Popular in Arts and Humanities

Arts and Humanities

Freedom’s Dominion

Vanderbilt University Jefferson Cowie

Arts and Humanities

Titus Quinctius Flamininus’ “Italian triumph”

McGill University Michael Fronda

Arts and Humanities

Lincoln and the Jews

Brandeis University Jonathan Sarna

Arts and Humanities

Amputations and Convalescence

University of Western Australia Emily Brink

Art

Drawing on the past: Palladio, his precursors and knowledge of ancient architecture

University of Birmingham David Hemsoll

Art

Language, Sound, and Image in Wallace Berman’s Aleph, 1956–1966

University of San Diego Chelsea Behle Fralick

Maricas: Queer Cultures and State Violence in Argentina and Spain, 1942–1982

View more insights in Arts and Humanities - Books - History - Women's & Gender History

View more figures from Universitat de València

View the page of Javier Fernández-Galeano

Read the Study

Next in Arts and Humanities

Freedom’s Dominion

Jefferson Cowie | Vanderbilt University

Forgetting Fathers: Untold Stories from an Orphaned Past

David Marshall | University of California Santa Barbara

Javier Fernández-Galeano discusses the many ways queer communities and individuals in Argentina and Spain fought against violence, rejected pathologization, and contested imposed, denigrating categorization.

Image courtesy of interviewee. August 28, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video consists of a dialogue discussing the motivations and methodologies behind a book focused on queer cultures and state violence, particularly in Argentina and Spain, during the late 20th century. The speaker emphasizes the importance of using state archival sources to explore the resilience of queer and trans communities, and to challenge the oppressive narratives propagated by authoritarian regimes.

They explain how their interest in this research began over 14 years ago while conducting a master's program. They argue that historical records, often overlooked, contain explicit representations of same-sex desire and community dynamics that reveal how marginalized individuals resisted persecution.

Throughout the interview, the speaker contrasts the explicitness of Argentine military records with the more moderated records from Spain. They discuss various terms, such as “maka,” “maicon,” and “marica,” to illustrate the cultural vernaculars reflecting differences in the queer experience and social stigma in these nations.

The conversation further explores themes of resistance, articulation of desire, integration of cultural practices, and ways queer individuals navigated oppressive systems through both humor and subversion. The overall argument suggests a spectrum of resistance that ranges from overt political activism to subtle forms of accommodation and playfulness within oppressive contexts.

In conclusion, the speaker calls for future research to examine the interplay between queer identities and other forms of marginalization, encouraging a broader understanding of social structures and interconnections that impact varied subjectivities. They advocate for a nuanced approach that acknowledges both global influences and local contexts in shaping the experiences of queer and trans individuals.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are five key points from the video :

1. **Archival Research and Queer Resilience**: The author discusses a long-term project aimed at exploring state and archival sources related to violence and how these can reveal the resilience of queer and trans communities. The aim is to undermine narratives of stigma and isolation that authoritarian states often project.

2. **Interconnectedness of Gender and Desire**: The video emphasizes a paradigm where sexual desire is intertwined with gender performance, contrasting this with the separation often found in the gay paradigm. This interconnectedness highlights how individuals express their identities and desires through performance and can process state violence in their expressions of sexuality.

3. **Resistance Through Everyday Actions**: The author argues that resistance to state oppression is not solely about formal activism but also includes daily actions and coded meanings that provide survival mechanisms and expressions of solidarity among queer individuals. This encompasses various forms of resistance, including sexual encounters as acts of defiance.

4. **Cultural Convideo and Historical Layers**: The video underscores the importance of understanding how different national convideos and historical periods shape the vocabularies and narratives around queer identities. Comparisons between Argentine and Spanish archival records reveal different attitudes and representations related to homosexuality and state control.

5. **Future Directions in Research**: The author advocates for future research to examine intersections between queer and trans subjectivities with other marginalized identities (e.g., racial, religious). This includes a holistic understanding of how various forms of inequality interconnect and how local and global convideos influence resistance and identity formation.

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.065 --> 00:01.925
Is a project that I started something like

00:02.725 --> 00:04.605
14 years ago when I was doing my masters.

00:05.065 --> 00:07.485
And at that time I felt like there was a lack

00:07.905 --> 00:11.405
of his graphical work on how state sources

00:11.625 --> 00:14.925
or the archival sources that are related to state violence

00:15.105 --> 00:18.015
or social violence are also a way

00:18.015 --> 00:21.535
of accessing the resilience of queer and trans communities.

00:21.555 --> 00:24.375
How we can read the sources through the lenses of

00:24.955 --> 00:26.535
the ways in which stigmatized

00:26.555 --> 00:29.575
and criminalized people were able to find around,

00:29.575 --> 00:33.735
communities, around languages, around sexual,

00:34.555 --> 00:35.775
sexual spaces too.

00:36.395 --> 00:40.895
Uh, so that was my perspective, how to use all these unuse

00:41.155 --> 00:44.335
or unexplored state archives in order to

00:45.085 --> 00:46.615
undermine the discourse

00:46.675 --> 00:49.895
and narratives that the authoritarian state have tried

00:49.895 --> 00:53.215
to project, which were all about same pain, stigma,

00:53.885 --> 00:58.285
isolation, lack of community, lack of meaning.

00:58.745 --> 01:01.045
How can we use the sources that were meant to

01:01.685 --> 01:04.565
reinforce a narrative to undermine that same discourse?

01:04.625 --> 01:06.485
And I started the project I was working on,

01:06.685 --> 01:08.165
I was using the category of homosexual,

01:08.215 --> 01:11.525
which comes from pathologizing criminalizing frameworks,

01:11.525 --> 01:14.365
but then it became appropriate by gay

01:14.365 --> 01:17.365
and queer movements in the sixties and seventies.

01:17.985 --> 01:20.285
Uh, but then I realized that in the sources,

01:20.465 --> 01:23.365
the terminology, the vernacular vocabulary of the America

01:23.385 --> 01:26.085
and the American was the way in which,

01:27.135 --> 01:28.205
state interventions

01:28.205 --> 01:30.485
or state violence somehow incorporated

01:31.185 --> 01:33.445
the actual daily experiences of people

01:33.705 --> 01:36.485
who were on the margins of sexual normativity.

01:36.985 --> 01:41.635
So the America has to do with the, with a paradigm

01:41.635 --> 01:44.355
to understand sexual desire that is prior to

01:45.055 --> 01:46.915
or distinct from the gay paradigm.

01:47.295 --> 01:49.435
In the gay paradigm, you have sexual orientation

01:49.655 --> 01:52.035
as something that is different from gender performance

01:52.535 --> 01:53.915
in the America paradigm.

01:54.005 --> 01:55.315
Those are intertwined.

01:55.315 --> 01:57.955
You cannot really separate the way in which a people,

01:58.375 --> 02:01.235
the way in which a person experiences their gender

02:01.825 --> 02:03.875
from the way in which they project their desires,

02:04.545 --> 02:08.095
they're actually mutually,

02:08.095 --> 02:09.855
mutually the course.

02:09.885 --> 02:11.975
They, they reinforce each other

02:12.115 --> 02:14.815
or they, materialize each other.

02:15.475 --> 02:17.095
So, for example, America will be someone

02:17.095 --> 02:20.735
that fail attraction towards male persons in order

02:20.755 --> 02:22.015
to express that desire.

02:22.405 --> 02:25.655
They will fa femina feminize themselves in public.

02:26.315 --> 02:28.895
Uh, so they will use the female gender

02:28.925 --> 02:30.135
when referring to themselves.

02:30.205 --> 02:32.575
They will be, flamboyant.

02:32.575 --> 02:35.575
They will be extravagant, they will be playful about

02:35.605 --> 02:37.735
that gender, ambivalence.

02:38.085 --> 02:41.535
They will sift from one gender to another,

02:42.555 --> 02:43.895
and they will be very seductive.

02:43.895 --> 02:45.175
They will be very provocative and very

02:45.175 --> 02:46.655
hypersexual in some occasions.

02:47.075 --> 02:49.295
And then the American is in Spanish,

02:49.355 --> 02:50.975
is all about the accents and the phonetics.

02:51.115 --> 02:54.375
So when you add the final on, it means that it's a,

02:54.595 --> 02:57.775
an even more hypersexual, more extreme, more visible

02:58.365 --> 03:01.365
iteration or manifestation of this America subjectivity.

03:01.425 --> 03:05.925
So the American was defined by bi, which is a Spanish term.

03:06.075 --> 03:08.845
That means the lack of self-control people who were

03:08.845 --> 03:10.405
so over the top, so in your face

03:10.405 --> 03:12.445
that there was no hope or redemption.

03:12.445 --> 03:16.285
They were seen as people who were so taken by their,

03:16.285 --> 03:18.405
the generation, their, the private,

03:18.435 --> 03:22.125
that they could only become like agents of contagion, people

03:22.145 --> 03:25.525
who will express that, transgression to other people.

03:25.905 --> 03:27.565
And the opposite of that is the Marquita,

03:27.565 --> 03:31.125
which is a domestic religious, inoffensive figure,

03:31.125 --> 03:33.645
which is a very particular local phenomenon,

03:33.785 --> 03:36.085
is particularly a strong in the south of Spain,

03:36.425 --> 03:38.205
but it also happens in our places.

03:38.545 --> 03:40.885
So depending on the accents, depending on the phonetics,

03:40.885 --> 03:43.005
we can distinguish different gradations

03:43.005 --> 03:44.525
of these stigmatized objectivity.

03:44.805 --> 03:48.165
I started this archival research when I was doing my masters

03:48.265 --> 03:51.045
at the new school, and my first archival experience was

03:51.045 --> 03:52.645
going to, I went to Buenos Aires,

03:52.645 --> 03:54.205
and I didn't know where to start, honestly.

03:54.205 --> 03:55.805
So I went to the National Archives

03:56.665 --> 03:58.125
and someone mentioned, okay,

03:58.265 --> 03:59.845
so there were homosexual soldiers

03:59.915 --> 04:01.605
that were prosecuted in the seventies,

04:02.065 --> 04:03.365
so maybe you can look at those.

04:03.385 --> 04:04.885
And I didn't have much hope about

04:05.345 --> 04:08.685
how military records will be relevant for a queer history

04:08.685 --> 04:11.005
or a history of queer resistance.

04:11.225 --> 04:12.885
But then there were extremely explicit,

04:13.015 --> 04:15.205
there were quai porn African, in which,

04:15.385 --> 04:17.405
in the ways in which soldiers were vocal

04:17.545 --> 04:21.045
and open about how they encounter each other, the kinds of,

04:21.825 --> 04:26.005
the mechanics of their sexual intercourse,

04:26.005 --> 04:29.005
particularly because they were performing binary roles.

04:29.005 --> 04:31.685
They were performing either the America high feminized

04:31.955 --> 04:34.445
persona or the hyper-masculine dominant

04:34.585 --> 04:37.485
and aggressive macho persona in order to do so.

04:37.485 --> 04:39.765
They were very explicit about the culation

04:39.765 --> 04:41.885
penetration urges, et cetera.

04:41.905 --> 04:46.485
So then I realized that in this very, very,

04:47.035 --> 04:50.125
very central to a state violence archives, military records,

04:50.785 --> 04:53.005
you can actually find the most explicit description

04:53.005 --> 04:54.485
of gay sex that you could ever imagine.

04:54.985 --> 04:57.165
And I don't know, the, the examples are fascinating.

04:57.165 --> 05:00.165
And then I decide to go from there to look for, to look

05:00.165 --> 05:03.525
for the most, most institutionalized,

05:03.525 --> 05:05.485
more violent archives and try to look at them

05:05.485 --> 05:07.565
through the lenses of desire, pleasure,

05:07.565 --> 05:09.485
and hypersexual encounters.

05:10.105 --> 05:11.685
Uh, so, and I was doing

05:11.685 --> 05:14.165
that research simultaneously in Spain and Argentina.

05:14.165 --> 05:15.925
So in Argentina, I was looking at military records,

05:16.065 --> 05:19.485
but also like activism, oral histories,

05:19.985 --> 05:21.325
the classification institute,

05:21.325 --> 05:24.605
which is a criminological foundation, institute.

05:25.345 --> 05:26.805
And in Spain, I was looking at background

05:26.865 --> 05:28.325
courts, in Spain.

05:28.325 --> 05:32.205
Homosexuality was prosecuted as a form of,

05:32.625 --> 05:35.005
as an expression of lamping proletariat lack

05:35.005 --> 05:36.885
of discipline, so to speak.

05:37.105 --> 05:40.085
Uh, the fact that it was called the ancy law is very

05:40.085 --> 05:41.445
indicative for the fact that the people

05:41.465 --> 05:44.445
who were prosecuted were the ones who were,

05:44.925 --> 05:46.525
supposedly unemployed or at the

05:46.525 --> 05:47.685
margins of the formal economy.

05:48.585 --> 05:51.885
Uh, and then I was interested in the different vocabularies

05:51.905 --> 05:54.325
or the different languages that you can see in these

05:54.325 --> 05:55.525
different national records.

05:55.715 --> 05:58.725
Comparing the military records in Argentina were, as I said,

05:59.255 --> 06:01.325
super explicit in your face.

06:01.745 --> 06:04.845
Uh, with the Spanish records that were more mediative,

06:05.095 --> 06:09.365
there was more paraphrasing, more attention

06:09.585 --> 06:10.845
to respectability

06:10.845 --> 06:13.645
and discretion, even in the way in which the authorities

06:13.645 --> 06:15.445
were creating these records.

06:15.995 --> 06:18.565
That led me to interrogate the sources

06:18.865 --> 06:20.565
and look for the reasons why

06:21.135 --> 06:23.365
these national paradigms will be both connected,

06:23.365 --> 06:26.365
but also distinct in terms of how they develop

06:26.465 --> 06:29.845
and became consolidated in this very significant period

06:29.845 --> 06:31.165
between the forties and the eighties.

06:31.785 --> 06:34.645
Uh, just to give you an example of like a soldier

06:34.745 --> 06:36.645
and what they will say to the, to the judge.

06:37.225 --> 06:38.805
So this is someone who was integrated

06:38.905 --> 06:42.775
for being bottom in gay sex, and he say, Mr.

06:42.865 --> 06:46.695
Judge, I experience an enormous satisfaction when I'm

06:46.695 --> 06:48.415
penetrated and I'm able

06:48.415 --> 06:50.855
to e*******e since at those moments I

06:50.855 --> 06:52.095
m********e at the same time.

06:52.795 --> 06:55.295
So this kind of very vocal confrontation with the state

06:55.295 --> 06:57.175
of telling them what they didn't want to hear,

06:57.175 --> 06:58.495
that you could find so much pressure

06:58.495 --> 07:02.535
and satisfaction in gay sex is my, is what drove me

07:02.595 --> 07:04.095
to unheard all the sources

07:04.155 --> 07:05.295
and incorporate them in my project.

07:05.655 --> 07:08.695
I would say it's about paying attention to the different,

07:08.915 --> 07:11.055
to the whole spectrum of resistance.

07:11.315 --> 07:14.455
Not only vocal political,

07:15.685 --> 07:18.985
public resistance that happens through protest or activism

07:19.245 --> 07:21.025
or formal organizations,

07:21.525 --> 07:25.225
but also the most daily,

07:26.165 --> 07:28.275
daily forms of resistance that have to do

07:28.275 --> 07:30.275
with sometimes accommodation

07:30.495 --> 07:32.755
or incorporating the discourses of power

07:33.135 --> 07:36.715
or material culture, the ways in which people use erotica,

07:37.065 --> 07:39.595
pornography, literature, et cetera.

07:39.595 --> 07:41.675
So trying to include all that spectrum

07:41.705 --> 07:42.995
that goes from the ian

07:43.255 --> 07:45.075
to the most political was challenging,

07:45.075 --> 07:46.755
but was also very enriching for the project.

07:47.615 --> 07:50.875
Uh, and also like finding those moments when people

07:50.895 --> 07:53.675
who are prosecuted for their queerness

07:53.695 --> 07:57.635
or their transness, were able to make fun

07:57.735 --> 08:01.315
of the per persecution, were able to par the,

08:01.615 --> 08:05.195
the undermine the underlying principles of state violence.

08:06.015 --> 08:09.035
Um, so a couple of examples.

08:09.035 --> 08:12.115
There is this person called Alita, who was America, someone

08:12.175 --> 08:15.195
who lived in between both genders, hypersexual,

08:15.935 --> 08:16.955
very selective.

08:17.215 --> 08:19.275
And in 1940s, she was interrogated

08:19.735 --> 08:21.595
by a criminologist in Buenos Aires,

08:21.935 --> 08:23.875
and she was flirting with the criminologist.

08:23.895 --> 08:26.715
So her way of resisting was actually sexualizing

08:26.715 --> 08:30.475
that encounter that was meant to produce a criminal report.

08:30.615 --> 08:32.955
And instead she was like, Hey, how are you?

08:33.705 --> 08:34.755
Like, you look cute today.

08:34.775 --> 08:37.915
So she was like very flirt, flirtatious with the integrator.

08:37.975 --> 08:40.555
And that really undermined the whole power

08:40.795 --> 08:41.915
structure of that situation, right?

08:42.255 --> 08:45.075
Uh, and then there are things that have to do more

08:45.075 --> 08:47.195
with particular cultural expressions.

08:47.195 --> 08:50.795
Like for example, in South Spain,

08:51.235 --> 08:53.915
Catholic curiosity was super important,

08:55.145 --> 08:57.485
for small communities in the way they build their

08:57.485 --> 09:01.325
so ability solidarity networks, daily rituals

09:01.785 --> 09:02.805
and maritas.

09:03.065 --> 09:06.485
Uh, in andal, Lucia were able to find mechanisms

09:06.485 --> 09:08.845
of social integration through that kind of

09:09.525 --> 09:10.725
participation in Catholic rituals

09:10.785 --> 09:14.685
and, sociability, which is also the language of power.

09:14.685 --> 09:17.565
Obviously the Franco regime was,

09:17.565 --> 09:20.445
instrumentalizing Catholic religiosity for the sake

09:20.445 --> 09:21.845
of a nationalist discourse.

09:22.345 --> 09:24.725
But the same discourse was also instrumentalized

09:24.785 --> 09:28.805
by communities who supported queer people in order to

09:29.965 --> 09:32.605
question the legitimacy of step persecution.

09:32.705 --> 09:35.485
So that continuity between power structures

09:35.505 --> 09:38.765
and the possibility of turning around those discourses

09:38.865 --> 09:41.325
to claim that it is legitimate to be different,

09:41.995 --> 09:43.885
that is something that is fascinating for me.

09:44.225 --> 09:46.525
Uh, and finally there is, there are also this ways in which

09:47.185 --> 09:51.245
people basically told the state, there is no role for you

09:51.385 --> 09:55.165
to, explore my private or intimate life.

09:55.665 --> 09:58.645
And you can even trace that in medical records

09:58.785 --> 10:00.685
or psychological exams.

10:01.305 --> 10:03.445
Uh, so I'm gonna written an example.

10:03.445 --> 10:07.005
This is a psychological exam in which the person is asked

10:07.005 --> 10:08.285
to complete a sentence.

10:09.745 --> 10:12.765
So these are his answers. The best thing.

10:13.445 --> 10:15.895
I never say what hurts me.

10:16.495 --> 10:19.295
I don't, so in secret nothing.

10:19.955 --> 10:22.655
So even though this person was not telling the interrogator

10:22.835 --> 10:25.655
or the psychological expert, I'm not gonna answer your

10:26.175 --> 10:28.815
questions, or I'm not gonna participate in this form

10:28.815 --> 10:31.375
of state violence, the way in which they refuse

10:31.395 --> 10:35.895
to provide any single information that will be, related

10:35.995 --> 10:39.055
to their pri, their intimacy, their actual desires,

10:39.355 --> 10:42.095
and they use this very like ambivalent answers,

10:42.355 --> 10:43.495
is very powerful to me.

10:43.755 --> 10:45.535
And it connects with the ways in which the,

10:46.395 --> 10:47.495
the political activism

10:47.495 --> 10:49.375
of the seventies presented similar claims.

10:50.215 --> 10:53.965
Leave us alone. Don't try to police our private lives

10:54.105 --> 10:55.885
or our communities.

10:56.105 --> 10:58.765
And that is also present before gay activism.

10:59.465 --> 11:02.445
Uh, so that there are so many iterations of this.

11:02.445 --> 11:05.845
And I think the key was to be attentive to the fact

11:05.845 --> 11:09.485
that sometimes it might seem that they are,

11:09.635 --> 11:14.445
that there is a rupture or a discontinue between negotiation

11:14.445 --> 11:17.165
and accommodation on the one hand, and confrontation

11:17.865 --> 11:19.845
and, opposition on the other.

11:19.845 --> 11:21.445
But I think there is more connection

11:21.445 --> 11:22.965
between the both extremes

11:22.965 --> 11:24.245
that we might think at the beginning.

11:25.585 --> 11:27.875
I think it has to do with,

11:27.875 --> 11:29.475
looking at America's objectivity

11:29.535 --> 11:32.195
and America archives through the lenses

11:32.415 --> 11:35.075
of understanding the particular context in which these

11:35.075 --> 11:39.195
people were reacting to, oppression and discrimination.

11:39.855 --> 11:44.315
Uh, there is an expression by a Spanish author, author,

11:44.395 --> 11:49.115
a Spanish novelist, who said in the fifties, Hilbert,

11:49.295 --> 11:52.435
he wrote, it's not like we are quiet or we are silent.

11:52.705 --> 11:55.685
It's that we are speaking a in a very low voice.

11:55.945 --> 11:58.165
So all the people who are attentive can listen to us.

11:58.705 --> 12:01.205
And I think that's something to keep in mind that mari

12:01.585 --> 12:03.485
or queer and trans people were creating

12:03.485 --> 12:05.085
meaning, but it was coded.

12:05.105 --> 12:08.845
It was, it was meant to be listened by those who were able

12:09.105 --> 12:12.205
to have a more sympathetic or understanding

12:12.265 --> 12:16.685
and understanding perspective on their daily experiences.

12:17.745 --> 12:20.895
Uh, so that doesn't mean that those forms

12:20.915 --> 12:23.615
of resistance were not changing the system

12:23.755 --> 12:27.095
or providing mechanisms of survival and resilience.

12:27.245 --> 12:31.295
It's just that we have to understand those code meanings in

12:31.295 --> 12:34.215
order to give them the value that they have in that moment.

12:34.715 --> 12:37.015
So I'm thinking, for example, in Miguel de Molina,

12:37.035 --> 12:41.855
who is in the cover of the book, he was a, a performer

12:41.855 --> 12:45.935
and singer, who never openly declare,

12:47.105 --> 12:49.205
at least in the fifties and sisters, that he was

12:49.965 --> 12:52.805
a gay person, that he had desires for other men.

12:53.405 --> 12:56.745
Uh, but then his followers, his fans were able to understand

12:57.015 --> 12:58.225
what he was doing in public.

12:58.965 --> 13:02.105
Uh, by the way, he used clothing, voice,

13:02.645 --> 13:04.505
sentimentality.

13:05.005 --> 13:09.345
So he had like this very extravagant, over the top blows

13:09.405 --> 13:10.425
and search.

13:11.165 --> 13:15.025
And his fans were always asking him for those designs,

13:15.025 --> 13:17.665
those patterns that he used for those clothing items.

13:18.325 --> 13:19.545
And also they were expressing

13:19.565 --> 13:22.465
how much his music was transporting them

13:22.465 --> 13:24.225
to a different space, to a space of freedom

13:24.365 --> 13:28.845
or, a space of,

13:29.345 --> 13:34.085
the possibility of imagining another situation

13:34.085 --> 13:35.925
where stigma was not so powerful.

13:36.865 --> 13:40.045
Uh, and those meanings might not be evident

13:40.385 --> 13:42.485
or obvious when you read the letters at the first time.

13:42.595 --> 13:45.845
It's someone saying, I want a copy of the pattern

13:45.955 --> 13:49.245
that you used to, create that beautiful shirt.

13:49.785 --> 13:51.205
But then if you keep reading there,

13:51.205 --> 13:54.125
talking about feeling transported, feeling freedom,

13:54.125 --> 13:56.685
feeling desire for Molina,

13:56.745 --> 13:58.485
and all that has to be incorporated into the

13:58.485 --> 13:59.805
his that we're writing today.

13:59.895 --> 14:01.565
Later in the seventies, late sixties

14:01.585 --> 14:04.125
and seventies, there was the argument

14:04.125 --> 14:05.285
that America's objectivity,

14:05.285 --> 14:09.085
because it was recreating gender binaries, the, the notion

14:09.085 --> 14:10.285
that there is a complementarity

14:10.285 --> 14:13.285
between the feminine receptive sexual partner

14:13.625 --> 14:16.925
and the active dominating insertive partner

14:17.905 --> 14:19.845
for the active, for some sectors

14:19.845 --> 14:21.605
of the activism in the seventies, that was

14:22.205 --> 14:24.965
considered alienation, that was considered something

14:24.965 --> 14:27.445
that prevented people from sexualization.

14:27.825 --> 14:28.925
And I'm trying to understand

14:28.985 --> 14:32.405
how sometimes even though we are operating within gender

14:32.645 --> 14:35.805
binaries or power structures, those can be more flexible.

14:35.805 --> 14:38.485
And there is a level of playfulness in our engagement

14:38.485 --> 14:39.485
with those structures.

14:39.825 --> 14:41.045
And I think that's something that comes

14:41.045 --> 14:42.325
across in the sources as well.

14:42.385 --> 14:44.245
The fact that it wasn't spoken about the fact

14:44.245 --> 14:46.925
that there was this undercurrent of alternative

14:47.725 --> 14:50.205
appropriations of mainstream discourses

14:50.205 --> 14:51.325
or mainstream figures,

14:51.745 --> 14:53.525
but it was something only visible

14:53.665 --> 14:55.045
for participants in the culture.

14:56.195 --> 14:59.565
That to me, is a very powerful strategy of,

15:00.525 --> 15:01.945
community building.

15:02.645 --> 15:03.645
Uh,

15:04.845 --> 15:05.855
Like the, even the

15:05.855 --> 15:07.255
Vocabulary that they use for people

15:07.275 --> 15:08.935
who participated in the sub culture,

15:09.995 --> 15:11.775
Uh, Convey the idea

15:12.325 --> 15:13.735
That It was not meant for everyone

15:13.735 --> 15:16.495
that you could survive by creating ledgers of possibility

15:16.515 --> 15:18.295
and ledgers of self protection.

15:18.315 --> 15:19.895
So one of the terms that they use for,

15:20.595 --> 15:23.695
Uh, queer people Or homosexual men who were

15:23.985 --> 15:27.775
Aware of the cultural repertoire that,

15:28.355 --> 15:29.945
that

15:30.225 --> 15:32.665
Preserve transgression and made it more,

15:33.285 --> 15:37.825
Uh, resilient, Wasdo, anddo

15:38.355 --> 15:39.985
Means the ones In the know,

15:40.205 --> 15:42.825
The ones who know the code. Uh,

15:43.525 --> 15:44.865
And again, there are tensions in

15:44.865 --> 15:47.265
This, in This repertoire.

15:47.345 --> 15:49.985
So then CanDos were not particularly sympathetic to America

15:49.985 --> 15:52.745
because they thought that America was too hypersexual,

15:52.885 --> 15:55.305
too visible and not respectable enough.

15:55.685 --> 15:59.145
And then CanDos were more invested in a certain genealogy

15:59.405 --> 16:02.785
of homosexuality that was grounded in antiquity

16:03.125 --> 16:05.385
and masculinity and civilization.

16:06.045 --> 16:08.745
But still, the idea there was this notion that you could

16:09.395 --> 16:12.985
first gather your strength in a kind of

16:13.535 --> 16:15.225
semi protected social circle,

16:15.405 --> 16:17.585
and then from there have the capacity

16:17.685 --> 16:21.905
to spread your message, ever farther, ever

16:22.445 --> 16:25.065
in a wider scale to change society.

16:25.065 --> 16:27.065
Gradually. We also have to incorporate

16:27.065 --> 16:29.905
that into our genealogies of sexual resistance.

16:30.005 --> 16:32.105
Sexual resistance does not start in the sixties.

16:32.105 --> 16:35.985
There is this previous undercurrent of, solidarity

16:36.165 --> 16:38.825
and survival that has to do with first gathering

16:39.545 --> 16:41.705
strength in a more sheltered space.

16:43.175 --> 16:45.035
And even the prisons are part of that.

16:45.035 --> 16:46.795
Like, America talk a lot about

16:46.795 --> 16:49.595
how when they were in prison, they were still able

16:49.615 --> 16:53.195
to be a community, because they gossip, they had lowers,

16:53.375 --> 16:54.635
and they used the materials

16:54.635 --> 16:57.115
that they had at their disposal in the prisons

16:57.415 --> 16:59.595
to maintain their performance of femininity.

16:59.615 --> 17:02.435
So Tanya Navarro, who's a person that I interviewed,

17:02.615 --> 17:05.995
she talk about using aluminum foil, plaster, things

17:05.995 --> 17:08.635
that seem very inoffensive in the context of the prison

17:09.015 --> 17:12.795
to create makeup so they could still preserve their mari

17:12.885 --> 17:15.075
femininity in a context of repression.

17:15.295 --> 17:16.435
And then the communities that they created

17:16.435 --> 17:18.355
inside the prison were extended beyond the prison.

17:18.935 --> 17:21.635
So only understanding these forms of solidarity

17:22.295 --> 17:24.315
and resilience before sexual liberation,

17:24.315 --> 17:25.435
we can understand what happened later.

17:25.635 --> 17:27.755
I think future research is about,

17:27.755 --> 17:30.115
looking at the connections between queer

17:30.135 --> 17:33.875
and trans subjectivities and other, marginalized

17:34.095 --> 17:37.315
or oppressed forms of subjectivity formation.

17:37.935 --> 17:41.875
So of course racial formation, religious religiosity,

17:41.875 --> 17:44.115
migration status, worker status.

17:44.915 --> 17:47.605
I think, the new research

17:47.605 --> 17:49.410
that is emerging at the moment is all about

17:50.115 --> 17:51.885
grounding the understanding of queer

17:51.905 --> 17:56.645
and trans lives in a broader, in a broader,

17:57.065 --> 18:00.645
analysis of social structures of inequality,

18:01.105 --> 18:02.565
and how those are interconnected.

18:02.985 --> 18:04.685
But for, in order to do so, we had

18:04.685 --> 18:07.045
to incorporate both the global and the local dimensions.

18:07.045 --> 18:10.325
And that's where my work was trying to intervene to look at

18:10.325 --> 18:12.525
what is particular about a certain

18:13.185 --> 18:16.965
nation state under daily politics of violence

18:17.665 --> 18:20.605
versus the transnational circulation

18:20.945 --> 18:22.685
of vernacular, languages of resistance.

18:23.265 --> 18:25.845
So I think we are able to keep both dimensions, the,

18:26.855 --> 18:29.395
the interconnection between queer and trans

18:29.815 --> 18:33.635
and other, forms of, or intersections of oppression.

18:33.765 --> 18:36.515
While at the same time we unpack

18:36.705 --> 18:39.075
what is particular about the local versus the global.

18:39.285 --> 18:42.275
There is so much that could be productive

18:42.275 --> 18:43.435
for our daily politics.

18:43.435 --> 18:45.915
And so, strategies of resilience,

18:46.055 --> 18:47.915
and that's I think where research is going.

"Revisiting Queer Resilience: Archival Research and the Interplay of State Violence and Community Identity"

00:00:00 - Is a project that I started something like 14 years ago when I was doing my masters. And at that time I felt like there was a lack of his graphical work on how state sources or the archival sources that are related to state violence or social violence are also a way of accessing the resilience of queer and trans communities. How we can read the sources through the lenses of the ways in which stigmatized and criminalized people were able to find around, communities, around languages, around sexual, sexual spaces too. so that was my perspective, how to use all these unuse
00:00:45 - undermine the discourse and narratives that the authoritarian state have tried to project, which were all about same pain, stigma, isolation, lack of community, lack of meaning. How can we use the sources that were meant to reinforce a narrative to undermine that same discourse? And I started the project I was working on, I was using the category of homosexual, which comes from pathologizing criminalizing frameworks, but then it became appropriate by gay and queer movements in the sixties and seventies. but then I realized that in the sources, the terminology, the vernacular vocabulary of the America
00:01:27 - state interventions or state violence somehow incorporated the actual daily experiences of people who were on the margins of sexual normativity. So the America has to do with the, with a paradigm to understand sexual desire that is prior to or distinct from the gay paradigm. In the gay paradigm, you have sexual orientation as something that is different from gender performance in the America paradigm. Those are intertwined. You cannot really separate the way in which a people, the way in which a person experiences their gender from the way in which they project their desires,
00:02:08 - mutually the course. They, they reinforce each other or they, materialize each other. So, for example, America will be someone that fail attraction towards male persons in order to express that desire. They will fa femina feminize themselves in public. so they will use the female gender when referring to themselves. They will be, flamboyant. They will be extravagant, they will be playful about that gender, ambivalence. They will sift from one gender to another, and they will be very seductive. They will be very provocative and very
00:02:47 - And then the American is in Spanish, is all about the accents and the phonetics. So when you add the final on, it means that it's a, an even more hypersexual, more extreme, more visible iteration or manifestation of this America subjectivity. So the American was defined by bi, which is a Spanish term. That means the lack of self-control people who were so over the top, so in your face that there was no hope or redemption. They were seen as people who were so taken by their, the generation, their, the private, that they could only become like agents of contagion, people who will express that, transgression to other people.
00:03:27 - which is a domestic religious, inoffensive figure, which is a very particular local phenomenon, is particularly a strong in the south of Spain, but it also happens in our places. So depending on the accents, depending on the phonetics, we can distinguish different gradations of these stigmatized objectivity. I started this archival research when I was doing my masters at the new school, and my first archival experience was going to, I went to Buenos Aires, and I didn't know where to start, honestly. So I went to the National Archives and someone mentioned, okay, so there were homosexual soldiers that were prosecuted in the seventies, so maybe you can look at those. And I didn't have much hope about how military records will be relevant for a queer history

"Exploring Resistance: The Dynamics of Queer Encounters Within Military Archives"

00:04:11 - But then there were extremely explicit, there were quai porn African, in which, in the ways in which soldiers were vocal and open about how they encounter each other, the kinds of, the mechanics of their sexual intercourse, particularly because they were performing binary roles. They were performing either the America high feminized persona or the hyper-masculine dominant and aggressive macho persona in order to do so. They were very explicit about the culation penetration urges, et cetera. So then I realized that in this very, very, very central to a state violence archives, military records,
00:04:53 - of gay sex that you could ever imagine. And I don't know, the, the examples are fascinating. And then I decide to go from there to look for, to look for the most, most institutionalized, more violent archives and try to look at them through the lenses of desire, pleasure, and hypersexual encounters. so, and I was doing that research simultaneously in Spain and Argentina. So in Argentina, I was looking at military records, but also like activism, oral histories, the classification institute, which is a criminological foundation, institute. And in Spain, I was looking at background courts, in Spain. Homosexuality was prosecuted as a form of,
00:05:35 - of discipline, so to speak. the fact that it was called the ancy law is very indicative for the fact that the people who were prosecuted were the ones who were, supposedly unemployed or at the margins of the formal economy. and then I was interested in the different vocabularies or the different languages that you can see in these different national records. Comparing the military records in Argentina were, as I said, super explicit in your face. with the Spanish records that were more mediative, there was more paraphrasing, more attention to respectability and discretion, even in the way in which the authorities
00:06:15 - That led me to interrogate the sources and look for the reasons why these national paradigms will be both connected, but also distinct in terms of how they develop and became consolidated in this very significant period between the forties and the eighties. just to give you an example of like a soldier and what they will say to the, to the judge. So this is someone who was integrated for being bottom in gay sex, and he say, Mr. Judge, I experience an enormous satisfaction when I'm penetrated and I'm able to e*******e since at those moments I m********e at the same time. So this kind of very vocal confrontation with the state
00:06:57 - that you could find so much pressure and satisfaction in gay sex is my, is what drove me to unheard all the sources and incorporate them in my project. I would say it's about paying attention to the different, to the whole spectrum of resistance. Not only vocal political, public resistance that happens through protest or activism or formal organizations, but also the most daily, daily forms of resistance that have to do with sometimes accommodation or incorporating the discourses of power or material culture, the ways in which people use erotica,
00:07:39 - So trying to include all that spectrum that goes from the ian to the most political was challenging, but was also very enriching for the project. and also like finding those moments when people who are prosecuted for their queerness or their transness, were able to make fun of the per persecution, were able to par the, the undermine the underlying principles of state violence. so a couple of examples. There is this person called Alita, who was America, someone who lived in between both genders, hypersexual, very selective.

"Subversive Encounters: Flirting with Power and Resisting Surveillance in Queer Contexts"

00:08:19 - by a criminologist in Buenos Aires, and she was flirting with the criminologist. So her way of resisting was actually sexualizing that encounter that was meant to produce a criminal report. And instead she was like, Hey, how are you? Like, you look cute today. So she was like very flirt, flirtatious with the integrator. And that really undermined the whole power structure of that situation, right? and then there are things that have to do more with particular cultural expressions. Like for example, in South Spain, Catholic curiosity was super important, for small communities in the way they build their
00:09:01 - and maritas. in andal, Lucia were able to find mechanisms of social integration through that kind of participation in Catholic rituals and, sociability, which is also the language of power. Obviously the Franco regime was, instrumentalizing Catholic religiosity for the sake of a nationalist discourse. But the same discourse was also instrumentalized by communities who supported queer people in order to question the legitimacy of step persecution. So that continuity between power structures and the possibility of turning around those discourses
00:09:41 - that is something that is fascinating for me. and finally there is, there are also this ways in which people basically told the state, there is no role for you to, explore my private or intimate life. And you can even trace that in medical records or psychological exams. so I'm gonna written an example. This is a psychological exam in which the person is asked to complete a sentence. So these are his answers. The best thing. I never say what hurts me. I don't, so in secret nothing.
00:10:22 - or the psychological expert, I'm not gonna answer your questions, or I'm not gonna participate in this form of state violence, the way in which they refuse to provide any single information that will be, related to their pri, their intimacy, their actual desires, and they use this very like ambivalent answers, is very powerful to me. And it connects with the ways in which the, the political activism of the seventies presented similar claims. Leave us alone. Don't try to police our private lives or our communities. And that is also present before gay activism. so that there are so many iterations of this.
00:11:05 - that sometimes it might seem that they are, that there is a rupture or a discontinue between negotiation and accommodation on the one hand, and confrontation and, opposition on the other. But I think there is more connection between the both extremes that we might think at the beginning. I think it has to do with, looking at America's objectivity and America archives through the lenses of understanding the particular context in which these people were reacting to, oppression and discrimination. there is an expression by a Spanish author, author,
00:11:49 - he wrote, it's not like we are quiet or we are silent. It's that we are speaking a in a very low voice. So all the people who are attentive can listen to us. And I think that's something to keep in mind that mari or queer and trans people were creating meaning, but it was coded. It was, it was meant to be listened by those who were able to have a more sympathetic or understanding and understanding perspective on their daily experiences. so that doesn't mean that those forms of resistance were not changing the system or providing mechanisms of survival and resilience.

"The Cultural Legacy of Miguel de Molina: Queer Expression and Community Resilience"

00:12:31 - order to give them the value that they have in that moment. So I'm thinking, for example, in Miguel de Molina, who is in the cover of the book, he was a, a performer and singer, who never openly declare, at least in the fifties and sisters, that he was a gay person, that he had desires for other men. but then his followers, his fans were able to understand what he was doing in public. by the way, he used clothing, voice, sentimentality. So he had like this very extravagant, over the top blows
00:13:11 - And his fans were always asking him for those designs, those patterns that he used for those clothing items. And also they were expressing how much his music was transporting them to a different space, to a space of freedom or, a space of, the possibility of imagining another situation where stigma was not so powerful. and those meanings might not be evident or obvious when you read the letters at the first time. It's someone saying, I want a copy of the pattern that you used to, create that beautiful shirt.
00:13:51 - talking about feeling transported, feeling freedom, feeling desire for Molina, and all that has to be incorporated into the his that we're writing today. Later in the seventies, late sixties and seventies, there was the argument that America's objectivity, because it was recreating gender binaries, the, the notion that there is a complementarity between the feminine receptive sexual partner and the active dominating insertive partner for the active, for some sectors of the activism in the seventies, that was considered alienation, that was considered something that prevented people from sexualization. And I'm trying to understand how sometimes even though we are operating within gender
00:14:35 - And there is a level of playfulness in our engagement with those structures. And I think that's something that comes across in the sources as well. The fact that it wasn't spoken about the fact that there was this undercurrent of alternative appropriations of mainstream discourses or mainstream figures, but it was something only visible for participants in the culture. That to me, is a very powerful strategy of, community building. Like the, even the Vocabulary that they use for people who participated in the sub culture, Convey the idea That It was not meant for everyone
00:15:16 - and ledgers of self protection. So one of the terms that they use for, queer people Or homosexual men who were Aware of the cultural repertoire that, that Preserve transgression and made it more, resilient, Wasdo, anddo Means the ones In the know, The ones who know the code. And again, there are tensions in This, in This repertoire. So then CanDos were not particularly sympathetic to America because they thought that America was too hypersexual, too visible and not respectable enough.
00:15:59 - of homosexuality that was grounded in antiquity and masculinity and civilization. But still, the idea there was this notion that you could first gather your strength in a kind of semi protected social circle, and then from there have the capacity to spread your message, ever farther, ever in a wider scale to change society. Gradually. We also have to incorporate that into our genealogies of sexual resistance. Sexual resistance does not start in the sixties. There is this previous undercurrent of, solidarity

"Resilience and Solidarity: Exploring Queer and Trans Identity Formation in Contexts of Repression"

00:16:39 - strength in a more sheltered space. And even the prisons are part of that. Like, America talk a lot about how when they were in prison, they were still able to be a community, because they gossip, they had lowers, and they used the materials that they had at their disposal in the prisons to maintain their performance of femininity. So Tanya Navarro, who's a person that I interviewed, she talk about using aluminum foil, plaster, things that seem very inoffensive in the context of the prison to create makeup so they could still preserve their mari femininity in a context of repression. And then the communities that they created
00:17:18 - So only understanding these forms of solidarity and resilience before sexual liberation, we can understand what happened later. I think future research is about, looking at the connections between queer and trans subjectivities and other, marginalized or oppressed forms of subjectivity formation. So of course racial formation, religious religiosity, migration status, worker status. I think, the new research that is emerging at the moment is all about grounding the understanding of queer and trans lives in a broader, in a broader,
00:18:01 - and how those are interconnected. But for, in order to do so, we had to incorporate both the global and the local dimensions. And that's where my work was trying to intervene to look at what is particular about a certain nation state under daily politics of violence versus the transnational circulation of vernacular, languages of resistance. So I think we are able to keep both dimensions, the, the interconnection between queer and trans and other, forms of, or intersections of oppression. While at the same time we unpack what is particular about the local versus the global.
00:18:46 - for our daily politics. And so, strategies of resilience, and that's I think where research is going.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis