Dominant Personality and Politically Inexperienced Presidents Challenge Term Limits

Key Question Being Explored in This Insight:

How do the unique personalities and experience levels of presidents influence their attempts to extend their terms in office?

View the page of: Ignacio Arana Araya

Institution: Carnegie Mellon University

Explore more insights in:

American Politics Political Science Social Sciences

Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider ▼

What assumptions does the research make?
Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness ▼

This research comes from Carnegie Mellon University . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Further Reading ▼

Read the Study

How do the unique personalities and experience levels of presidents influence their attempts to extend their terms in office?

Image courtesy of interviewee. November 14, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video discusses a research project which investigates the behavior of Latin American presidents, focusing particularly on the tendency of some leaders to attempt to overstay their terms in office by relaxing constitutional term limits. The researcher conducted interviews with 24 presidents across nine Latin American countries, exploring how individual characteristics, governance contexts, and relationships with constitutions influence presidential actions.

The research reveals that dominant personality traits, such as a desire for control and a tendency to impose their will, correlate with attempts to relax term limits. The study also suggests that politically inexperienced leaders are more likely to pursue such changes due to their naivete about the challenges involved and the backlash they may face.

After surveying over 1,000 experts to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of presidents from 1945 to 2021, the findings indicate that leaders with high dominance scores are significantly more likely to attempt to change term limits. Additionally, the study highlights that weak enforcement of constitutional rules makes it easier for leaders to violate them, undermining democratic norms and institutions.

The consequences of these actions often include the erosion of democracy, as seen in countries like Argentina, Honduras, Peru, and Venezuela, which transitioned from semi-democracies to authoritarian regimes under such leaders. The researcher emphasizes the need for further studies to understand the psychological profiles of leaders that correlate with these detrimental behaviors, suggesting that insights from differential psychology could improve our understanding of how leadership characteristics influence political outcomes. Ultimately, the goal of the research is to identify the factors that lead presidents to become overreaching leaders and the impact they have on democratic governance.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are five key points from the video:

1. **Exploratory Analysis of Presidential Behavior**: The author conducted interviews with 24 Latin American presidents across nine countries to explore how individual characteristics, governance convideos, and constitutional relationships influence presidential behavior, particularly in regard to efforts to remain in power beyond term limits.

2. **Dominant Individual Characteristics**: The research highlights that dominant individuals—characterized by a willingness to impose their will and challenge others—are more likely to attempt to relax term limits. The findings suggest a correlation between high dominance scores and the likelihood of presidents trying to extend their time in office.

3. **Psychometric Survey of Experts**: To assess the psychometric characteristics of presidents, a survey was conducted among over 1,000 experts who evaluated 152 presidents from 1945 to 2012 using validated personality scales, revealing that low dominance correlates with a low likelihood of attempting to change term limits.

4. **Impact of Political Experience**: The study indicates that politically inexperienced leaders are significantly more likely to attempt to relax term limits compared to their experienced counterparts. Political inexperience can lead to underestimating challenges and backlash, with a marked increase in attempts to change term limits among those without prior political experience.

5. **Consequences for Democracy**: The author notes that presidents who successfully relax term limits often undermine democratic institutions and norms, leading to a decline in democracy scores and possibly resulting in authoritarian regime shifts. The video stresses the importance of enforcing institutional rules and the challenges posed by unstable political cultures that allow such overreach.

Export as PDF
Here are some key quotes extracted from the video that summarize its main points regarding presidential behavior, term limits, and the political dynamics in Latin America:

1. **Exploratory Analysis of Presidential Behavior**: "I first conducted an exploratory analysis to understand presidential behavior... I went to nine countries and did semi-structured interviews with 24 Latin American presidents."

2. **Impact of Individual Characteristics**: "These leaders discussed whether their individual characteristics had an impact from their performance in office, the convideos in which they govern, and the relationships they have with their constitutions."

3. **Dominance and Term Limits**: "I propose that the characteristics of dominant individuals are associated with the presidential attempts to relax term limits... dominant individuals are people inclined to impose their will, and they're not very afraid of challenging others."

4. **Historical Examples of Overreach**: "For example, Honduras military overthrew Manuel Zelaya in 2009 to prevent him from overstaying in office... violent protests induced president Daniel Ortega to abandon his reformation efforts in 2017."

5. **Statistical Findings on Dominance**: "There's an almost 0% chance that presidents who score low in dominance will attempt to relax their term limits, but the probabilities of an attempt increased up to 16% when the leaders have the maximum score of dominance."

6. **Rules and Enforcement**: "The lesson from this experience is that institutional design is certainly important, but if the rules are not enforced, then they lose relevance."

7. **Differentiating Rule Changes and Overreach**: "I would like to distinguish between changing the rules of presidential term limits, which is not necessarily bad for democracy and attempts of presidents who try to overstay in office."

8. **Consequence of Overreaching Leaders**: "There is evidence that the country's democracy scores decline under this type of overreaching leaders, and some countries even experience regime changes."

9. **Political Experience and Its Effects**: "I found that when a leader is highly politically experienced, the likelihood that he or she will attempt to remove term limits is only 1.4%. However, when the presidents have no previous political experience, the likelihood to relax their term limits increases to 9%."

10. **Future Research Directions**: "Yet we still have a limited understanding of the difference that they make in office... Examining how the characteristics of leaders relate to political outcomes will allow us to understand the true impact that leaders make across situations in which their actions are central in presidential systems."

These quotes encapsulate the essence of the research presented, focusing on the relationships between presidential characteristics, political behavior, institutional designs, and democracy in the convideo of Latin America.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:00.125 --> 00:00:02.965
I first conducted an exploratory analysis

2
00:00:03.185 --> 00:00:04.845
to understand presidential behavior.

3
00:00:05.645 --> 00:00:07.165
I, I went to nine countries

4
00:00:07.385 --> 00:00:09.645
and did, semi-structured interviews

5
00:00:09.875 --> 00:00:12.405
with 24 Latin American presidents.

6
00:00:13.185 --> 00:00:16.685
So, these leaders discussed whether their individual

7
00:00:16.685 --> 00:00:19.845
characteristics had an impact from their performance in

8
00:00:19.845 --> 00:00:22.925
office, the contexts in which they govern,

9
00:00:23.465 --> 00:00:26.365
and the relationships they have with their constitutions.

10
00:00:27.135 --> 00:00:29.125
These interviews helped me to,

11
00:00:29.125 --> 00:00:30.645
to understand presidential behavior,

12
00:00:31.465 --> 00:00:35.325
and also gave me ideas, about what can lead precedents

13
00:00:35.425 --> 00:00:37.845
to attempt to overstay overstaying office.

14
00:00:39.065 --> 00:00:41.885
And, and I propose that the characteristics of,

15
00:00:42.205 --> 00:00:44.245
dominant individuals are associated

16
00:00:44.795 --> 00:00:46.845
with the presidential attempts to relax.

17
00:00:46.955 --> 00:00:50.965
Term limits dominant individuals are,

18
00:00:52.325 --> 00:00:54.385
people inclined to impose their will,

19
00:00:54.965 --> 00:00:57.385
and they're not very afraid of challenging others.

20
00:00:57.995 --> 00:01:01.185
These are characteristics that a health presidents

21
00:01:01.325 --> 00:01:04.225
to continue their efforts to retain office

22
00:01:04.895 --> 00:01:06.665
despite intense opposition.

23
00:01:07.245 --> 00:01:12.025
So, for example, Hondura military overthrew Manuel Alia in

24
00:01:12.025 --> 00:01:16.905
2009 to prevent him from overstaying in office,

25
00:01:17.605 --> 00:01:21.145
in, in Wai violent protests,

26
00:01:21.455 --> 00:01:23.665
induced president Orio Cortez

27
00:01:24.205 --> 00:01:27.985
to abandon his reformation efforts in 2017.

28
00:01:28.345 --> 00:01:31.265
Dominant individuals also enjoy controlling their contexts

29
00:01:31.365 --> 00:01:35.385
and have a drive for control and, and overreaching.

30
00:01:35.385 --> 00:01:38.625
Presidents should be well equipped to control

31
00:01:38.765 --> 00:01:41.745
and lead others because they need to gain the support

32
00:01:41.925 --> 00:01:45.585
of other politicians to succeed in the reformation attempts.

33
00:01:46.765 --> 00:01:48.815
Another characteristics is that,

34
00:01:49.095 --> 00:01:52.655
dominant individuals are highly motivated, todo others,

35
00:01:53.075 --> 00:01:56.655
and over staying in office allows presidents to have a,

36
00:01:56.875 --> 00:02:00.055
to leave a bigger legacy than their predecessors dominant

37
00:02:00.105 --> 00:02:02.575
presidents should be of the kind

38
00:02:02.575 --> 00:02:06.015
that they particularly dislike, stepping down from office

39
00:02:06.835 --> 00:02:09.495
and see it as a personal loss to adversaries.

40
00:02:10.485 --> 00:02:14.735
Then, to measure the psychometric characteristics

41
00:02:14.735 --> 00:02:18.415
of presidents, I conducted a survey among hundreds

42
00:02:18.475 --> 00:02:20.255
of experts on American

43
00:02:20.555 --> 00:02:23.575
and Latin American presidents who were asked

44
00:02:23.755 --> 00:02:26.455
to fill out psychometric scales,

45
00:02:26.455 --> 00:02:28.415
validated in personality research.

46
00:02:29.365 --> 00:02:31.055
This was an enormous effort

47
00:02:31.055 --> 00:02:33.135
because it is extremely difficult

48
00:02:33.435 --> 00:02:37.255
to find experts on presidents, especially for presidents

49
00:02:37.255 --> 00:02:39.615
who were burned long ago and in the small

50
00:02:39.755 --> 00:02:40.815
and poorer countries.

51
00:02:41.605 --> 00:02:44.735
However, after an extensive, process

52
00:02:45.455 --> 00:02:46.495
research assistance,

53
00:02:46.715 --> 00:02:50.375
and I managed to find more than 1000 experts

54
00:02:51.075 --> 00:02:54.615
and several hundred evaluated 152 presidents

55
00:02:54.995 --> 00:02:58.775
who were governing from 1945 to 2012,

56
00:03:00.395 --> 00:03:03.355
I have recently expanded the survey in, in a,

57
00:03:03.495 --> 00:03:04.555
in a more recent wave.

58
00:03:04.775 --> 00:03:08.875
So now, 228 presidents who ruled

59
00:03:09.085 --> 00:03:13.195
until from 1945 to 2021 have been evaluated

60
00:03:14.745 --> 00:03:16.075
talking about dominance.

61
00:03:16.075 --> 00:03:19.115
There are different psychotic scales that dominance

62
00:03:19.215 --> 00:03:22.995
and I decided to follow the operationalization used in the

63
00:03:22.995 --> 00:03:25.475
International Personality Item pool

64
00:03:25.865 --> 00:03:29.195
because it captures the characteristics that I mentioned

65
00:03:29.495 --> 00:03:31.915
and that should motivate presence to attempt

66
00:03:31.975 --> 00:03:33.675
to relax their term limits.

67
00:03:33.825 --> 00:03:36.995
This scale identifies individuals who like

68
00:03:36.995 --> 00:03:40.915
to impose their will, are not afraid of challenging

69
00:03:41.015 --> 00:03:44.795
and criticizing others, enjoy controlling their context.

70
00:03:45.215 --> 00:03:47.755
And they're also motivated, as discussed,

71
00:03:48.265 --> 00:03:49.635
motivated to do others.

72
00:03:50.335 --> 00:03:52.675
So in the statistical analysis, I found

73
00:03:52.675 --> 00:03:57.275
that there's an almost 0% chance that precedents

74
00:03:57.275 --> 00:03:59.795
who score low in dominance will attempt

75
00:03:59.855 --> 00:04:00.995
to relax their term limits,

76
00:04:01.815 --> 00:04:04.915
but the probabilities of an attempt increased up

77
00:04:04.915 --> 00:04:08.955
to 16% when the leaders have the maximum score of dominance.

78
00:04:09.055 --> 00:04:10.555
The findings do not suggest

79
00:04:10.745 --> 00:04:14.115
that the rules about term limits are poorly designed.

80
00:04:14.975 --> 00:04:16.915
In some countries, the Conti,

81
00:04:16.915 --> 00:04:19.835
the Constitution can be amended by an absolute majority,

82
00:04:20.165 --> 00:04:21.595
which is a low threshold,

83
00:04:22.175 --> 00:04:25.515
but in most countries, it is not an easy endeavor.

84
00:04:25.855 --> 00:04:28.715
So, for example, in the years of my sample, which covers

85
00:04:28.715 --> 00:04:29.715
between 90 45

86
00:04:29.815 --> 00:04:34.235
and 2012, the most typical rule demands

87
00:04:34.235 --> 00:04:38.155
that at least two thirds of Congress plus an additional step

88
00:04:38.855 --> 00:04:41.795
is necessary to amend the Constitution.

89
00:04:41.825 --> 00:04:44.835
It's very difficult. Several of the presidents attempted

90
00:04:44.835 --> 00:04:49.035
to relax their term limits, eh, breaking the rules.

91
00:04:50.015 --> 00:04:51.755
So let me provide you an example.

92
00:04:52.735 --> 00:04:55.715
The last Latin American president who managed

93
00:04:55.855 --> 00:04:58.595
to bypass the constitution to remain in office

94
00:04:59.295 --> 00:05:01.515
was Najib Kelley of El Salvador.

95
00:05:01.975 --> 00:05:06.635
Um, in 2021, the Salvador Constitution has four articles

96
00:05:06.665 --> 00:05:10.035
that in different ways for big presidential reelection.

97
00:05:10.865 --> 00:05:13.075
However, BKE was able to run

98
00:05:13.095 --> 00:05:15.435
for reelection this year in 2024,

99
00:05:15.865 --> 00:05:19.915
because a subservient Supreme Court said that he could

100
00:05:20.665 --> 00:05:24.635
with an opaque legal interpretation of what, of

101
00:05:24.635 --> 00:05:28.395
what really is an open violation of the Constitution.

102
00:05:29.295 --> 00:05:32.875
So the lesson from this exper experience is

103
00:05:32.875 --> 00:05:35.595
that institutional design is certainly important,

104
00:05:36.335 --> 00:05:39.715
but if the rules are not enforced, then they lose relevance.

105
00:05:40.495 --> 00:05:43.155
And the problem in many of the American countries is

106
00:05:43.155 --> 00:05:45.315
that the rules are unstable

107
00:05:45.775 --> 00:05:48.915
or are weakly enforced, or both.

108
00:05:50.295 --> 00:05:52.755
Um, with respect to to the political culture,

109
00:05:53.245 --> 00:05:57.565
there is an indulgent relationship between weak institutions

110
00:05:58.025 --> 00:06:02.325
and elite behavior because the current elites may try

111
00:06:02.325 --> 00:06:05.805
to change the rules because the rules are unstable

112
00:06:06.345 --> 00:06:09.525
and the rules are unstable because the leads change them.

113
00:06:09.915 --> 00:06:12.365
This is a very difficult problem to solve.

114
00:06:12.685 --> 00:06:15.525
I would like to distinguish, between,

115
00:06:16.285 --> 00:06:18.325
changing the rules of presidential term limits,

116
00:06:18.935 --> 00:06:21.445
which is not necessarily bad for democracy

117
00:06:22.145 --> 00:06:25.085
and attempts of presidents who try

118
00:06:25.085 --> 00:06:28.005
to adjust the constitutions of their countries

119
00:06:28.265 --> 00:06:30.125
so they can oversay in office.

120
00:06:30.745 --> 00:06:33.085
So the second is what I study,

121
00:06:33.955 --> 00:06:37.615
and the consequences are generally bad for democracy.

122
00:06:38.505 --> 00:06:39.615
There is evidence

123
00:06:39.725 --> 00:06:43.975
that the country's democracy scores decline under this type

124
00:06:44.115 --> 00:06:45.815
of overreaching leaders,

125
00:06:46.555 --> 00:06:49.175
and some countries even experience regime changes.

126
00:06:51.375 --> 00:06:55.305
Argentina with Juan Domingo, Peron Honduras with

127
00:06:56.255 --> 00:07:01.185
Tios Andino, Peru and their Alberto Fujimori and Venezuela

128
00:07:01.285 --> 00:07:02.505
and their Ugo Chavez.

129
00:07:03.165 --> 00:07:06.625
All these countries moved from being semi democracies into

130
00:07:06.625 --> 00:07:07.625
authoritarian regimes.

131
00:07:08.085 --> 00:07:11.585
And in all these processes, presidents were able

132
00:07:11.745 --> 00:07:15.545
to retain power because they relaxed their term limits.

133
00:07:16.805 --> 00:07:19.945
So if you look at historical record, you'll find that some

134
00:07:19.945 --> 00:07:23.905
of the most influential Larry Meghan presidents attained

135
00:07:23.905 --> 00:07:25.145
historical prominence

136
00:07:25.435 --> 00:07:27.665
after they were able to overstay in office.

137
00:07:28.965 --> 00:07:30.825
Um, presidents

138
00:07:31.005 --> 00:07:35.225
who relax term limits under undermine democracy regime

139
00:07:35.225 --> 00:07:38.025
attributes mainly through two paths.

140
00:07:38.675 --> 00:07:41.905
First, they assault democratic institutions.

141
00:07:42.685 --> 00:07:45.265
Um, these leaders undermine the law by showing

142
00:07:45.265 --> 00:07:49.745
that people in power can change the rules to hold on

143
00:07:49.805 --> 00:07:50.825
to their positions

144
00:07:51.085 --> 00:07:53.225
and extend their term in their timing office.

145
00:07:55.275 --> 00:07:58.355
Additionally, leaders who stay in power for a long time

146
00:07:58.875 --> 00:08:00.555
weakened the checks and balances

147
00:08:00.975 --> 00:08:03.275
by building loyalty within the government

148
00:08:03.345 --> 00:08:06.915
through more appointments in areas like the bureaucracy,

149
00:08:07.575 --> 00:08:09.235
courts and the military.

150
00:08:11.105 --> 00:08:14.685
Second, these leaders erode democratic norms

151
00:08:14.905 --> 00:08:17.325
by constraining political competition.

152
00:08:18.295 --> 00:08:21.925
These leaders enjoy an incumbent advantage, including access

153
00:08:21.925 --> 00:08:25.125
to governmental resources and name recognition,

154
00:08:25.825 --> 00:08:28.205
and the voters aversion to change.

155
00:08:29.225 --> 00:08:32.365
So the records show that presidents who run for

156
00:08:32.885 --> 00:08:34.205
reelection often win,

157
00:08:34.745 --> 00:08:38.725
and the presidents who relax their term limits once often

158
00:08:39.065 --> 00:08:41.005
try again and succeed.

159
00:08:41.065 --> 00:08:43.925
In the interviews I conducted with former presidents,

160
00:08:43.925 --> 00:08:45.285
several of them remarked

161
00:08:45.425 --> 00:08:49.045
how relevant having political experience is for go.

162
00:08:50.545 --> 00:08:53.505
Research has also associated political inexperience

163
00:08:53.615 --> 00:08:55.205
with unconventional behavior.

164
00:08:56.405 --> 00:09:00.385
So building in these insights, in this paper, I proposed

165
00:09:00.415 --> 00:09:03.505
that political inexperienced residents are more likely

166
00:09:03.565 --> 00:09:07.185
to attempt to relax their turn limits for too many reasons.

167
00:09:08.295 --> 00:09:11.965
First, politically inexperienced ENTs are more prone

168
00:09:12.265 --> 00:09:16.525
to overlook all the challenges that are involved in trying

169
00:09:16.525 --> 00:09:18.005
to relax their term limits.

170
00:09:19.575 --> 00:09:22.345
This happens because they're unfamiliar with,

171
00:09:22.345 --> 00:09:25.065
governmental procedures and practices, and

172
00:09:25.065 --> 00:09:28.145
because they do not have experience with electoral

173
00:09:28.145 --> 00:09:30.985
and policy defeats, so they're not used

174
00:09:30.985 --> 00:09:33.225
to making concessions to rivals

175
00:09:33.245 --> 00:09:37.095
and achieving incremental changes in some,

176
00:09:37.205 --> 00:09:40.135
they're more likely to overestimate their

177
00:09:40.245 --> 00:09:41.375
chances of success.

178
00:09:42.275 --> 00:09:44.895
Second, these leaders are more likely

179
00:09:44.955 --> 00:09:47.095
to underestimate the backlash

180
00:09:47.485 --> 00:09:50.495
that their overreaching beha behavior will receive.

181
00:09:51.445 --> 00:09:53.735
Individuals who reach the presidency

182
00:09:53.965 --> 00:09:56.335
with little socialization in politics

183
00:09:56.915 --> 00:09:58.975
are not very constrained by elite networks

184
00:09:59.195 --> 00:10:02.575
and are unfamiliar with democratic norms such

185
00:10:02.575 --> 00:10:04.415
as making concessions to rivals.

186
00:10:05.955 --> 00:10:07.255
So they have succeeded

187
00:10:07.255 --> 00:10:10.335
because of their ties with their electoral base,

188
00:10:11.035 --> 00:10:13.855
not their ties with traditional political parties.

189
00:10:14.105 --> 00:10:16.975
Other political elite members do not have much

190
00:10:17.085 --> 00:10:19.215
influence on their behavior.

191
00:10:20.985 --> 00:10:23.405
Now, how to measure political experience

192
00:10:23.705 --> 00:10:24.765
is quite a challenge.

193
00:10:25.065 --> 00:10:29.085
It is not a straightforward, I used a free measures.

194
00:10:29.465 --> 00:10:33.445
The main one is based on the formal political positions the

195
00:10:33.445 --> 00:10:36.325
president's held before reaching the presidency.

196
00:10:37.535 --> 00:10:41.235
So I consider the most experienced leaders, those

197
00:10:41.235 --> 00:10:42.355
who had an executive

198
00:10:42.535 --> 00:10:45.875
and legislative trajectory, followed by leaders

199
00:10:46.065 --> 00:10:47.515
with either legislative

200
00:10:47.615 --> 00:10:52.315
or executive executive experience than those who held one

201
00:10:52.335 --> 00:10:54.755
or more positions at the subnational level.

202
00:10:55.695 --> 00:10:57.875
And the least experienced were those

203
00:10:57.875 --> 00:11:00.795
who had no formal experience whatsoever

204
00:11:01.695 --> 00:11:04.835
before becoming presidents in,

205
00:11:05.175 --> 00:11:09.395
and several leaders fall in this category as a robustness.

206
00:11:09.755 --> 00:11:14.115
I also measure experience considering the time politicians

207
00:11:14.365 --> 00:11:15.475
spent in a position

208
00:11:16.175 --> 00:11:20.075
and with a, with a dichotomous variable that distinguished

209
00:11:20.075 --> 00:11:22.595
between leaders who had political experience

210
00:11:22.595 --> 00:11:25.395
before reaching office and those who did not.

211
00:11:26.375 --> 00:11:28.635
So, I found

212
00:11:28.635 --> 00:11:31.715
that when a leader is highly political experienced,

213
00:11:32.415 --> 00:11:34.035
the likelihood that he

214
00:11:34.035 --> 00:11:36.635
or she will attempt to remove term limits

215
00:11:37.295 --> 00:11:39.275
is only 1.4%.

216
00:11:39.705 --> 00:11:42.555
However, when the presidents have no previous political

217
00:11:42.555 --> 00:11:45.475
experience, the chances that they will try

218
00:11:45.555 --> 00:11:49.475
to relax their time limits increases to 9%.

219
00:11:50.065 --> 00:11:51.575
There you go. That's important data.

220
00:11:51.575 --> 00:11:52.895
So where does, where do you think future

221
00:11:53.325 --> 00:11:54.445
research should be in this area?

222
00:11:56.595 --> 00:12:00.915
Yeah, so, I study national political leaders

223
00:12:01.185 --> 00:12:04.275
because their position is highly consequential

224
00:12:04.775 --> 00:12:06.115
for the societies they rule.

225
00:12:06.695 --> 00:12:09.675
Yet we still have a limited understanding of the difference

226
00:12:10.025 --> 00:12:11.195
that they make in office.

227
00:12:12.545 --> 00:12:16.295
Heads of government are undermining democratic attributes

228
00:12:16.595 --> 00:12:20.055
around the world today, yet a systematic analysis

229
00:12:20.235 --> 00:12:23.535
of which leaders ERO democracy is lacking.

230
00:12:24.575 --> 00:12:25.875
We ignore, for example,

231
00:12:26.135 --> 00:12:29.395
if overreaching leaders share individual characteristics

232
00:12:29.545 --> 00:12:32.595
that make them more prone to undermine democracy.

233
00:12:33.815 --> 00:12:36.795
And if we do not know whether anti-democratic leaders

234
00:12:37.365 --> 00:12:40.355
share specific commonalities, then the chances

235
00:12:40.355 --> 00:12:41.555
of identifying them

236
00:12:41.975 --> 00:12:45.155
and learning how to stop them are drastically reduced.

237
00:12:46.535 --> 00:12:49.555
The results, from my work suggests

238
00:12:49.555 --> 00:12:52.915
that presidential studies should more often employ insights

239
00:12:53.025 --> 00:12:55.515
from differential psychology and treat

240
00:12:55.515 --> 00:12:56.955
and developed differences of leaders

241
00:12:57.375 --> 00:12:58.675
as independent variables.

242
00:13:00.235 --> 00:13:03.275
Examining how the characteristics of leaders relate

243
00:13:03.335 --> 00:13:05.675
to political outcomes will allow us

244
00:13:05.675 --> 00:13:08.115
to understand the true impact that leaders

245
00:13:08.705 --> 00:13:10.355
make across situations

246
00:13:10.895 --> 00:13:14.755
in which their actions are central in presidential systems.

247
00:13:15.575 --> 00:13:18.675
For example, in legislating declaring emergencies

248
00:13:18.975 --> 00:13:23.335
or appointing cabinet members, the relevance

249
00:13:23.715 --> 00:13:27.775
of these individual characteristics should change according

250
00:13:27.875 --> 00:13:29.775
the, to the context of course.

251
00:13:30.355 --> 00:13:33.935
So we need to take into account the circumstances in which

252
00:13:33.935 --> 00:13:36.135
presidential behavior takes place.

253
00:13:37.655 --> 00:13:41.275
Now, you asked me what other personal characteristics,

254
00:13:41.745 --> 00:13:43.795
certainly other psychological

255
00:13:44.095 --> 00:13:47.155
and extra psychological characteristics of the leaders

256
00:13:47.815 --> 00:13:50.395
are relevant in terms of personality.

257
00:13:51.355 --> 00:13:54.395
I think a natural starting point is to examine

258
00:13:54.815 --> 00:13:57.995
how the big five core personality, personality traits

259
00:13:58.185 --> 00:14:01.955
that we all humans share have an impact on

260
00:14:02.225 --> 00:14:03.275
executive governance.

261
00:14:04.535 --> 00:14:07.785
Regarding, extra psychological characteristics,

262
00:14:08.585 --> 00:14:12.025
I think we need to think of central components

263
00:14:12.575 --> 00:14:16.985
that explain human behavior, such as level of education,

264
00:14:18.045 --> 00:14:22.625
soc, socioeconomic origin, gender, age, ethnicity,

265
00:14:23.545 --> 00:14:27.185
religion, whether the leaders had experience in security

266
00:14:27.185 --> 00:14:29.585
forces in regular organizations

267
00:14:30.125 --> 00:14:32.185
as entrepreneurs or in academia.

268
00:14:32.835 --> 00:14:35.625
These are important components that should shape

269
00:14:36.045 --> 00:14:40.545
how leaders see the world and therefore how they act in it.

270
00:14:42.845 --> 00:14:46.415
From a more distant perspective, I think

271
00:14:46.415 --> 00:14:49.175
that there are three types of fundamental questions

272
00:14:49.485 --> 00:14:52.245
that we need to address about national political leaders.

273
00:14:54.395 --> 00:14:58.265
First, what explains their selection to power?

274
00:14:59.165 --> 00:15:01.865
Why certain individuals are elected

275
00:15:02.165 --> 00:15:05.145
or selected to take office and not others?

276
00:15:06.185 --> 00:15:08.905
A second question is, what drives the leaders

277
00:15:09.295 --> 00:15:10.745
performance in office?

278
00:15:11.655 --> 00:15:14.505
What are the characteristics of these successful leaders?

279
00:15:15.445 --> 00:15:19.225
And finally, which leaders attain historical prominence?

280
00:15:19.925 --> 00:15:23.905
Who are the leaders that become so consequential

281
00:15:24.135 --> 00:15:25.785
that they make it into history?

282
00:15:26.645 --> 00:15:30.185
So the ultimate, the ultimate goal of my research is

283
00:15:30.205 --> 00:15:33.065
to address these important questions.

Exploring Presidential Behavior and Term Limit Overreach

00:00:00 - I first conducted an exploratory analysis to understand presidential behavior. I, I went to nine countries and did, semi-structured interviews with 24 Latin American presidents. So, these leaders discussed whether their individual characteristics had an impact from their performance in office, the contexts in which they govern, and the relationships they have with their constitutions. These interviews helped me to, to understand presidential behavior,

00:00:35 - to attempt to overstay overstaying office. And, and I propose that the characteristics of, dominant individuals are associated with the presidential attempts to relax. Term limits dominant individuals are, people inclined to impose their will, and they're not very afraid of challenging others. These are characteristics that a health presidents to continue their efforts to retain office

00:01:07 - So, for example, Hondura military overthrew Manuel Alia in 2009 to prevent him from overstaying in office, in, in Wai violent protests, induced president Orio Cortez to abandon his reformation efforts in 2017. Dominant individuals also enjoy controlling their contexts and have a drive for control and, and overreaching.

Dominance and Legacy in Presidential Leadership

00:01:38 - and lead others because they need to gain the support of other politicians to succeed in the reformation attempts. Another characteristics is that, dominant individuals are highly motivated, todo others, and over staying in office allows presidents to have a, to leave a bigger legacy than their predecessors dominant presidents should be of the kind that they particularly dislike, stepping down from office

00:02:10 - Then, to measure the psychometric characteristics of presidents, I conducted a survey among hundreds of experts on American and Latin American presidents who were asked to fill out psychometric scales, validated in personality research. This was an enormous effort because it is extremely difficult to find experts on presidents, especially for presidents

00:02:39 - and poorer countries. However, after an extensive, process research assistance, and I managed to find more than 1000 experts and several hundred evaluated 152 presidents who were governing from 1945 to 2012, I have recently expanded the survey in, in a, in a more recent wave. So now, 228 presidents who ruled

Psychometric Insights on Presidential Dominance and Term Limits

00:03:14 - talking about dominance. There are different psychotic scales that dominance and I decided to follow the operationalization used in the International Personality Item pool because it captures the characteristics that I mentioned and that should motivate presence to attempt to relax their term limits. This scale identifies individuals who like to impose their will, are not afraid of challenging

00:03:45 - And they're also motivated, as discussed, motivated to do others. So in the statistical analysis, I found that there's an almost 0% chance that precedents who score low in dominance will attempt to relax their term limits, but the probabilities of an attempt increased up to 16% when the leaders have the maximum score of dominance. The findings do not suggest that the rules about term limits are poorly designed.

00:04:16 - the Constitution can be amended by an absolute majority, which is a low threshold, but in most countries, it is not an easy endeavor. So, for example, in the years of my sample, which covers between 90 45 and 2012, the most typical rule demands that at least two thirds of Congress plus an additional step is necessary to amend the Constitution. It's very difficult. Several of the presidents attempted to relax their term limits, eh, breaking the rules.

Constitutional Erosion in Latin America: The Case of Najib Kelley

00:04:52 - The last Latin American president who managed to bypass the constitution to remain in office was Najib Kelley of El Salvador. in 2021, the Salvador Constitution has four articles that in different ways for big presidential reelection. However, BKE was able to run for reelection this year in 2024, because a subservient Supreme Court said that he could

00:05:24 - what really is an open violation of the Constitution. So the lesson from this exper experience is that institutional design is certainly important, but if the rules are not enforced, then they lose relevance. And the problem in many of the American countries is that the rules are unstable or are weakly enforced, or both. with respect to to the political culture,

00:05:58 - and elite behavior because the current elites may try to change the rules because the rules are unstable and the rules are unstable because the leads change them. This is a very difficult problem to solve. I would like to distinguish, between, changing the rules of presidential term limits, which is not necessarily bad for democracy and attempts of presidents who try

Impacts of Overreaching Leadership on Democracy

00:06:28 - so they can oversay in office. So the second is what I study, and the consequences are generally bad for democracy. There is evidence that the country's democracy scores decline under this type of overreaching leaders, and some countries even experience regime changes. Argentina with Juan Domingo, Peron Honduras with

00:07:01 - and their Ugo Chavez. All these countries moved from being semi democracies into authoritarian regimes. And in all these processes, presidents were able to retain power because they relaxed their term limits. So if you look at historical record, you'll find that some of the most influential Larry Meghan presidents attained historical prominence after they were able to overstay in office.

00:07:31 - who relax term limits under undermine democracy regime attributes mainly through two paths. First, they assault democratic institutions. these leaders undermine the law by showing that people in power can change the rules to hold on to their positions and extend their term in their timing office. Additionally, leaders who stay in power for a long time weakened the checks and balances

Political Experience and Democratic Erosion

00:08:03 - through more appointments in areas like the bureaucracy, courts and the military. Second, these leaders erode democratic norms by constraining political competition. These leaders enjoy an incumbent advantage, including access to governmental resources and name recognition, and the voters aversion to change. So the records show that presidents who run for

00:08:34 - and the presidents who relax their term limits once often try again and succeed. In the interviews I conducted with former presidents, several of them remarked how relevant having political experience is for go. Research has also associated political inexperience with unconventional behavior. So building in these insights, in this paper, I proposed that political inexperienced residents are more likely

00:09:08 - First, politically inexperienced ENTs are more prone to overlook all the challenges that are involved in trying to relax their term limits. This happens because they're unfamiliar with, governmental procedures and practices, and because they do not have experience with electoral and policy defeats, so they're not used to making concessions to rivals and achieving incremental changes in some,

Political Inexperience and Overreaching Behavior in Leadership

00:09:40 - chances of success. Second, these leaders are more likely to underestimate the backlash that their overreaching beha behavior will receive. Individuals who reach the presidency with little socialization in politics are not very constrained by elite networks and are unfamiliar with democratic norms such as making concessions to rivals. So they have succeeded

00:10:11 - not their ties with traditional political parties. Other political elite members do not have much influence on their behavior. Now, how to measure political experience is quite a challenge. It is not a straightforward, I used a free measures. The main one is based on the formal political positions the president's held before reaching the presidency.

00:10:41 - who had an executive and legislative trajectory, followed by leaders with either legislative or executive executive experience than those who held one or more positions at the subnational level. And the least experienced were those who had no formal experience whatsoever before becoming presidents in, and several leaders fall in this category as a robustness.

Impact of Political Experience on Term Limit Relaxation

00:11:14 - spent in a position and with a, with a dichotomous variable that distinguished between leaders who had political experience before reaching office and those who did not. So, I found that when a leader is highly political experienced, the likelihood that he or she will attempt to remove term limits is only 1.4%. However, when the presidents have no previous political

00:11:45 - to relax their time limits increases to 9%. There you go. That's important data. So where does, where do you think future research should be in this area? Yeah, so, I study national political leaders because their position is highly consequential for the societies they rule. Yet we still have a limited understanding of the difference that they make in office. Heads of government are undermining democratic attributes

00:12:20 - of which leaders ERO democracy is lacking. We ignore, for example, if overreaching leaders share individual characteristics that make them more prone to undermine democracy. And if we do not know whether anti-democratic leaders share specific commonalities, then the chances of identifying them and learning how to stop them are drastically reduced. The results, from my work suggests

Examining Leader Characteristics and Their Political Impact

00:12:53 - from differential psychology and treat and developed differences of leaders as independent variables. Examining how the characteristics of leaders relate to political outcomes will allow us to understand the true impact that leaders make across situations in which their actions are central in presidential systems. For example, in legislating declaring emergencies or appointing cabinet members, the relevance

00:13:27 - the, to the context of course. So we need to take into account the circumstances in which presidential behavior takes place. Now, you asked me what other personal characteristics, certainly other psychological and extra psychological characteristics of the leaders are relevant in terms of personality. I think a natural starting point is to examine

00:13:58 - that we all humans share have an impact on executive governance. Regarding, extra psychological characteristics, I think we need to think of central components that explain human behavior, such as level of education, soc, socioeconomic origin, gender, age, ethnicity, religion, whether the leaders had experience in security

Exploring the Dynamics of Political Leadership

00:14:30 - as entrepreneurs or in academia. These are important components that should shape how leaders see the world and therefore how they act in it. From a more distant perspective, I think that there are three types of fundamental questions that we need to address about national political leaders. First, what explains their selection to power?

00:15:02 - or selected to take office and not others? A second question is, what drives the leaders performance in office? What are the characteristics of these successful leaders? And finally, which leaders attain historical prominence? Who are the leaders that become so consequential that they make it into history? So the ultimate, the ultimate goal of my research is

00:15:30 -

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis

Data

Originals

Explainers

Podcasts

Faculti

New on Faculti

Idea Explorer

Definition

News Context

Critical Questions and Answers

Research Summaries

Dominant Personality and Politically Inexperienced Presidents Challenge Term Limits

Media Literacy Toolkit

Critical Questions to Consider ▼

Bias and Perspective Awareness ▼

Further Reading ▼