Popular in Social Sciences

Political Science

V-Dem’s Conceptions of Democracy and Their Consequences

University of Notre Dame Michael Coppedge

Central Monetary Authorities

Macroeconomic modelling of CBDC: a critical review

European Central Bank Ulrich Bindseil

Social Identities and Divisions

A new explanation of antisemitism: Jew hatred as a civilisational phenomenon

Boston University Liah Greenfeld

Central Monetary Authorities

Financing Private Credit

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Nina Boyarchenko

Economics

Failing Banks

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Emil Verner

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

American Politics

Murmurations of Injustice: Dynamics of Structural Injustice and Epistemic Oppression

View more insights in Social Sciences - Political Science - Political Theory

View more figures from Vanderbilt University

View the page of Brooke Ackerly

Read the Study

Next in Political Science

The Liberalism of Refuge

Bryan Garsten | Yale University

Do Billboard Advertisements Increase Voter Turnout?

Donald Green | Columbia University

Structural injustice refers to systemic social, political, and economic inequalities that are embedded within institutions and societal structures, disproportionately disadvantaging certain groups while maintaining power imbalances.

Image courtesy of interviewee. November 7, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video discusses the concept of structural injustice, characterized as injustices that often manifest more visibly in their consequences rather than through the underlying processes that create them. The author highlights that structural injustices arise from political, economic, and social institutions that allow significant harms, such as famine and climate change, to occur, even though many people recognize these issues as unacceptable.

The metaphor of "murmuration," which refers to the behavior of starlings flocking together to evade predators, is employed to illustrate how individuals are interconnected within these systems of injustice. Just as starlings react to each other’s movements, people respond to the behaviors of those around them in social contexts, which can perpetuate structural injustices.

Furthermore, the text introduces the concept of epistemology, or the study of knowledge and belief, discussing how individuals discern fact from opinion and how societal influences shape these discernments. Political epistemology highlights shared norms and beliefs that guide how people process information.

In discussing feminism and other political theories, the text emphasizes the dynamic nature of societal evolution in confronting injustices and how different ideas can either unify or divide communities. By understanding these dynamics, individuals can potentially foster change within their social contexts. The author encourages a view of political community as one where individuals can engage in constructive dialogue to navigate differing opinions and beliefs, ultimately facilitating progress toward addressing structural injustices.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are five key points from the video discussing structural injustice and its relation to social behavior and epistemology:

1. **Definition of Structural Injustice**: Structural injustice refers to the systemic and institutional frameworks that create and perpetuate injustices, such as famine and climate change. The real injustice lies not in the observable harms, but in the political, economic, and social structures that enable these harms to occur.

2. **Visibility of Consequences vs. Processes**: The video emphasizes that the consequences of structural injustice, like famine and climate change, are often more visible than the underlying processes and institutions that create these conditions. This makes it challenging for individuals to recognize and address the root causes of these injustices.

3. **Metaphor of Murmuration**: The phenomenon of murmuration among starlings is used as a metaphor to illustrate how individuals are embedded in social and institutional structures that influence their behavior. Just as starlings react to the movements of those around them, people also respond to the behaviors and opinions within their social and political communities, often without realizing the extent of this influence.

4. **Epistemology and Political Understanding**: The concept of epistemology, or the way individuals process information and distinguish between facts and opinions, is important in understanding structural injustice. Political epistemology recognizes that people's beliefs and behaviors are influenced by shared social, political, and economic relations, which can shape how they interpret injustice.

5. **Feminism and Political Theory**: The video discusses how feminist thought and other political theories can lead to shifts in understanding structural injustice. It describes how differing opinions and experiences within a community can create divisions (or "clouds"), illustrating that new ideas can either unite or pull apart political communities, impacting collective understanding and action against injustice.

Export as PDF
Here are some key quotes from the video on structural injustice, each emphasizing crucial concepts discussed:

1. **Definition of Structural Injustice**:
- "Structural injustice describes a category of injustice that is... capacious... It's those problems that are the most pressing, because it's hard for many of us to agree on what kind of problem they are, let alone, what the scope and scale is."

2. **Understanding the Harm vs. Injustice**:
- "The famine is a harm, but it's not the injustice. The injustice is the political, economic and social structures of the world that enable that to take place when any given person observing that would say that's not okay."

3. **Visibility of Injustices**:
- "By structural injustice, I mean those kinds of injustices that are more easily seen in their consequences than they are in the processes, the institutions that create them."

4. **Murmuration Metaphor**:
- "I use the metaphor of murmuration... because like those starlings, we also are embedded in those institutions and practices that make structural injustice happen."

5. **Awareness of Influence**:
- "We may not be aware of how our behaviors, our ideas, what we say, influence the seven birds around us, and yet they do."

6. **Epistemology and Its Role**:
- "Epistemology is... my way of taking in information and sorting it... In this political environment, for many people, those facts and opinions go so close together."

7. **Political Epistemology**:
- "Political epistemology is the recognition that a lot of [sharings] influence my behavior, influence how I'm thinking about things."

8. **Feminism and Structural Injustice**:
- "Feminism has had lots of moments throughout the history of political thought... that sparks maybe a shift in our understandings of structural injustice."

9. **Community Dynamics**:
- "Imagine we're sharing a political community and somebody experiences something and they don't say that's sexist, but their resistant behavior makes somebody go in one direction."

10. **Convideoual Variation**:
- "Once you're talking about an idea like feminism, you are no longer in a political theory world. You're in the world of people's concrete struggles."

These quotes encapsulate the core themes of the video, highlighting the complexity of structural injustice, the metaphor of murmuration to illustrate interconnected behaviors, the role of epistemology in understanding and addressing injustice, and the influence of feminist thought in the political landscape.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:00.285 --> 00:00:03.205
Structural injustice describes a category of injustice

2
00:00:03.995 --> 00:00:07.085
that is, I'm gonna use a big word,

3
00:00:07.275 --> 00:00:08.405
capacious, right?

4
00:00:09.155 --> 00:00:13.445
It's those problems that are the most pressing,

5
00:00:13.875 --> 00:00:17.605
because it's hard as for many of us

6
00:00:18.025 --> 00:00:22.485
to agree on what kind of problem they are, let alone,

7
00:00:22.555 --> 00:00:23.965
what the scope and scale is.

8
00:00:24.145 --> 00:00:25.325
So let me get concrete.

9
00:00:25.745 --> 00:00:29.085
Um, it's really hard to face,

10
00:00:29.425 --> 00:00:31.845
and yet we can see famine.

11
00:00:32.265 --> 00:00:34.925
Um, this week there's new news about climate change.

12
00:00:34.925 --> 00:00:36.725
We can see climate change.

13
00:00:37.305 --> 00:00:39.325
Um, we can see a financial crisis.

14
00:00:39.425 --> 00:00:40.485
We might not see it coming,

15
00:00:40.625 --> 00:00:43.205
but once we're embedded in it, we can certainly see it.

16
00:00:44.205 --> 00:00:48.765
Structural injustice, covers the broad category

17
00:00:49.025 --> 00:00:51.805
of all of the institutions

18
00:00:52.505 --> 00:00:54.965
and the legal processes

19
00:00:55.385 --> 00:00:59.965
and the informal, ways that we act with one another

20
00:01:00.475 --> 00:01:03.325
that create the conditions

21
00:01:03.825 --> 00:01:06.245
for those big harms to take place.

22
00:01:06.585 --> 00:01:09.845
The famine is a harm, but it's not the injustice.

23
00:01:10.105 --> 00:01:14.085
The injustice is the, the political, economic

24
00:01:14.185 --> 00:01:16.965
and social structures of the world that enable that

25
00:01:16.965 --> 00:01:20.045
to take place when any given person observing

26
00:01:20.045 --> 00:01:22.005
that would say that's not okay.

27
00:01:22.405 --> 00:01:23.765
Likewise, climate change.

28
00:01:23.835 --> 00:01:25.605
Anybody who knows there's climate change

29
00:01:26.115 --> 00:01:27.445
does not think it's okay.

30
00:01:27.945 --> 00:01:30.845
But it is very hard for us to observe the forces

31
00:01:30.955 --> 00:01:34.325
that have created that conditions that make it very hard

32
00:01:34.325 --> 00:01:37.045
for us to, to take a different course.

33
00:01:37.185 --> 00:01:41.485
So by structural injustice, I mean those kinds of injustices

34
00:01:42.035 --> 00:01:46.565
that are more easily seen in their consequences than they

35
00:01:46.565 --> 00:01:49.445
are in the processes, the institutions that create them.

36
00:01:49.965 --> 00:01:53.565
I use the metaphor of murmuration, which is

37
00:01:53.565 --> 00:01:56.325
that beautiful phenomenon you might see if you're out

38
00:01:56.325 --> 00:01:59.645
walking in na in nature, when you see a group

39
00:01:59.645 --> 00:02:01.725
of starlings following each other,

40
00:02:01.825 --> 00:02:04.125
and you might see one cloud go this way

41
00:02:04.145 --> 00:02:05.325
and one cloud go that way,

42
00:02:05.325 --> 00:02:07.725
and then all of a sudden they're all, going together

43
00:02:08.605 --> 00:02:10.765
where there might be one stray one,

44
00:02:10.765 --> 00:02:12.525
going off toward the horizon alone.

45
00:02:13.065 --> 00:02:17.085
Why does that happen? Because for a starling,

46
00:02:17.575 --> 00:02:19.125
there are too many threatening things,

47
00:02:19.865 --> 00:02:24.605
and it's too much work for us to, for any given bird to

48
00:02:25.535 --> 00:02:28.645
track all the potential predators, all the opportunities

49
00:02:28.705 --> 00:02:31.005
for food, which way the weather is going.

50
00:02:31.345 --> 00:02:34.645
And so each starling is responding to the behaviors

51
00:02:34.645 --> 00:02:36.245
of the seven starlings around them.

52
00:02:36.625 --> 00:02:39.325
And as a result, we, they follow each other.

53
00:02:39.785 --> 00:02:41.325
Um, though they don't have to.

54
00:02:41.625 --> 00:02:44.685
And as we know by that one who goes off, they can,

55
00:02:44.715 --> 00:02:46.645
they can come together, they can go apart.

56
00:02:47.145 --> 00:02:50.445
Why do I use the meta metaphor of murmuration

57
00:02:50.585 --> 00:02:52.085
to think about structural injustice?

58
00:02:53.015 --> 00:02:55.225
Because like those starlings,

59
00:02:55.885 --> 00:02:58.625
we also are embedded in those institutions and

60
00:02:58.865 --> 00:03:00.765
Practices that make structural injustice happen.

61
00:03:01.465 --> 00:03:05.245
And we may or may not be aware of how our behaviors,

62
00:03:05.545 --> 00:03:09.565
our ideas, what we say, influence the seven birds around us,

63
00:03:09.565 --> 00:03:10.885
influence the people around us.

64
00:03:11.265 --> 00:03:15.045
And yet they do. And so what I use this metaphor to,

65
00:03:15.045 --> 00:03:16.805
help us understand is the fact

66
00:03:16.805 --> 00:03:18.725
that we are embedded in structural injustice.

67
00:03:18.915 --> 00:03:21.085
It's not something outside us that we can look at.

68
00:03:21.905 --> 00:03:24.245
We have the capacity to affect change,

69
00:03:24.825 --> 00:03:28.925
but we may not be aware of either the injustice that cloud

70
00:03:28.925 --> 00:03:31.805
that we're in or how we can affect change within it.

71
00:03:31.805 --> 00:03:33.685
Epistemology is a pretty fancy word.

72
00:03:34.145 --> 00:03:37.845
Um, and, the first time I introduce it,

73
00:03:37.845 --> 00:03:42.805
say in a classroom, I might say it's, it's

74
00:03:43.505 --> 00:03:47.375
how you know what you know is fact

75
00:03:47.755 --> 00:03:49.455
or opinion, right?

76
00:03:49.455 --> 00:03:52.855
So my epistemology is my way of taking in information

77
00:03:53.275 --> 00:03:56.375
and sorting it and thinking, that's your opinion.

78
00:03:56.805 --> 00:03:58.095
That is an important fact.

79
00:03:58.595 --> 00:04:03.095
And in this political environment, for many people,

80
00:04:03.105 --> 00:04:05.495
those facts and opinions go so close together.

81
00:04:05.525 --> 00:04:06.695
It's hard to tell the difference.

82
00:04:07.235 --> 00:04:11.135
Um, so I think we can all understand that,

83
00:04:12.365 --> 00:04:14.775
that there is a difference between fact and opinion,

84
00:04:15.195 --> 00:04:16.895
but we don't always have a handle

85
00:04:16.895 --> 00:04:18.615
around what that different is.

86
00:04:19.625 --> 00:04:21.605
So why do I use epistemology

87
00:04:21.825 --> 00:04:23.485
to talk about structural injustice?

88
00:04:23.635 --> 00:04:25.245
That would be a reasonable question.

89
00:04:26.155 --> 00:04:31.105
Well, because you, I'm in that cloud of responding

90
00:04:31.105 --> 00:04:33.745
to other people's behaviors, one

91
00:04:33.745 --> 00:04:34.865
of the things I'm responding

92
00:04:34.865 --> 00:04:36.985
to is the information they give me.

93
00:04:37.765 --> 00:04:41.965
Am I following the opinion of somebody I agree with,

94
00:04:42.185 --> 00:04:43.405
or somebody I respect?

95
00:04:43.945 --> 00:04:47.405
Or am I taking in new information from somebody I don't

96
00:04:47.405 --> 00:04:50.205
agree with or I haven't had respect for

97
00:04:50.385 --> 00:04:52.525
and I'm learning something entirely new?

98
00:04:53.075 --> 00:04:56.205
Both of those things happen to us in real life, and we may

99
00:04:56.205 --> 00:04:58.325
or may not respond to them,

100
00:04:58.665 --> 00:05:00.525
in the same way at every given time.

101
00:05:01.185 --> 00:05:04.885
But how we sort through that, that's our epistemology.

102
00:05:05.115 --> 00:05:06.405
They are ways in which you

103
00:05:06.465 --> 00:05:09.685
and I share some epistemological assumptions.

104
00:05:09.825 --> 00:05:11.925
We have some things that we would both agree

105
00:05:11.985 --> 00:05:13.205
or fact versus opinion.

106
00:05:13.745 --> 00:05:15.765
Um, you might think about a football match

107
00:05:15.765 --> 00:05:17.645
or a soccer match in which,

108
00:05:18.085 --> 00:05:20.445
a goal clearly is a good goal.

109
00:05:20.865 --> 00:05:23.165
And then you can think about moments when you've been

110
00:05:23.325 --> 00:05:25.845
watching a sporting event, when there's some tension

111
00:05:25.985 --> 00:05:29.165
around whether the referees will agree that

112
00:05:29.165 --> 00:05:30.365
that was indeed a goal,

113
00:05:30.465 --> 00:05:32.165
or everybody was where they were supposed

114
00:05:32.165 --> 00:05:33.605
to be when that that goal took place.

115
00:05:34.145 --> 00:05:38.845
So, we can all see epistemology at work,

116
00:05:39.385 --> 00:05:40.765
in those sorts of examples.

117
00:05:41.315 --> 00:05:44.445
What we may not be aware of is when we share them,

118
00:05:45.075 --> 00:05:46.685
when we don't share them.

119
00:05:46.785 --> 00:05:51.365
So, political epistemology is the recognition that a lot

120
00:05:51.705 --> 00:05:54.765
of what I use to sort out fact and opinion

121
00:05:55.505 --> 00:05:56.765
and then influence

122
00:05:56.785 --> 00:05:58.965
My behavior, influence how I'm thinking about things.

123
00:05:59.305 --> 00:06:01.045
But a lot of that is shared.

124
00:06:01.755 --> 00:06:05.605
It's shared, shared through my social political

125
00:06:06.025 --> 00:06:07.445
and economic relations.

126
00:06:07.625 --> 00:06:09.805
I'm a political theorist, right?

127
00:06:10.205 --> 00:06:13.325
I think about how we think we should live together

128
00:06:14.215 --> 00:06:15.995
and over the history of time.

129
00:06:16.235 --> 00:06:18.675
I don't generally go back too far before Aris bottle.

130
00:06:19.335 --> 00:06:23.875
Um, but over time, over millennium, we millennia we have

131
00:06:24.255 --> 00:06:27.315
as a society thought in different ways about

132
00:06:27.375 --> 00:06:28.435
how we should live together.

133
00:06:28.895 --> 00:06:32.155
And over that time, in different cultures, we have lots

134
00:06:32.155 --> 00:06:35.355
of different opinions about we've, we've developed

135
00:06:35.415 --> 00:06:37.675
and explored lots of different theories.

136
00:06:37.675 --> 00:06:39.555
Sometimes they come into contact with each other,

137
00:06:39.625 --> 00:06:42.035
sometimes they have developed independently,

138
00:06:42.035 --> 00:06:43.635
and it's quite late in their development

139
00:06:43.635 --> 00:06:45.115
that they come in contact with one another.

140
00:06:45.935 --> 00:06:48.245
Feminism has had lots

141
00:06:48.245 --> 00:06:50.445
of moments throughout the history of political thought.

142
00:06:51.425 --> 00:06:56.085
And at each of those moments, it is a way

143
00:06:56.105 --> 00:06:58.645
of thinking about how we should live together.

144
00:06:58.915 --> 00:07:03.245
That sparks maybe a shift in our understandings

145
00:07:03.265 --> 00:07:04.525
of structural injustice.

146
00:07:05.295 --> 00:07:07.525
Often initially. Think about those murmuration.

147
00:07:07.525 --> 00:07:08.885
They don't always come to together.

148
00:07:09.555 --> 00:07:12.565
Sometimes a murmuration creates two clouds,

149
00:07:12.565 --> 00:07:15.365
and you see these birds go off in different directions.

150
00:07:15.465 --> 00:07:18.765
So one of the things that feminism, one

151
00:07:18.765 --> 00:07:20.805
of the reasons the, the, lemme start again.

152
00:07:21.765 --> 00:07:25.385
The metaphor of murmuration can help us think about the

153
00:07:25.385 --> 00:07:27.265
influence of feminism in any given

154
00:07:27.895 --> 00:07:29.025
area of political thought.

155
00:07:29.085 --> 00:07:32.785
So imagine, we're sharing a political community

156
00:07:33.445 --> 00:07:35.545
and somebody experiences something

157
00:07:35.545 --> 00:07:38.775
and they don't say that's sexist,

158
00:07:39.075 --> 00:07:40.295
but they resist

159
00:07:40.885 --> 00:07:44.975
that resistant behavior makes somebody go in one direction.

160
00:07:45.075 --> 00:07:48.175
And some others say, me too, and they go along too.

161
00:07:48.715 --> 00:07:50.575
And others say, no, not that.

162
00:07:50.675 --> 00:07:52.775
And so now we have these two clouds,

163
00:07:53.075 --> 00:07:54.615
and they may not be that far apart,

164
00:07:55.075 --> 00:07:57.415
but instead of following one another,

165
00:07:57.445 --> 00:07:59.335
what we're experiencing is the pushing.

166
00:07:59.995 --> 00:08:02.855
So feminism, decolonial, political thought,

167
00:08:02.855 --> 00:08:04.735
post-colonial political thought,

168
00:08:05.025 --> 00:08:06.535
indigenous political thought.

169
00:08:07.315 --> 00:08:10.045
Um, Confucian political thought.

170
00:08:10.045 --> 00:08:12.565
I mean, throughout, throughout political history,

171
00:08:13.255 --> 00:08:17.485
there are examples of people trying to think differently

172
00:08:18.375 --> 00:08:21.965
about what they're experiencing in their political time

173
00:08:22.305 --> 00:08:24.245
and what that means for how we should live together.

174
00:08:25.025 --> 00:08:29.245
And feminism is one of the ones that has created rifts,

175
00:08:29.665 --> 00:08:33.485
but it has also created, what would be the right word?

176
00:08:33.775 --> 00:08:35.645
Flows. It's shifted in a direction.

177
00:08:36.025 --> 00:08:39.565
Um, we can talk about that generally,

178
00:08:40.265 --> 00:08:44.605
but we should also think about how that varies by context.

179
00:08:45.515 --> 00:08:48.085
Once you're talking about an idea like feminism,

180
00:08:48.425 --> 00:08:51.005
you are no longer in a political theory world.

181
00:08:51.425 --> 00:08:54.685
You're in the world of people's concrete struggles and they

182
00:08:54.685 --> 00:08:56.165
Look different by place

183
00:08:56.745 --> 00:08:59.445
and by time, and by who's around them.

184
00:08:59.805 --> 00:09:03.125
I came to this one day actually when my stepmother sent me a

185
00:09:03.715 --> 00:09:08.165
beautiful video of murmuration taking place at the coast.

186
00:09:08.865 --> 00:09:12.565
Um, I hadn't been using this metaphor prior to that

187
00:09:12.585 --> 00:09:14.125
to understand this phenomena.

188
00:09:15.835 --> 00:09:18.675
I have found it since then. So useful.

189
00:09:19.425 --> 00:09:22.875
It's useful for helping me see what I'm observing.

190
00:09:23.175 --> 00:09:25.395
New ideas do push our thinking,

191
00:09:25.455 --> 00:09:28.115
but are they pushing us or pulling us?

192
00:09:28.535 --> 00:09:31.275
The metaphor of motivations helps us see

193
00:09:31.345 --> 00:09:33.755
that both things can be happening at once.

194
00:09:34.455 --> 00:09:38.355
And we can be involved in a, a shared political community

195
00:09:38.375 --> 00:09:40.275
and think very differently about the

196
00:09:40.275 --> 00:09:41.515
direction that we should go.

197
00:09:42.255 --> 00:09:46.435
We might have a conversation to make that shift in a way

198
00:09:46.435 --> 00:09:48.355
that neither of us feel pushed.

199
00:09:48.805 --> 00:09:50.355
We're rather pulling each other,

200
00:09:50.605 --> 00:09:52.475
we're drawing each other to new ideas.

201
00:09:53.095 --> 00:09:55.715
Or you can see in political communities

202
00:09:55.715 --> 00:09:59.355
and maybe, if we're thinking about this particular

203
00:09:59.355 --> 00:10:02.755
political moment, we might see that it looks more divisive,

204
00:10:02.975 --> 00:10:05.875
than it has at other moments in history.

Understanding Structural Injustice and Its Impact

00:00:00 - Structural injustice describes a category of injustice that is, I'm gonna use a big word, capacious, right? It's those problems that are the most pressing, because it's hard as for many of us to agree on what kind of problem they are, let alone, what the scope and scale is. So let me get concrete. it's really hard to face, and yet we can see famine.

00:00:34 - We can see climate change. we can see a financial crisis. We might not see it coming, but once we're embedded in it, we can certainly see it. Structural injustice, covers the broad category of all of the institutions and the legal processes and the informal, ways that we act with one another that create the conditions

00:01:06 - The famine is a harm, but it's not the injustice. The injustice is the, the political, economic and social structures of the world that enable that to take place when any given person observing that would say that's not okay. Likewise, climate change. Anybody who knows there's climate change does not think it's okay. But it is very hard for us to observe the forces that have created that conditions that make it very hard

Understanding Structural Injustice Through Murmuration

00:01:37 - So by structural injustice, I mean those kinds of injustices that are more easily seen in their consequences than they are in the processes, the institutions that create them. I use the metaphor of murmuration, which is that beautiful phenomenon you might see if you're out walking in na in nature, when you see a group of starlings following each other, and you might see one cloud go this way and one cloud go that way,

00:02:08 - where there might be one stray one, going off toward the horizon alone. Why does that happen? Because for a starling, there are too many threatening things, and it's too much work for us to, for any given bird to track all the potential predators, all the opportunities for food, which way the weather is going. And so each starling is responding to the behaviors of the seven starlings around them.

00:02:39 - though they don't have to. And as we know by that one who goes off, they can, they can come together, they can go apart. Why do I use the meta metaphor of murmuration to think about structural injustice? Because like those starlings, we also are embedded in those institutions and Practices that make structural injustice happen. And we may or may not be aware of how our behaviors, our ideas, what we say, influence the seven birds around us,

Understanding Structural Injustice and Epistemology

00:03:11 - And yet they do. And so what I use this metaphor to, help us understand is the fact that we are embedded in structural injustice. It's not something outside us that we can look at. We have the capacity to affect change, but we may not be aware of either the injustice that cloud that we're in or how we can affect change within it. Epistemology is a pretty fancy word. and, the first time I introduce it, say in a classroom, I might say it's, it's

00:03:47 - or opinion, right? So my epistemology is my way of taking in information and sorting it and thinking, that's your opinion. That is an important fact. And in this political environment, for many people, those facts and opinions go so close together. It's hard to tell the difference. so I think we can all understand that, that there is a difference between fact and opinion,

00:04:16 - around what that different is. So why do I use epistemology to talk about structural injustice? That would be a reasonable question. Well, because you, I'm in that cloud of responding to other people's behaviors, one of the things I'm responding to is the information they give me. Am I following the opinion of somebody I agree with, or somebody I respect? Or am I taking in new information from somebody I don't

Exploring Epistemology and Shared Understanding

00:04:50 - and I'm learning something entirely new? Both of those things happen to us in real life, and we may or may not respond to them, in the same way at every given time. But how we sort through that, that's our epistemology. They are ways in which you and I share some epistemological assumptions. We have some things that we would both agree or fact versus opinion. you might think about a football match or a soccer match in which,

00:05:20 - And then you can think about moments when you've been watching a sporting event, when there's some tension around whether the referees will agree that that was indeed a goal, or everybody was where they were supposed to be when that that goal took place. So, we can all see epistemology at work, in those sorts of examples. What we may not be aware of is when we share them, when we don't share them. So, political epistemology is the recognition that a lot

00:05:55 - and then influence My behavior, influence how I'm thinking about things. But a lot of that is shared. It's shared, shared through my social political and economic relations. I'm a political theorist, right? I think about how we think we should live together and over the history of time. I don't generally go back too far before Aris bottle. but over time, over millennium, we millennia we have

Feminism and the Dynamics of Political Community

00:06:27 - how we should live together. And over that time, in different cultures, we have lots of different opinions about we've, we've developed and explored lots of different theories. Sometimes they come into contact with each other, sometimes they have developed independently, and it's quite late in their development that they come in contact with one another. Feminism has had lots of moments throughout the history of political thought. And at each of those moments, it is a way

00:06:58 - That sparks maybe a shift in our understandings of structural injustice. Often initially. Think about those murmuration. They don't always come to together. Sometimes a murmuration creates two clouds, and you see these birds go off in different directions. So one of the things that feminism, one of the reasons the, the, lemme start again. The metaphor of murmuration can help us think about the influence of feminism in any given

00:07:29 - So imagine, we're sharing a political community and somebody experiences something and they don't say that's sexist, but they resist that resistant behavior makes somebody go in one direction. And some others say, me too, and they go along too. And others say, no, not that. And so now we have these two clouds, and they may not be that far apart, but instead of following one another, what we're experiencing is the pushing.

Feminism and Diverse Political Thought: Contextual Influences on Social Struggles

00:08:02 - post-colonial political thought, indigenous political thought. Confucian political thought. I mean, throughout, throughout political history, there are examples of people trying to think differently about what they're experiencing in their political time and what that means for how we should live together. And feminism is one of the ones that has created rifts, but it has also created, what would be the right word?

00:08:36 - we can talk about that generally, but we should also think about how that varies by context. Once you're talking about an idea like feminism, you are no longer in a political theory world. You're in the world of people's concrete struggles and they Look different by place and by time, and by who's around them. I came to this one day actually when my stepmother sent me a beautiful video of murmuration taking place at the coast.

00:09:12 - to understand this phenomena. I have found it since then. So useful. It's useful for helping me see what I'm observing. New ideas do push our thinking, but are they pushing us or pulling us? The metaphor of motivations helps us see that both things can be happening at once. And we can be involved in a, a shared political community and think very differently about the

Shifting Perspectives: Nurturing Dialogue in Political Communities

00:10:02 - We might have a conversation to make that shift in a way that neither of us feel pushed. We're rather pulling each other, we're drawing each other to new ideas. Or you can see in political communities and maybe, if we're thinking about this particular political moment, we might see that it looks more divisive, than it has at other moments in history.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis