A Flawed Revision of the Common Rule


Next in Biomedical Ethics

In September 2015, sixteen federal agencies released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that outlined far-reaching changes to the Common Rule. The Common Rule is the regulatory framework for all federally funded human subjects research; many U.S. institutions extend it to nonfederally funded research as well. David Magnus discusses the ability of a range of multimedia informational aids to improve participant understanding in the context of research on medical practices. David Magnus, PhD is Thomas A. Raffin Professor of Medicine and Biomedical Ethics and Professor of Pediatrics and Medicine at Stanford University, where he is Director of the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and co-Chair of the Ethics Committee for the Stanford Hospital. He is the former President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors, and is the Editor in Chief of the American Journal of Bioethics.

Publication

Image courtesy of interviewee. December 11, 2017

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.
Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2013 - 2024. All rights reserved.

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Browse 8000+ figures on the platform by subject or sub-category using our top menu or search bar.

Video Pages

Use Workspace to generate Interactive transcripts, Related Studies, AI Chat, Multi-language translations, Key points and quotes, and more.

Contact Us

For all queries, please contact our switchboard at:

UK/EUR: 0330 043 0655

USA: 18335826650

The switchboard is open from Monday to Friday during working hours (9am to 6pm). We recommend calling us for a more immediate response.

Or Submit a Ticket

FAQs

What is Faculti?

Faculti is a research, policy and scholarship streaming platform, set up by a former school teacher, that covers 8000 academics annually across 20 subjects, across the world. The aim is to interview academics and policy makers discussing their research or analysis without any journalistic influence or bias. More here

How do you select interviews?

Team of editors across all the main disciplines select publications along a three-pronged approach: 1. Most cited and latest in each subject 2. Internal audience website data 3. Publisher Partners suggestions eg Taylor and Francis, Princeton University Press, they suggest what to cover.

Interview Process

All questions sent in advance by 4-5 days. Interview undertaken on Zoom, Webex or phone. Journalist checks for framing, lighting, sound. Journalist interviews you, asks follow-ups, retakes. Raw footage enters editing cycle.

Accessibility Options

error: