Search results for the keyword {phrase} ({results_count} of {results_count_total}). There will be further results within Author, Category and Institution pages directly.
Displaying {results_count} results of {results_count_total}
Beginning in 1985, Judge and then Justice Antonin Scalia advocated forcefully against the use of legislative history in statutory interpretation. Justice Scalia’s position, in line with his textualism, was that legislative history was irrelevant and judges should avoid invoking it. Reactions to his attacks among Justices and prominent circuit judges had an ideological quality, with greater support from ideological conservatives. Stuart Benjamin discusses the role that political party and timing of judicial nomination played in circuit judges’ use of legislative history.
Image courtesy of interviewee. February 20, 2024
Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.
Faculti is a research, policy and scholarship streaming platform, set up by a former school teacher, that covers 8000 academics annually across 20 subjects, across the world. The aim is to interview academics and policy makers discussing their research or analysis without any journalistic influence or bias. More here
How do you select interviews?
Team of editors across all the main disciplines select publications along a three-pronged approach: 1. Most cited and latest in each subject 2. Internal audience website data 3. Publisher Partners suggestions eg Taylor and Francis, Princeton University Press, they suggest what to cover.
Interview Process
All questions sent in advance by 4-5 days. Interview undertaken on Zoom, Webex or phone. Journalist checks for framing, lighting, sound. Journalist interviews you, asks follow-ups, retakes. Raw footage enters editing cycle.
