people's experiences actually were.

195
00:09:58.705 --> 00:10:01.365
And, and, particularly the,

196
00:10:01.385 --> 00:10:03.005
the black women who were interviewed.

197
00:10:03.105 --> 00:10:05.485
Uh, we matched the kind of interviewee

198
00:10:05.545 --> 00:10:08.805
and interviewers by race almost most of the times as one

199
00:10:08.805 --> 00:10:11.645
of the women on the team was an African American woman.

200
00:10:11.785 --> 00:10:14.205
And what they would often say to her is,

201
00:10:14.205 --> 00:10:17.285
nobody has asked us, nobody cares.

202
00:10:17.285 --> 00:10:20.485
Everybody just wants to see, black women's sexuality

203
00:10:20.665 --> 00:10:22.205
as a problem, but,

204
00:10:22.385 --> 00:10:26.165
but have not been asking, about pleasure, desire,

205
00:10:26.845 --> 00:10:29.245
intimacy, like what's, you know, what's working.

206
00:10:29.585 --> 00:10:33.405
And they were very appreciative of being asked to talk about

207
00:10:33.405 --> 00:10:35.925
what was, what was like affirmatively like working

208
00:10:36.065 --> 00:10:38.805
or what their experiences actually were.

209
00:10:39.025 --> 00:10:42.045
And so, so we did very much try in kind

210
00:10:42.045 --> 00:10:46.125
of in the representation in the, the final, paper

211
00:10:46.705 --> 00:10:49.605
to do the best we could to sort of give voice

212
00:10:49.785 --> 00:10:52.805
to the experiences of the individuals that we talk to.

213
00:10:53.025 --> 00:10:55.925
We often, the kind of risks to women

214
00:10:56.305 --> 00:10:59.845
of bad relationships are sometimes not kind

215
00:10:59.845 --> 00:11:01.005
of fully acknowledged.

216
00:11:01.285 --> 00:11:04.325
I mean, we know about the really bad consequences of sort

217
00:11:04.445 --> 00:11:05.965
of intimate partner violence and,

218
00:11:05.985 --> 00:11:07.925
and the like, which is quite common, but,

219
00:11:08.385 --> 00:11:12.565
but the ways that women can get, swept into like lots

220
00:11:12.565 --> 00:11:16.125
of caretaking work that they, that they might not want

221
00:11:16.125 --> 00:11:19.405
to be doing or that they, they, you know, they kind

222
00:11:19.405 --> 00:11:23.005
of losing themselves, the kind of merged identities

223
00:11:23.305 --> 00:11:26.965
and the women that these were, again, women, 35

224
00:11:26.985 --> 00:11:28.925
to 55 years old,

225
00:11:29.145 --> 00:11:31.365
and Mo many of them had been

226
00:11:31.365 --> 00:11:32.525
around the block a time or two.

227
00:11:32.675 --> 00:11:35.405
They had had previous relationships with men.

228
00:11:35.515 --> 00:11:37.325
They, some of them had been married, many

229
00:11:37.325 --> 00:11:39.845
of them had children, and they were a little bit kind

230
00:11:39.845 --> 00:11:41.285
of just over it a bit.

231
00:11:41.955 --> 00:11:45.245
They were just, they were like, I can live on my own.

232
00:11:45.765 --> 00:11:47.965
I can be independent if they had kids.

233
00:11:47.965 --> 00:11:51.565
They didn't necessarily want to involve men who were kind

234
00:11:51.565 --> 00:11:53.805
of, you know, would be in a stepparent role deeply

235
00:11:53.915 --> 00:11:55.045
into their children's lives.

236
00:11:55.105 --> 00:11:57.685
So some of, some of the autonomy was about,

237
00:11:57.685 --> 00:11:59.885
protecting their children from,

238
00:11:59.885 --> 00:12:01.605
other men being involved in their lives

239
00:12:02.425 --> 00:12:05.925
and staying, having a single identity meant

240
00:12:05.925 --> 00:12:08.045
that when they were out in public, if they, they,

241
00:12:08.265 --> 00:12:12.725
if they did happen to meet Mr. Wright, they they could be,

242
00:12:12.865 --> 00:12:15.765
they could kick the, you know, the, the guy

243
00:12:15.765 --> 00:12:17.645
that they were currently seeing to the curb

244
00:12:18.225 --> 00:12:20.925
and potentially get, get involved in a more,

245
00:12:21.165 --> 00:12:22.605
a committed relationship with someone

246
00:12:22.665 --> 00:12:24.005
who might be a better bet.

247
00:12:24.225 --> 00:12:27.765
So it preserved, it kept options open as well.

248
00:12:28.305 --> 00:12:30.765
In terms of the emotional piece of it,

249
00:12:30.865 --> 00:12:35.285
it is in some ways kind of emotionally protective as well

250
00:12:35.505 --> 00:12:39.285
for some of them in that there's a lot of emotional,

251
00:12:39.285 --> 00:12:42.885
psychological kind of risk when one is like all in

252
00:12:42.885 --> 00:12:45.765
and deeply, deeply in love with someone when is really

253
00:12:46.355 --> 00:12:49.765
like throwing over just a lot of kind of trust

254
00:12:49.945 --> 00:12:52.045
and just kind of a just, you know,

255
00:12:52.235 --> 00:12:54.685
investing a lot emotionally in that person.

256
00:12:55.065 --> 00:12:59.805
And so they were also engaging in a kind of a bounded,

257
00:13:00.035 --> 00:13:03.645
some of them sort of bounded investment emotionally as well.

258
00:13:04.305 --> 00:13:07.605
So, you know, seeking, comfort, sex,

259
00:13:07.815 --> 00:13:09.765
friendship, companionship.

260
00:13:10.425 --> 00:13:14.085
But some of them were just a little bit leery about going

261
00:13:14.155 --> 00:13:18.485
like, buying into the whole romantic kind of like,

262
00:13:18.625 --> 00:13:20.645
you know, happily ever after.

263
00:13:21.115 --> 00:13:24.645
Love is all, like love will conquer all they were.

264
00:13:24.865 --> 00:13:28.485
That's, and that having women kind of push back on romance,

265
00:13:28.765 --> 00:13:32.285
I mean, we're just, we're fed these kind of romantic scripts

266
00:13:32.285 --> 00:13:35.045
and all of these, you know, there's romance novels

267
00:13:35.045 --> 00:13:36.325
and romantic comedies

268
00:13:36.325 --> 00:13:38.205
and all of this with this notion that sort

269
00:13:38.205 --> 00:13:41.085
of romance is like the thing to put at the center of life

270
00:13:41.145 --> 00:13:42.405
and that will conquer everything.

271
00:13:42.735 --> 00:13:45.725
These women were actually kind of pushing back on that.

272
00:13:45.795 --> 00:13:48.165
They were, they were sort of challenging that in kind

273
00:13:48.165 --> 00:13:50.325
of an interesting way, in ways

274
00:13:50.325 --> 00:13:52.765
that I think were pr probably more radical than they,

275
00:13:52.765 --> 00:13:54.445
than they understood,

276
00:13:55.425 --> 00:13:58.125
as they did not actually understand themselves as, as kind

277
00:13:58.125 --> 00:14:02.885
of as particularly, you know, kind of radical

278
00:14:03.145 --> 00:14:04.685
or transgressive folks.

279
00:14:04.755 --> 00:14:06.605
They were just like living their best life

280
00:14:06.825 --> 00:14:08.965
and doing what they needed to do to protect themselves.

281
00:14:09.285 --> 00:14:12.325
I mean, I think one, one thing that you know,

282
00:14:12.405 --> 00:14:15.605
I would argue is that, sort of access

283
00:14:15.665 --> 00:14:19.445
to economic security ability to support children,

284
00:14:19.675 --> 00:14:24.205
shouldn't be contingent upon, marital status

285
00:14:24.345 --> 00:14:26.925
or relationship form that the children's welfare

286
00:14:27.385 --> 00:14:30.685
and just general, that the kind of that welfare benefits

287
00:14:30.785 --> 00:14:35.205
or kind of the basic security should not flow through having

288
00:14:35.225 --> 00:14:37.725
to have organize one's family structure in any

289
00:14:37.725 --> 00:14:38.805
particular way.

290
00:14:39.545 --> 00:14:43.805
But I mean, this is connected to this whole larger set of,

291
00:14:43.865 --> 00:14:47.565
issues that is flowing through I think discussions in,

292
00:14:47.585 --> 00:14:49.685
in the US and, and around the globe.

293
00:14:49.885 --> 00:14:53.805
I mean, certainly and, Japan, Korea, China,

294
00:14:54.055 --> 00:14:56.445
other places about sort of fertility decline

295
00:14:56.705 --> 00:15:00.925
and the, the sort of the movement away from kind

296
00:15:00.925 --> 00:15:02.525
of conventional family structures.

297
00:15:02.625 --> 00:15:05.965
And I think kind of what this, how this paper connects to

298
00:15:05.965 --> 00:15:10.725
that is that if governments are invested in

299
00:15:11.245 --> 00:15:13.445
maintaining fertility, they,

300
00:15:14.665 --> 00:15:18.725
and they want to do so in a way that is supportive of women

301
00:15:18.865 --> 00:15:21.485
and kind of women's autonomy, they probably need

302
00:15:21.485 --> 00:15:25.165
to make a lot more serious structural changes than they are

303
00:15:25.165 --> 00:15:28.205
have currently been known that they are willing to do.

304
00:15:28.705 --> 00:15:32.165
And even that may not work well, kind of actually everything

305
00:15:32.165 --> 00:15:33.325
that has been written

306
00:15:33.385 --> 00:15:35.645
and comes out suggests that it's extremely,

307
00:15:35.645 --> 00:15:39.285
extremely difficult to move people, to kind

308
00:15:39.285 --> 00:15:41.085
of have children or move to kind

309
00:15:41.085 --> 00:15:42.725
of conventional family forms if

310
00:15:42.725 --> 00:15:43.965
that's not what they want to do.

311
00:15:44.065 --> 00:15:47.405
But it does suggest that that given this kind of the range

312
00:15:47.465 --> 00:15:49.805
of alternatives that are available now

313
00:15:49.805 --> 00:15:53.565
and the declining stigma associated with being single

314
00:15:53.945 --> 00:15:55.005
or having no children

315
00:15:55.385 --> 00:15:58.805
or having other relationship forms, it does mean

316
00:15:58.805 --> 00:16:02.165
that governments that are invested in fertility need to need

317
00:16:02.165 --> 00:16:05.445
to really probably move a lot more assertively towards

318
00:16:05.455 --> 00:16:08.045
supporting families, sort of, you know,

319
00:16:08.045 --> 00:16:11.125
family leave policies making, just making it easier

320
00:16:11.665 --> 00:16:13.845
for people to have children if they want them.

321
00:16:14.525 --> 00:16:18.925
I think that we actually know surprisingly little about

322
00:16:19.275 --> 00:16:21.445
what, women in midlife are doing sexually,

323
00:16:21.465 --> 00:16:22.965
and actually in some ways what,

324
00:16:23.035 --> 00:16:25.005
what people are doing sexually,

325
00:16:25.315 --> 00:16:29.085
because a lot of sort of demo demographic research

326
00:16:29.995 --> 00:16:32.925
uses categories related to relationships

327
00:16:32.985 --> 00:16:35.085
and sexuality that are outdated

328
00:16:35.945 --> 00:16:40.605
and don't actually allow people in their responses to, to,

329
00:16:41.065 --> 00:16:44.845
to even offer up what they're up to.

330
00:16:45.185 --> 00:16:47.885
And so, so one of the values of this kind of

331
00:16:48.485 --> 00:16:52.885
grounded inductive research here is to collect information

332
00:16:52.885 --> 00:16:55.845
that then can feed back into survey design

333
00:16:55.945 --> 00:16:59.245
and design better questions that then could,

334
00:17:00.215 --> 00:17:03.725
allow demographers to get better, sort

335
00:17:03.725 --> 00:17:06.085
of representative, more representative data on

336
00:17:06.085 --> 00:17:07.165
what people are actually doing.

337
00:17:07.265 --> 00:17:10.125
And that's, I mean, a limitation of this kind of research is

338
00:17:10.125 --> 00:17:11.445
that it cannot be generalized.

339
00:17:11.525 --> 00:17:14.245
I do wanna make sure that the audience is aware

340
00:17:14.245 --> 00:17:18.165
that this was a small, sample of people that we kind

341
00:17:18.165 --> 00:17:20.805
of happen to be able to recruit into this project.

342
00:17:21.025 --> 00:17:24.765
So we, we can't speak from this to what the prevalence

343
00:17:24.865 --> 00:17:28.565
of this practice is in the larger population, kind

344
00:17:28.565 --> 00:17:30.805
of in the US or, you know, certainly nowhere else.

345
00:17:30.985 --> 00:17:35.285
But what we can add is insight into what questions,

346
00:17:36.025 --> 00:17:38.445
individuals who are doing kind

347
00:17:38.445 --> 00:17:41.285
of representative survey research would, would need to ask

348
00:17:41.345 --> 00:17:43.725
to kind of figure out what people, what people were doing.

Understanding Situationships: Perspectives of Women Aged 35-55

00:00:00 - Situationship is a relationship form that sort of sits in between a kind of casual liaison and a committed relationship. In the paper, we define them as a sexual and or romantic liaison lasting at least six months, defined by a lack of expectation on one side or the other, that the relationship will lead to a commitment or be publicly acknowledged. In other words, it just sort of sits there in an undefined space.

00:00:35 - who are 35 to 55 years old, but a lot of like the, well, the little bit of existing scholarship and the large amount of social media attention has been to younger women. And a lot of the mass media type articles are like, how to find out if you're in a situationship so you can get out of it. Situation ships bad, bad, bad. And that is because if, if younger women are still hoping

00:01:10 - being in a situation ship could in fact be experienced by some younger women as kind of a waste of time or as not leading to that. But for the women who were over 35 that we talked to, situation ships were experienced somewhat differently. Not always entirely positively, but much more so in the sense of being able to avoid some

Exploring Women's Perspectives on Situationships

00:01:40 - who are not, they did not view as particularly desirable as life partners and getting at least some of the benefits of being in, a sexual romantic relationship. So it, it allowed to get some of the good while avoiding a lot of the be. We did quite lengthy in-depth interviews with 53 American women who were located at all, lived in all kinds of different places in the United States,

00:02:08 - but some of them were located everywhere, and they were like slightly more than half African American and the rest were white and they were mixed in terms of their economic situation, their degree of kind of economic precarity. So there was a lot of variation on both class and race in the interviews were quite lengthy. We talked about their whole sexual romantic relationship, history, childhood, what they learned about, sex and romance, and then just kind

00:02:41 - And to be clear, also, we, we interviewed people who were not in an exclusive relationship. That is, they did not understand themselves as stably partnered or if they had one partner, they were looking for more. So we, we selected on people who were open to or interested in finding additional partners. So this Was not just a, you know, random sample of people who were married and the, like, these were people who were, who were in fact looking and we kind of, we ended up writing this paper in part because after we collected the data,

Defining Situationships: A New Relationship Language

00:03:16 - We just could not work out what initially just kind of whether they were dating, whether they were looking, whether they were in relationships, whether they were singled or single. Because, because their situations were well situation chip. And we didn't have the language for that until we started listening to the interviews. And it was actually the interviewees themselves that sort of gave us the language.

00:03:45 - started hearing them talk about what they were doing as situation chip. Not all of them, in fact, relatively few of them, but a lot of them were using terms like, you know, just like, well, it's sort of like a relationship, but not, or this is my, you know, some of them said, you know, sort of, just sort of side, side thing or they just, they struggled to define it, but some of them use the term situationship.

00:04:18 - as the term would suggest in the sense that I think people have been engaging in quite complicated and uncategorized types of like sexual and romantic liaisons for a long time. But I do think over the kind of larger span of kind of history and in the United States and in other, you know, and actually we've been hearing that this is true in the, this this is happening in the UK and other places around the world. I, I talked to a British journalist a a while back. It was like, wait, this is happening here.

Evolving Relationship Dynamics: Women's Autonomy and Situationships

00:04:50 - in many societies and there's more opportunity for, women especially to live autonomous lives and be economically secure outside of marriage, there just is more space for things to kind of, that are, that are kind of not in a con in a conventional structure to, to emerge. But yes, this, the term has definitely become more prevalent in the media in the last, in the last few years,

00:05:21 - So there was both white and black women were engaging in ships, and both the women who were more economically secure and the ones who were more precarious women who were highly economically precarious, were slightly more likely than other women that we talked to, to be celibate, that is doing absolutely nothing at all. Like it seemed like there was a little, there was a sense of like having to be sort of, at least some degree of economic security was required to be able

00:05:50 - And white women, and particularly on the younger end of the age continuum that we talked to, were more likely Slightly only slightly to be conventionally dating that is out on a kind of Bumble or OkCupid and going on sort of conventional dates. And women sort of who were older and black women were less likely to be doing that. And, and black women ever so slightly more than white women were in fact currently involved in situation Chip.

Intersectional Inequalities in Love and Intimacy

00:06:22 - as we might've thought they would. I think that the differences sort of emerge out of patterns of privilege and disadvantage in the sense that there's, I mean, we kind of started the project interested in sort of inequalities of like intersectional inequalities of love and romance, and this notion that class race, gender, age, sort of conventional sort of body views of attractiveness would mean that people would have more access to love sex intimacy,

00:06:54 - And we did find that to be the case that, that there are definitely distinct patterns in terms of who has, who has access to the more socially valued or higher status ways of doing love, sex intimacy, and who has access to love sex intimacy at all. We found for the, the women who were sort of most economically disadvantaged that they were ended up celibate, they couldn't, they were struggling to access any form of love, sex, intimacy.

00:07:26 - and also this form, the situation ships itself like a many of the, kind of the women would have said that everything else being equal, if they thought that they could find a man who was, a decent guy, would treat them well, was respectful, was employed, was kind of going to be able to pull his own weight and was genuinely available

Navigating Relationship Preferences: Situationships vs. Marriage

00:07:58 - that they would have preferred that, but that that was not on the table. So that they, so that the kind of options that were, that in other words, a situationship was much better than celibacy, but not as good potentially as marriage, but marriage was not on offer. We were only looking at, women who were open to sexual and romantic relationships with men. So the women who were queer identified were sort of bisexual

00:08:31 - or kind of not fully identifying as lesbian. Like, I am not having any, anything to do with men. It would be really, really interesting for future research to engage more thoroughly across the kind of gender and sexual identity spectrum in terms of kind of virginity of relationship forms. What we would probably expect to see and what would be consistent with what we found is that, is that, is that willingness to be, expansive in, you know,

00:09:04 - with being willing to be expansive on another, in the sense that the women who that we talked to who were some amount of non heterosexually identified were, were I think some somewhat more open to, you know, sort of more unconventional relationship forms. Yeah. But most of the women that we, we talked to actually perceive themselves as, as, as heterosexual and mean, we would, I mean, definitely tried in every aspect

Listening to Untold Narratives: Black Women's Experiences in Situationships

00:09:35 - of respectful of ev you know, everyone we talked to, to really listen and, and in fact the coming up with the situation, chip as a term itself was kind of out of our like, real conviction that we needed to just really hear and kind of reflect back to, you know, in our publication and our scholarship, what was, what they were at, what people's experiences actually were. And, and, particularly the, the black women who were interviewed.

00:10:05 - and interviewers by race almost most of the times as one of the women on the team was an African American woman. And what they would often say to her is, nobody has asked us, nobody cares. Everybody just wants to see, black women's sexuality as a problem, but, but have not been asking, about pleasure, desire, intimacy, like what's, you know, what's working. And they were very appreciative of being asked to talk about

00:10:36 - or what their experiences actually were. And so, so we did very much try in kind of in the representation in the, the final, paper to do the best we could to sort of give voice to the experiences of the individuals that we talk to. We often, the kind of risks to women of bad relationships are sometimes not kind of fully acknowledged. I mean, we know about the really bad consequences of sort

Empowerment and Independence in Modern Relationships

00:11:05 - and the like, which is quite common, but, but the ways that women can get, swept into like lots of caretaking work that they, that they might not want to be doing or that they, they, you know, they kind of losing themselves, the kind of merged identities and the women that these were, again, women, 35 to 55 years old, and Mo many of them had been around the block a time or two. They had had previous relationships with men.

00:11:37 - of them had children, and they were a little bit kind of just over it a bit. They were just, they were like, I can live on my own. I can be independent if they had kids. They didn't necessarily want to involve men who were kind of, you know, would be in a stepparent role deeply into their children's lives. So some of, some of the autonomy was about, protecting their children from, other men being involved in their lives and staying, having a single identity meant

00:12:08 - if they did happen to meet Mr. Wright, they they could be, they could kick the, you know, the, the guy that they were currently seeing to the curb and potentially get, get involved in a more, a committed relationship with someone who might be a better bet. So it preserved, it kept options open as well. In terms of the emotional piece of it, it is in some ways kind of emotionally protective as well for some of them in that there's a lot of emotional,

Challenging Romantic Norms: Women's Perspectives on Love and Autonomy

00:12:42 - and deeply, deeply in love with someone when is really like throwing over just a lot of kind of trust and just kind of a just, you know, investing a lot emotionally in that person. And so they were also engaging in a kind of a bounded, some of them sort of bounded investment emotionally as well. So, you know, seeking, comfort, sex, friendship, companionship.

00:13:14 - like, buying into the whole romantic kind of like, you know, happily ever after. Love is all, like love will conquer all they were. That's, and that having women kind of push back on romance, I mean, we're just, we're fed these kind of romantic scripts and all of these, you know, there's romance novels and romantic comedies and all of this with this notion that sort of romance is like the thing to put at the center of life

00:13:42 - These women were actually kind of pushing back on that. They were, they were sort of challenging that in kind of an interesting way, in ways that I think were pr probably more radical than they, than they understood, as they did not actually understand themselves as, as kind of as particularly, you know, kind of radical or transgressive folks. They were just like living their best life and doing what they needed to do to protect themselves. I mean, I think one, one thing that you know,

Reevaluating Family Structures and Economic Security

00:14:15 - to economic security ability to support children, shouldn't be contingent upon, marital status or relationship form that the children's welfare and just general, that the kind of that welfare benefits or kind of the basic security should not flow through having to have organize one's family structure in any particular way. But I mean, this is connected to this whole larger set of,

00:14:47 - in the US and, and around the globe. I mean, certainly and, Japan, Korea, China, other places about sort of fertility decline and the, the sort of the movement away from kind of conventional family structures. And I think kind of what this, how this paper connects to that is that if governments are invested in maintaining fertility, they,

00:15:18 - and kind of women's autonomy, they probably need to make a lot more serious structural changes than they are have currently been known that they are willing to do. And even that may not work well, kind of actually everything that has been written and comes out suggests that it's extremely, extremely difficult to move people, to kind of have children or move to kind of conventional family forms if that's not what they want to do. But it does suggest that that given this kind of the range

Reevaluating Family Structures and Sexuality Research

00:15:49 - and the declining stigma associated with being single or having no children or having other relationship forms, it does mean that governments that are invested in fertility need to need to really probably move a lot more assertively towards supporting families, sort of, you know, family leave policies making, just making it easier for people to have children if they want them. I think that we actually know surprisingly little about

00:16:21 - and actually in some ways what, what people are doing sexually, because a lot of sort of demo demographic research uses categories related to relationships and sexuality that are outdated and don't actually allow people in their responses to, to, to even offer up what they're up to. And so, so one of the values of this kind of grounded inductive research here is to collect information

00:16:55 - and design better questions that then could, allow demographers to get better, sort of representative, more representative data on what people are actually doing. And that's, I mean, a limitation of this kind of research is that it cannot be generalized. I do wanna make sure that the audience is aware that this was a small, sample of people that we kind of happen to be able to recruit into this project. So we, we can't speak from this to what the prevalence

Insights for Improving Survey Research on Relationships

00:17:41 - of in the US or, you know, certainly nowhere else. But what we can add is insight into what questions, individuals who are doing kind of representative survey research would, would need to ask to kind of figure out what people, what people were doing.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis