Popular in Social Sciences

Political Science

V-Dem’s Conceptions of Democracy and Their Consequences

University of Notre Dame Michael Coppedge

Central Monetary Authorities

Macroeconomic modelling of CBDC: a critical review

European Central Bank Ulrich Bindseil

Social Identities and Divisions

A new explanation of antisemitism: Jew hatred as a civilisational phenomenon

Boston University Liah Greenfeld

Central Monetary Authorities

Financing Private Credit

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Nina Boyarchenko

Economics

Failing Banks

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Emil Verner

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

American Politics

The Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Persian version of ‎Romantic Love Myths Questionnaire

View more insights in Social Sciences - Psychology - Social Psychology

View more figures from University of Calgary

View the page of Sadeq Fallah Tafti

Read the Study

Next in Psychology

Efficiency Neglect

Jason Dana | Yale University

Intersectionality: A critical framework for mainstream health psychology

Lisa Bowleg | George Washington University

Sadeq Fallahtafti discusses the psychometric ‎properties of the Persian version of the Romantic Love Myths Questionnaire (RLMQ) developed by Lara and Gómez-Urrutia (2021).

Image courtesy of interviewee. August 9, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video is a transcript of a discussion regarding a study on conditional cash transfers and women's reproductive choices. It focuses on the concepts of romantic love and the myths surrounding it, particularly in the context of Persian-speaking populations.

The speaker outlines the challenges in translating and applying the Romantic Love Myth Questionnaire (RLMQ), developed by Laura and Gomez, to a Persian-speaking demographic. The questionnaire examines beliefs about love that can lead to destructive behaviors in romantic relationships, such as the idea that love justifies aggression or control.

Key points include:
- Love myths can include beliefs that romantic love involves suffering or that true love can excuse harmful behavior.
- The translation process was extensive to ensure that the meaning was preserved between the English and Persian versions.
- The research aimed to assess the correlation between belief in these myths and experiences of dating violence, as well as perceived relationship quality among participants.
- Findings suggested that higher belief in love myths correlated with increased experiences of dating violence and lower perceived quality in relationships.
- Additionally, younger participants exhibited a higher belief in these myths, while older individuals showed a decrease in such beliefs, indicating a potential shift in understanding love as people age.

Overall, the speaker indicates that further research is necessary to explore these dynamics within the Persian-speaking population and how they compare globally, emphasizing the potential for cultural influences and outcomes in understanding romantic relationships.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are 5 key points from the video:

1. **Research Relevance**: The importance of applicability in social sciences research is emphasized, particularly regarding how findings can address real-life issues, such as violence in romantic relationships.

2. **Love Myths and Their Impact**: The concept of "love myths" is introduced, which refers to unrealistic beliefs about love that can lead to vulnerability and destructive behavior in relationships. Examples of these myths include beliefs that “one who loves you hurts you” or that “love can overcome anything.”

3. **Study by La Gomez**: The speaker references research by La Gomez that developed a short, reliable tool (the Romantic Love Myth Questionnaire) to measure beliefs about love myths, indicating its correlation with relationship quality and experiences of dating violence.

4. **Translation and Adaptation**: The speaker discusses translating the Romantic Love Myth Questionnaire to Persian, aiming to fill gaps in research available to Persian-speaking populations and ensuring that the translated items carry the same meanings as the original.

5. **Correlations and Findings**: Findings from the research showed that individuals’ beliefs in love myths correlated with their experiences of relationship violence and perceived relationship quality, suggesting that higher belief in love myths could be linked to worse relationship outcomes. The study found demographic patterns, such as older individuals tending to have lower beliefs in these myths.

Export as PDF
Here are some key quotes from the video:

1. **Applicability of Research**:
- "In social sciences, what researchers need to take care of is the applicability of the research. If your research is going to answer and meet some needs in the daily life of people."

2. **Violence in Relationships**:
- "So many times people are affected by violence in their romantic relationships. This is one of the major issues in today's world."

3. **Love Myths**:
- "The love myth refers to the belief that people have a bad romantic love, which have been found to be not realistic, but also yet destructive."

4. **Idealization and Splitting**:
- "When you idealize your partner, you are about to... it's called splitting in psychoanalytic. You are seeing that your partner is harming you, but you have idealized your partner and you cannot perceive that as a hurt."

5. **Relationship Quality**:
- "There were positive correlations between the idealization and perceived relationship quality."

6. **Dating Violence and Love Myths**:
- "We found significant correlations between the level of belief in love myths and the level of them experiencing dating violence."

7. **Translating Tools for Research**:
- "We just started the process to translating this to Persian... so you can validate that scale and use it in Persian-speaking populations."

8. **Contribution to Research**:
- "The contribution is mainly having access to Persian speaking populations all over the world."

9. **Age and Love Myths**:
- "The higher the age, the less the level of belief in love myths."

10. **Cultural Convideo**:
- "There are universal themes, but also unique factors in understanding romantic love among Iranian populations."

These quotes encapsulate some of the main themes of the video regarding violence in relationships, the concept of love myths, the research process, and cultural considerations in romantic relationships.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.285 --> 00:04.165
I think, in social sciences, what researchers need to,

00:04.985 --> 00:07.325
you know, take care

00:07.325 --> 00:10.965
of is the applicability of the research.

00:11.165 --> 00:14.405
I mean, if your research is going to answer

00:14.745 --> 00:18.005
and meet some needs in the daily life of people.

00:18.505 --> 00:22.605
So in clinical, psychology, we can see that

00:22.665 --> 00:25.645
so many times people are affected by, you know,

00:25.925 --> 00:27.805
violence in their romantic relationships.

00:28.545 --> 00:30.685
So, and this is one of the, you know,

00:31.055 --> 00:33.125
major issues in today's world.

00:33.425 --> 00:37.005
So, and, you know, researchers in social psychology,

00:37.105 --> 00:39.365
in clinical psychology are trying to find out

00:39.675 --> 00:42.885
what are the reasons leading to that

00:44.225 --> 00:46.905
violence in romantic and dating relationships.

00:47.005 --> 00:49.825
You know, these are the, you know, the, the,

00:49.825 --> 00:52.705
these are the places that people are going to feel safe.

00:52.755 --> 00:55.345
These are the places that are going to affect

00:55.565 --> 00:57.945
and increase the quality of life of people.

00:58.125 --> 01:01.705
So WhatsApp, I just, you know, in searching the literature,

01:01.785 --> 01:05.745
I just, came to, happened to find a research

01:05.885 --> 01:07.545
by La Gomez,

01:08.045 --> 01:12.105
and they had just, prepared a very nice short

01:12.165 --> 01:16.745
but reliable tool for investigating the love myth.

01:17.125 --> 01:18.465
So, what is a love myth?

01:18.965 --> 01:21.505
The love myth refers to the belief

01:21.695 --> 01:24.185
that people have a bad romantic love,

01:24.755 --> 01:28.425
which have been fo found to be not realistic,

01:28.965 --> 01:31.105
but also yet destructive,

01:31.165 --> 01:34.345
and just making them in a, you know, vulnerable situation.

01:34.405 --> 01:35.865
For example, one of the, one

01:35.865 --> 01:40.355
of these love myths in the question is A one who loves you,

01:40.355 --> 01:45.135
hurts you, or, love can do anything for you.

01:45.315 --> 01:47.055
So these are the beliefs

01:47.115 --> 01:49.935
and beliefs like these in two dimensions.

01:50.145 --> 01:53.095
There are two dimensions in these, you know,

01:53.575 --> 01:54.695
questionnaire in this scale.

01:54.895 --> 01:58.655
I mean, one of them is idealization.

01:59.025 --> 02:01.655
There are five items that, you know, the, the more

02:02.275 --> 02:06.175
you score on those, you know items, the more it shows

02:06.175 --> 02:08.735
that you are prone to idealize your partner.

02:08.875 --> 02:12.735
So when you idealize your partner, you are about to,

02:13.125 --> 02:15.775
it's called splitting in psychoanalytic.

02:16.235 --> 02:19.775
No, in psychoanalytic they say it's a kind of splitting.

02:20.205 --> 02:22.735
What does it mean? It means that you are seeing

02:22.735 --> 02:24.495
that your partner is harming you,

02:24.875 --> 02:26.815
but you have idealized your partner

02:26.995 --> 02:30.575
and you cannot perceive that as a heart.

02:30.835 --> 02:35.495
So this is, yeah, so this is, the, I idealization

02:35.875 --> 02:39.505
and you know, that sort of, love myth.

02:39.845 --> 02:42.865
The other one is about, you know, aggression

02:43.085 --> 02:46.025
and, you know, having the violence in, in,

02:46.205 --> 02:47.265
in the nature of love.

02:47.365 --> 02:50.465
And you are like, okay, so, fighting

02:50.575 --> 02:53.425
with your loved one is a sign of your love.

02:54.445 --> 02:58.705
One who loves you, hurts you. So if the guy, if they are

02:58.805 --> 03:01.125
Controlling you, if they are harming you,

03:01.155 --> 03:02.405
this is a sign of love.

03:02.945 --> 03:06.885
So this could lead to major violence

03:07.425 --> 03:09.405
in a dating and romantic relationship.

03:09.745 --> 03:12.965
And Laura and Gomez have found it, have found some in,

03:12.985 --> 03:15.405
in their numerous, you know, research.

03:15.715 --> 03:17.685
They have found some correlations

03:18.465 --> 03:23.205
and predictability of the violence in the relationship

03:23.665 --> 03:26.245
and also in the quality of the relationship.

03:27.105 --> 03:30.205
Uh, you know, these correlations between these

03:31.225 --> 03:34.925
and the level of belief in those love myths.

03:35.625 --> 03:37.325
So that's why we,

03:37.325 --> 03:40.405
because I was, doing, I was doing my PhD,

03:41.495 --> 03:43.915
my PhD dissertation on romantic love,

03:44.455 --> 03:47.155
and I was like, okay, so what affects

03:47.715 --> 03:49.915
people's understanding of love?

03:50.185 --> 03:53.355
What affects the quality of,

03:54.095 --> 03:55.835
you know, romantic relationship?

03:56.135 --> 04:00.835
So if one is having a very good time in the

04:01.035 --> 04:05.235
romantic relationship, and the other one is suffering from

04:05.255 --> 04:07.635
the romantic relationship, what is that?

04:07.735 --> 04:10.835
So, and in my search, I just happened to find that,

04:11.375 --> 04:13.595
and I was like, this is a very good one.

04:13.705 --> 04:16.835
They have worked on that. I guess it was published in 2021.

04:16.865 --> 04:20.355
Yeah, Lauren Gomez, they just published a paper in 2021,

04:20.375 --> 04:24.715
and we just started, the process to translating this

04:24.975 --> 04:28.275
to Persian, Persian speaking people all over the world,

04:28.275 --> 04:30.235
they are almost all one

04:30.235 --> 04:32.835
or two person of all the people in the world.

04:32.935 --> 04:37.595
So you need to know, I mean, when you, you don't,

04:37.595 --> 04:40.755
you don't need to make, make it make a scale yourself.

04:40.855 --> 04:44.315
So there are some skills out there, so you can just validate

04:44.315 --> 04:47.715
that scale and use it in Persian

04:48.115 --> 04:49.555
speaking populations.

04:49.775 --> 04:52.835
So I guess this is a very, very crucial thing,

04:52.835 --> 04:56.155
because in Iran when I just, looked for it, I was like,

04:56.255 --> 04:57.955
my God, nothing is here.

04:59.295 --> 05:03.435
And there are some scans which are no longer, you know,

05:03.435 --> 05:07.235
that much used in the, in today's, you know, research.

05:07.735 --> 05:12.035
And there are almost nothing else to investigate

05:12.545 --> 05:16.635
this, you know, we, we, we had some problems, you know,

05:16.635 --> 05:18.955
translating love myth to Persian.

05:19.655 --> 05:23.035
So because we are like, okay, so what can we translate?

05:23.035 --> 05:26.435
What word can we use in Persian so that

05:27.255 --> 05:29.555
it just conveys the meaning?

05:29.695 --> 05:31.955
So this process of translating

05:32.095 --> 05:36.075
and back translating just, it was just only 10 items,

05:36.695 --> 05:39.955
but it just took a lot of time from us, you know,

05:39.955 --> 05:42.475
because we wanted to make sure that people

05:43.215 --> 05:47.195
are perceiving the items, just like what Lara

05:47.195 --> 05:49.315
and Gomez had meant.

05:49.615 --> 05:51.995
So understanding the English version

05:52.135 --> 05:54.955
and understanding the Persian version was really crucial.

05:55.135 --> 05:58.445
So I think the contribution is mainly

05:59.265 --> 06:02.405
having access to Persian speaking, you know,

06:02.935 --> 06:04.645
population all over the world.

06:05.075 --> 06:06.765
This is very, very crucial. Yeah.

06:06.945 --> 06:10.645
And of course, you know, by just checking the coefficiency,

06:10.725 --> 06:13.445
I mean the statistics and the reliability and validity.

06:13.445 --> 06:17.525
So we happen to find that, yeah, this sounds

06:17.785 --> 06:22.045
to be a very reliable instrument to just,

06:22.065 --> 06:23.285
you know, yeah.

06:23.505 --> 06:25.925
Uh, you know, investigate the level

06:26.025 --> 06:29.125
of people believing in those loveness when you have decided

06:29.125 --> 06:32.325
that we, they really need this, need this scale to be

06:33.145 --> 06:34.725
in person, to be, to, to be able

06:34.745 --> 06:37.085
to be used in Persian speaking population.

06:37.505 --> 06:41.525
So the next step is starting the, you know, translating

06:41.825 --> 06:42.965
and back translating.

06:43.105 --> 06:45.685
So you've got 10 items.

06:46.265 --> 06:49.645
You have someone just translating them to Persian

06:49.645 --> 06:51.365
or far c whatever we call it,

06:51.865 --> 06:54.365
and then someone else should just translate

06:54.365 --> 06:55.605
this back to English.

06:55.625 --> 06:57.205
So you can see, you can see

06:57.205 --> 07:00.965
that are they still conveying the same meaning or not?

07:01.065 --> 07:02.405
So this is a process.

07:02.555 --> 07:05.525
This is just not, not just one click, this is a process.

07:05.625 --> 07:08.085
It just goes, you know, and it just goes forward. Yeah.

07:08.625 --> 07:11.725
And then when you are, when you have made sure that, yeah,

07:12.275 --> 07:16.005
this is the Persian version of this scale, so

07:16.005 --> 07:19.405
that then you need to just check this,

07:19.485 --> 07:21.765
I mean the reliability and validity of it.

07:21.825 --> 07:24.565
So we needed to check the correlations.

07:25.105 --> 07:27.005
We checked almost the same stuff

07:27.005 --> 07:29.405
that Lauren Gomez did in their study.

07:29.985 --> 07:34.005
We check the correlations between, you know, the, we,

07:34.105 --> 07:37.165
we, we, we just call this RLMQ, you know,

07:37.485 --> 07:41.365
romantic relationship, romantic love myth questionnaire,

07:41.665 --> 07:46.365
and we just check the, correlations between these

07:46.825 --> 07:48.605
and two other factors.

07:49.145 --> 07:51.525
One of them was perceived relationship quality component.

07:52.105 --> 07:53.365
It was a short version of it.

07:53.865 --> 07:55.725
And the other one was,

07:56.025 --> 07:57.845
the violence in the relationship

07:58.025 --> 07:59.645
dating violence questionnaire.

07:59.825 --> 08:02.965
So when you go and try to find that,

08:02.965 --> 08:06.445
because the literature says there are correlations

08:06.445 --> 08:10.465
between these two, so if your scale

08:11.005 --> 08:14.305
is still reliable in Persian two,

08:14.795 --> 08:18.585
there should also be significant, you know,

08:18.695 --> 08:22.025
relations correlations between these two, you know?

08:22.445 --> 08:26.205
So yeah. And we found that, yes, for example,

08:26.825 --> 08:30.805
the Chromebook alpha for, you know, the,

08:31.905 --> 08:36.405
the, the main, I mean the RLMQ, it was, 70%.

08:37.065 --> 08:38.405
So that was that that sounds

08:38.425 --> 08:40.605
to be a reliable, you know, scale for us.

08:40.905 --> 08:43.725
And then we found that there were some significant,

08:44.545 --> 08:47.525
you know, correlations between the level

08:47.625 --> 08:50.005
of people believing in love myths

08:50.425 --> 08:54.965
and the level of them experiencing dating violence,

08:55.005 --> 08:56.005
violence in your relationships,

08:56.305 --> 08:58.605
in our daily lives, what are we afraid of?

08:58.605 --> 09:00.445
We are afraid of violence in the relationship.

09:00.465 --> 09:02.565
So, okay, yeah, we're gonna avoid them.

09:02.945 --> 09:05.685
So what can predict them? What are the correlations?

09:06.065 --> 09:07.565
We don't know what is the cause

09:07.705 --> 09:09.565
or what is, you know, we, we would like

09:09.565 --> 09:11.645
to just avoid the correlations as well.

09:11.825 --> 09:14.245
So what is the, what are the correlation?

09:14.305 --> 09:16.525
So we found idea maybe loveness,

09:16.585 --> 09:20.965
and we are like, okay, so we have this, you know,

09:22.685 --> 09:24.425
dating violence experience.

09:24.925 --> 09:29.065
So, have your partner just checked your phone?

09:29.535 --> 09:33.545
Have they, forced you

09:33.645 --> 09:35.465
to do something you didn't like?

09:36.415 --> 09:39.545
Have they, harmed you physically or mentally?

09:40.445 --> 09:42.825
Had they, you know, had they have, they just,

09:43.265 --> 09:45.225
threatened you and stuff like that?

09:45.225 --> 09:48.265
These are the items about dating violence.

09:48.925 --> 09:51.025
So have you ever have,

09:51.125 --> 09:53.345
how much have you experienced these things?

09:53.655 --> 09:55.105
Okay, this is here.

09:55.725 --> 09:59.785
And then you are asked, do you believe that a true love can,

10:00.245 --> 10:01.585
can care everything?

10:02.205 --> 10:05.465
Do you believe that a true love contains harms?

10:06.005 --> 10:09.705
Do you believe that one who loves you, harms you?

10:11.505 --> 10:13.125
Are these the, the, the beliefs

10:13.125 --> 10:15.645
that you do, do you believe them?

10:16.185 --> 10:18.725
And then, so this is about the, you know, the,

10:18.985 --> 10:22.645
the correlation between the love met and dating violence.

10:23.265 --> 10:26.765
And again, we have the perceived relationship quality

10:27.625 --> 10:29.005
in perceived relationship quality.

10:29.145 --> 10:31.485
We are like, okay, so how do you lo

10:31.705 --> 10:33.125
how do you find your relationship?

10:33.955 --> 10:36.535
Do you like your relationship? Don't you like it?

10:36.585 --> 10:39.415
Don't you like your relationship here? You know?

10:39.635 --> 10:43.335
And here there was two different findings

10:44.185 --> 10:47.475
between the, quality of the relationship.

10:48.745 --> 10:50.445
And so we had the love abuse.

10:50.745 --> 10:52.365
So if there is aggression

10:52.385 --> 10:55.245
and abuse in the relationship, there are two as aspects.

10:55.365 --> 10:57.125
I mean, subscales in a love map,

10:57.585 --> 10:59.285
and the other one is idealization.

11:00.215 --> 11:05.175
There were positive correlations between,

11:05.965 --> 11:08.415
between the idealization

11:08.915 --> 11:11.015
and perceived relationship quality.

11:11.725 --> 11:13.695
They said that, yeah, we like the relationship.

11:14.045 --> 11:17.455
Yeah, it's fine. It's very good, it's good.

11:17.975 --> 11:20.815
I love my partner. But in the other items,

11:21.465 --> 11:23.655
there was negative correl relations.

11:24.695 --> 11:27.715
So when they were like, they were, you know,

11:28.245 --> 11:31.115
perceiving and experiencing abusing the relationship,

11:31.465 --> 11:35.355
sometimes you just, happen to see that people just,

11:36.375 --> 11:39.035
get to a state of ambivalence.

11:39.745 --> 11:42.955
They're like, I do like this partner,

11:43.495 --> 11:45.475
but I'm being,

11:46.515 --> 11:48.675
I am having a very hard time here.

11:49.495 --> 11:53.485
So, and so here you couldn't find a significant

11:54.325 --> 11:57.325
positive relationship, but also, a,

11:57.485 --> 11:58.605
a negative relationship

11:58.605 --> 12:02.725
between the perceived relationship quality and love abuse.

12:03.245 --> 12:06.605
I mean, dimension of the love myth, you see?

12:06.785 --> 12:08.845
So yeah, this, this, this is what happens.

12:09.125 --> 12:13.605
I mean, maybe if we could just do this in a longitudinal

12:14.085 --> 12:16.405
research, maybe things would also change,

12:16.715 --> 12:20.885
because love myth can just make you feel better about your

12:20.885 --> 12:23.365
relationship, you know, in a very short term.

12:23.505 --> 12:25.845
But in long term, the quality

12:25.905 --> 12:28.485
of the relationship might gradually decrease.

12:29.025 --> 12:31.445
As we can see in our research,

12:31.595 --> 12:35.365
just like the original research done by, Gomez

12:35.365 --> 12:40.355
and Laura, Laura Gomez, we just found

12:40.355 --> 12:43.915
that based on the age, I mean, there was a correlation

12:43.915 --> 12:45.835
between the age and the level

12:45.895 --> 12:48.275
of the belief love myth as well.

12:48.975 --> 12:52.355
So this was, you know, this was done for,

12:52.415 --> 12:56.115
our population was, you know, the people between 18 and 24.

12:56.215 --> 13:00.795
And there were six, 600, 364 participants.

13:00.855 --> 13:05.065
So these people who were just, select by, you know,

13:05.385 --> 13:08.865
convenience sampling, random sampling method,

13:10.785 --> 13:14.595
the higher the age, the less the level of

13:15.135 --> 13:17.355
belief in, you know, loveness.

13:17.575 --> 13:21.875
So probably gradually people find that, no,

13:21.945 --> 13:24.955
this love map cannot work for us.

13:25.825 --> 13:27.795
They find that, yeah, they find

13:27.795 --> 13:31.115
that this is affecting the quality of the relationship.

13:31.875 --> 13:34.515
I think this is just the beginning, you know?

13:35.035 --> 13:38.475
I mean, so for my PhD dissertation, what I did was,

13:38.535 --> 13:40.835
you know, investigating romantic love

13:41.175 --> 13:44.075
and the way people perceive romantic love.

13:44.635 --> 13:45.675
I mean, Iranian women

13:45.735 --> 13:49.075
and men in heterosexual relationships, what do they call,

13:49.075 --> 13:50.835
what do they mean by romantic love?

13:50.945 --> 13:53.235
When when they say we are in law, what do they mean?

13:53.735 --> 13:58.595
And there we found some bio psychosocial factors.

13:59.315 --> 14:01.675
I mean, there were some differences between men

14:01.675 --> 14:05.035
and women, which could just refer to some biological

14:05.795 --> 14:07.875
revolutionary, you know, differences.

14:08.295 --> 14:10.995
We found some, psychological,

14:11.625 --> 14:15.195
because there seemed to be some individual differences

14:15.855 --> 14:17.475
in their understanding.

14:17.935 --> 14:20.875
And there were some, you know, some of them, I mean,

14:20.875 --> 14:24.835
the pattern of them loving each other was just, you know,

14:25.295 --> 14:28.795
it was, it seemed to be universal, you know, I mean,

14:29.095 --> 14:33.075
and there were some social factors that in a, in,

14:33.335 --> 14:37.195
in a culture like Iran, it could be different

14:37.825 --> 14:40.075
from a culture, for example, in uk

14:40.615 --> 14:44.155
or even from culture here in Iran compared

14:44.155 --> 14:45.355
with two 20 years ago.

14:45.455 --> 14:47.475
So I think here,

14:47.865 --> 14:51.485
talking about Persian participants, participants,

14:51.485 --> 14:56.325
we didn't find here a major difference between our findings

14:56.755 --> 14:57.885
with, Gomez

14:57.885 --> 15:01.365
and aio, I mean, in, in the original research.

15:01.665 --> 15:06.045
But if we start applying these tool to

15:06.605 --> 15:10.165
investigate Persian speaking, you know, lovers

15:10.225 --> 15:11.645
or Persians speaking youth,

15:11.675 --> 15:14.605
when they are in a romantic relationship, we might happen

15:14.665 --> 15:18.205
to see some, again, bio psychosocial factors.

15:18.715 --> 15:20.325
What are the universal things?

15:20.675 --> 15:24.805
What are unique about Iranian populations here?

15:24.835 --> 15:28.125
Because we, again, here found that the, the,

15:28.145 --> 15:31.165
the higher the age, the less the level of belief,

15:31.785 --> 15:35.205
or we didn't find any, you know,

15:35.535 --> 15:38.325
major differences in, in the numbers

15:38.705 --> 15:41.925
of belief in some particular love myths.

15:42.265 --> 15:45.485
You know, I mean, what the, what what we found was

15:45.665 --> 15:49.685
so identical was so similar with what Gomez found.

15:50.275 --> 15:51.885
This could be probably because,

15:52.075 --> 15:55.605
because of the fact that there is this globalization,

15:55.735 --> 15:57.765
there is this, you know, the differences

15:57.795 --> 16:01.245
between nations are decreasing a little bit.

16:01.705 --> 16:06.445
But I am curious to see this, I mean, these changes

16:07.135 --> 16:11.685
might emerge much more clearly when we try

16:11.745 --> 16:14.165
to do some qualitative research

16:14.505 --> 16:16.965
as I did in my PhD dissertation.

16:16.985 --> 16:21.285
But here we didn't find a major difference with that.

"Exploring the Impact of Love Myths on Relationship Dynamics and Well-Being"

00:00:00 - I think, in social sciences, what researchers need to, you know, take care of is the applicability of the research. I mean, if your research is going to answer and meet some needs in the daily life of people. So in clinical, psychology, we can see that so many times people are affected by, you know, violence in their romantic relationships. So, and this is one of the, you know, major issues in today's world. So, and, you know, researchers in social psychology, in clinical psychology are trying to find out what are the reasons leading to that
00:00:47 - You know, these are the, you know, the, the, these are the places that people are going to feel safe. These are the places that are going to affect and increase the quality of life of people. So WhatsApp, I just, you know, in searching the literature, I just, came to, happened to find a research by La Gomez, and they had just, prepared a very nice short but reliable tool for investigating the love myth. So, what is a love myth? The love myth refers to the belief that people have a bad romantic love,
00:01:28 - but also yet destructive, and just making them in a, you know, vulnerable situation. For example, one of the, one of these love myths in the question is A one who loves you, hurts you, or, love can do anything for you. So these are the beliefs and beliefs like these in two dimensions. There are two dimensions in these, you know, questionnaire in this scale. I mean, one of them is idealization. There are five items that, you know, the, the more you score on those, you know items, the more it shows
00:02:08 - So when you idealize your partner, you are about to, it's called splitting in psychoanalytic. No, in psychoanalytic they say it's a kind of splitting. What does it mean? It means that you are seeing that your partner is harming you, but you have idealized your partner and you cannot perceive that as a heart. So this is, yeah, so this is, the, I idealization and you know, that sort of, love myth. The other one is about, you know, aggression and, you know, having the violence in, in,
00:02:47 - And you are like, okay, so, fighting with your loved one is a sign of your love. One who loves you, hurts you. So if the guy, if they are Controlling you, if they are harming you, this is a sign of love. So this could lead to major violence in a dating and romantic relationship. And Laura and Gomez have found it, have found some in, in their numerous, you know, research. They have found some correlations and predictability of the violence in the relationship and also in the quality of the relationship.
00:03:31 - and the level of belief in those love myths. So that's why we, because I was, doing, I was doing my PhD, my PhD dissertation on romantic love, and I was like, okay, so what affects people's understanding of love? What affects the quality of, you know, romantic relationship? So if one is having a very good time in the romantic relationship, and the other one is suffering from the romantic relationship, what is that?

"Translating and Validating the Love Myth Questionnaire for Persian-Speaking Populations"

00:04:11 - and I was like, this is a very good one. They have worked on that. I guess it was published in 2021. Yeah, Lauren Gomez, they just published a paper in 2021, and we just started, the process to translating this to Persian, Persian speaking people all over the world, they are almost all one or two person of all the people in the world. So you need to know, I mean, when you, you don't, you don't need to make, make it make a scale yourself. So there are some skills out there, so you can just validate that scale and use it in Persian
00:04:49 - So I guess this is a very, very crucial thing, because in Iran when I just, looked for it, I was like, my God, nothing is here. And there are some scans which are no longer, you know, that much used in the, in today's, you know, research. And there are almost nothing else to investigate this, you know, we, we, we had some problems, you know, translating love myth to Persian. So because we are like, okay, so what can we translate? What word can we use in Persian so that it just conveys the meaning?
00:05:32 - and back translating just, it was just only 10 items, but it just took a lot of time from us, you know, because we wanted to make sure that people are perceiving the items, just like what Lara and Gomez had meant. So understanding the English version and understanding the Persian version was really crucial. So I think the contribution is mainly having access to Persian speaking, you know, population all over the world. This is very, very crucial. Yeah. And of course, you know, by just checking the coefficiency,
00:06:13 - So we happen to find that, yeah, this sounds to be a very reliable instrument to just, you know, yeah. you know, investigate the level of people believing in those loveness when you have decided that we, they really need this, need this scale to be in person, to be, to, to be able to be used in Persian speaking population. So the next step is starting the, you know, translating and back translating. So you've got 10 items. You have someone just translating them to Persian or far c whatever we call it,
00:06:54 - this back to English. So you can see, you can see that are they still conveying the same meaning or not? So this is a process. This is just not, not just one click, this is a process. It just goes, you know, and it just goes forward. Yeah. And then when you are, when you have made sure that, yeah, this is the Persian version of this scale, so that then you need to just check this, I mean the reliability and validity of it. So we needed to check the correlations. We checked almost the same stuff that Lauren Gomez did in their study. We check the correlations between, you know, the, we,
00:07:37 - romantic relationship, romantic love myth questionnaire, and we just check the, correlations between these and two other factors. One of them was perceived relationship quality component. It was a short version of it. And the other one was, the violence in the relationship dating violence questionnaire. So when you go and try to find that, because the literature says there are correlations between these two, so if your scale is still reliable in Persian two,

"Exploring the Correlation Between Beliefs in Love Myths and Experiences of Dating Violence"

00:08:18 - relations correlations between these two, you know? So yeah. And we found that, yes, for example, the Chromebook alpha for, you know, the, the, the main, I mean the RLMQ, it was, 70%. So that was that that sounds to be a reliable, you know, scale for us. And then we found that there were some significant, you know, correlations between the level of people believing in love myths and the level of them experiencing dating violence,
00:08:56 - in our daily lives, what are we afraid of? We are afraid of violence in the relationship. So, okay, yeah, we're gonna avoid them. So what can predict them? What are the correlations? We don't know what is the cause or what is, you know, we, we would like to just avoid the correlations as well. So what is the, what are the correlation? So we found idea maybe loveness, and we are like, okay, so we have this, you know, dating violence experience. So, have your partner just checked your phone? Have they, forced you to do something you didn't like?
00:09:40 - Had they, you know, had they have, they just, threatened you and stuff like that? These are the items about dating violence. So have you ever have, how much have you experienced these things? Okay, this is here. And then you are asked, do you believe that a true love can, can care everything? Do you believe that a true love contains harms? Do you believe that one who loves you, harms you? Are these the, the, the beliefs that you do, do you believe them? And then, so this is about the, you know, the,
00:10:23 - And again, we have the perceived relationship quality in perceived relationship quality. We are like, okay, so how do you lo how do you find your relationship? Do you like your relationship? Don't you like it? Don't you like your relationship here? You know? And here there was two different findings between the, quality of the relationship. And so we had the love abuse. So if there is aggression and abuse in the relationship, there are two as aspects. I mean, subscales in a love map, and the other one is idealization.
00:11:05 - between the idealization and perceived relationship quality. They said that, yeah, we like the relationship. Yeah, it's fine. It's very good, it's good. I love my partner. But in the other items, there was negative correl relations. So when they were like, they were, you know, perceiving and experiencing abusing the relationship, sometimes you just, happen to see that people just, get to a state of ambivalence. They're like, I do like this partner,
00:11:46 - I am having a very hard time here. So, and so here you couldn't find a significant positive relationship, but also, a, a negative relationship between the perceived relationship quality and love abuse. I mean, dimension of the love myth, you see? So yeah, this, this, this is what happens. I mean, maybe if we could just do this in a longitudinal research, maybe things would also change, because love myth can just make you feel better about your relationship, you know, in a very short term.

Exploring the Evolution of Romantic Love Beliefs Among Iranian Youth: A Cross-Cultural Perspective**

00:12:25 - of the relationship might gradually decrease. As we can see in our research, just like the original research done by, Gomez and Laura, Laura Gomez, we just found that based on the age, I mean, there was a correlation between the age and the level of the belief love myth as well. So this was, you know, this was done for, our population was, you know, the people between 18 and 24. And there were six, 600, 364 participants. So these people who were just, select by, you know,
00:13:10 - the higher the age, the less the level of belief in, you know, loveness. So probably gradually people find that, no, this love map cannot work for us. They find that, yeah, they find that this is affecting the quality of the relationship. I think this is just the beginning, you know? I mean, so for my PhD dissertation, what I did was, you know, investigating romantic love and the way people perceive romantic love. I mean, Iranian women
00:13:49 - what do they mean by romantic love? When when they say we are in law, what do they mean? And there we found some bio psychosocial factors. I mean, there were some differences between men and women, which could just refer to some biological revolutionary, you know, differences. We found some, psychological, because there seemed to be some individual differences in their understanding. And there were some, you know, some of them, I mean, the pattern of them loving each other was just, you know, it was, it seemed to be universal, you know, I mean,
00:14:33 - in a culture like Iran, it could be different from a culture, for example, in uk or even from culture here in Iran compared with two 20 years ago. So I think here, talking about Persian participants, participants, we didn't find here a major difference between our findings with, Gomez and aio, I mean, in, in the original research. But if we start applying these tool to investigate Persian speaking, you know, lovers
00:15:11 - when they are in a romantic relationship, we might happen to see some, again, bio psychosocial factors. What are the universal things? What are unique about Iranian populations here? Because we, again, here found that the, the, the higher the age, the less the level of belief, or we didn't find any, you know, major differences in, in the numbers of belief in some particular love myths. You know, I mean, what the, what what we found was so identical was so similar with what Gomez found.
00:16:16 - because of the fact that there is this globalization, there is this, you know, the differences between nations are decreasing a little bit. But I am curious to see this, I mean, these changes might emerge much more clearly when we try to do some qualitative research as I did in my PhD dissertation. But here we didn't find a major difference with that.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis