Election Integrity in a One-Party Dictatorship

Key Question Being Explored in This Insight:

How did allegations of voter fraud at a 1949 Leningrad party conference spark the Leningrad Affair and reveal the role of elections in Stalin-era governance?

View the page of: David Brandenberger

Institution: University of Richmond

Explore more insights in:

Arts and Humanities European History History

Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider ▼

What assumptions does the research make?
Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness ▼

This research comes from University of Richmond . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Further Reading ▼

Read the Study

How did allegations of voter fraud at a 1949 Leningrad party conference spark the Leningrad Affair and reveal the role of elections in Stalin-era governance?

Image courtesy of interviewee. December 17, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video discusses the electoral system of the Soviet Union in the late 1940s, particularly focusing on a pivotal moment in 1948 involving the Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) party organization. Initially, a non-competitive, single-party electoral process had stabilized by the 1930s, granting party leaders a semblance of democratic legitimacy while firmly maintaining control by the Communist Party. However, during World War II, this system broke down. By 1948, amidst a push to regain legitimacy, Leningrad’s party organization conducted an election where a slight dissent emerged: 23 protest votes out of over a thousand cast.

The response from Moscow was severe when Leningrad officials misrepresented the results, falsely claiming a unanimous approval of their leadership. The situation escalated into a scandal, leading to the dismissal and arrest of numerous officials by early 1949, showcasing the tensions between central and local authorities within the Communist Party.

The scenario illustrates the broader dynamics of governance in the Soviet Union, where elections served not as genuine democratic processes but as mechanisms for the central authority to monitor and ensure loyalty from regional officials. The aftermath highlighted how Moscow sought to maintain control and accountability amidst concerns of insubordination and corruption. The author argues that the historical view of a rigid totalitarian regime needs reevaluation, revealing a more nuanced interaction between central authorities and provincial leaders, thus emphasizing the complex reality of authoritarian governance in that era.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are five key points derived from the video regarding the electoral process and political dynamics within the Soviet Union, specifically focusing on the events surrounding the Leningrad party organization in 1948:

1. **Stability of Political System**: In the 1930s, the Soviet Union established a non-competitive electoral process controlled by the Communist Party to provide party leaders with a semblance of legitimacy while maintaining tight control. This system began to break down during WWII due to wartime exigencies but was reinstated by 1948 as party elections resumed to reaffirm local and regional officials' legitimacy.

2. **Scandal and its Consequences**: In December 1948, the Leningrad party organization held elections, resulting in 23 protest votes out of over a thousand. The head of the electoral commission, Tik Kuf, falsely reported a unanimous victory. This deception triggered a significant scandal, leading to the dismissal, arrests, and severe consequences for many local leaders, highlighting the regime’s intolerance for any form of dissent or perceived insubordination.

3. **Elections as Control Mechanisms**: The electoral process in the Soviet system was not a genuine democratic practice but rather a mechanism for validating decisions made in Moscow. Elections served as early warning systems to monitor local officials' performance and maintain loyalty to the central authority, with any signs of dissent viewed as serious challenges to the regime.

4. **Transition from Political Machines to Meritocracy**: The video discusses a shift between the reliance on client-patron networks and a potential move towards a meritocratic system. While local leaders enjoyed some latitude in governance, they had to remain loyal to Moscow and effectively implement the central policies. Any deviation from this loyalty was met with severe repercussions, indicating a rigid authoritarian structure rather than totalitarian control.

5. **Implications for Historical Understanding**: The findings and archival research conducted post-1991 offer new insights into the nature of governance in the Soviet Union. The events in Leningrad illustrate that while the system appeared top-down and authoritarian, there were subtle feedback mechanisms at play from local officials back to the center. This complexity of relations challenges simplistic views of totalitarianism and emphasizes the importance of local governance dynamics in the Soviet political landscape.

Export as PDF
Here are some key quotes extracted from the video, along with their convideoual significance:

1. **"In the 1930s, the system of a non-competitive single party, single candidate, electoral process becomes pretty stable and standardized."**
- This quote highlights the establishment of the electoral system in the Soviet Union, which was designed to function under the strict control of the Communist Party while simulating democratic legitimacy.

2. **"This is done essentially to give party leaders a sense of legitimacy, in a democratic sense, while keeping it very firmly under the control of the Communist Party."**
- It underscores the manipulation of democratic practices to maintain authority and control over political processes.

3. **"The system breaks down because of the wartime emergency, the exigencies of this incredible conflict."**
- This indicates how World War II disrupted established political practices and the structure of party governance.

4. **"In particular, 15 votes are cast against...the head of the electoral commission...tells his fellow members that we're gonna deliver this result unanimously for our party bosses."**
- This moment illustrates the internal manipulation and pressures within party dynamics, shedding light on the lack of genuine electoral fairness.

5. **"This causes a massive scandal when it gets to Moscow because...the Lenn graders are boasting of a unanimous electoral victory."**
- The reaction from Moscow indicates the importance of perceived unity and compliance within party leadership, which was crucial for maintaining the party's image.

6. **"This act of deceiving the Moscow authorities...removing the ability to surveil the local and regional situation...leads to this major purge in 1949."**
- This highlights the consequences of failing to meet Moscow’s expectations, illustrating how dissent or even the appearance of it could lead to severe repercussions.

7. **"Elections were one of several sorts of early warning systems, which the party was using."**
- This points to the dual role of elections as not only a façade of democracy but also as a tool for the central authority to gauge loyalty and control in the provinces.

8. **"It's a top down situation...their consent is engineered from below."**
- This differentiates between genuine democratic processes and the Soviet method of ensuring acceptance of party directives.

9. **"The moment that these local barons and party leaders become wayward... Moscow becomes extremely concerned and views it not only as insubordination, but something tantamount to treason."**
- This encapsulates the rigid intolerance to deviation from the party line, emphasizing the totalitarian nature of the political environment.

10. **"What we would probably call today, a sort of authoritarian politics, not totalitarian control."**
- This suggests a nuanced understanding of governance within the Soviet Union, categorizing it as authoritarian rather than purely totalitarian, presenting a more layered political landscape.

These quotes reflect the central themes of legitimacy, control, manipulation, and the consequences of dissent within the convideo of Soviet electoral processes and governance during the mid-20th century.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.845
In the 1930s, the system

2
00:00:02.145 --> 00:00:06.005
of a non-competitive single party, single candidate,

3
00:00:06.715 --> 00:00:08.925
electoral process becomes pretty stable

4
00:00:09.025 --> 00:00:10.085
and, and standardized.

5
00:00:10.515 --> 00:00:14.365
This is done essentially to give, party leaders a sense

6
00:00:14.365 --> 00:00:17.125
of legitimacy, in a democratic sense,

7
00:00:17.125 --> 00:00:18.565
while keeping it very firmly under the

8
00:00:18.565 --> 00:00:19.845
control of the Communist Party.

9
00:00:20.265 --> 00:00:22.405
During World War ii in the early 1940s,

10
00:00:22.865 --> 00:00:23.965
the system breaks down

11
00:00:23.965 --> 00:00:26.685
because of the wartime emergency, the exigencies of,

12
00:00:26.705 --> 00:00:29.205
of this, incredible conflict.

13
00:00:29.465 --> 00:00:32.765
And by 19, it's only really by 1948 that the party begins

14
00:00:32.765 --> 00:00:34.925
to think about reviving his practice

15
00:00:34.925 --> 00:00:37.525
of party elections at party conferences in order

16
00:00:37.665 --> 00:00:41.915
to reacquire that sense of legitimacy, for its,

17
00:00:42.185 --> 00:00:44.515
officials in the local and the regional level.

18
00:00:45.015 --> 00:00:49.115
So that gets us to 1948, which is, an important year

19
00:00:49.115 --> 00:00:53.235
for the piece that I wrote, insofar as, it's at

20
00:00:53.235 --> 00:00:55.315
that time that the Lenn grad party organization,

21
00:00:55.315 --> 00:00:57.955
which is the third largest in the Soviet Union,

22
00:00:58.475 --> 00:01:00.155
Len grad is, is known today as St.

23
00:01:00.155 --> 00:01:02.155
Petersburg. So it's a massive city and region.

24
00:01:02.575 --> 00:01:05.755
The Leningrad Association Dec Len grad party organization

25
00:01:05.755 --> 00:01:09.595
decides in 1948, according to the requests of Moscow,

26
00:01:09.595 --> 00:01:10.995
that it's time to have a major

27
00:01:10.995 --> 00:01:12.835
conference and a big election.

28
00:01:12.935 --> 00:01:14.435
It needs to reelect its officials

29
00:01:14.455 --> 00:01:16.195
to demonstrate their legitimacy.

30
00:01:16.535 --> 00:01:19.875
And so they do that in, in mid to late December of 1948.

31
00:01:20.295 --> 00:01:22.675
The really interesting moment here, though, is that

32
00:01:22.735 --> 00:01:24.555
of over a thousand votes cast

33
00:01:24.695 --> 00:01:26.355
for these Lenin grad party bosses.

34
00:01:26.895 --> 00:01:30.515
23 negative na votes are cast,

35
00:01:30.585 --> 00:01:32.355
protest votes, I guess we could call them.

36
00:01:32.735 --> 00:01:35.635
In particular, 15 votes are cast against the Second

37
00:01:35.955 --> 00:01:36.955
Secretary Kapustin.

38
00:01:38.215 --> 00:01:41.075
Uh, this might not have been a very big deal, I guess,

39
00:01:41.395 --> 00:01:43.595
historically speaking, except for the fact that the head

40
00:01:43.595 --> 00:01:46.435
of the electoral commission of this party conference,

41
00:01:46.515 --> 00:01:49.155
a guy named Tik Kuf, tells his fellow members

42
00:01:49.155 --> 00:01:50.475
of this electoral commission

43
00:01:50.545 --> 00:01:53.275
that we're gonna deliver this result unanimously

44
00:01:53.695 --> 00:01:55.515
for our party bosses in Lenn grad.

45
00:01:55.575 --> 00:01:58.075
He didn't have to do this apparently, but he did it anyway.

46
00:01:58.705 --> 00:02:01.755
This causes a massive schedule, scandal when it gets

47
00:02:01.755 --> 00:02:04.675
to Moscow because of at least two factors.

48
00:02:04.885 --> 00:02:07.635
First of all, the Lenn graders are representing themselves

49
00:02:07.655 --> 00:02:12.115
as being in, total control of the situation in Len grad.

50
00:02:12.115 --> 00:02:14.395
They're boasting of a unanimous electoral victory.

51
00:02:14.625 --> 00:02:18.035
They're boasting of, of, of, solidarity and,

52
00:02:18.035 --> 00:02:20.715
and cohesion within the party organization up

53
00:02:20.715 --> 00:02:21.955
to the very last margin.

54
00:02:22.775 --> 00:02:26.235
Second of all, at least Tik enough has dared

55
00:02:26.235 --> 00:02:27.315
to deceive Moscow

56
00:02:27.335 --> 00:02:30.875
and re report, falsified, vote rigging,

57
00:02:31.015 --> 00:02:32.115
at this election.

58
00:02:32.335 --> 00:02:34.955
And so this is a really quite a big major issue.

59
00:02:35.135 --> 00:02:37.915
Within a month of the breaking of the scandal in January

60
00:02:38.055 --> 00:02:42.115
of 1949, all the major party officials associated

61
00:02:42.115 --> 00:02:43.715
with this voting scandal have lost their jobs.

62
00:02:44.495 --> 00:02:47.555
Six months later, almost all of them are under arrest,

63
00:02:47.895 --> 00:02:50.835
and by the end of 1950, almost all

64
00:02:50.835 --> 00:02:52.755
of them have been sentenced to long prison terms,

65
00:02:52.775 --> 00:02:54.035
and 20 have been shot.

66
00:02:54.495 --> 00:02:57.835
So it is a really major issue that spirals out of

67
00:02:58.025 --> 00:03:01.405
what seems like perhaps just a very small hiccup in an

68
00:03:01.405 --> 00:03:04.525
otherwise pretty well organized Stalinist,

69
00:03:04.655 --> 00:03:07.485
experience with electoral democracy or democracy.

70
00:03:07.765 --> 00:03:10.565
I guess if we consider a, one party system

71
00:03:10.955 --> 00:03:12.125
with no competition

72
00:03:12.465 --> 00:03:14.845
and, no alternative candidates, I think

73
00:03:14.845 --> 00:03:18.605
that it's important not to think about this as a,

74
00:03:18.605 --> 00:03:20.925
as a democratic system in which individuals

75
00:03:20.925 --> 00:03:24.045
and people in which people are able to,

76
00:03:24.145 --> 00:03:25.205
select their own leaders.

77
00:03:25.835 --> 00:03:27.885
Instead, it's a validation system

78
00:03:27.985 --> 00:03:30.485
or an approval system in which,

79
00:03:30.495 --> 00:03:32.125
party officials on the local level

80
00:03:32.125 --> 00:03:34.645
or on the regional level are able to,

81
00:03:35.165 --> 00:03:37.645
validate decisions made for them in Moscow.

82
00:03:38.505 --> 00:03:43.445
Te the, te Kuf, the head

83
00:03:43.445 --> 00:03:47.005
of the Electoral Commission in Leningrad, in December

84
00:03:47.005 --> 00:03:50.365
of 1948, was attempting to, cheat the system.

85
00:03:50.525 --> 00:03:52.405
I guess we could simply say, we could say he's trying

86
00:03:52.405 --> 00:03:55.205
to circum, he's trying to circumvent party controls.

87
00:03:55.675 --> 00:03:59.685
He's trying to, embellish the reputation

88
00:03:59.705 --> 00:04:02.605
of leaders who've sustained a bit of a,

89
00:04:02.625 --> 00:04:03.725
of a protest vote.

90
00:04:03.725 --> 00:04:06.685
They've sustained some dissent in, in the region

91
00:04:07.585 --> 00:04:09.805
at the same time, in the, in the central leadership.

92
00:04:09.805 --> 00:04:13.085
There's great concern then about why,

93
00:04:13.905 --> 00:04:17.085
the Len graders might be trying to conceal these votes,

94
00:04:17.195 --> 00:04:20.445
whether where is, if there's smoke, perhaps there's fire.

95
00:04:20.835 --> 00:04:23.565
This ends up mounting into a major issue, not just

96
00:04:23.565 --> 00:04:26.045
of insubordination, but something tantamount to treason.

97
00:04:26.045 --> 00:04:28.725
This is a really interesting sorts of, research,

98
00:04:28.725 --> 00:04:31.285
which we have only been able to do since 1991.

99
00:04:31.555 --> 00:04:34.085
Most of this was impossible to do during the Cold War,

100
00:04:34.085 --> 00:04:36.485
but when the Communist archives opened in 1991,

101
00:04:36.485 --> 00:04:38.245
it became possible to begin to think about this.

102
00:04:38.385 --> 00:04:41.205
So how should we think about this in general?

103
00:04:41.505 --> 00:04:44.125
Why would the Moscow authorities want local

104
00:04:44.145 --> 00:04:46.685
and regional level, officials to run

105
00:04:46.685 --> 00:04:47.725
for election in the first place?

106
00:04:47.725 --> 00:04:49.165
Well, if they want them to demonstrate

107
00:04:49.165 --> 00:04:51.125
that they can administer effectively

108
00:04:51.785 --> 00:04:55.205
and, run Moscow's policy on the local

109
00:04:55.265 --> 00:04:58.045
and regional level, they also want to be sure

110
00:04:58.155 --> 00:05:00.405
that they can run their own party organizations,

111
00:05:00.515 --> 00:05:03.285
that they can actually deliver either unanimous votes

112
00:05:03.345 --> 00:05:07.045
or near unanimity within their, party organizations.

113
00:05:07.705 --> 00:05:11.205
If they can't, if they either generate nay votes

114
00:05:11.265 --> 00:05:14.045
or protest votes or any sort of sign of dissent.

115
00:05:14.465 --> 00:05:17.325
That's something that Moscow is planning on using

116
00:05:17.325 --> 00:05:22.245
after 1948 as almost a, an early warning system in,

117
00:05:22.545 --> 00:05:24.805
in order to decide whether leaders need to be replaced,

118
00:05:24.835 --> 00:05:28.125
whether local or regional investigations need to take place.

119
00:05:28.785 --> 00:05:30.165
So that's what Moscow is thinking.

120
00:05:30.165 --> 00:05:32.565
It's trying to, it is trying to make leaders accountable.

121
00:05:32.755 --> 00:05:35.045
It's really hard to know what te enough was up

122
00:05:35.045 --> 00:05:37.725
to at the head of that party commission, the,

123
00:05:37.725 --> 00:05:39.605
the vote counting commission at that, at that,

124
00:05:39.665 --> 00:05:40.805
party conference.

125
00:05:41.345 --> 00:05:44.485
He could have either gotten a direct order from local bosses

126
00:05:44.745 --> 00:05:47.445
or on the regional level bosses who said, we need

127
00:05:47.445 --> 00:05:48.845
to be reelected unanimously.

128
00:05:49.345 --> 00:05:51.645
He may have done it on his own, out of a sense

129
00:05:51.645 --> 00:05:53.565
of being the client of one of these bosses

130
00:05:53.785 --> 00:05:56.085
and needing to protect those bosses reputation.

131
00:05:56.085 --> 00:05:57.165
He may have done it on his own.

132
00:05:57.625 --> 00:06:01.645
He may have also even not understood the democratic process.

133
00:06:02.005 --> 00:06:04.285
I guess he was a newly appointed official.

134
00:06:04.295 --> 00:06:06.885
There hadn't been elections in Leningrad for eight years.

135
00:06:07.425 --> 00:06:09.925
He may have grown up seeing Stalin and Molotov

136
00:06:09.925 --> 00:06:12.285
and other all union leaders be elected unanimously

137
00:06:12.425 --> 00:06:16.285
and decide that his leaders too should get a unanimous vote.

138
00:06:16.665 --> 00:06:18.085
But it almost doesn't matter

139
00:06:18.355 --> 00:06:21.565
because, the vote for the, the, the, the,

140
00:06:21.565 --> 00:06:24.205
the feeling from Moscow, the reaction from Moscow was

141
00:06:24.205 --> 00:06:27.245
so hysterical, so angry, so in temperate

142
00:06:27.355 --> 00:06:29.845
that the Leonard graders would dare to try

143
00:06:29.865 --> 00:06:34.285
and falsify, less than optimal, election results.

144
00:06:34.705 --> 00:06:36.045
And so this act

145
00:06:36.045 --> 00:06:38.965
of deceiving the Moscow authorities in short,

146
00:06:38.965 --> 00:06:40.285
circuiting a a,

147
00:06:40.335 --> 00:06:42.725
early warning system like they had set up,

148
00:06:44.045 --> 00:06:46.045
removing the ability to surveil the local

149
00:06:46.065 --> 00:06:48.605
and regional situation, Leningrad was considered

150
00:06:48.605 --> 00:06:50.165
to be an absolute red flag and,

151
00:06:50.185 --> 00:06:52.725
and leads to this major purge in

152
00:06:52.925 --> 00:06:54.405
1949 that I just laid out for you.

153
00:06:54.455 --> 00:06:57.565
We're learning a lot more about this now than we were able

154
00:06:57.565 --> 00:06:58.925
to say a generation ago,

155
00:06:59.305 --> 00:07:02.325
but it seems increasingly clear from the best work in the

156
00:07:02.325 --> 00:07:05.525
field that the Stalinist administration

157
00:07:05.655 --> 00:07:07.485
after the war was attempting to create a sort

158
00:07:07.485 --> 00:07:09.125
of meritocracy,

159
00:07:09.315 --> 00:07:11.565
mere party appointments wasn't enough anymore.

160
00:07:12.065 --> 00:07:14.805
Uh, they monitored not only the social origins

161
00:07:14.905 --> 00:07:17.325
of party leaders that were being appointed in the local

162
00:07:17.325 --> 00:07:19.205
and regional level, but educational level.

163
00:07:19.875 --> 00:07:21.445
They also kept very careful track

164
00:07:21.445 --> 00:07:22.685
of their administrative record.

165
00:07:23.175 --> 00:07:24.485
Could they deliver the plan?

166
00:07:24.855 --> 00:07:26.805
Could they implement Moscow's policies?

167
00:07:26.805 --> 00:07:29.005
Could they communicate ideas successfully

168
00:07:29.265 --> 00:07:32.165
to their own constituencies when they couldn't,

169
00:07:32.235 --> 00:07:34.485
they were recalled to Moscow, sent

170
00:07:34.485 --> 00:07:36.845
through a retraining course and sent somewhere else.

171
00:07:36.985 --> 00:07:39.085
So there were real sanctions applied to,

172
00:07:39.265 --> 00:07:42.125
in unsuccessful leaders, which I think can lead us

173
00:07:42.125 --> 00:07:43.405
to believe that this was an effort

174
00:07:43.405 --> 00:07:44.685
to create a meritocratic system.

175
00:07:45.315 --> 00:07:49.765
When Moscow sends investigators to Len grad in early 1949,

176
00:07:49.765 --> 00:07:51.685
though, to investigate the voter fraud,

177
00:07:51.875 --> 00:07:53.725
they discovered something completely different.

178
00:07:53.755 --> 00:07:56.805
They discovered that the local Len grad leaders on the local

179
00:07:56.825 --> 00:08:00.205
and regional levels had set up big patron client networks.

180
00:08:00.395 --> 00:08:03.085
They were tolerating limited levels of abuse, of power,

181
00:08:03.145 --> 00:08:06.925
and even corruption from their underlings in ex in exchange

182
00:08:07.025 --> 00:08:08.605
for vertical,

183
00:08:09.185 --> 00:08:12.325
for vertical loyalty within these patron client networks.

184
00:08:12.795 --> 00:08:15.485
This was a source of great frustration to Moscow.

185
00:08:15.665 --> 00:08:17.365
Of course, we shouldn't necessarily say

186
00:08:17.365 --> 00:08:20.285
that Len Grad was more corrupt than any other,

187
00:08:20.375 --> 00:08:23.405
major industrial center in the, in the country in the 1940s.

188
00:08:23.875 --> 00:08:28.445
Most major party organizations in most major, locations,

189
00:08:29.065 --> 00:08:32.325
cities and regions were probably more political machines

190
00:08:32.325 --> 00:08:34.365
than they were meritocratic operations.

191
00:08:35.185 --> 00:08:36.925
And it is also really important to note

192
00:08:37.035 --> 00:08:38.725
that Stalin was probably prepared,

193
00:08:38.725 --> 00:08:40.885
at least in the short term, to tolerate these political

194
00:08:40.885 --> 00:08:44.485
machines as long as they were loyal to Moscow

195
00:08:44.485 --> 00:08:45.925
and delivered the five-year plan.

196
00:08:46.345 --> 00:08:48.405
The key thing to take away here, though,

197
00:08:48.745 --> 00:08:52.005
is in this transition from machine to meritocracy,

198
00:08:52.385 --> 00:08:55.685
the Lenin graders, unfortunately, a wayward,

199
00:08:55.795 --> 00:08:57.085
they appear insubordinate.

200
00:08:57.085 --> 00:08:59.485
They appear as if they're prepared to deceive the center,

201
00:08:59.985 --> 00:09:02.645
and that's where this break deal breaks down.

202
00:09:02.745 --> 00:09:04.565
If, if Stalin was willing to tolerate

203
00:09:04.955 --> 00:09:08.925
what some scholars like, Yom Gosky from Manchester

204
00:09:09.105 --> 00:09:12.405
and Nuke from Oxford have suggested, is sort

205
00:09:12.405 --> 00:09:14.085
of a sub-state dictatorship.

206
00:09:14.085 --> 00:09:16.605
If Stalin was willing to tolerate sub-state dictators

207
00:09:16.945 --> 00:09:18.845
as long as they were obedient to Moscow

208
00:09:18.845 --> 00:09:21.685
and fulfill the economic plan, the moment that they step out

209
00:09:21.685 --> 00:09:22.925
of line, they're busted.

210
00:09:23.025 --> 00:09:24.685
And this is what happens in Len grad

211
00:09:24.695 --> 00:09:26.445
after the scandals of 1948.

212
00:09:26.625 --> 00:09:29.205
So previous to 1991, we assume

213
00:09:29.205 --> 00:09:32.325
that the system worked in a totalitarian sort of fashion

214
00:09:32.515 --> 00:09:35.405
that, all policy was devised in Moscow.

215
00:09:35.665 --> 00:09:38.445
It was implemented in the regions on the local

216
00:09:38.465 --> 00:09:40.005
and the regional level, but

217
00:09:40.155 --> 00:09:42.685
that very little deviation was tolerated.

218
00:09:42.715 --> 00:09:44.605
Very little personality was tolerated.

219
00:09:44.945 --> 00:09:48.445
Uh, the local and regional officials were simply in lockstep

220
00:09:48.445 --> 00:09:50.125
implementing what was devised and,

221
00:09:50.225 --> 00:09:53.685
and, promulgated in Moscow, the newest research,

222
00:09:53.705 --> 00:09:56.845
and again, I'll, I'll, I'll, plug, two

223
00:09:56.845 --> 00:09:59.245
of the most exciting researchers who are doing some

224
00:09:59.245 --> 00:10:01.685
of this work these days, Joran, Gosky and Manchester

225
00:10:01.785 --> 00:10:03.365
and Nuke in Moscow.

226
00:10:03.635 --> 00:10:06.005
They argue that that old totalitarian model is rather

227
00:10:06.095 --> 00:10:10.565
simplistic, and that the, top down, authority

228
00:10:10.625 --> 00:10:14.245
of the state was not sufficient in order to, to,

229
00:10:14.525 --> 00:10:17.325
a accomplish absolute fulfillment of the plan

230
00:10:17.875 --> 00:10:20.045
without some leeway being given

231
00:10:20.145 --> 00:10:21.565
to local and regional bosses.

232
00:10:21.865 --> 00:10:23.085
So Golitsky and,

233
00:10:23.085 --> 00:10:26.445
and k Clev new demonstrate in, in their most recent book

234
00:10:27.445 --> 00:10:30.975
that, there was sort of a deal that was created

235
00:10:30.975 --> 00:10:34.135
between Moscow and the provinces in which the provinces were

236
00:10:34.135 --> 00:10:37.855
allowed to, provincial barons

237
00:10:37.855 --> 00:10:41.135
and bosses were allowed to, enjoy a certain level

238
00:10:41.235 --> 00:10:43.695
of abuse, of authority, of corruption, of patronage

239
00:10:43.695 --> 00:10:46.895
and clientelism as long as they were loyal to the center.

240
00:10:47.315 --> 00:10:51.175
But the key takeaway here again, is that the moment

241
00:10:51.245 --> 00:10:54.295
that these, local barons and,

242
00:10:54.315 --> 00:10:58.935
and, party leaders become wayward,

243
00:10:59.035 --> 00:11:00.775
the moment that they step out of line, the moment

244
00:11:00.775 --> 00:11:03.375
that they begin to break this implicit deal of loyalty

245
00:11:03.955 --> 00:11:07.735
in exchange for that, latitude of action,

246
00:11:08.515 --> 00:11:10.335
Moscow becomes extremely concerned

247
00:11:10.335 --> 00:11:12.375
and views it not only as insubordination,

248
00:11:12.635 --> 00:11:15.215
but something tantamount, to treason.

249
00:11:16.205 --> 00:11:19.225
Uh, so I, I think that that's really the big, that

250
00:11:19.225 --> 00:11:21.545
that's the way that policymaking changes, that we,

251
00:11:21.545 --> 00:11:23.465
we should think about the Lenn grad.

252
00:11:23.815 --> 00:11:25.585
It's worthwhile, maybe mentioning for a moment

253
00:11:25.585 --> 00:11:27.945
that the Lenn Grets had gone through World War II

254
00:11:28.365 --> 00:11:30.785
and spent almost 900 days in a blockade.

255
00:11:31.005 --> 00:11:32.585
The Lenn grad party organization,

256
00:11:32.585 --> 00:11:35.305
therefore, had developed its own leadership style during

257
00:11:35.305 --> 00:11:37.625
that time period, which differed a little bit from

258
00:11:37.625 --> 00:11:38.745
what was practiced elsewhere.

259
00:11:39.605 --> 00:11:44.105
But Moscow tolerated it after the war, between 1945

260
00:11:44.105 --> 00:11:47.305
and 1948, because the Lenon grads were successful at

261
00:11:47.305 --> 00:11:50.505
delivering the plan at reinforcing the party line.

262
00:11:50.765 --> 00:11:52.385
It seemed as if they were obedient,

263
00:11:52.525 --> 00:11:55.765
but they were, this new particular deal of tolerance

264
00:11:55.825 --> 00:11:59.125
for sub-state dictators was only tolerated up

265
00:11:59.125 --> 00:12:01.165
until the moment when those dictators begin

266
00:12:01.165 --> 00:12:02.565
to try and deceive Moscow.

267
00:12:02.865 --> 00:12:03.965
And that's what appears

268
00:12:03.965 --> 00:12:06.005
to happen at this December 48 conference.

269
00:12:06.185 --> 00:12:09.005
And that appears to be the red line across which these,

270
00:12:09.385 --> 00:12:10.845
these, local

271
00:12:10.865 --> 00:12:13.005
and regional bosses are not allowed to cross.

272
00:12:13.285 --> 00:12:15.165
I guess what I've tried to argue in the, in the,

273
00:12:15.185 --> 00:12:17.645
in the piece that we've looked at for today is

274
00:12:17.645 --> 00:12:20.325
that elections were one of several sorts

275
00:12:20.325 --> 00:12:22.925
of early warning systems, which the party was using.

276
00:12:22.995 --> 00:12:26.445
Something that we probably don't expect,

277
00:12:26.475 --> 00:12:28.965
when we're casually thinking about the Soviet Union,

278
00:12:29.015 --> 00:12:32.205
we're used to thinking about the Soviet Union using the

279
00:12:32.205 --> 00:12:34.405
secret police, the central committee

280
00:12:34.585 --> 00:12:36.965
and Stalin's organizations in the very center of,

281
00:12:36.985 --> 00:12:39.005
of the political universe of the Soviet Union,

282
00:12:39.095 --> 00:12:42.285
would send out investigative teams to do audits of local

283
00:12:42.505 --> 00:12:43.925
and regional organizations.

284
00:12:43.975 --> 00:12:45.925
There are all sorts of bureaucratic structures

285
00:12:45.945 --> 00:12:49.365
and police driven structures that they could use to try

286
00:12:49.365 --> 00:12:52.645
and keep a hold on the situation, on the local

287
00:12:52.665 --> 00:12:55.445
and regional level, and keep it running in a way which was,

288
00:12:55.745 --> 00:12:58.765
appropriately centralized for their tastes.

289
00:12:59.105 --> 00:13:01.445
But I, what I've tried to contribute in this article

290
00:13:02.025 --> 00:13:05.245
is a new understanding of how elections were also used

291
00:13:05.265 --> 00:13:09.485
as a mechanism of control, a mechanism of surveillance.

292
00:13:09.755 --> 00:13:12.925
It's not at all the sort of democratic functioning,

293
00:13:12.955 --> 00:13:15.445
institution that we might expect.

294
00:13:15.905 --> 00:13:20.765
Uh, of course, it's, it's at first blush, a,

295
00:13:20.865 --> 00:13:24.285
non-competitive single party, single candidate system.

296
00:13:24.585 --> 00:13:26.005
But even more than that,

297
00:13:26.275 --> 00:13:29.365
it's not a grassroots driven democratic system of,

298
00:13:29.825 --> 00:13:32.005
in which you select leaders from below.

299
00:13:32.395 --> 00:13:36.085
Instead, it's a top down situation, scenario in which,

300
00:13:36.265 --> 00:13:38.885
leaders are selected from above.

301
00:13:39.375 --> 00:13:42.925
Their consent is engineered from below,

302
00:13:43.545 --> 00:13:46.645
and then the party monitors the performance

303
00:13:46.645 --> 00:13:48.885
of those officials by means of a whole variety

304
00:13:48.885 --> 00:13:51.285
of different sorts of things, including elections, in order

305
00:13:51.285 --> 00:13:53.645
to ensure that that loyal, capable,

306
00:13:54.245 --> 00:13:56.365
competent people are running party affairs

307
00:13:56.385 --> 00:13:57.605
on the local and regional level.

308
00:13:57.745 --> 00:13:58.805
So it's, it is a demo.

309
00:13:58.865 --> 00:14:01.565
It is an election, but it's not a democratic election.

310
00:14:01.905 --> 00:14:04.725
It is, much more the power of the party

311
00:14:04.865 --> 00:14:07.805
and the state rather than it is anything reminiscent

312
00:14:07.805 --> 00:14:08.965
of people power, I guess.

313
00:14:09.345 --> 00:14:11.805
Um, so I think that's the really big takeaway.

314
00:14:12.065 --> 00:14:14.845
The totalitarian model doesn't appear very competitive.

315
00:14:14.845 --> 00:14:16.045
When we get this close

316
00:14:16.065 --> 00:14:18.205
and use this sort of degree of archival research

317
00:14:18.205 --> 00:14:21.725
and look at case studies like this, the totalitarian model

318
00:14:21.825 --> 00:14:23.805
of absolute authority from above

319
00:14:24.185 --> 00:14:25.845
and absolute obedience from

320
00:14:25.895 --> 00:14:28.365
below doesn't seem to work very well.

321
00:14:28.755 --> 00:14:30.205
Perhaps it's because the,

322
00:14:30.345 --> 00:14:33.165
the officials were poorly educated,

323
00:14:33.345 --> 00:14:36.205
but perhaps it's also because it was a vast country.

324
00:14:36.745 --> 00:14:39.885
And, the ability of the state to,

325
00:14:40.105 --> 00:14:43.005
create a puppet master paradigm in which it would absolutely

326
00:14:43.005 --> 00:14:46.285
control affairs, concerning local and offic and,

327
00:14:46.285 --> 00:14:48.445
and regional officials, just wasn't possible.

328
00:14:49.065 --> 00:14:51.725
And so the, the, the system instead devises

329
00:14:51.725 --> 00:14:53.645
what we would probably call today, a sort

330
00:14:53.645 --> 00:14:56.725
of authoritarian politics, not totalitarian control,

331
00:14:56.745 --> 00:15:00.565
but more, a rigid authoritarian system in which specific

332
00:15:01.095 --> 00:15:05.205
appointees of the center are allowed enough, leeway

333
00:15:05.205 --> 00:15:09.445
to have incentive to continue to enforce central Dictat,

334
00:15:09.705 --> 00:15:11.365
to, bring in the plan.

335
00:15:11.905 --> 00:15:15.325
Uh, this explains a lot of the corruption

336
00:15:15.325 --> 00:15:17.725
that we're beginning to, become aware of

337
00:15:17.725 --> 00:15:19.045
as we dig into the archives.

338
00:15:19.045 --> 00:15:21.165
This explains the patron client networks

339
00:15:21.165 --> 00:15:23.005
that we never imagined existing before.

340
00:15:23.545 --> 00:15:26.765
Um, it looks like a system which is much more organic

341
00:15:27.065 --> 00:15:29.205
and has feedback mechanisms,

342
00:15:29.225 --> 00:15:30.885
not just top down, but bottom up.

343
00:15:31.275 --> 00:15:32.845
It's not the feedback mechanisms

344
00:15:32.845 --> 00:15:35.485
that we'd expect in popular referendums or, or,

345
00:15:35.625 --> 00:15:37.325
or multi-party elections in the West.

346
00:15:37.665 --> 00:15:42.085
But we do see a much more, I guess, living,

347
00:15:42.085 --> 00:15:44.565
organic sense of, of internal Soviet politics.

348
00:15:44.835 --> 00:15:47.365
I've tried to emphasize in our discussion today is

349
00:15:47.365 --> 00:15:49.965
that 23 votes out of a thousand,

350
00:15:50.155 --> 00:15:51.565
shouldn't seem like anything,

351
00:15:52.345 --> 00:15:55.085
and probably Tik enough, the fellow in charge

352
00:15:55.085 --> 00:15:58.205
of the electoral comp, commission at that,

353
00:15:58.485 --> 00:16:01.325
December, 1948 party conference,

354
00:16:01.425 --> 00:16:05.565
he also probably viewed it as, inconsequential, sort

355
00:16:05.605 --> 00:16:07.885
of an ugly way to mar the reputations

356
00:16:07.905 --> 00:16:10.085
of his party leaders, his bosses.

357
00:16:10.225 --> 00:16:13.405
And so therefore, he appears to have been quite determined

358
00:16:13.465 --> 00:16:15.805
to just sort of sweep it under the carpet and,

359
00:16:15.865 --> 00:16:18.125
and hope that nobody noticed the fact

360
00:16:18.125 --> 00:16:19.605
that Moscow did notice.

361
00:16:20.145 --> 00:16:24.765
And the fact that Moscow reacted with such anger,

362
00:16:25.035 --> 00:16:29.885
with such, vitriol to this, to this, instance

363
00:16:29.945 --> 00:16:32.525
of party, vote rigging is important.

364
00:16:32.785 --> 00:16:35.085
And I think it's important for two levels on two levels.

365
00:16:35.085 --> 00:16:36.445
First of all, I think it's important

366
00:16:36.595 --> 00:16:38.805
because, it does indicate

367
00:16:38.805 --> 00:16:40.885
that there was some dissent within the Leonard Guard party

368
00:16:40.885 --> 00:16:44.165
organization in particular in regard to one leader,

369
00:16:44.245 --> 00:16:45.725
Kapustin, the second in command.

370
00:16:46.405 --> 00:16:48.625
That's interesting. It means that there's, there,

371
00:16:48.635 --> 00:16:51.425
there is some discord within a party organization

372
00:16:51.425 --> 00:16:52.465
that we generally consider

373
00:16:52.465 --> 00:16:53.785
to have been pretty high functioning.

374
00:16:54.255 --> 00:16:56.465
Much more important though is the fact, fact,

375
00:16:56.465 --> 00:16:58.145
and this is much more important to Moscow.

376
00:16:58.405 --> 00:17:01.745
Uh, this demonstrates gorlitsky have nuke to be right about

377
00:17:01.745 --> 00:17:03.465
how elections are actually being used.

378
00:17:03.535 --> 00:17:06.585
They're not really differ delivering referendum on leaders

379
00:17:07.025 --> 00:17:08.705
'cause those leaders are gonna be elected anyway.

380
00:17:09.015 --> 00:17:10.865
It's instead a feedback mechanism

381
00:17:10.925 --> 00:17:13.265
or an early warning mechanism to indicate

382
00:17:13.575 --> 00:17:15.425
what is going on in the regional level

383
00:17:15.685 --> 00:17:17.985
and should the party be concerned,

384
00:17:17.985 --> 00:17:19.585
about anything going on out there.

385
00:17:19.965 --> 00:17:24.225
And so the Leonard Gutter's efforts to rig the vote in 1948

386
00:17:24.565 --> 00:17:27.505
and to conceal the fact that there was a fairly small,

387
00:17:27.525 --> 00:17:29.825
but nevertheless distinct protest vote in

388
00:17:29.825 --> 00:17:32.185
that election is really important to the way

389
00:17:32.185 --> 00:17:33.345
that we understand this system.

390
00:17:33.345 --> 00:17:37.465
That the system, was sensitive to feedback from below,

391
00:17:37.485 --> 00:17:40.905
but it was also very, very concerned about falsification

392
00:17:41.285 --> 00:17:44.745
and bad data coming back from appointed officials,

393
00:17:44.935 --> 00:17:46.625
from out in those, in, in,

394
00:17:46.645 --> 00:17:48.825
in those provincial areas. And so, again, I guess I

395
00:17:48.825 --> 00:17:49.925
Will come back to the notion

396
00:17:50.115 --> 00:17:51.845
that elections in the Soviet system,

397
00:17:51.845 --> 00:17:54.965
especially under Stalin, are much less an exercise

398
00:17:54.965 --> 00:17:56.005
of Vox popule.

399
00:17:56.155 --> 00:18:01.005
They're much less, sort of grassroots effort to,

400
00:18:01.265 --> 00:18:03.965
select leaders and much more a,

401
00:18:04.095 --> 00:18:07.205
diagnostic system imposed from above in order

402
00:18:07.445 --> 00:18:09.405
to monitor essentially appointed leaders

403
00:18:09.745 --> 00:18:12.845
and assure, administrative effectiveness on the local

404
00:18:12.845 --> 00:18:13.565
and regional levels.

Legitimacy and Control: The 1948 Leningrad Party Elections

00:00:00 - In the 1930s, the system of a non-competitive single party, single candidate, electoral process becomes pretty stable and, and standardized. This is done essentially to give, party leaders a sense of legitimacy, in a democratic sense, while keeping it very firmly under the control of the Communist Party. During World War ii in the early 1940s, the system breaks down because of the wartime emergency, the exigencies of, of this, incredible conflict. And by 19, it's only really by 1948 that the party begins

00:00:34 - of party elections at party conferences in order to reacquire that sense of legitimacy, for its, officials in the local and the regional level. So that gets us to 1948, which is, an important year for the piece that I wrote, insofar as, it's at that time that the Lenn grad party organization, which is the third largest in the Soviet Union, Len grad is, is known today as St. Petersburg. So it's a massive city and region. The Leningrad Association Dec Len grad party organization

00:01:09 - that it's time to have a major conference and a big election. It needs to reelect its officials to demonstrate their legitimacy. And so they do that in, in mid to late December of 1948. The really interesting moment here, though, is that of over a thousand votes cast for these Lenin grad party bosses. 23 negative na votes are cast, protest votes, I guess we could call them. In particular, 15 votes are cast against the Second

Scandal Unveiled: The Leningrad Electoral Deception

00:01:38 - this might not have been a very big deal, I guess, historically speaking, except for the fact that the head of the electoral commission of this party conference, a guy named Tik Kuf, tells his fellow members of this electoral commission that we're gonna deliver this result unanimously for our party bosses in Lenn grad. He didn't have to do this apparently, but he did it anyway. This causes a massive schedule, scandal when it gets to Moscow because of at least two factors. First of all, the Lenn graders are representing themselves

00:02:12 - They're boasting of a unanimous electoral victory. They're boasting of, of, of, solidarity and, and cohesion within the party organization up to the very last margin. Second of all, at least Tik enough has dared to deceive Moscow and re report, falsified, vote rigging, at this election. And so this is a really quite a big major issue. Within a month of the breaking of the scandal in January

00:02:42 - with this voting scandal have lost their jobs. Six months later, almost all of them are under arrest, and by the end of 1950, almost all of them have been sentenced to long prison terms, and 20 have been shot. So it is a really major issue that spirals out of what seems like perhaps just a very small hiccup in an otherwise pretty well organized Stalinist, experience with electoral democracy or democracy. I guess if we consider a, one party system

Electoral Legitimacy and Party Control in Soviet Politics

00:03:12 - and, no alternative candidates, I think that it's important not to think about this as a, as a democratic system in which individuals and people in which people are able to, select their own leaders. Instead, it's a validation system or an approval system in which, party officials on the local level or on the regional level are able to, validate decisions made for them in Moscow. Te the, te Kuf, the head

00:03:47 - of 1948, was attempting to, cheat the system. I guess we could simply say, we could say he's trying to circum, he's trying to circumvent party controls. He's trying to, embellish the reputation of leaders who've sustained a bit of a, of a protest vote. They've sustained some dissent in, in the region at the same time, in the, in the central leadership. There's great concern then about why,

00:04:17 - whether where is, if there's smoke, perhaps there's fire. This ends up mounting into a major issue, not just of insubordination, but something tantamount to treason. This is a really interesting sorts of, research, which we have only been able to do since 1991. Most of this was impossible to do during the Cold War, but when the Communist archives opened in 1991, it became possible to begin to think about this. So how should we think about this in general? Why would the Moscow authorities want local

Understanding Moscow's Electoral Strategy and Accountability Mechanisms

00:04:46 - for election in the first place? Well, if they want them to demonstrate that they can administer effectively and, run Moscow's policy on the local and regional level, they also want to be sure that they can run their own party organizations, that they can actually deliver either unanimous votes or near unanimity within their, party organizations. If they can't, if they either generate nay votes or protest votes or any sort of sign of dissent.

00:05:17 - after 1948 as almost a, an early warning system in, in order to decide whether leaders need to be replaced, whether local or regional investigations need to take place. So that's what Moscow is thinking. It's trying to, it is trying to make leaders accountable. It's really hard to know what te enough was up to at the head of that party commission, the, the vote counting commission at that, at that, party conference. He could have either gotten a direct order from local bosses

00:05:47 - to be reelected unanimously. He may have done it on his own, out of a sense of being the client of one of these bosses and needing to protect those bosses reputation. He may have done it on his own. He may have also even not understood the democratic process. I guess he was a newly appointed official. There hadn't been elections in Leningrad for eight years. He may have grown up seeing Stalin and Molotov and other all union leaders be elected unanimously and decide that his leaders too should get a unanimous vote.

Election Rigging and the Purge of 1949 in Leningrad

00:06:18 - because, the vote for the, the, the, the, the feeling from Moscow, the reaction from Moscow was so hysterical, so angry, so in temperate that the Leonard graders would dare to try and falsify, less than optimal, election results. And so this act of deceiving the Moscow authorities in short, circuiting a a, early warning system like they had set up, removing the ability to surveil the local and regional situation, Leningrad was considered

00:06:50 - and leads to this major purge in 1949 that I just laid out for you. We're learning a lot more about this now than we were able to say a generation ago, but it seems increasingly clear from the best work in the field that the Stalinist administration after the war was attempting to create a sort of meritocracy, mere party appointments wasn't enough anymore. they monitored not only the social origins of party leaders that were being appointed in the local and regional level, but educational level.

00:07:21 - of their administrative record. Could they deliver the plan? Could they implement Moscow's policies? Could they communicate ideas successfully to their own constituencies when they couldn't, they were recalled to Moscow, sent through a retraining course and sent somewhere else. So there were real sanctions applied to, in unsuccessful leaders, which I think can lead us to believe that this was an effort to create a meritocratic system. When Moscow sends investigators to Len grad in early 1949, though, to investigate the voter fraud,

Patron-Client Networks and Moscow's Frustration

00:07:53 - They discovered that the local Len grad leaders on the local and regional levels had set up big patron client networks. They were tolerating limited levels of abuse, of power, and even corruption from their underlings in ex in exchange for vertical, for vertical loyalty within these patron client networks. This was a source of great frustration to Moscow. Of course, we shouldn't necessarily say that Len Grad was more corrupt than any other, major industrial center in the, in the country in the 1940s.

00:08:29 - cities and regions were probably more political machines than they were meritocratic operations. And it is also really important to note that Stalin was probably prepared, at least in the short term, to tolerate these political machines as long as they were loyal to Moscow and delivered the five-year plan. The key thing to take away here, though, is in this transition from machine to meritocracy, the Lenin graders, unfortunately, a wayward,

00:08:57 - They appear as if they're prepared to deceive the center, and that's where this break deal breaks down. If, if Stalin was willing to tolerate what some scholars like, Yom Gosky from Manchester and Nuke from Oxford have suggested, is sort of a sub-state dictatorship. If Stalin was willing to tolerate sub-state dictators as long as they were obedient to Moscow and fulfill the economic plan, the moment that they step out of line, they're busted. And this is what happens in Len grad after the scandals of 1948.

Totalitarian Control and Local Autonomy in Soviet Governance

00:09:29 - that the system worked in a totalitarian sort of fashion that, all policy was devised in Moscow. It was implemented in the regions on the local and the regional level, but that very little deviation was tolerated. Very little personality was tolerated. the local and regional officials were simply in lockstep implementing what was devised and, and, promulgated in Moscow, the newest research, and again, I'll, I'll, I'll, plug, two

00:09:59 - of this work these days, Joran, Gosky and Manchester and Nuke in Moscow. They argue that that old totalitarian model is rather simplistic, and that the, top down, authority of the state was not sufficient in order to, to, a accomplish absolute fulfillment of the plan without some leeway being given to local and regional bosses. So Golitsky and, and k Clev new demonstrate in, in their most recent book

00:10:30 - between Moscow and the provinces in which the provinces were allowed to, provincial barons and bosses were allowed to, enjoy a certain level of abuse, of authority, of corruption, of patronage and clientelism as long as they were loyal to the center. But the key takeaway here again, is that the moment that these, local barons and, and, party leaders become wayward,

Breach of Loyalty: The Leningrad Conference and Moscow's Response

00:11:00 - that they begin to break this implicit deal of loyalty in exchange for that, latitude of action, Moscow becomes extremely concerned and views it not only as insubordination, but something tantamount, to treason. so I, I think that that's really the big, that that's the way that policymaking changes, that we, we should think about the Lenn grad. It's worthwhile, maybe mentioning for a moment that the Lenn Grets had gone through World War II and spent almost 900 days in a blockade.

00:11:32 - therefore, had developed its own leadership style during that time period, which differed a little bit from what was practiced elsewhere. But Moscow tolerated it after the war, between 1945 and 1948, because the Lenon grads were successful at delivering the plan at reinforcing the party line. It seemed as if they were obedient, but they were, this new particular deal of tolerance for sub-state dictators was only tolerated up until the moment when those dictators begin

00:12:02 - And that's what appears to happen at this December 48 conference. And that appears to be the red line across which these, these, local and regional bosses are not allowed to cross. I guess what I've tried to argue in the, in the, in the piece that we've looked at for today is that elections were one of several sorts of early warning systems, which the party was using. Something that we probably don't expect, when we're casually thinking about the Soviet Union, we're used to thinking about the Soviet Union using the

Understanding Soviet Elections: A Top-Down Approach

00:12:34 - and Stalin's organizations in the very center of, of the political universe of the Soviet Union, would send out investigative teams to do audits of local and regional organizations. There are all sorts of bureaucratic structures and police driven structures that they could use to try and keep a hold on the situation, on the local and regional level, and keep it running in a way which was, appropriately centralized for their tastes. But I, what I've tried to contribute in this article is a new understanding of how elections were also used

00:13:09 - It's not at all the sort of democratic functioning, institution that we might expect. of course, it's, it's at first blush, a, non-competitive single party, single candidate system. But even more than that, it's not a grassroots driven democratic system of, in which you select leaders from below. Instead, it's a top down situation, scenario in which,

00:13:39 - Their consent is engineered from below, and then the party monitors the performance of those officials by means of a whole variety of different sorts of things, including elections, in order to ensure that that loyal, capable, competent people are running party affairs on the local and regional level. So it's, it is a demo. It is an election, but it's not a democratic election. It is, much more the power of the party and the state rather than it is anything reminiscent

Redefining Authority: From Totalitarianism to Authoritarianism

00:14:09 - so I think that's the really big takeaway. The totalitarian model doesn't appear very competitive. When we get this close and use this sort of degree of archival research and look at case studies like this, the totalitarian model of absolute authority from above and absolute obedience from below doesn't seem to work very well. Perhaps it's because the, the officials were poorly educated, but perhaps it's also because it was a vast country. And, the ability of the state to,

00:14:43 - control affairs, concerning local and offic and, and regional officials, just wasn't possible. And so the, the, the system instead devises what we would probably call today, a sort of authoritarian politics, not totalitarian control, but more, a rigid authoritarian system in which specific appointees of the center are allowed enough, leeway to have incentive to continue to enforce central Dictat, to, bring in the plan.

00:15:15 - that we're beginning to, become aware of as we dig into the archives. This explains the patron client networks that we never imagined existing before. it looks like a system which is much more organic and has feedback mechanisms, not just top down, but bottom up. It's not the feedback mechanisms that we'd expect in popular referendums or, or, or multi-party elections in the West. But we do see a much more, I guess, living,

Vote Rigging and Party Dissent in Post-War Leningrad

00:15:44 - I've tried to emphasize in our discussion today is that 23 votes out of a thousand, shouldn't seem like anything, and probably Tik enough, the fellow in charge of the electoral comp, commission at that, December, 1948 party conference, he also probably viewed it as, inconsequential, sort of an ugly way to mar the reputations of his party leaders, his bosses. And so therefore, he appears to have been quite determined

00:16:15 - and hope that nobody noticed the fact that Moscow did notice. And the fact that Moscow reacted with such anger, with such, vitriol to this, to this, instance of party, vote rigging is important. And I think it's important for two levels on two levels. First of all, I think it's important because, it does indicate that there was some dissent within the Leonard Guard party organization in particular in regard to one leader,

00:16:46 - That's interesting. It means that there's, there, there is some discord within a party organization that we generally consider to have been pretty high functioning. Much more important though is the fact, fact, and this is much more important to Moscow. this demonstrates gorlitsky have nuke to be right about how elections are actually being used. They're not really differ delivering referendum on leaders 'cause those leaders are gonna be elected anyway. It's instead a feedback mechanism or an early warning mechanism to indicate what is going on in the regional level

Understanding Soviet Elections: A Diagnostic System

00:17:17 - about anything going on out there. And so the Leonard Gutter's efforts to rig the vote in 1948 and to conceal the fact that there was a fairly small, but nevertheless distinct protest vote in that election is really important to the way that we understand this system. That the system, was sensitive to feedback from below, but it was also very, very concerned about falsification and bad data coming back from appointed officials, from out in those, in, in,

00:18:12 - Will come back to the notion that elections in the Soviet system, especially under Stalin, are much less an exercise of Vox popule. They're much less, sort of grassroots effort to, select leaders and much more a, diagnostic system imposed from above in order to monitor essentially appointed leaders and assure, administrative effectiveness on the local and regional levels.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis

Data

Originals

Explainers

Podcasts

Faculti

New on Faculti

Idea Explorer

Definition

News Context

Critical Questions and Answers

Research Summaries

Election Integrity in a One-Party Dictatorship

Media Literacy Toolkit

Critical Questions to Consider ▼

Bias and Perspective Awareness ▼

Further Reading ▼