Dancing in the Rain: Resilience in High-Risk Industries

View more insights in Business Podcasts

View more figures from Faculti

No related posts found.

Today, we’re exploring a fascinating topic—how high-risk organizations balance stability and flexibility to build resilience in the face of life-threatening dangers.

Image courtesy of interviewee. January 2, 2025

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

In this episode of the Faculty Business podcast, hosts Lily and David discuss the concept of resilience in high-risk industries such as nuclear power, aviation, and healthcare. They introduce the metaphor of "dancing in the rain during a hurricane" to describe how organizations must balance strict safety protocols with the need for flexibility in unexpected situations.

They explain that organizations can become less safe if they are too rigid and focused on compliance, leading to complacency—a phenomenon referred to as the "paradox of almost totally safe systems." The discussion emphasizes the importance of "flexible rules" that encourage employees to interpret guidelines based on real-time situations rather than adhering strictly to checklists.

The hosts highlight that fostering a culture of mindfulness, open communication, and continuous learning is crucial for organizations. Examples from aviation, where pilots undergo scenario-based training, demonstrate the value of teaching critical thinking instead of mere procedural adherence.

They conclude by encouraging listeners to apply these principles in their own work environments, emphasizing the benefits of resilience in navigating today’s complex and rapidly changing world. The episode reminds that resilience is like a muscle: the more it's exercised, the stronger it becomes.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are five key points from the podcast about resilience in high-risk industries:

1. **Balancing Stability and Flexibility**: Organizations in high-risk fields, such as nuclear power, aviation, and healthcare, must balance strict safety regulations with the ability to adapt quickly to unexpected situations. This balance is likened to "dancing in the rain during a hurricane."

2. **The Paradox of Safety**: Overly rigid safety protocols can lead to complacency, making organizations less safe over time. Employees may become so focused on following rules that they miss critical situations, akin to how increased car safety can lead to more reckless driving.

3. **Flexible Rules and Mindfulness**: Instead of rigid checklists, organizations benefit from flexible rules that encourage employees to interpret guidelines based on real-time circumstances. This requires mindfulness, continuous learning, and a deep understanding of underlying principles rather than mere memorization of procedures.

4. **Culture of Thoughtful Compliance**: High-risk industries are shifting towards a culture of thoughtful compliance that emphasizes decision-making processes rather than strict adherence to procedures. This approach helps organizations learn from incidents and improves resilience.

5. **Application Beyond High-Risk Industries**: The concepts discussed are applicable beyond high-risk sectors. Organizations in various fields can benefit from fostering open communication, continuous learning, and regularly reviewing procedures to adapt to complex and unpredictable environments. Cultivating resilience can be empowering for teams and individuals alike.

Export as PDF
Here are the key quotes and insights from the video detailing the Faculty Business podcast discussion on resilience in high-risk industries:

1. **Dancing in the Rain Metaphor**:
- "It's actually about organizations learning to dance in the rain during a hurricane."

2. **Stability vs. Flexibility**:
- "It's about balancing rigid safety measures with the ability to think on your feet when things go sideways."

3. **Paradox of Safety**:
- "Organizations that are too rigid to the letter can actually become less safe over time."
- "When systems become so safe that nothing ever goes wrong, people can become complacent."

4. **Flexible Rules Concept**:
- "These aren't your typical rigid checklists. Instead, they're more like guidelines that allow employees to interpret and adapt their actions based on what's happening in real time."

5. **Training Principles**:
- "It's about training people to understand the principles behind the rules so they can apply them intelligently in new situations."

6. **Balancing Metrics and Resilience**:
- "Over-reliance on these metrics can actually backfire and ironically undermine the very resilience these organizations are trying to build."

7. **Rethinking Rule Design**:
- "It's about rethinking how rules are designed, implemented, and controlled, that values both stability and flexibility."

8. **Aviation Example**:
- "Pilots are put through simulations of unusual situations where they have to apply their knowledge creatively."

9. **Culture of Thoughtful Compliance**:
- "They're trying to build a culture of thoughtful compliance rather than blind obedience."

10. **Application Beyond High-Risk Industries**:
- "The principles of balancing stability and flexibility, fostering a culture of mindfulness and continuous learning... could benefit any organization."

11. **Encouraging Open Communication**:
- "Encourage people to speak up about potential issues or ideas for improvement."

12. **Continuous Learning**:
- "Stay curious, seek out new perspectives and be willing to adapt."

13. **Mindset of Resilience**:
- "Resilience is like a muscle."

14. **Final Thought**:
- "Whether you are piloting a plane or just navigating your day-to-day life, a little flexibility can go a long way, and a little stability doesn't hurt either."

These quotes encapsulate the main themes of the discussion, focusing on the challenges of resilience in high-risk environments, the balance between safety and adaptability, and the importance of a proactive organizational culture.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:02.135 --> 00:00:04.305
Welcome to the Faculty Business podcast,

2
00:00:04.915 --> 00:00:08.345
where we distill groundbreaking research on organizational

3
00:00:08.345 --> 00:00:11.585
studies into quick and actionable insights.

4
00:00:12.445 --> 00:00:15.345
I'm Lily. Resilience in high risk industries.

5
00:00:15.845 --> 00:00:17.585
It sounds like a dry topic, right?

6
00:00:18.375 --> 00:00:21.385
Well, what if I told you it's actually about organizations

7
00:00:21.705 --> 00:00:23.825
learning to dance in the rain during a hurricane?

8
00:00:24.565 --> 00:00:26.975
I'm David. Whoa, that's quite an image.

9
00:00:27.435 --> 00:00:29.255
Are we talking about actual dancing here

10
00:00:29.795 --> 00:00:31.295
or is this some kind of metaphor?

11
00:00:32.245 --> 00:00:36.425
Ha ha. Well, it's definitely a metaphor, but an apt one.

12
00:00:37.165 --> 00:00:38.785
You see, we are diving into

13
00:00:38.785 --> 00:00:41.865
how organizations in high stakes industries like nuclear

14
00:00:41.915 --> 00:00:46.225
power, aviation and healthcare, managed to stay both stable

15
00:00:46.325 --> 00:00:49.585
and flexible in the face of potentially catastrophic risks.

16
00:00:50.875 --> 00:00:52.685
Hmm, that does sound intriguing.

17
00:00:53.505 --> 00:00:55.445
So what exactly do you mean

18
00:00:55.445 --> 00:00:58.085
by dancing in the rain during a hurricane?

19
00:00:59.285 --> 00:01:01.815
Well, imagine you are running a nuclear power plant.

20
00:01:02.275 --> 00:01:05.295
You've got incredibly strict safety protocols in place.

21
00:01:05.565 --> 00:01:06.935
Your stability, if you will,

22
00:01:07.595 --> 00:01:11.255
but then suddenly an unexpected earthquake hits.

23
00:01:11.955 --> 00:01:15.535
Now you need to be flexible to adapt quickly to a situation

24
00:01:15.535 --> 00:01:17.415
that might not be covered in your rule

25
00:01:17.415 --> 00:01:18.895
book. That's the dance.

26
00:01:19.755 --> 00:01:23.775
Oh, I see. So it's about balancing rigid safety measures

27
00:01:23.775 --> 00:01:25.495
with the ability to think on your feet

28
00:01:25.495 --> 00:01:26.575
when things go sideways.

29
00:01:27.785 --> 00:01:30.805
Exactly. And here's where it gets really interesting.

30
00:01:31.825 --> 00:01:34.305
Research shows that organizations that are too rigid

31
00:01:34.765 --> 00:01:36.945
to focused on following every rule

32
00:01:36.965 --> 00:01:40.225
to the letter can actually become less safe over time.

33
00:01:41.295 --> 00:01:44.115
Wait, what? How does that work?

34
00:01:45.115 --> 00:01:47.115
I would've thought more rules equals more safety.

35
00:01:48.125 --> 00:01:49.155
You'd think so, right?

36
00:01:49.775 --> 00:01:53.275
But it's called the paradox of almost totally safe systems.

37
00:01:54.375 --> 00:01:57.665
When systems become so safe that nothing ever goes wrong,

38
00:01:58.085 --> 00:01:59.865
people can become complacent.

39
00:02:00.495 --> 00:02:02.345
They might start to let their guard down

40
00:02:02.725 --> 00:02:04.585
or become so focused on ticking boxes

41
00:02:04.615 --> 00:02:06.105
that they miss the bigger picture.

42
00:02:06.845 --> 00:02:08.425
Huh, that's fascinating.

43
00:02:09.445 --> 00:02:13.395
It's like, how some studies suggest

44
00:02:13.395 --> 00:02:15.955
that making cars safer has led to more reckless driving

45
00:02:16.595 --> 00:02:18.245
because people feel invincible.

46
00:02:18.955 --> 00:02:20.295
That's a great parallel,

47
00:02:20.965 --> 00:02:23.145
and it highlights the central challenge these

48
00:02:23.145 --> 00:02:24.265
organizations face.

49
00:02:24.695 --> 00:02:27.025
They need to find a way to enforce compliance

50
00:02:27.365 --> 00:02:29.345
and maintain high safety standards,

51
00:02:29.645 --> 00:02:31.345
but also foster adaptability

52
00:02:31.685 --> 00:02:33.905
and keep people engaged and alert.

53
00:02:34.375 --> 00:02:36.145
It's not an easy balance to strike.

54
00:02:36.685 --> 00:02:38.595
So how do they do it? I mean,

55
00:02:38.595 --> 00:02:40.035
if I'm working in a nuclear plant,

56
00:02:40.815 --> 00:02:43.315
I'd want very clear specific instructions to follow,

57
00:02:43.765 --> 00:02:45.235
especially in an emergency.

58
00:02:46.455 --> 00:02:49.425
Well, that's where the concept of flexible rules comes in.

59
00:02:49.995 --> 00:02:52.625
These aren't your typical rigid checklists.

60
00:02:53.135 --> 00:02:55.825
Instead, they're more like guidelines that allow employees

61
00:02:55.825 --> 00:02:58.545
to interpret and adapt their actions based on

62
00:02:58.545 --> 00:02:59.715
what's happening in real time.

63
00:03:00.755 --> 00:03:02.675
Hmm, that sounds great in theory,

64
00:03:03.335 --> 00:03:05.195
but I can imagine it'd be pretty challenging

65
00:03:05.195 --> 00:03:06.355
to implement in practice.

66
00:03:07.425 --> 00:03:08.525
You are absolutely right.

67
00:03:09.085 --> 00:03:11.685
Implementing these flexible rules isn't easy.

68
00:03:12.425 --> 00:03:15.245
It requires a high level of mindfulness from employees,

69
00:03:15.695 --> 00:03:16.725
continuous learning,

70
00:03:17.185 --> 00:03:20.485
and the ability to make sense of complex situations quickly.

71
00:03:21.195 --> 00:03:23.125
It's not about throwing out the rule book,

72
00:03:23.595 --> 00:03:26.365
it's about training people to understand the principles

73
00:03:26.385 --> 00:03:29.525
behind the rules so they can apply them intelligently

74
00:03:29.625 --> 00:03:30.765
in new situations.

75
00:03:31.505 --> 00:03:33.405
So it's less about memorizing procedures

76
00:03:33.905 --> 00:03:36.445
and more about deeply understanding the

77
00:03:36.685 --> 00:03:37.765
underlying principles.

78
00:03:38.805 --> 00:03:41.815
Exactly. And this approach isn't just limited

79
00:03:41.955 --> 00:03:43.615
to the employees on the front lines.

80
00:03:44.315 --> 00:03:47.455
It extends to how these organizations approach control

81
00:03:47.755 --> 00:03:48.935
and monitoring as well.

82
00:03:49.725 --> 00:03:52.975
Many high risk organizations rely heavily on quantifiable

83
00:03:52.975 --> 00:03:54.775
indicators to enforce compliance.

84
00:03:55.235 --> 00:03:57.495
You know, things like checklists completed,

85
00:03:57.715 --> 00:04:00.575
safety protocols followed, that sort of thing.

86
00:04:01.555 --> 00:04:03.125
Well, that makes sense.

87
00:04:04.085 --> 00:04:07.285
I mean, you wanna be able to measure safety, right?

88
00:04:08.615 --> 00:04:10.825
Sure. But here's the catch over.

89
00:04:10.905 --> 00:04:13.825
Reliance on these metrics can actually backfire.

90
00:04:14.525 --> 00:04:17.065
It can create a false sense of security,

91
00:04:17.405 --> 00:04:18.945
and ironically,

92
00:04:19.455 --> 00:04:21.465
undermine the very resilience these

93
00:04:21.465 --> 00:04:23.105
organizations are trying to build.

94
00:04:23.575 --> 00:04:26.025
It's like focusing so much on the individual trees

95
00:04:26.025 --> 00:04:28.065
that you lose sight of the forest. Oh,

96
00:04:28.205 --> 00:04:29.205
Wow.

97
00:04:29.895 --> 00:04:32.575
I hadn't thought of it that way. So

98
00:04:32.575 --> 00:04:34.855
how do these organizations strike the right balance?

99
00:04:36.555 --> 00:04:39.005
Well, there's no one size fits all answer,

100
00:04:39.505 --> 00:04:42.485
but the research suggests that it's about rethinking

101
00:04:42.505 --> 00:04:46.205
how rules are designed, implemented, and controlled.

102
00:04:46.915 --> 00:04:48.365
It's about creating a culture

103
00:04:48.395 --> 00:04:50.805
that values both stability and flexibility.

104
00:04:51.635 --> 00:04:54.645
This might involve things like scenario based training,

105
00:04:55.525 --> 00:04:58.725
encouraging open communication about near misses and errors,

106
00:04:59.145 --> 00:05:00.485
and regularly reviewing

107
00:05:00.485 --> 00:05:04.085
and updating procedures based on real world experiences.

108
00:05:05.205 --> 00:05:06.385
Can you give an example of what

109
00:05:06.385 --> 00:05:07.505
that might look like in practice?

110
00:05:08.385 --> 00:05:11.195
Sure. Let's take aviation as an example.

111
00:05:12.115 --> 00:05:14.155
Airlines have incredibly detailed procedures

112
00:05:14.155 --> 00:05:15.755
for everything from pre-flight checks

113
00:05:15.815 --> 00:05:17.315
to emergency situations,

114
00:05:17.975 --> 00:05:20.795
but they also invest heavily in scenario-based training

115
00:05:20.825 --> 00:05:22.955
that goes beyond just following checklists.

116
00:05:23.695 --> 00:05:26.555
Pilots are put through simulations of unusual situations

117
00:05:26.555 --> 00:05:28.515
where they have to apply their knowledge creatively.

118
00:05:29.305 --> 00:05:32.475
That makes sense. So they're not just learning what

119
00:05:32.475 --> 00:05:34.245
to do, but how to think.

120
00:05:35.295 --> 00:05:38.175
Exactly. And this approach extends to

121
00:05:38.175 --> 00:05:39.735
how incidents are handled too.

122
00:05:40.325 --> 00:05:42.615
Instead of just focusing on whether procedures were

123
00:05:42.735 --> 00:05:44.975
followed, they look at the decision making process.

124
00:05:45.765 --> 00:05:47.095
They ask questions like,

125
00:05:47.565 --> 00:05:49.855
what information did the crew have at the time?

126
00:05:50.445 --> 00:05:51.815
What were they trying to achieve?

127
00:05:52.675 --> 00:05:54.455
How did they interpret the situation?

128
00:05:55.075 --> 00:05:56.095
That's really interesting.

129
00:05:56.725 --> 00:05:58.205
It's like they're trying to build a culture

130
00:05:58.265 --> 00:06:01.285
of thoughtful compliance rather than blind obedience.

131
00:06:02.125 --> 00:06:03.385
That's a great way to put it.

132
00:06:04.005 --> 00:06:05.505
And it's not just in aviation.

133
00:06:06.165 --> 00:06:07.985
We see similar approaches in healthcare

134
00:06:08.315 --> 00:06:09.785
where there's been a move towards

135
00:06:09.805 --> 00:06:11.105
what's called just culture.

136
00:06:11.845 --> 00:06:13.785
The idea is to create an environment

137
00:06:13.785 --> 00:06:16.105
where people feel safe reporting errors

138
00:06:16.525 --> 00:06:18.585
or near misses without fear of punishment,

139
00:06:18.925 --> 00:06:21.905
but also where there's accountability for reckless behavior.

140
00:06:22.685 --> 00:06:25.105
You know, as we're talking about this, I can't help

141
00:06:25.105 --> 00:06:27.225
but think about how these principles might apply

142
00:06:27.285 --> 00:06:29.105
beyond just high risk industries.

143
00:06:29.995 --> 00:06:32.795
I mean, in a world that's becoming increasingly complex

144
00:06:32.855 --> 00:06:35.755
and unpredictable, couldn't any organization benefit

145
00:06:36.345 --> 00:06:37.355
from this kind of approach?

146
00:06:39.065 --> 00:06:41.545
Absolutely. While the stakes might not be

147
00:06:41.545 --> 00:06:44.345
as high in other industries, the principles

148
00:06:44.345 --> 00:06:45.585
of balancing stability

149
00:06:45.725 --> 00:06:49.065
and flexibility, fostering a culture of mindfulness

150
00:06:49.405 --> 00:06:53.425
and continuous learning and rethinking how we approach rules

151
00:06:53.485 --> 00:06:57.265
and control, these could be valuable in any organization.

152
00:06:58.465 --> 00:07:01.455
Think about how quickly technology is changing the business

153
00:07:01.455 --> 00:07:02.735
landscape or

154
00:07:02.735 --> 00:07:05.935
how global events can suddenly disrupt supply chains.

155
00:07:06.665 --> 00:07:07.755
Well, I don't know about you,

156
00:07:08.375 --> 00:07:10.585
but I'm feeling inspired to take a fresh look at

157
00:07:10.585 --> 00:07:11.745
how we do things around here.

158
00:07:12.835 --> 00:07:15.065
Maybe it's time to dance in the rain a little more often.

159
00:07:15.985 --> 00:07:18.785
I love that idea, and it's a great reminder

160
00:07:18.785 --> 00:07:21.705
that resilience isn't just about surviving tough times.

161
00:07:22.455 --> 00:07:24.065
It's about thriving in them.

162
00:07:24.655 --> 00:07:26.745
It's about seeing challenges as opportunities

163
00:07:26.885 --> 00:07:27.905
for growth and learning.

164
00:07:28.415 --> 00:07:30.225
Whether you are in a high risk industry

165
00:07:30.285 --> 00:07:34.865
or not, cultivating that mindset can be incredibly powerful.

166
00:07:35.485 --> 00:07:38.185
So how can our listeners start applying these ideas in

167
00:07:38.185 --> 00:07:40.345
their own lives or workplaces?

168
00:07:41.605 --> 00:07:42.665
That's a great question.

169
00:07:43.545 --> 00:07:45.185
I think a good place to start is

170
00:07:45.185 --> 00:07:46.905
by fostering open communication.

171
00:07:47.615 --> 00:07:50.505
Encourage people to speak up about potential issues

172
00:07:50.645 --> 00:07:52.105
or ideas for improvement.

173
00:07:52.725 --> 00:07:54.785
Create an environment where it's okay

174
00:07:54.845 --> 00:07:57.505
to question the status quo or admit to mistakes.

175
00:07:58.335 --> 00:08:00.945
It's also worth regularly reviewing your procedures

176
00:08:01.165 --> 00:08:03.705
and asking if they're still serving their intended purpose.

177
00:08:04.735 --> 00:08:06.725
Those sound like practical steps. Anyone can take?

178
00:08:07.995 --> 00:08:09.575
Any other advice for our listeners?

179
00:08:11.155 --> 00:08:13.315
Absolutely. I'd encourage everyone

180
00:08:13.315 --> 00:08:14.995
to embrace continuous learning.

181
00:08:15.615 --> 00:08:17.155
The world is changing rapidly

182
00:08:17.735 --> 00:08:20.195
and what worked yesterday might not work tomorrow.

183
00:08:20.865 --> 00:08:22.955
Stay curious, seek out new perspectives

184
00:08:22.955 --> 00:08:24.115
and be willing to adapt

185
00:08:24.695 --> 00:08:27.035
and remember, resilience is like a muscle.

186
00:08:27.455 --> 00:08:30.275
The more you exercise it, the stronger it gets.

187
00:08:30.855 --> 00:08:33.965
That's great advice. It's really about cultivating a

188
00:08:33.965 --> 00:08:35.765
mindset of resilience in our daily lives.

189
00:08:37.105 --> 00:08:40.355
Exactly. And on that note, I think it's time we wrap up.

190
00:08:40.695 --> 00:08:42.315
Thanks for joining us on faculty

191
00:08:42.495 --> 00:08:44.195
for this fascinating exploration

192
00:08:44.535 --> 00:08:47.115
of resilience in high risk organizations.

193
00:08:48.235 --> 00:08:50.035
Remember, whether you are piloting a plane

194
00:08:50.375 --> 00:08:52.475
or just navigating your day-to-day life,

195
00:08:53.035 --> 00:08:55.035
a little flexibility can go a long way,

196
00:08:55.945 --> 00:08:57.605
And a little stability doesn't hurt either.

197
00:08:58.095 --> 00:09:00.645
Until next time, stay safe, stay flexible,

198
00:09:00.945 --> 00:09:02.125
and keep dancing in that rain.

Dancing in the Rain: Resilience in High-Risk Industries

00:00:02 - Welcome to the Faculty Business podcast, where we distill groundbreaking research on organizational studies into quick and actionable insights. I'm Lily. Resilience in high risk industries. It sounds like a dry topic, right? Well, what if I told you it's actually about organizations learning to dance in the rain during a hurricane? I'm David. Whoa, that's quite an image. Are we talking about actual dancing here or is this some kind of metaphor?

00:00:37 - You see, we are diving into how organizations in high stakes industries like nuclear power, aviation and healthcare, managed to stay both stable and flexible in the face of potentially catastrophic risks. Hmm, that does sound intriguing. So what exactly do you mean by dancing in the rain during a hurricane? Well, imagine you are running a nuclear power plant.

00:01:05 - Your stability, if you will, but then suddenly an unexpected earthquake hits. Now you need to be flexible to adapt quickly to a situation that might not be covered in your rule book. That's the dance. I see. So it's about balancing rigid safety measures with the ability to think on your feet when things go sideways. Exactly. And here's where it gets really interesting. Research shows that organizations that are too rigid

Balancing Safety and Complacency

00:01:36 - to the letter can actually become less safe over time. Wait, what? How does that work? I would've thought more rules equals more safety. You'd think so, right? But it's called the paradox of almost totally safe systems. When systems become so safe that nothing ever goes wrong, people can become complacent. They might start to let their guard down or become so focused on ticking boxes that they miss the bigger picture.

00:02:09 - It's like, how some studies suggest that making cars safer has led to more reckless driving because people feel invincible. That's a great parallel, and it highlights the central challenge these organizations face. They need to find a way to enforce compliance and maintain high safety standards, but also foster adaptability and keep people engaged and alert. It's not an easy balance to strike. So how do they do it? I mean,

00:02:40 - I'd want very clear specific instructions to follow, especially in an emergency. Well, that's where the concept of flexible rules comes in. These aren't your typical rigid checklists. Instead, they're more like guidelines that allow employees to interpret and adapt their actions based on what's happening in real time. Hmm, that sounds great in theory, but I can imagine it'd be pretty challenging to implement in practice. You are absolutely right.

Mindfulness and Adaptive Compliance in High-Risk Organizations

00:03:12 - It requires a high level of mindfulness from employees, continuous learning, and the ability to make sense of complex situations quickly. It's not about throwing out the rule book, it's about training people to understand the principles behind the rules so they can apply them intelligently in new situations. So it's less about memorizing procedures and more about deeply understanding the underlying principles. Exactly. And this approach isn't just limited

00:03:44 - It extends to how these organizations approach control and monitoring as well. Many high risk organizations rely heavily on quantifiable indicators to enforce compliance. You know, things like checklists completed, safety protocols followed, that sort of thing. Well, that makes sense. I mean, you wanna be able to measure safety, right? Sure. But here's the catch over. Reliance on these metrics can actually backfire.

00:04:17 - and ironically, undermine the very resilience these organizations are trying to build. It's like focusing so much on the individual trees that you lose sight of the forest. Wow. I hadn't thought of it that way. So how do these organizations strike the right balance? Well, there's no one size fits all answer, but the research suggests that it's about rethinking how rules are designed, implemented, and controlled.

Balancing Stability and Flexibility in High-Risk Industries

00:04:48 - that values both stability and flexibility. This might involve things like scenario based training, encouraging open communication about near misses and errors, and regularly reviewing and updating procedures based on real world experiences. Can you give an example of what that might look like in practice? Sure. Let's take aviation as an example. Airlines have incredibly detailed procedures for everything from pre-flight checks to emergency situations,

00:05:20 - that goes beyond just following checklists. Pilots are put through simulations of unusual situations where they have to apply their knowledge creatively. That makes sense. So they're not just learning what to do, but how to think. Exactly. And this approach extends to how incidents are handled too. Instead of just focusing on whether procedures were followed, they look at the decision making process. They ask questions like, what information did the crew have at the time?

00:05:52 - How did they interpret the situation? That's really interesting. It's like they're trying to build a culture of thoughtful compliance rather than blind obedience. That's a great way to put it. And it's not just in aviation. We see similar approaches in healthcare where there's been a move towards what's called just culture. The idea is to create an environment where people feel safe reporting errors or near misses without fear of punishment, but also where there's accountability for reckless behavior.

Resilience and Adaptability Across Industries

00:06:25 - but think about how these principles might apply beyond just high risk industries. I mean, in a world that's becoming increasingly complex and unpredictable, couldn't any organization benefit from this kind of approach? Absolutely. While the stakes might not be as high in other industries, the principles of balancing stability and flexibility, fostering a culture of mindfulness and continuous learning and rethinking how we approach rules

00:06:58 - Think about how quickly technology is changing the business landscape or how global events can suddenly disrupt supply chains. Well, I don't know about you, but I'm feeling inspired to take a fresh look at how we do things around here. Maybe it's time to dance in the rain a little more often. I love that idea, and it's a great reminder that resilience isn't just about surviving tough times. It's about thriving in them.

00:07:26 - for growth and learning. Whether you are in a high risk industry or not, cultivating that mindset can be incredibly powerful. So how can our listeners start applying these ideas in their own lives or workplaces? That's a great question. I think a good place to start is by fostering open communication. Encourage people to speak up about potential issues or ideas for improvement. Create an environment where it's okay

Embracing Resilience Through Continuous Learning

00:07:58 - It's also worth regularly reviewing your procedures and asking if they're still serving their intended purpose. Those sound like practical steps. Anyone can take? Any other advice for our listeners? Absolutely. I'd encourage everyone to embrace continuous learning. The world is changing rapidly and what worked yesterday might not work tomorrow. Stay curious, seek out new perspectives and be willing to adapt and remember, resilience is like a muscle.

00:08:30 - That's great advice. It's really about cultivating a mindset of resilience in our daily lives. Exactly. And on that note, I think it's time we wrap up. Thanks for joining us on faculty for this fascinating exploration of resilience in high risk organizations. Remember, whether you are piloting a plane or just navigating your day-to-day life, a little flexibility can go a long way, And a little stability doesn't hurt either.

00:09:00 - and keep dancing in that rain.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis

Data

Originals

Explainers

Podcasts