How Reducing Employment Protection Affects Job Creation and Job Destruction Summary

View more insights in Research Shorts - Economics

View more figures from Faculti

Next in Economics

Conditional cash transfers and women’s reproductive choices Summary

| Faculti

Collective bargaining in the age of precarious employment Summary

| Faculti

A reduction in employment protection is expected to encourage both job creation and job destruction

Image courtesy of interviewee. July 11, 2024

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

The video discusses a study that examines how changes in employment protection legislation affect job creation and destruction in Italy. Prior to 2012, smaller firms (15 or fewer workers) had less stringent employment protections compared to larger firms. After 2012, all firms gained the ability to fire workers for economic reasons, impacting firm behavior. The study found that larger firms increased job destruction, while those exactly at the 15-worker cutoff did not alter job creation, contrary to the policy's intent to promote hiring. The findings indicated that policy uncertainty, particularly regarding potential future changes to employment protection, leads firms to be cautious in their hiring and firing decisions. This video suggests that policy uncertainty should be considered in future labor market research.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.035 --> 00:02.645
This video discusses a study examining the effects

00:02.645 --> 00:05.885
of employment protection legislation on job creation

00:05.985 --> 00:07.085
and job destruction.

00:07.825 --> 00:10.965
The study uses the the entire population of Italian firms

00:11.345 --> 00:12.965
and aims to understand the effect

00:12.965 --> 00:14.885
of a reduction in employment protection

00:14.905 --> 00:16.125
on these two margins.

00:16.935 --> 00:20.245
Prior to 2012, Italian firms with 15

00:20.345 --> 00:23.405
or fewer workers had lighter employment protection,

00:23.695 --> 00:25.965
while larger firms had stricter protection.

00:26.935 --> 00:30.205
After 2012, all firms could use economic reasons

00:30.265 --> 00:33.365
to fire workers, making it easier for larger firms

00:33.465 --> 00:36.045
to fire employees and changing firm behavior.

00:37.105 --> 00:39.445
The author finds that firms above the cutoff,

00:39.475 --> 00:42.165
15 workers increased job destruction,

00:42.945 --> 00:45.685
but firms at the cutoff exactly 15 workers,

00:46.025 --> 00:47.525
did not change job creation,

00:47.815 --> 00:49.965
which is surprising given the policy's

00:49.965 --> 00:51.445
motivation to encourage hiring.

00:52.875 --> 00:56.325
This video reveals that firms do not hire new workers due

00:56.405 --> 00:57.445
to policy uncertainty,

00:57.795 --> 01:00.365
despite theoretical models predicting they would.

01:00.465 --> 01:03.725
The uncertainty regarding the possible reintroduction

01:03.725 --> 01:06.165
of a policy in the future leads firms

01:06.225 --> 01:08.885
to be cautious in hiring and firing decisions.

01:09.715 --> 01:11.005
This highlights the importance

01:11.005 --> 01:14.805
of considering policy uncertainty in future research on

01:14.845 --> 01:16.005
labor market policies.

"Analyzing the Impact of Employment Protection Legislation on Job Dynamics in Italian Firms"

00:00:00 - This video discusses a study examining the effects of employment protection legislation on job creation and job destruction. The study uses the the entire population of Italian firms and aims to understand the effect of a reduction in employment protection on these two margins. Prior to 2012, Italian firms with 15 or fewer workers had lighter employment protection, while larger firms had stricter protection. After 2012, all firms could use economic reasons to fire workers, making it easier for larger firms to fire employees and changing firm behavior. The author finds that firms above the cutoff, 15 workers increased job destruction,
00:01:14 - did not change job creation, which is surprising given the policy's motivation to encourage hiring. This video reveals that firms do not hire new workers due to policy uncertainty, despite theoretical models predicting they would. The uncertainty regarding the possible reintroduction of a policy in the future leads firms to be cautious in hiring and firing decisions. This highlights the importance of considering policy uncertainty in future research on labor market policies.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis