How Constitutional Drafters Use Comparative Evidence

New Themes

Climate Finance, Risk, and Governance Law, AI, and Ethics in Digital Societies Economics of Uncertainty and Disasters Business, Technology, and Power Structures Architecture as Political Memory and Agency

Power, Violence, and the Political Imagination Imperial Legacies, Design, and Global History

Popular Categories

Law Economics Finance Political Science Business Architecture Engineering Science Education History Psychology All Professional All Arts and Humanities All Social Sciences All Sciences

Law Economics Finance Political Science Business Architecture Engineering Science Education History Psychology All Professional All Arts and Humanities All Social Sciences All Sciences Literature Mathematics Computer Science Philosophy Biology Chemistry View all categories

Institutions Knowledge Base^Beta

Support

For Universities For Research Comms For Teams Upgrade About Member Support Privacy Terms

Copyright Faculti 2013-2025. All Rights Reserved.

How Constitutional Drafters Use Comparative Evidence

How Constitutional Drafters Use Comparative Evidence

Svitlana Chernykh

Australian National University

Research Context

More Detail

Svitlana Chernykh discusses the transcripts of constitutional deliberations in two settings of third-wave democratization, Brazil and Ukraine.

No Q&A Available

AI-generated questions for this video will appear here once processed.

Ask the video a question: Explore the transcript or get definitions

Loading...