Popular in Political Science

American Politics

Keeping the Republic

Boston College Marc Landy

British Politics

Entrepreneurial thinking: the politics and practice of policy impact

University of Sheffield Matthew Flinders

Asian Politics

The Politics of Knowledge in Development

University of Delhi Madhulika Banerjee

American Politics

Fifty years of declining confidence and increasing polarization in trust

University of California Berkeley Henry Brady

American Politics

The Opening Dilemma

Cornell University Richard Bensel

Political Economy

Wait and See?

University of Liverpool Mariaelisa Epifanio

Political Science

The Colonialist Roots of Democratic Decay

University of California Los Angeles Richard D. Anderson, Jr

Parties and Elections: An End to Canadian Exceptionalism?

View more insights in Social Sciences - Political Science - Canadian Politics

View more figures from St. Francis Xavier University

View the page of James Bickerton

Read the Book

No related posts found.

James Bickerton provides an overview of the Canadian party system, speaks to the long-term factors that have combined in the past to produce the unique character of the party system, and whether a “Canadian exceptionalism” will persist.

Image courtesy of interviewee. April 3, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video video discusses the evolution of regionalism and party systems in Canadian politics. It outlines how regionalism influences the political landscape and the dominant role of the Liberal Party throughout various party systems.

1. **Exceptionalism**: Canada’s political landscape is deemed exceptional compared to similar countries, primarily due to its centrist Liberal Party and lack of class-based voting.

2. **Party Systems**: This video video identifies four distinct party systems in Canada’s history:
- The **first party system** (1867-1921) featured two national parties, alternating in power, until disrupted by changes in party dynamics.
- The **second party system** (post-1921) arose after World War I, with the emergence of new regional and populist parties and the Liberal Party maintaining dominance.
- The **third party system** (1961-1984) saw the rise of the New Democratic Party (NDP), alongside Liberals and Conservatives, with a focus on urban and left-leaning policies under Pierre Trudeau.
- The **fourth party system** emerged in the 1980s, characterized by ideological polarization, with shifts in power dynamics leading to the Conservative Party replacing the Progressive Conservatives after Brian Mulroney’s leadership.

3. **Current Trends**: This video video suggests that while the Liberals have historically dominated, recent elections (2015 onwards) led to minority governments and increased competition from conservatively polarized parties. It posits that Canada may be moving away from its exceptionalism towards a more ideologically divided party system, mirroring left-right polarization, while still facing the influences of cultural politics, particularly from Quebec.

In summary, the text details Canada’s unique political trajectory, shaped by regionalism and evolving party systems, exploring the potential shifts towards a more ideologically polarized landscape.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.000 --> 00:02.845
Throughout my career, I've been interested particularly in

00:02.845 --> 00:05.565
the question of, regionalism in Canada,

00:05.775 --> 00:07.965
which is a prominent feature of our politics,

00:08.465 --> 00:10.565
and especially how it affected the party system.

00:11.275 --> 00:13.885
When you look at the literature on party politics in Canada,

00:14.625 --> 00:17.405
it, it does quite strongly make the case

00:17.405 --> 00:19.885
that Canada is somewhat exceptional compared

00:19.885 --> 00:22.965
to similar countries using similar political systems.

00:23.785 --> 00:27.525
Um, and that exceptionalism is, partially rooted in

00:28.205 --> 00:31.365
regionalism, but mostly related to the fact that

00:31.905 --> 00:34.925
our party politics has been dominated by a centrist party,

00:35.665 --> 00:37.165
the liberal party of Canada.

00:37.865 --> 00:40.445
Uh, we haven't had the kind of class-based voting

00:40.835 --> 00:43.885
that is common in a lot of other countries like ours.

00:44.705 --> 00:49.445
And, as a result of that, we have had,

00:50.395 --> 00:52.085
like I said, a dominant liberal party,

00:52.145 --> 00:56.005
but also, very successful region based

00:56.515 --> 01:00.005
insurgent parties, protest parties that have been a feature

01:00.005 --> 01:02.605
of the system since, 1921, really.

01:03.305 --> 01:06.245
Um, so that results in a lot

01:06.245 --> 01:08.405
of minority governments, in Canada.

01:09.145 --> 01:11.765
So there's a, there's a series of things all interrelated,

01:12.385 --> 01:15.685
that make Canada somewhat, exceptional compared to,

01:15.825 --> 01:17.125
similar countries.

01:17.505 --> 01:20.885
Canada basically has had a number of realigning elections.

01:21.925 --> 01:23.265
So on a, on a more

01:23.265 --> 01:24.265
or less regular basis,

01:24.735 --> 01:26.785
there's been a big change in the party system.

01:27.565 --> 01:31.145
So much so that it kind of introduces a new party system.

01:31.725 --> 01:34.025
So we can think about Canadian party politics,

01:34.025 --> 01:35.545
and this is common in the literature

01:36.425 --> 01:38.365
as a sequence of party systems.

01:38.995 --> 01:40.765
Each one different from the one before it.

01:41.465 --> 01:43.725
And we're in the fourth one now.

01:44.025 --> 01:46.205
So the first party system was really

01:47.075 --> 01:51.725
from Confederation in 1867 up until the election of 1921,

01:51.865 --> 01:53.565
the first post-war election.

01:54.505 --> 01:58.245
And that's the period of normal party politics in Canada.

01:58.395 --> 02:02.965
That is to say, two national parties alternating in power,

02:03.915 --> 02:07.205
more or less, making similar appeals to different regions,

02:07.205 --> 02:08.765
classes and language groups.

02:09.385 --> 02:11.605
So you get this classic two party system.

02:12.475 --> 02:14.495
But even within that first party system,

02:14.495 --> 02:18.945
there was a realigning election, in 1896.

02:18.965 --> 02:21.745
Before that, the conservatives were dominant under the

02:21.745 --> 02:24.025
leadership of really the country's founders.

02:24.125 --> 02:26.125
So John A. McDonald. And then

02:26.125 --> 02:29.805
after 1896 party politics became dominated

02:29.865 --> 02:31.125
by the liberals

02:31.745 --> 02:34.765
and they were under the leadership of Sir Wilford Laurier.

02:34.945 --> 02:39.045
But the key to their newfound dominance was

02:39.635 --> 02:42.765
they began to make a special appeal to French Canada.

02:43.665 --> 02:46.365
Of course, French Canada constituted one third of all

02:46.365 --> 02:47.685
of Canadian population,

02:48.505 --> 02:51.245
and the liberals got a stranglehold on French Canadian

02:51.245 --> 02:54.765
voters based on cultural politics, really about

02:55.605 --> 02:58.755
language, religion, identity. And they

02:59.115 --> 03:02.435
That strong position in Quebec to remain the,

03:02.455 --> 03:04.635
the dominant party really throughout the 20th century.

03:05.295 --> 03:06.995
So that was the first party system.

03:08.065 --> 03:10.725
Uh, the second party system comes along

03:10.965 --> 03:12.205
'cause the first party system's totally

03:12.205 --> 03:13.645
disrupted by World War I.

03:14.665 --> 03:17.325
Uh, the conservatives form a a sort

03:17.325 --> 03:18.685
of a common front government,

03:19.305 --> 03:21.485
and they take power throughout the war.

03:22.225 --> 03:23.845
Uh, the liberals are kind of reduced

03:23.865 --> 03:26.965
to a mostly French Canadian rump during the war years.

03:27.515 --> 03:29.645
British Canadians are loyal to Britain,

03:29.865 --> 03:31.805
and so they're supportive of the war effort.

03:31.825 --> 03:33.245
French Canada was opposed to it.

03:33.785 --> 03:37.275
And so that really creates a, a situation in Canada,

03:37.405 --> 03:38.595
which is not civil war,

03:38.615 --> 03:40.635
but it's one of the closest times we've

03:40.635 --> 03:41.675
come to Civil War in Canada.

03:42.835 --> 03:46.055
At the end of the war, the coalition breaks up.

03:46.595 --> 03:49.565
Conservatives have lost a lot of legitimacy as a result

03:49.565 --> 03:50.725
of their conduct of the war.

03:51.545 --> 03:55.125
And 1921 introduces, new

03:56.235 --> 03:58.245
Western populous parties.

03:58.275 --> 04:00.725
They, Western Canada produces these

04:00.725 --> 04:02.245
class-based populous parties.

04:02.595 --> 04:05.165
There's a lot of social conflict in the post-war era.

04:05.945 --> 04:09.005
Uh, and we're gonna have a new party system, we'll,

04:09.005 --> 04:11.765
we'll never have a two party system again after 1921.

04:12.315 --> 04:14.245
It's gonna be the liberals that are gonna be dominant.

04:15.715 --> 04:18.725
It's gonna be mainly the conservatives in opposition,

04:19.025 --> 04:20.325
but also a series

04:20.385 --> 04:24.645
of populist parties based in Western Canada, that are,

04:25.145 --> 04:27.405
also a feature of the party system.

04:27.585 --> 04:30.925
So, you know, we have, the progressives,

04:30.925 --> 04:32.165
which is farmer based party.

04:32.345 --> 04:35.645
We have the CCF, which is on a classic socialist party.

04:36.185 --> 04:39.445
We have the social credit, which is this right wing populist

04:39.445 --> 04:42.285
party, and they're all parties in the second party system.

04:42.345 --> 04:45.405
So the second party system much more fragmented.

04:46.245 --> 04:48.625
The liberals are dominant mostly under the leadership

04:48.625 --> 04:50.985
of William Blind McKenzie King, who is this.

04:51.525 --> 04:53.185
He was in power for 22 years.

04:54.045 --> 04:56.425
He was a master at brokerage politics, sort

04:56.425 --> 04:58.785
of accommodating linguistic and class

04:58.805 --> 05:00.505
and regional divisions within Canada.

05:01.405 --> 05:04.785
Uh, class-based voting never really takes hold in Canada

05:04.785 --> 05:06.145
throughout this whole period.

05:06.685 --> 05:09.625
And the liberals are sort of the natural governing party

05:09.625 --> 05:12.305
of Canada as a result of their ability

05:12.305 --> 05:13.745
to use cultural politics

05:13.745 --> 05:15.425
and regional politics to their advantage.

05:16.005 --> 05:19.825
So centrism kind of reigned supreme, in Canada

05:19.825 --> 05:20.905
during that whole period.

05:22.305 --> 05:24.285
So that's the first two party systems.

05:25.145 --> 05:29.125
Uh, and liberals are really dominant throughout the second

05:29.125 --> 05:32.295
party system, but that's gonna come to an end.

05:32.795 --> 05:34.895
Uh, as I said, the liberals are in power

05:35.895 --> 05:37.195
pretty well constantly.

05:37.385 --> 05:42.235
From 1921 up until 1957, very brief interlude at the,

05:42.295 --> 05:46.085
in the midst of the depression years, by nine,

05:46.185 --> 05:47.325
by the late 1950s.

05:47.435 --> 05:49.045
They're, they're very old party.

05:49.685 --> 05:51.845
I mean, the party leadership starts to look like one

05:51.845 --> 05:54.605
of those old Soviet borough, you know, pictures.

05:54.985 --> 05:56.365
You're all elderly men.

05:57.065 --> 06:01.085
Um, Canadians are becoming increasingly uneasy,

06:01.945 --> 06:05.045
both with the, the dominance of sort of political

06:05.045 --> 06:07.245
and bureaucratic elite that's been in power for a long time.

06:07.945 --> 06:11.045
But also, there's a upwelling

06:11.045 --> 06:12.605
of Canadian nationalism that's starting.

06:12.785 --> 06:14.645
And in the post-war years, Canada is

06:15.725 --> 06:19.845
strongly moving into the US orbit economically becoming

06:20.435 --> 06:22.885
basically just an extension of the American economy.

06:23.735 --> 06:24.795
And so there starts

06:24.815 --> 06:27.075
to be a nationalist backlash against the direction

06:27.075 --> 06:29.155
that the liberals are taking the country at that time.

06:30.115 --> 06:32.695
And this results in another realigning election,

06:33.475 --> 06:38.175
and that's in 1958 when the conservatives come to power,

06:38.955 --> 06:43.175
under a rather unorthodox leader, who was kind

06:43.175 --> 06:44.295
of a western populist.

