The China-OECD trade divide: building bridges

Today’s largest trade frictions stem from differences between China and the OECD regarding the appropriate role of government. Daniel Trefler discusses the two types of differences. The first are legitimate attitudinal differences towards industrial policy (the use of subsidies), competition policy (the use of forced industry consolidation), and innovation policy (weak protections of intellectual property). China and the OECD will have to reach an accommodation on these differences if the end game is a rules-based trading system.

Daniel Trefler is a Canadian economist who is currently the J. Douglas and Ruth Grant Chair in Competitiveness and Prosperity at the Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. He is among the most influential and frequently cited economists worldwide.

Image courtesy of interviewee

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Guest visitors to the Faculti website can view any insight monthly. You have insight(s) remaining for this month

Register for free as an individual and view thousands of insights in our archive today or subscribe for subject access.

You may already have institutional access to Faculti. Please access Faculti using your institution credentials.

Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2022. All rights reserved.

Add the Faculti Web App to your Mobile or Desktop homescreen