06:44.325 --> 06:47.895
John Diefenbaker. His name was, who's also,

06:47.895 --> 06:49.455
an old style Canadian nationalist.

06:50.095 --> 06:54.255
I say old style because he believed in sort of one country,

06:55.035 --> 06:57.815
nationalism, you know, one nation, one country.

06:58.475 --> 07:00.295
So it wasn't really popular in Quebec,

07:00.295 --> 07:02.575
but it was very popular with most of English Canada.

07:03.405 --> 07:06.625
And it's, it's, changes the whole realignment

07:06.725 --> 07:08.145
of the, party system.

07:08.245 --> 07:10.945
So from 19 50, 58 onwards,

07:11.765 --> 07:14.025
the conservatives really become the dominant party in

07:14.025 --> 07:17.265
Western Canada and the dominant party really in rural

07:17.295 --> 07:18.385
English speaking Canada.

07:19.205 --> 07:21.665
And ever since then, that's been true.

07:22.415 --> 07:24.275
So the conservatives have a very solid

07:24.845 --> 07:28.475
voter base from 1958 onwards, thanks to Deen Bakker.

07:28.475 --> 07:31.735
Really, the liberals during their period out

07:31.735 --> 07:33.735
of power kinda reorient themselves.

07:34.535 --> 07:37.575
I mean, Canada is becoming a more affluent,

07:37.575 --> 07:40.575
middle class urban society in those post-war years.

07:41.195 --> 07:43.895
You know, Lahr glory, the, those 30 years

07:43.895 --> 07:46.455
of economic prosperity everyone experienced.

07:47.375 --> 07:50.875
Uh, and that causes the liberals to rethink their strategy

07:51.095 --> 07:52.595
and their profile with voters.

07:53.455 --> 07:56.595
And they become more left-leaning.

07:56.745 --> 07:59.315
They become kind of a moderate social democratic party.

08:00.775 --> 08:03.745
They reinvigorate, the party in terms of their,

08:03.795 --> 08:05.185
their candidates and so on.

08:05.445 --> 08:07.345
And they become much more urban party,

08:07.495 --> 08:09.145
much more focused on urban voters

08:09.145 --> 08:11.025
because the cities are really growing in Canada.

08:11.685 --> 08:13.345
Big cities are becoming more dominant

08:13.485 --> 08:14.585
in terms of the voter base.

08:15.575 --> 08:17.595
And so now we have a new party system.

08:18.465 --> 08:21.555
There's one other party though that's important

08:21.615 --> 08:22.915
to this third party system,

08:23.655 --> 08:26.505
and that's a social democratic party on the left

08:26.505 --> 08:29.265
of the liberals called the New Democratic Party.

08:29.265 --> 08:30.945
They're formed in 1961.

08:31.795 --> 08:34.885
They're basically an offshoot of the old CCF,

08:34.885 --> 08:37.085
which was a socialist party of the old style

08:37.625 --> 08:38.725
in the thirties and forties.

08:39.345 --> 08:41.525
And they moderate and they form an alliance

08:41.525 --> 08:43.885
with organized labor, and they become a classic kind

08:43.885 --> 08:48.195
of social democratic labor type party competing

08:48.195 --> 08:50.035
for votes on the left with the liberals,

08:50.175 --> 08:51.475
mostly in urban Canada.

08:52.015 --> 08:55.075
And so we had these three parties that are competing

08:55.655 --> 08:59.195
in the third party system, liberals, conservatives, and NDP,

08:59.195 --> 09:00.715
but the liberals are once again dominant,

09:01.455 --> 09:03.595
and they're back in power in 63,

09:04.055 --> 09:07.035
and they stay in power right up until 1984.

09:07.135 --> 09:09.515
So once again, you know, more than two decades, decades

09:09.575 --> 09:12.635
of liberal dominance, mostly under the leadership

09:12.655 --> 09:13.955
of pure Elliot Trudeau,

09:14.885 --> 09:17.985
who is a very important prime minister in Canadian history.

09:19.125 --> 09:21.025
He, he really,

09:21.315 --> 09:25.625
gives the liberals a new purchase on the support of

09:26.165 --> 09:27.385
French Canadian voters

09:28.925 --> 09:32.745
and, increasing number of minority ethnic voters

09:32.745 --> 09:35.665
because the very high levels of immigration into Canada.

09:36.345 --> 09:38.845
And so the liberals become a priority once again

09:38.845 --> 09:41.965
of French Canada, but also of,

09:41.965 --> 09:44.965
visible minorities in Canada, especially in the cities.

09:45.465 --> 09:48.165
And Trudeau does this by crafting kind of a national unity,

09:49.005 --> 09:52.815
national identity strategy in which,

09:53.075 --> 09:55.775
he promotes Canada as a multicultural country.

09:56.235 --> 09:59.855
He passed a multiculturalism, policy,

09:59.955 --> 10:01.815
as an officially bilingual Canada.

10:02.075 --> 10:03.855
So he kind of brings,

10:04.035 --> 10:06.655
French Canada back into the liberal fold with this,

10:06.985 --> 10:08.135
linguistic policy

10:09.235 --> 10:11.215
and with his promise

10:11.355 --> 10:14.695
to bring in a new constitution based on a charter of rights

10:14.695 --> 10:17.655
and freedoms, whereby all Canadians will be equal

10:17.655 --> 10:21.335
as individuals, with a, with the idea that the

10:22.255 --> 10:24.455
provinces will also be all equal.

10:24.955 --> 10:28.015
He kind of resists the idea of Quebec nationalism.

10:28.075 --> 10:31.975
In fact, he came to Ottawa in 1965, really

10:32.035 --> 10:34.695
to combat the rise of separatism in Quebec.

10:35.115 --> 10:37.455
Uh, Trudeau is a, he is a quebecer,

10:37.795 --> 10:39.895
but he is opposed to Quebec nationalism

10:39.915 --> 10:41.255
and to the idea of separatism.

10:41.595 --> 10:43.735
So he becomes a real champion in English Canada

10:44.005 --> 10:48.575
because he's the main sort of obstacle to Quebec separatism.

10:49.115 --> 10:51.415
But at the same time, he appeals to French Canada

10:51.885 --> 10:53.575
with his linguistic policies

10:53.715 --> 10:57.535
and his, his idea that Canada should be, you know, two equal

10:58.255 --> 11:00.095
languages, French and English.

11:00.555 --> 11:04.655
So that's really, pat with the pattern

11:04.755 --> 11:05.815
of the third party system.

11:06.465 --> 11:09.565
So Canada, as I mentioned at the outset,

11:10.185 --> 11:12.005
really we've had four party systems.

11:12.065 --> 11:13.885
So we're in the fourth party system now.

11:13.885 --> 11:16.925
So that means that that third party system dominated

11:16.925 --> 11:19.565
by the liberals, again with Pierre Elliot Trudeau

11:19.745 --> 11:22.765
as a key figure, that that comes to an end.

11:23.065 --> 11:27.055
How did that happen? Um, Brian Mulrooney,

11:27.155 --> 11:28.655
who was Prime Minister of Canada,

11:28.975 --> 11:31.135
a progressive conservative prime minister of Canada

11:31.685 --> 11:35.475
from 1984 to 1993,

11:36.055 --> 11:37.395
he managed to, again,

11:37.395 --> 11:38.955
the liberals were getting along in the tooth

11:38.955 --> 11:40.355
rather tired as a government.

11:40.355 --> 11:42.555
There was an economic recession in the early eighties.

11:43.345 --> 11:47.195
Trudeau retired in 1984, and a new liberal leader came in.

11:47.695 --> 11:50.235
All of this created an opportunity for the conservatives

11:50.655 --> 11:52.355
who were called the progressive Conservatives

11:53.035 --> 11:55.285
from the middle of the Second World War onward.

11:56.045 --> 11:59.505
And they elected a new leader who was a quebecer, a fluent,

11:59.565 --> 12:02.385
French speaker, Brian Mulrooney.

12:03.195 --> 12:04.775
Uh, and he had a strategy

12:05.275 --> 12:07.215
to bring Quebec into the conservative camp.

12:07.675 --> 12:12.095
He promised that he would, reform the Constitution

12:12.095 --> 12:14.335
that was passed in 1982 in order

12:14.335 --> 12:17.375
to give Quebec special status within the Constitution

12:17.755 --> 12:19.135
as a province, unlike the others.

12:19.675 --> 12:23.405
And Quebec nationalists who really resented Trudeaus,

12:24.075 --> 12:27.565
anti nationalism, they kind of flopped to Maro.

12:28.495 --> 12:32.515
And so, even the separatist party in Quebec,

12:32.545 --> 12:35.275
recommended that their supporters vote

12:35.275 --> 12:37.635
for Maroone in the 1984 election.

12:37.935 --> 12:40.635
And he had promised them to bring them into the Constitution

12:40.825 --> 12:43.075
with honor and enthusiasm, as he said.

12:43.665 --> 12:47.725
And so the conservatives won this massive majority in 1984,

12:48.725 --> 12:51.785
and it looked like Mulroney had pulled it off

12:51.815 --> 12:54.785
that he had realigned Canadian politics yet again.

12:54.805 --> 12:57.585
But it turned out to be a, a failed realignment.

12:58.775 --> 13:02.795
He had an electoral coalition, which was very, difficult

13:02.795 --> 13:06.275
to sustain Francophones and Franco Phobes

13:06.275 --> 13:08.315
and the Franco Phobes were Western Canadians

13:08.895 --> 13:11.675
who did not like the idea of special treatment for Quebec.

13:12.095 --> 13:14.835
So cultural politics once again,

13:15.165 --> 13:18.075
rears its head in Canadian, politics here.

13:18.255 --> 13:20.155
And he was able to sustain

13:20.155 --> 13:24.075
that electoral coalition over two majorities in 1988.

13:24.175 --> 13:26.315
He did it because he had

13:26.835 --> 13:28.955
a constitutional agreement called the Mic Lake Accord,

13:28.965 --> 13:30.675
which was signed by all the provinces,

13:31.135 --> 13:33.275
and he had a free trade agreement with the United States,

13:33.275 --> 13:35.115
which was really popular in Western Canada.

13:35.935 --> 13:38.395
So he managed to keep that coalition together.

13:40.175 --> 13:42.955
But between 1988 and 1983, it all fell apart.

13:43.575 --> 13:47.155
Uh, the constitutional reform agreement fell apart.

13:47.895 --> 13:49.955
Uh, the free trade agreement came into effect,

13:49.975 --> 13:53.985
but Canada immediately ran into an economic recession,

13:54.055 --> 13:56.305
with a lot of job losses to the United States,

13:57.045 --> 13:59.225
and big questions about whether

13:59.225 --> 14:00.825
or not free trade had been a big mistake.

14:01.045 --> 14:03.105
And in fact, Mahoney never won a majority

14:03.105 --> 14:04.425
support for free trade.

14:04.925 --> 14:07.105
He got about 43% in that election.

14:07.165 --> 14:08.505
So most Canadians actually voted

14:08.505 --> 14:09.665
against the free trade agreement.

14:09.975 --> 14:12.145
It's very popular now, but at the time it wasn't.

14:13.095 --> 14:15.515
And that set up a situation in 1993,

14:15.595 --> 14:19.865
a real electoral earthquake situation where,

14:20.005 --> 14:22.305
the conservative coalition Mulroney had put together

14:23.545 --> 14:25.785
fractures into three different blocks.

14:26.735 --> 14:31.355
Uh, the Quebec base of support was overtaken by

14:32.075 --> 14:35.115
a new, separatist party at the federal level.

14:35.135 --> 14:36.395
So there's kinda sister party

14:36.495 --> 14:38.515
to the separatist party at the provincial level,

14:38.535 --> 14:40.875
the party Quebec law, this was called the Block Quebec law,

14:41.615 --> 14:43.355
led by a very close confidant

14:43.355 --> 14:44.395
and friend of Maroone

14:44.395 --> 14:47.115
who abandoned the party when the Mech Lake

14:47.115 --> 14:48.355
Accord fell apart.

14:48.355 --> 14:50.395
He abandoned the party, started the block Quebec,

14:51.105 --> 14:52.845
and they won the majority of seats

14:53.235 --> 14:57.285
that the conservatives held in Quebec in the 1993 election.

14:57.345 --> 15:01.125
So now we have a separatist party at the federal

15:01.135 --> 15:02.525
level in Parliament.

15:02.525 --> 15:05.005
They actually formed the official opposition in 1993.

15:05.005 --> 15:07.925
They got 54 seats in the West.

15:08.775 --> 15:11.085
There was a real upsurge of Western

15:12.855 --> 15:15.885
neoliberal populism, which is very unhappy

15:16.275 --> 15:18.205
with the way in which Maroone

15:18.205 --> 15:20.725
and the Conservative party had catered to Quebec.

15:21.305 --> 15:23.445
And moreover, there were fiscal

15:23.585 --> 15:28.045
and economic, problems, that weren't being addressed

15:28.785 --> 15:30.485
by the government to the satisfaction

15:30.485 --> 15:31.845
of these Western populace.

15:32.265 --> 15:35.405
So they began a new party called the Reform Party,

15:36.065 --> 15:38.405
and they basically took over the western base

15:38.465 --> 15:40.525
of the Conservative Party so that, so

15:40.525 --> 15:42.845
that conservative party that John Deen Bay Grade created

15:43.775 --> 15:45.355
was destroyed in 1993,

15:45.825 --> 15:48.795
that the progressive conservative party has never recovered.

15:48.795 --> 15:50.195
In fact, they've disappeared now.

15:50.945 --> 15:53.635
They, eventually gave up the ghost

15:53.735 --> 15:57.275
and merged with this reform Western Reform party

15:57.935 --> 16:00.555
to create a new conservative party of Canada.

16:00.705 --> 16:02.075
That happened in 2003.

16:03.265 --> 16:07.605
Uh, but as long as though that, division

16:08.815 --> 16:11.945
between the progressive conservatives, the Reform Party,

16:12.085 --> 16:14.545
and the Block Quebecois, as long as that was the case,

16:15.285 --> 16:17.105
it opened the door for the liberals

16:17.105 --> 16:18.625
to once again become the dominant party.

16:19.045 --> 16:21.425
And so the liberals, the last brokerage party standing

16:21.425 --> 16:25.105
really, they were able to once again assume power

16:25.215 --> 16:28.985
between 1993 and 2004 under Jean.

16:30.045 --> 16:33.975
Uh, so that kind of extended that period

16:34.035 --> 16:36.855
of liberal dominance all the way up to 2004,

16:38.835 --> 16:41.015
the fourth party system, the party system we're in now,

16:41.015 --> 16:43.135
it's very different from the third party system.

16:43.305 --> 16:47.335
Third party system was dominated by brokerage politics, by

16:48.025 --> 16:50.255
again, by centrist politics, again,

16:50.255 --> 16:53.575
by liberal liberals were able to, dominate

16:53.575 --> 16:54.695
during most of that period.

16:54.845 --> 16:57.175
Maroone just kind of copied the liberals

16:57.555 --> 16:59.375
and displaced them for a short period of time.

17:00.555 --> 17:03.005
This new party system we're in now is much more

17:04.155 --> 17:05.685
ideologically polarized

17:06.125 --> 17:07.575
because the reform party,

17:07.575 --> 17:09.895
which took over the progressive conservative party

17:10.515 --> 17:11.575
is much more right wing,

17:11.685 --> 17:14.215
much more ideologically right wing than the

17:14.215 --> 17:15.575
old progressive conservative party.

17:16.615 --> 17:20.615
Um, the block Quebec law has continued

17:20.615 --> 17:23.095
to be a large factor in our politics

17:23.155 --> 17:26.245
and continues to win, a majority

17:26.345 --> 17:28.365
or close to a majority of the seats in Quebec

17:28.885 --> 17:30.005
election and election out.

17:30.675 --> 17:33.735
And so we have this party system now with the liberals,

17:33.735 --> 17:37.095
the NDP, this new conservative party

17:37.155 --> 17:38.215
and the Block Quebec law,

17:38.235 --> 17:40.655
and the sort of a small green party,

17:40.805 --> 17:43.415
that are all competing in this party system.

17:44.755 --> 17:46.895
But the big difference about this party system really

17:47.555 --> 17:50.855
is in terms of the, the voter basis.

17:52.315 --> 17:55.455
Um, and there was some difference of opinion

17:55.485 --> 17:58.855
that were expressed by voting behavior experts about whether

17:58.915 --> 18:00.615
we had really seen a dramatic change

18:00.675 --> 18:01.975
in Canadian voting behavior.

18:02.555 --> 18:05.495
One group of voting behaviorists said, no,

18:05.995 --> 18:08.775
we still have sort of weak partisan,

18:09.715 --> 18:11.575
partisanship in Canada.

18:12.435 --> 18:13.815
We, we have volatility

18:13.845 --> 18:15.615
because the electorate's willing to,

18:16.235 --> 18:18.655
to move quickly from one party to another.

18:18.655 --> 18:20.295
They're not ideologically committed,

18:20.675 --> 18:21.975
and that's still the kind

18:21.975 --> 18:23.815
of party politics we have in Canada.

18:24.755 --> 18:27.895
But then there was another group of beha voter behaviorists,

18:28.115 --> 18:30.895
behavior theorists who said, no,

18:30.895 --> 18:33.215
the evidence doesn't point that way anymore.

18:33.275 --> 18:34.935
The evidence instead points to

18:35.515 --> 18:39.455
an increasingly ideologically divided electorate

18:39.885 --> 18:41.575
with much more partisan sorting.

18:41.765 --> 18:46.455
This is where voters identify, with a particular party

18:46.475 --> 18:49.095
or group of parties based on ideological orientation.

18:49.595 --> 18:53.565
And that would suggest that Canadian exceptionalism may in

18:53.565 --> 18:57.805
fact be, if not,

18:57.945 --> 19:00.645
at an end, at least the possibility is

19:00.645 --> 19:03.645
that we're moving away from it towards something

19:03.645 --> 19:05.205
that looks much more like a,

19:05.605 --> 19:08.485
a left right ideologically polarized party system.

19:09.265 --> 19:13.805
Uh, and we're, we're not quite there at the moment.

19:14.715 --> 19:16.935
Um, the liberals are still in power.

19:17.125 --> 19:19.655
They, they came back to power in 2015

19:19.655 --> 19:23.655
after losing power in, 2004 to the conservatives.

19:23.655 --> 19:27.255
They came back to power in 2015 under Justin Trudeau,

19:27.275 --> 19:28.895
who is Pierre Elliot Trudeau's son.

19:29.795 --> 19:33.615
Uh, and that was a surprise

19:33.765 --> 19:35.655
because in the previous election,

19:35.655 --> 19:37.015
the liberals had actually finished third

19:37.895 --> 19:40.675
and instead the NDP was the official opposition.

19:41.195 --> 19:43.155
A left-wing party conservatives,

19:43.155 --> 19:45.795
and much more right wing party were the government.

19:45.975 --> 19:48.995
And it looked like in 2011, yeah, it's happened.

19:49.175 --> 19:51.595
We have now an ideologically polarized

19:51.735 --> 19:52.995
mainly two party system.

19:53.615 --> 19:55.795
And then in 2015, all

19:55.795 --> 19:57.875
of a sudden Justin Trudeau becomes

19:57.875 --> 19:58.915
the leader of the liberal party.

19:59.815 --> 20:04.355
Uh, the liberals move left onto NDP territory

20:05.215 --> 20:09.035
and between Trudeau's attraction as a new leader,

20:09.455 --> 20:11.955
and this left move to the left of the liberal party,

20:12.375 --> 20:15.355
the liberals were able to win the election of 2015.

20:15.795 --> 20:18.995
A majority in fact. But in 20 19, 20 21,

20:19.225 --> 20:22.795
that turned into two minority governments with a coalition

20:22.795 --> 20:23.835
between the liberals

20:23.835 --> 20:27.075
and the NDP, keeping the left at center parties in power.

20:27.865 --> 20:30.005
Um, but all of the data

20:30.265 --> 20:32.685
and all of the surveys that we have now suggest

20:33.075 --> 20:36.445
that the conservatives are poised

20:36.505 --> 20:39.725
to regain power in the next election, which is due in 2025

20:40.385 --> 20:42.805
as a much more right wing alternative,

20:42.875 --> 20:45.285
very solidly neoliberal in terms

20:45.285 --> 20:48.370
of their ideological orientation, much more so than the old

20:49.005 --> 20:50.045
progressive conservative party.

20:50.775 --> 20:54.795
And the NDP and the liberals are almost indistinguishable in

20:54.795 --> 20:56.795
terms of their party platforms.

20:57.335 --> 21:01.595
Uh, and as a result, I think we're on the verge really of,

21:01.815 --> 21:04.195
sort of a, a final realignment

21:04.775 --> 21:06.715
of the Canadian party system

21:07.135 --> 21:08.435
and maybe an end to Canadian

21:08.435 --> 21:10.035
exceptionalism, the fly in the ointment.

21:11.415 --> 21:12.815
Cultural politics could continue

21:13.165 --> 21:14.735
because we still have Quebec

21:15.735 --> 21:17.715
and we still have this separate disparity,

21:17.715 --> 21:20.435
the block Quebec law whose voters are basically voting

21:20.435 --> 21:22.035
for them because they're nationalists

21:22.895 --> 21:24.515
or they favor Quebec independence.

21:25.375 --> 21:28.715
And that could, could still,

21:28.855 --> 21:31.875
be a big factor preventing this nice sort of

21:32.515 --> 21:35.475
movement towards, you know, left, right,

21:36.025 --> 21:37.875
ideologically polarized politics.

21:37.875 --> 21:38.795
We'll, we'll see what happens.

Understanding Canadian Political Regionalism and Exceptionalism

00:00:00 - Throughout my career, I've been interested particularly in the question of, regionalism in Canada, which is a prominent feature of our politics, and especially how it affected the party system. When you look at the literature on party politics in Canada, it, it does quite strongly make the case that Canada is somewhat exceptional compared to similar countries using similar political systems. and that exceptionalism is, partially rooted in regionalism, but mostly related to the fact that our party politics has been dominated by a centrist party,
00:00:37 - we haven't had the kind of class-based voting that is common in a lot of other countries like ours. And, as a result of that, we have had, like I said, a dominant liberal party, but also, very successful region based insurgent parties, protest parties that have been a feature of the system since, 1921, really. so that results in a lot
00:01:09 - So there's a, there's a series of things all interrelated, that make Canada somewhat, exceptional compared to, similar countries. Canada basically has had a number of realigning elections. So on a, on a more or less regular basis, there's been a big change in the party system. So much so that it kind of introduces a new party system. So we can think about Canadian party politics, and this is common in the literature
00:01:38 - Each one different from the one before it. And we're in the fourth one now. So the first party system was really from Confederation in 1867 up until the election of 1921, the first post-war election. And that's the period of normal party politics in Canada. That is to say, two national parties alternating in power, more or less, making similar appeals to different regions,
00:02:09 - So you get this classic two party system. But even within that first party system, there was a realigning election, in 1896. Before that, the conservatives were dominant under the leadership of really the country's founders. So John A. McDonald. And then after 1896 party politics became dominated by the liberals and they were under the leadership of Sir Wilford Laurier. But the key to their newfound dominance was
00:02:43 - Of course, French Canada constituted one third of all of Canadian population, and the liberals got a stranglehold on French Canadian voters based on cultural politics, really about language, religion, identity. And they That strong position in Quebec to remain the, the dominant party really throughout the 20th century. So that was the first party system. the second party system comes along

Canadian Political Dynamics During World War I

00:03:12 - disrupted by World War I. the conservatives form a a sort of a common front government, and they take power throughout the war. the liberals are kind of reduced to a mostly French Canadian rump during the war years. British Canadians are loyal to Britain, and so they're supportive of the war effort. French Canada was opposed to it. And so that really creates a, a situation in Canada, which is not civil war, but it's one of the closest times we've come to Civil War in Canada.
00:03:46 - Conservatives have lost a lot of legitimacy as a result of their conduct of the war. And 1921 introduces, new Western populous parties. They, Western Canada produces these class-based populous parties. There's a lot of social conflict in the post-war era. and we're gonna have a new party system, we'll, we'll never have a two party system again after 1921. It's gonna be the liberals that are gonna be dominant.
00:04:19 - but also a series of populist parties based in Western Canada, that are, also a feature of the party system. So, you know, we have, the progressives, which is farmer based party. We have the CCF, which is on a classic socialist party. We have the social credit, which is this right wing populist party, and they're all parties in the second party system. So the second party system much more fragmented.
00:04:48 - of William Blind McKenzie King, who is this. He was in power for 22 years. He was a master at brokerage politics, sort of accommodating linguistic and class and regional divisions within Canada. class-based voting never really takes hold in Canada throughout this whole period. And the liberals are sort of the natural governing party of Canada as a result of their ability to use cultural politics and regional politics to their advantage. So centrism kind of reigned supreme, in Canada
00:05:22 - So that's the first two party systems. and liberals are really dominant throughout the second party system, but that's gonna come to an end. as I said, the liberals are in power pretty well constantly. From 1921 up until 1957, very brief interlude at the, in the midst of the depression years, by nine, by the late 1950s. They're, they're very old party. I mean, the party leadership starts to look like one
00:05:54 - You're all elderly men. Canadians are becoming increasingly uneasy, both with the, the dominance of sort of political and bureaucratic elite that's been in power for a long time. But also, there's a upwelling of Canadian nationalism that's starting. And in the post-war years, Canada is strongly moving into the US orbit economically becoming basically just an extension of the American economy.

Canadian Political Realignments and Nationalism

00:06:24 - to be a nationalist backlash against the direction that the liberals are taking the country at that time. And this results in another realigning election, and that's in 1958 when the conservatives come to power, under a rather unorthodox leader, who was kind of a western populist. John Diefenbaker. His name was, who's also, an old style Canadian nationalist. I say old style because he believed in sort of one country,
00:06:58 - So it wasn't really popular in Quebec, but it was very popular with most of English Canada. And it's, it's, changes the whole realignment of the, party system. So from 19 50, 58 onwards, the conservatives really become the dominant party in Western Canada and the dominant party really in rural English speaking Canada. And ever since then, that's been true. So the conservatives have a very solid voter base from 1958 onwards, thanks to Deen Bakker.
00:07:31 - of power kinda reorient themselves. I mean, Canada is becoming a more affluent, middle class urban society in those post-war years. You know, Lahr glory, the, those 30 years of economic prosperity everyone experienced. and that causes the liberals to rethink their strategy and their profile with voters. And they become more left-leaning. They become kind of a moderate social democratic party.
00:08:03 - their candidates and so on. And they become much more urban party, much more focused on urban voters because the cities are really growing in Canada. Big cities are becoming more dominant in terms of the voter base. And so now we have a new party system. There's one other party though that's important to this third party system, and that's a social democratic party on the left of the liberals called the New Democratic Party. They're formed in 1961.
00:08:34 - which was a socialist party of the old style in the thirties and forties. And they moderate and they form an alliance with organized labor, and they become a classic kind of social democratic labor type party competing for votes on the left with the liberals, mostly in urban Canada. And so we had these three parties that are competing in the third party system, liberals, conservatives, and NDP, but the liberals are once again dominant, and they're back in power in 63,
00:09:07 - So once again, you know, more than two decades, decades of liberal dominance, mostly under the leadership of pure Elliot Trudeau, who is a very important prime minister in Canadian history. He, he really, gives the liberals a new purchase on the support of French Canadian voters and, increasing number of minority ethnic voters because the very high levels of immigration into Canada.

Trudeau's Multicultural Vision and Political Legacy

00:09:38 - of French Canada, but also of, visible minorities in Canada, especially in the cities. And Trudeau does this by crafting kind of a national unity, national identity strategy in which, he promotes Canada as a multicultural country. He passed a multiculturalism, policy, as an officially bilingual Canada. So he kind of brings, French Canada back into the liberal fold with this,
00:10:09 - and with his promise to bring in a new constitution based on a charter of rights and freedoms, whereby all Canadians will be equal as individuals, with a, with the idea that the provinces will also be all equal. He kind of resists the idea of Quebec nationalism. In fact, he came to Ottawa in 1965, really to combat the rise of separatism in Quebec. Trudeau is a, he is a quebecer,
00:10:39 - and to the idea of separatism. So he becomes a real champion in English Canada because he's the main sort of obstacle to Quebec separatism. But at the same time, he appeals to French Canada with his linguistic policies and his, his idea that Canada should be, you know, two equal languages, French and English. So that's really, pat with the pattern of the third party system. So Canada, as I mentioned at the outset,
00:11:12 - So we're in the fourth party system now. So that means that that third party system dominated by the liberals, again with Pierre Elliot Trudeau as a key figure, that that comes to an end. How did that happen? Brian Mulrooney, who was Prime Minister of Canada, a progressive conservative prime minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993, he managed to, again, the liberals were getting along in the tooth rather tired as a government.
00:11:43 - Trudeau retired in 1984, and a new liberal leader came in. All of this created an opportunity for the conservatives who were called the progressive Conservatives from the middle of the Second World War onward. And they elected a new leader who was a quebecer, a fluent, French speaker, Brian Mulrooney. and he had a strategy to bring Quebec into the conservative camp. He promised that he would, reform the Constitution
00:12:14 - to give Quebec special status within the Constitution as a province, unlike the others. And Quebec nationalists who really resented Trudeaus, anti nationalism, they kind of flopped to Maro. And so, even the separatist party in Quebec, recommended that their supporters vote for Maroone in the 1984 election. And he had promised them to bring them into the Constitution with honor and enthusiasm, as he said.

Failed Realignment in Canadian Politics Explored

00:12:48 - and it looked like Mulroney had pulled it off that he had realigned Canadian politics yet again. But it turned out to be a, a failed realignment. He had an electoral coalition, which was very, difficult to sustain Francophones and Franco Phobes and the Franco Phobes were Western Canadians who did not like the idea of special treatment for Quebec. So cultural politics once again,
00:13:18 - And he was able to sustain that electoral coalition over two majorities in 1988. He did it because he had a constitutional agreement called the Mic Lake Accord, which was signed by all the provinces, and he had a free trade agreement with the United States, which was really popular in Western Canada. So he managed to keep that coalition together. But between 1988 and 1983, it all fell apart. the constitutional reform agreement fell apart.
00:13:49 - but Canada immediately ran into an economic recession, with a lot of job losses to the United States, and big questions about whether or not free trade had been a big mistake. And in fact, Mahoney never won a majority support for free trade. He got about 43% in that election. So most Canadians actually voted against the free trade agreement. It's very popular now, but at the time it wasn't. And that set up a situation in 1993, a real electoral earthquake situation where,
00:14:23 - fractures into three different blocks. the Quebec base of support was overtaken by a new, separatist party at the federal level. So there's kinda sister party to the separatist party at the provincial level, the party Quebec law, this was called the Block Quebec law, led by a very close confidant and friend of Maroone who abandoned the party when the Mech Lake Accord fell apart. He abandoned the party, started the block Quebec,
00:14:53 - that the conservatives held in Quebec in the 1993 election. So now we have a separatist party at the federal level in Parliament. They actually formed the official opposition in 1993. They got 54 seats in the West. There was a real upsurge of Western neoliberal populism, which is very unhappy with the way in which Maroone and the Conservative party had catered to Quebec.
00:15:23 - and economic, problems, that weren't being addressed by the government to the satisfaction of these Western populace. So they began a new party called the Reform Party, and they basically took over the western base of the Conservative Party so that, so that conservative party that John Deen Bay Grade created was destroyed in 1993, that the progressive conservative party has never recovered. In fact, they've disappeared now. They, eventually gave up the ghost

Shifts in Canadian Party Dynamics and Ideology

00:15:57 - to create a new conservative party of Canada. That happened in 2003. but as long as though that, division between the progressive conservatives, the Reform Party, and the Block Quebecois, as long as that was the case, it opened the door for the liberals to once again become the dominant party. And so the liberals, the last brokerage party standing really, they were able to once again assume power
00:16:30 - so that kind of extended that period of liberal dominance all the way up to 2004, the fourth party system, the party system we're in now, it's very different from the third party system. Third party system was dominated by brokerage politics, by again, by centrist politics, again, by liberal liberals were able to, dominate during most of that period. Maroone just kind of copied the liberals
00:17:00 - This new party system we're in now is much more ideologically polarized because the reform party, which took over the progressive conservative party is much more right wing, much more ideologically right wing than the old progressive conservative party. the block Quebec law has continued to be a large factor in our politics and continues to win, a majority or close to a majority of the seats in Quebec
00:17:30 - And so we have this party system now with the liberals, the NDP, this new conservative party and the Block Quebec law, and the sort of a small green party, that are all competing in this party system. But the big difference about this party system really is in terms of the, the voter basis. and there was some difference of opinion that were expressed by voting behavior experts about whether
00:18:00 - in Canadian voting behavior. One group of voting behaviorists said, no, we still have sort of weak partisan, partisanship in Canada. We, we have volatility because the electorate's willing to, to move quickly from one party to another. They're not ideologically committed, and that's still the kind of party politics we have in Canada. But then there was another group of beha voter behaviorists, behavior theorists who said, no,
00:18:33 - The evidence instead points to an increasingly ideologically divided electorate with much more partisan sorting. This is where voters identify, with a particular party or group of parties based on ideological orientation. And that would suggest that Canadian exceptionalism may in fact be, if not, at an end, at least the possibility is that we're moving away from it towards something

Canada's Evolving Ideological Party Landscape

00:19:05 - a left right ideologically polarized party system. and we're, we're not quite there at the moment. the liberals are still in power. They, they came back to power in 2015 after losing power in, 2004 to the conservatives. They came back to power in 2015 under Justin Trudeau, who is Pierre Elliot Trudeau's son. and that was a surprise
00:19:35 - the liberals had actually finished third and instead the NDP was the official opposition. A left-wing party conservatives, and much more right wing party were the government. And it looked like in 2011, yeah, it's happened. We have now an ideologically polarized mainly two party system. And then in 2015, all of a sudden Justin Trudeau becomes the leader of the liberal party. the liberals move left onto NDP territory
00:20:09 - and this left move to the left of the liberal party, the liberals were able to win the election of 2015. A majority in fact. But in 20 19, 20 21, that turned into two minority governments with a coalition between the liberals and the NDP, keeping the left at center parties in power. but all of the data and all of the surveys that we have now suggest that the conservatives are poised
00:20:40 - as a much more right wing alternative, very solidly neoliberal in terms of their ideological orientation, much more so than the old progressive conservative party. And the NDP and the liberals are almost indistinguishable in terms of their party platforms. and as a result, I think we're on the verge really of, sort of a, a final realignment of the Canadian party system
00:21:08 - exceptionalism, the fly in the ointment. Cultural politics could continue because we still have Quebec and we still have this separate disparity, the block Quebec law whose voters are basically voting for them because they're nationalists or they favor Quebec independence. And that could, could still, be a big factor preventing this nice sort of movement towards, you know, left, right, ideologically polarized politics.
00:21:37 -

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Faculti

Popular in Political Science

Keeping the Republic

Entrepreneurial thinking: the politics and practice of policy impact

The Politics of Knowledge in Development

Fifty years of declining confidence and increasing polarization in trust

The Opening Dilemma

Wait and See?

The Colonialist Roots of Democratic Decay

Parties and Elections: An End to Canadian Exceptionalism?

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Contact Us

FAQs

What is Faculti?

How do you select interviews?

Interview Process

Page Structure

Popular in Political Science

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Contact Us

FAQs

What is Faculti?

How do you select interviews?

Interview Process

Accessibility Options

Contrast Adjustment

Text Size Adjustment

Text Spacing Adjustment

Line Height Adjustment

Cursor Size Adjustment

Page Structure Options

Page Structure