Popular in Law

Human Rights Law

Human Rights and Corruption: Problems and Potential of Individualising a Systemic Problem

Max Planck Institute Anne Peters

Law

A statistical approach to law school citation rankings

University of Virginia Joshua Fischman

Constitutional Law

What is constitutional ideology?

University of Oxford Nick Barber

Civil Procedure Law

Politics, Identity, and Class Certification on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

University of Pennsylvania Sean Farhang

Law

Diversity and Social Mobility in the UK legal profession

Law Society I. Stephanie Boyce

Internet Law

The Law of AI for Good

University of San Diego Orly Lobel

Law

Surrey’s Silence: Subpart F and the Swiss Subsidiary Tax that Never Was

Boston University Steven Dean

Transforming Restorative Justice for Transitional Settings

View more insights in Professional - Law - Human Rights Law

View more figures from University of Nottingham

View the page of Kerry Clamp

Read the Study

Next in Human Rights Law

The Discursive Evolution of Human Rights Law

Renana Keydar, Vera Shikhelman | Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Human Rights and Corruption: Problems and Potential of Individualising a Systemic Problem

Anne Peters | Max Planck Institute

Kerry Clamp discusses the approaches to transitional justice; retributive and reparative.

Image courtesy of interviewee. May 30, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Comments are closed.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

The speaker discusses their research on transitional justice, focusing on the experiences of South Africa, the Czech Republic, and Northern Ireland in overcoming dictatorship and conflict. They highlight a gap in the existing scholarship regarding restorative justice, which they explored during their PhD. The speaker defines transitional justice as a response to systemic crimes, such as human rights abuses, and describes its evolution over time, particularly following global conflicts like World War II.

They distinguish between two main approaches to transitional justice: **retributive**, which involves punishing offenders through legal mechanisms like tribunals, and **restorative**, which seeks to address the harm caused by these crimes in a manner that fosters reconciliation and healing within communities.

Restorative justice is characterized by various applications including truth and reconciliation commissions, youth justice reforms, and community responses to crime in places lacking effective criminal justice systems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of contextualizing individual transgressions within the broader community dynamics and identities to effectively address past injustices and promote future peace.

However, they critique the effectiveness of transitional justice processes, noting that political and resource constraints often make them selective and inadequate. They argue for a more inclusive understanding of justice that empowers individuals rather than focusing solely on the agendas of international or supranational organizations.

Overall, the speaker advocates for a shift in how transitional justice is conceptualized, underscoring the need for community-led dialogues that can bridge divisions and address the structural issues leading to conflict. They stress the importance of meaningful conversations rooted in the experiences and concerns of individuals in the community as a path towards fostering genuine reconciliation and lasting peace.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.145 --> 00:01.925
My PhD was on the topic.

00:02.425 --> 00:06.845
Um, but what I did in that, body of work is focus on

00:07.025 --> 00:09.685
how South Africa, the Czech Republic in Northern Ireland

00:10.435 --> 00:12.165
kind of came through their transitions.

00:12.165 --> 00:15.205
How they moved away from being in a, in a state of,

00:15.465 --> 00:17.845
you know, dictatorships

00:18.065 --> 00:20.365
or active conflict between communities.

00:21.145 --> 00:23.045
And it was really interesting at looking

00:23.105 --> 00:27.205
how they used the word restorative justice, what it meant,

00:27.665 --> 00:29.485
how, how they used it to deal with the past,

00:29.985 --> 00:31.885
but then also how it was used to deal

00:32.025 --> 00:33.285
to reform criminal justice.

00:34.065 --> 00:37.165
And what was very evident is that there wasn't a lot

00:37.165 --> 00:38.485
of work on this.

00:39.145 --> 00:40.765
And in restorative justice,

00:40.765 --> 00:43.285
scholarship practice always leads scholarship.

00:43.545 --> 00:46.445
So it, you know, a, a book that kind

00:46.445 --> 00:48.765
of gave a broader overview of

00:48.765 --> 00:52.525
what was happening in post-conflict countries, seemed

00:52.525 --> 00:54.805
to be, a gap that needed to be filled.

00:54.925 --> 00:58.765
Transitional justice broadly is just responding

00:59.145 --> 01:03.365
to any large scale systemic crimes that have occurred.

01:03.825 --> 01:06.085
So, you know, this might be human rights abuses

01:06.105 --> 01:09.365
or persecution or violence on a systematic scale.

01:09.865 --> 01:12.565
And we've seen that it's evolved over a number

01:12.565 --> 01:13.845
of phases, right?

01:13.985 --> 01:17.645
So we can see really early on following the second World War

01:17.995 --> 01:19.885
transitions, in southern Europe.

01:20.065 --> 01:22.485
So Spain and Portugal, for example,

01:22.545 --> 01:27.165
and also the collapse of the communist regime, had,

01:27.305 --> 01:28.525
had particular tendencies.

01:28.545 --> 01:30.845
And part of that was around, deterrent.

01:30.845 --> 01:34.485
So prosecuting those that were mostly responsible

01:34.625 --> 01:37.325
for coming up with the architecture, I guess.

01:37.825 --> 01:41.285
Um, so you see that in Nuremberg is denunciation, so

01:42.005 --> 01:43.605
prosecuting leaders in show trials.

01:43.705 --> 01:48.205
So you saw that in Spain and portal or, incapacitation.

01:48.225 --> 01:50.405
So in communist regimes, they had a,

01:50.605 --> 01:52.005
a concept called illustration.

01:52.665 --> 01:54.085
And basically what happened is

01:54.085 --> 01:55.845
after the transition, individuals

01:55.845 --> 01:58.005
who were in power in institutions, so for example,

01:58.065 --> 02:01.565
the military or, you know, government,

02:01.605 --> 02:04.445
institutions were removed from the, from those roles,

02:04.505 --> 02:06.285
and were not allowed to retain that power.

02:06.285 --> 02:09.285
So there was no undermining of the shift to, to a democracy.

02:10.305 --> 02:11.685
Um, after the,

02:11.695 --> 02:15.525
after that kind of period, we see conflict

02:15.595 --> 02:17.965
that was slightly more complicated,

02:17.965 --> 02:20.365
because it was about waring communities, right?

02:20.545 --> 02:22.965
And so what ends up happening is that,

02:23.035 --> 02:24.885
communities had a particular identity

02:25.425 --> 02:27.965
and there were no easy winners and losers.

02:28.945 --> 02:32.995
So approaching,

02:33.215 --> 02:35.155
transgressions, I guess becomes

02:35.715 --> 02:37.075
a little bit more complicated.

02:37.295 --> 02:38.715
So, and it also,

02:38.715 --> 02:40.795
what it does is if we're gonna prosecute people,

02:41.495 --> 02:42.755
why are people gonna give up power?

02:42.865 --> 02:45.555
They're not right. Why, why are they going

02:45.555 --> 02:47.595
to volunteer themselves to be locked up?

02:48.175 --> 02:50.475
And so we see opportunities

02:50.895 --> 02:53.795
or the threat that that will reignite conflict, but also

02:53.885 --> 02:55.395
after the Cold War, we kind

02:55.395 --> 02:58.635
of then see this move in transitional justice towards

02:58.635 --> 03:01.325
talking about reconciliation or nation building

03:01.665 --> 03:05.485
or, punishing or pardoning human rights abusers

03:05.665 --> 03:07.245
and that, and that, that debate.

03:07.425 --> 03:10.125
So, transitional justice encapsulates all of that.

03:10.585 --> 03:12.605
But most recently we see this distinction

03:12.665 --> 03:15.245
or a categorization of approaches that are considered to be

03:16.045 --> 03:18.765
retributive or restorative.

03:19.105 --> 03:22.205
And that's kind of the two main features at the minute.

03:22.715 --> 03:26.605
Attritive approaches in general, as you would expect,

03:27.115 --> 03:28.565
include national

03:28.625 --> 03:32.925
and international criminal justice processes, tribunals,

03:32.925 --> 03:36.485
for example, or national inquiries or commissions.

03:37.305 --> 03:41.245
Um, and they'll explore what happened during the process,

03:41.545 --> 03:44.805
but also hold very particular people to account for it.

03:45.185 --> 03:48.485
So it's about dealing with very specific incidents,

03:48.625 --> 03:51.325
as opposed to thinking about nation building, et cetera.

03:51.865 --> 03:55.685
Um, and the international community, some,

03:56.115 --> 03:58.285
some countries can't afford to,

03:58.425 --> 04:01.765
or they don't have the infrastructure to punish individuals,

04:01.875 --> 04:02.885
prosecute them, right?

04:02.945 --> 04:04.645
And so the international community has a

04:04.645 --> 04:05.845
role to play in that as well.

04:05.845 --> 04:07.685
So we see that with the international criminal court.

04:07.905 --> 04:11.365
We see that with tribunals being set up, for example,

04:11.585 --> 04:12.645
for Yugoslavia

04:12.645 --> 04:15.685
or in Rwanda, where they, they,

04:15.735 --> 04:17.005
prosecuted individuals.

04:17.005 --> 04:19.005
So that's kind of the retributive side of things.

04:19.505 --> 04:22.125
The restorative justice side is a little bit,

04:22.315 --> 04:23.645
more complicated, right?

04:23.745 --> 04:26.485
So most people when they've heard of restorative justice,

04:26.515 --> 04:28.645
they think about people and a victim meeting

04:28.645 --> 04:29.925
their offender, right?

04:30.305 --> 04:33.685
And getting some kind of payback reparation.

04:33.685 --> 04:35.725
And, and those kinds of ideas are there,

04:35.745 --> 04:39.205
but they're a little bit more, expansive, I guess in,

04:39.945 --> 04:42.125
in post-conflict or transitional settings.

04:42.125 --> 04:45.525
Because again, if we go back to that identity issue,

04:46.245 --> 04:48.485
although individuals may have been involved in particular

04:48.965 --> 04:51.045
incidents, the rationales

04:51.105 --> 04:53.165
or the kind of, motivations

04:53.185 --> 04:56.805
for those in incidents are plugged into a much broader

04:57.325 --> 05:00.885
identity whereby people are fighting, for example,

05:01.265 --> 05:02.685
to realize their own rights.

05:02.745 --> 05:04.645
You know, that violence might have not been the first

05:04.645 --> 05:06.805
option, but it might be the last option,

05:06.805 --> 05:07.965
and they've gone along with that.

05:08.105 --> 05:09.885
So we see kind

05:09.885 --> 05:12.325
of restorative justice being used in three different ways.

05:12.335 --> 05:13.685
First at a conceptual level.

05:13.785 --> 05:16.685
So we see this mostly with, truth

05:16.685 --> 05:17.925
and reconciliation commission.

05:17.925 --> 05:20.245
So South Africa was the first one where this concept,

05:20.275 --> 05:23.045
restorative justice, really came to the fore, right?

05:23.105 --> 05:24.245
And Archbishop,

05:24.525 --> 05:27.725
Archbishop Desmond Tutu spoke a lot about forgiveness,

05:28.255 --> 05:29.725
about nation building,

05:29.855 --> 05:32.245
about moving forward together as a community.

05:32.865 --> 05:36.885
Um, and, and that's kind of where it, where it's,

05:37.265 --> 05:39.205
really got to prominence, I guess.

05:39.665 --> 05:42.365
So this is more about normative values, pursuing that

05:42.905 --> 05:44.605
you then have a strategic level that,

05:44.605 --> 05:49.525
which I was mentioning, in terms of my PhD whereby,

05:49.555 --> 05:52.405
post regime governments will use restorative justice

05:52.665 --> 05:54.565
to initiate criminal justice reform.

05:54.825 --> 05:57.485
And we see this most often in youth justice,

05:57.775 --> 05:59.085
which isn't surprising, right?

05:59.085 --> 06:02.325
Because we, we think kids make mistakes, they need support,

06:02.355 --> 06:03.525
they need to be educated.

06:04.265 --> 06:06.325
Um, we don't wanna give them criminal records.

06:06.705 --> 06:09.245
We want them to be able to understand the harm

06:09.245 --> 06:11.565
that they're causing, but also to take actions

06:11.565 --> 06:12.725
to address that harm, right?

06:12.725 --> 06:14.485
So we are holding them to accountants in

06:14.485 --> 06:15.605
some way, shape or form.

06:15.945 --> 06:19.165
So we've seen criminal justice reform based on restorative

06:19.165 --> 06:22.565
justice principles in South Africa, in the Czech Republic

06:22.705 --> 06:24.565
and Northern Ireland use conferencing.

06:24.705 --> 06:27.565
So every, in, every child that gets prosecuted,

06:27.785 --> 06:31.405
for the most part, borrow a couple of, elements will go

06:31.405 --> 06:34.565
through a conferencing process, in those countries.

06:34.585 --> 06:37.045
So it kind of signals a, a shift from the way

06:37.045 --> 06:38.765
that we have dealt with things to a new way

06:38.765 --> 06:40.325
that we're gonna deal with things and hopefully

06:40.325 --> 06:41.925
that those young people are gonna grow up

06:42.345 --> 06:45.005
and become more law abiding individuals.

06:45.355 --> 06:47.845
There's a final one, a practical level,

06:47.845 --> 06:50.005
where restorative justice is, has been used

06:50.005 --> 06:51.165
to plug a justice gap.

06:51.665 --> 06:54.725
And very often we see this happening towards the end

06:54.725 --> 06:55.725
of any conflicts,

06:55.825 --> 06:58.725
or just in the early days when the new regime is just

06:58.725 --> 07:00.685
setting up its infrastructure again.

07:01.185 --> 07:05.245
And, communities, the police, for example,

07:05.345 --> 07:08.205
who have been instigators in a lot of conflicts and partisan

07:08.385 --> 07:11.445
and their approaches won't be able to enter a community.

07:11.865 --> 07:14.925
But just because the criminal justice system has no role

07:14.925 --> 07:17.165
to play in a community, that doesn't mean

07:17.165 --> 07:19.365
that crime's not being taken, right?

07:19.465 --> 07:21.325
And so we see communities coming up

07:21.325 --> 07:25.565
with community responses, to deal with offenses

07:25.565 --> 07:28.285
or behavior that is really blight in their community.

07:28.285 --> 07:31.205
So we see this happening in Northern Ireland, Sierra Leone,

07:31.605 --> 07:34.845
Columbia, a whole range of places where they're using this.

07:34.845 --> 07:37.525
So that, that's kind of the, the broad spectrum

07:38.045 --> 07:39.165
spectrum of transitional justice.

07:39.895 --> 07:43.165
While transitional justice is mainly looking at both the

07:43.165 --> 07:44.565
past of what's happened

07:44.565 --> 07:46.205
and dealing with harm that's being caused,

07:46.585 --> 07:49.805
it also focuses on the future about let's move from then

07:49.945 --> 07:52.085
to a new future that's peaceful, et cetera.

07:52.545 --> 07:56.245
The biggest problem with all transitional justice processes

07:56.865 --> 08:00.965
is that, the resources and time

08:01.745 --> 08:04.645
and political constraints make it a really selective

08:04.715 --> 08:05.925
process, right?

08:06.105 --> 08:09.125
So it's, there are, there are not kind

08:09.125 --> 08:12.485
of consistent ways in which,

08:13.145 --> 08:15.925
the past is dealt dealt with in a meaningful way.

08:16.265 --> 08:21.085
So that presents quite a, a challenge, if you will.

08:21.505 --> 08:24.005
Um, and certainly in my work, and,

08:24.025 --> 08:25.885
and a lot of my colleagues work would argue

08:25.885 --> 08:28.045
that transitional justice is quite inadequate

08:28.045 --> 08:30.725
because it doesn't really address the past, right?

08:31.265 --> 08:34.605
So one, one, I think it's, you know, that I refer

08:34.605 --> 08:36.765
to in the book and, and I use it quite a bit, is

08:36.765 --> 08:41.645
that roughly about 40 to 50% of all conflicts in the 19th,

08:41.825 --> 08:45.485
in the 20th century, 21st century, it seems to be going

08:45.485 --> 08:46.685
that way, who go

08:46.685 --> 08:48.645
through a peace process will end up back in

08:48.645 --> 08:50.005
violent conflict within five years.

08:50.745 --> 08:53.805
So if you think about the millions and millions of dollars

08:53.865 --> 08:56.965
or pounds that are spent on transitional justice mechanisms,

08:56.965 --> 08:59.565
and very often for a short defined period of time,

09:00.165 --> 09:03.285
Columbia's going through a, a peace process, I think, again,

09:03.285 --> 09:05.325
for the third or fourth time at the minute.

09:05.825 --> 09:08.085
And that's over a slightly longer period,

09:08.505 --> 09:11.605
but their REIT is still very narrower and focused.

09:12.185 --> 09:15.285
So those are really challenging.

09:15.705 --> 09:19.365
So the way that we conceptualize peace is quite,

09:20.145 --> 09:21.365
narrow.

09:21.475 --> 09:24.285
It's not necessarily meeting the needs of individuals

09:24.285 --> 09:25.685
that make up their population.

09:26.345 --> 09:29.725
Um, and it's, it's not necessarily about,

09:29.755 --> 09:32.805
long lasting peace, it's more about the absence of co

09:32.805 --> 09:36.645
of conflict or violence that we're really focusing on,

09:36.905 --> 09:40.245
not a positive piece, where, you know, it,

09:40.265 --> 09:42.005
it addresses kind of the structural issues

09:42.005 --> 09:43.725
that have been driving that conflict.

09:44.385 --> 09:47.245
And so, if you think about the fact that roughly

09:47.985 --> 09:52.525
we have about 66 million, persons

09:52.525 --> 09:54.725
of concern, and by that we mean refugees,

09:54.905 --> 09:57.765
we mean asylum seekers, we mean displaced people.

09:58.275 --> 10:00.845
They've got a number of needs and deficits, right?

10:01.265 --> 10:04.285
Um, that aren't being addressed at all anyway.

10:04.665 --> 10:07.645
And a lot of the time, transitional justice can just be,

10:08.805 --> 10:13.085
I always think about it as, as a visible effort to make sure

10:13.085 --> 10:14.845
that the international community thinks

10:14.845 --> 10:15.845
that something's happening.

10:16.345 --> 10:17.565
And so as a South African,

10:17.585 --> 10:20.525
the Truth Reconciliation Commission, you know,

10:20.545 --> 10:24.485
to give a practical example, we couldn't prosecute people,

10:25.185 --> 10:27.125
because there's no way

10:27.755 --> 10:30.125
that the apartheid regime was going

10:30.125 --> 10:32.805
to relinquish control if they were just gonna be prosecuted

10:32.865 --> 10:33.925
and ended up in prison.

10:34.505 --> 10:36.685
So we had to negotiate an amnesty,

10:36.685 --> 10:39.725
and that was the first time that amnesty was partial.

10:40.745 --> 10:43.165
Um, and the way that they then dealt with that was

10:43.165 --> 10:44.165
through the Truth Commission.

10:44.345 --> 10:47.125
And they said, if you come forward as a,

10:47.425 --> 10:49.845
as a perpetrator, and you explain what happened

10:49.845 --> 10:51.005
and why it happened, as long

10:51.005 --> 10:52.605
as it had a political motivation,

10:53.265 --> 10:56.165
you will get amnesty the slides.

10:56.345 --> 10:57.885
And, and that sounds great on paper,

10:58.225 --> 10:59.885
but what we know happened is

10:59.885 --> 11:01.725
that not many perpetrators came forward

11:02.195 --> 11:04.725
because, well, what are you gonna do?

11:06.185 --> 11:08.605
You know? So there's, there's really challenges.

11:08.605 --> 11:10.765
There are a lot of challenges in terms of,

11:11.105 --> 11:12.125
of restorative justice,

11:12.305 --> 11:14.245
and some, some of my colleagues,

11:14.245 --> 11:15.765
like Kira McAvoy have argued

11:15.765 --> 11:18.325
that legalism is a huge problem.

11:18.355 --> 11:21.085
It's too dominant that we are not thinking about

11:21.955 --> 11:24.925
justice on a broader scale that's gonna be meaningful,

11:24.925 --> 11:26.165
people that's actually gonna

11:26.165 --> 11:27.525
achieve the change that we want.

11:27.945 --> 11:29.805
And this book, in part, makes a case

11:29.805 --> 11:33.885
for restorative justice in much broader terms, about,

11:33.895 --> 11:35.805
about how we can give ownership back

11:35.805 --> 11:38.285
to individuals rather than it being priorities

11:38.285 --> 11:39.485
of the international community

11:39.505 --> 11:41.325
or supernational organizations

11:41.325 --> 11:44.125
that are driving particular institutions

11:44.125 --> 11:45.125
of transitional justice.

11:45.965 --> 11:48.085
I think that the book and,

11:48.185 --> 11:51.285
and subsequent work on, on the topic that I've done is

11:51.285 --> 11:54.565
that if we want to achieve positive change,

11:54.945 --> 11:58.205
actual real change, enduring peace,

11:58.555 --> 12:00.885
equitable relationships, we have

12:00.885 --> 12:02.245
to look at things differently.

12:03.105 --> 12:06.765
And as we all know, you know, even in our own relationships,

12:06.765 --> 12:08.325
when we have arguments or tensions

12:08.325 --> 12:12.325
or conflict, the people that best know what the issues are,

12:12.335 --> 12:13.405
where they coming from

12:13.425 --> 12:15.685
and how to deal with them come from the

12:15.685 --> 12:17.125
individuals themselves, right?

12:17.275 --> 12:20.125
Sometimes you might need some help from professionals

12:20.265 --> 12:21.605
to guide those conversations.

12:21.675 --> 12:23.485
It's about helping you to communicate

12:23.485 --> 12:24.845
what you want to say better.

12:25.235 --> 12:27.925
It's not about saying, actually this is your problem

12:28.065 --> 12:29.285
and this is what you need to do.

12:29.815 --> 12:32.405
Right? And transitional justice is very similar.

12:32.745 --> 12:36.325
So we have, we have these deep rooted conflicts.

12:36.345 --> 12:37.725
So if you think about Rwanda,

12:37.745 --> 12:39.205
the Sies and the tootsies, right?

12:39.345 --> 12:42.675
If you look back in history, the inverse was true.

12:42.935 --> 12:44.395
The tootsies dominated the hoodies.

12:44.455 --> 12:46.315
And so conflict has a long history.

12:46.315 --> 12:50.395
If we are just dealing with one particular incident,

12:50.865 --> 12:54.235
what all we are doing is we are turning the current losers

12:54.625 --> 12:57.795
into winners, which means that that animosity

12:57.795 --> 13:00.875
and tension still stays there between those communities.

13:01.415 --> 13:05.705
And that's, that's a risky, risky, dynamic.

13:06.545 --> 13:09.185
Ultimately, what we want to do is to make sure

13:09.735 --> 13:14.545
that we create a situation wherein we're honest about

13:14.565 --> 13:17.305
the structural violence in our societies

13:18.055 --> 13:21.225
that are creating these kinds of, hierarchies

13:21.245 --> 13:22.945
of communities of issues.

13:23.125 --> 13:24.585
You know, we see this everywhere, not,

13:24.685 --> 13:26.825
not only in in conflict settings,

13:27.245 --> 13:29.785
but we need to acknowledge actually what's driving these,

13:29.915 --> 13:33.025
these inequalities, these inadequacies, these,

13:33.785 --> 13:35.025
I don't know, resentment.

13:35.245 --> 13:37.945
The, the kind of narratives, the intergenerational trauma

13:37.945 --> 13:41.105
that's passed down that continues to fuel things,

13:41.765 --> 13:43.225
to achieve change.

13:43.805 --> 13:46.545
And the wonder of restorative justice isn't necessarily

13:46.875 --> 13:49.425
about a meeting between two individuals

13:49.445 --> 13:51.545
who have been affected by a particular incident.

13:52.205 --> 13:54.865
The value of it, I think is about,

13:55.935 --> 13:57.585
it's discursive nature, the fact

13:57.585 --> 13:58.825
that we can talk about things,

13:59.565 --> 14:02.745
and it's about creating an environment whereby we can talk

14:02.905 --> 14:04.705
about things in a non-threatening way.

14:05.325 --> 14:08.625
And so one of, one of the examples that I use from America

14:09.145 --> 14:11.545
actually, is, is

14:11.845 --> 14:14.305
by an author called Co co his colleagues,

14:14.765 --> 14:17.385
and they talk about a restorative justice process,

14:17.455 --> 14:19.745
community mediation in a community

14:19.745 --> 14:22.105
that was having real problems with racism.

14:23.085 --> 14:25.025
And they invited the whole community

14:25.645 --> 14:27.025
to come to this meeting.

14:27.885 --> 14:30.945
And what they did there is they gave people very specific

14:30.995 --> 14:33.705
short amount of time, two minutes to talk about

14:33.705 --> 14:35.585
what it was like for them to live in that community,

14:36.255 --> 14:39.625
what they felt threaten was threatening in their community,

14:39.625 --> 14:40.625
what they were worried about,

14:40.645 --> 14:42.225
and actually this type of society

14:42.225 --> 14:43.665
that they really wanted to live in.

14:44.005 --> 14:45.545
And what was really surprising is

14:45.545 --> 14:47.905
that there weren't really distinctions when we're talk,

14:47.905 --> 14:49.145
when we're talking about those things.

14:49.565 --> 14:50.745
People, regardless of

14:50.745 --> 14:51.925
Culture, color, or creed,

14:51.945 --> 14:54.045
are basically saying the similar things.

14:54.505 --> 14:56.525
So if we could be having those conversations

14:57.315 --> 14:59.325
whereby we can move out

14:59.325 --> 15:01.965
of senseless violence into something much more productive

15:01.965 --> 15:03.965
where everybody's winning, then

15:03.965 --> 15:05.605
that is a much better place to be.

15:05.625 --> 15:09.365
And that's kind of the arguments in, in, in my work that,

15:09.595 --> 15:10.445
that I put forward.

"Transitional Justice: Navigating Restoration and Accountability in Post-Conflict Societies"

00:00:00 - My PhD was on the topic. but what I did in that, body of work is focus on how South Africa, the Czech Republic in Northern Ireland kind of came through their transitions. How they moved away from being in a, in a state of, you know, dictatorships or active conflict between communities. And it was really interesting at looking how they used the word restorative justice, what it meant, how, how they used it to deal with the past, but then also how it was used to deal to reform criminal justice. And what was very evident is that there wasn't a lot of work on this. And in restorative justice,
00:00:43 - So it, you know, a, a book that kind of gave a broader overview of what was happening in post-conflict countries, seemed to be, a gap that needed to be filled. Transitional justice broadly is just responding to any large scale systemic crimes that have occurred. So, you know, this might be human rights abuses or persecution or violence on a systematic scale. And we've seen that it's evolved over a number of phases, right? So we can see really early on following the second World War transitions, in southern Europe. So Spain and Portugal, for example,
00:01:27 - had particular tendencies. And part of that was around, deterrent. So prosecuting those that were mostly responsible for coming up with the architecture, I guess. so you see that in Nuremberg is denunciation, so prosecuting leaders in show trials. So you saw that in Spain and portal or, incapacitation. So in communist regimes, they had a, a concept called illustration. And basically what happened is after the transition, individuals who were in power in institutions, so for example, the military or, you know, government, institutions were removed from the, from those roles,
00:02:06 - So there was no undermining of the shift to, to a democracy. after the, after that kind of period, we see conflict that was slightly more complicated, because it was about waring communities, right? And so what ends up happening is that, communities had a particular identity and there were no easy winners and losers. So approaching, transgressions, I guess becomes a little bit more complicated. So, and it also, what it does is if we're gonna prosecute people, why are people gonna give up power? They're not right. Why, why are they going
00:02:48 - And so we see opportunities or the threat that that will reignite conflict, but also after the Cold War, we kind of then see this move in transitional justice towards talking about reconciliation or nation building or, punishing or pardoning human rights abusers and that, and that, that debate. So, transitional justice encapsulates all of that. But most recently we see this distinction or a categorization of approaches that are considered to be retributive or restorative. And that's kind of the two main features at the minute. Attritive approaches in general, as you would expect,
00:03:28 - and international criminal justice processes, tribunals, for example, or national inquiries or commissions. and they'll explore what happened during the process, but also hold very particular people to account for it. So it's about dealing with very specific incidents, as opposed to thinking about nation building, et cetera. and the international community, some, some countries can't afford to, or they don't have the infrastructure to punish individuals, prosecute them, right? And so the international community has a role to play in that as well. So we see that with the international criminal court.

"Exploring the Complexities and Functions of Restorative Justice in Transitional Settings"

00:04:11 - for Yugoslavia or in Rwanda, where they, they, prosecuted individuals. So that's kind of the retributive side of things. The restorative justice side is a little bit, more complicated, right? So most people when they've heard of restorative justice, they think about people and a victim meeting their offender, right? And getting some kind of payback reparation. And, and those kinds of ideas are there, but they're a little bit more, expansive, I guess in, in post-conflict or transitional settings. Because again, if we go back to that identity issue, although individuals may have been involved in particular
00:04:51 - or the kind of, motivations for those in incidents are plugged into a much broader identity whereby people are fighting, for example, to realize their own rights. You know, that violence might have not been the first option, but it might be the last option, and they've gone along with that. So we see kind of restorative justice being used in three different ways. First at a conceptual level. So we see this mostly with, truth and reconciliation commission. So South Africa was the first one where this concept, restorative justice, really came to the fore, right? And Archbishop, Archbishop Desmond Tutu spoke a lot about forgiveness, about nation building,
00:05:32 - and, and that's kind of where it, where it's, really got to prominence, I guess. So this is more about normative values, pursuing that you then have a strategic level that, which I was mentioning, in terms of my PhD whereby, post regime governments will use restorative justice to initiate criminal justice reform. And we see this most often in youth justice, which isn't surprising, right? Because we, we think kids make mistakes, they need support, they need to be educated. we don't wanna give them criminal records. We want them to be able to understand the harm that they're causing, but also to take actions
00:06:12 - So we are holding them to accountants in some way, shape or form. So we've seen criminal justice reform based on restorative justice principles in South Africa, in the Czech Republic and Northern Ireland use conferencing. So every, in, every child that gets prosecuted, for the most part, borrow a couple of, elements will go through a conferencing process, in those countries. So it kind of signals a, a shift from the way that we have dealt with things to a new way that we're gonna deal with things and hopefully that those young people are gonna grow up and become more law abiding individuals. There's a final one, a practical level, where restorative justice is, has been used to plug a justice gap.
00:06:54 - of any conflicts, or just in the early days when the new regime is just setting up its infrastructure again. And, communities, the police, for example, who have been instigators in a lot of conflicts and partisan and their approaches won't be able to enter a community. But just because the criminal justice system has no role to play in a community, that doesn't mean that crime's not being taken, right? And so we see communities coming up with community responses, to deal with offenses or behavior that is really blight in their community. So we see this happening in Northern Ireland, Sierra Leone, Columbia, a whole range of places where they're using this.
00:07:38 - spectrum of transitional justice. While transitional justice is mainly looking at both the past of what's happened and dealing with harm that's being caused, it also focuses on the future about let's move from then to a new future that's peaceful, et cetera. The biggest problem with all transitional justice processes is that, the resources and time and political constraints make it a really selective process, right? So it's, there are, there are not kind of consistent ways in which, the past is dealt dealt with in a meaningful way.

"Challenges and Limitations of Transitional Justice in Achieving Lasting Peace"

00:08:21 - and certainly in my work, and, and a lot of my colleagues work would argue that transitional justice is quite inadequate because it doesn't really address the past, right? So one, one, I think it's, you know, that I refer to in the book and, and I use it quite a bit, is that roughly about 40 to 50% of all conflicts in the 19th, in the 20th century, 21st century, it seems to be going that way, who go through a peace process will end up back in violent conflict within five years. So if you think about the millions and millions of dollars or pounds that are spent on transitional justice mechanisms,
00:09:00 - Columbia's going through a, a peace process, I think, again, for the third or fourth time at the minute. And that's over a slightly longer period, but their REIT is still very narrower and focused. So those are really challenging. So the way that we conceptualize peace is quite, narrow. It's not necessarily meeting the needs of individuals that make up their population. and it's, it's not necessarily about, long lasting peace, it's more about the absence of co of conflict or violence that we're really focusing on, not a positive piece, where, you know, it,
00:09:42 - that have been driving that conflict. And so, if you think about the fact that roughly we have about 66 million, persons of concern, and by that we mean refugees, we mean asylum seekers, we mean displaced people. They've got a number of needs and deficits, right? that aren't being addressed at all anyway. And a lot of the time, transitional justice can just be, I always think about it as, as a visible effort to make sure that the international community thinks that something's happening. And so as a South African, the Truth Reconciliation Commission, you know,
00:10:25 - because there's no way that the apartheid regime was going to relinquish control if they were just gonna be prosecuted and ended up in prison. So we had to negotiate an amnesty, and that was the first time that amnesty was partial. and the way that they then dealt with that was through the Truth Commission. And they said, if you come forward as a, as a perpetrator, and you explain what happened and why it happened, as long as it had a political motivation, you will get amnesty the slides. And, and that sounds great on paper, but what we know happened is that not many perpetrators came forward
00:11:06 - You know? So there's, there's really challenges. There are a lot of challenges in terms of, of restorative justice, and some, some of my colleagues, like Kira McAvoy have argued that legalism is a huge problem. It's too dominant that we are not thinking about justice on a broader scale that's gonna be meaningful, people that's actually gonna achieve the change that we want. And this book, in part, makes a case for restorative justice in much broader terms, about, about how we can give ownership back to individuals rather than it being priorities of the international community or supernational organizations that are driving particular institutions
00:11:45 - I think that the book and, and subsequent work on, on the topic that I've done is that if we want to achieve positive change, actual real change, enduring peace, equitable relationships, we have to look at things differently. And as we all know, you know, even in our own relationships, when we have arguments or tensions or conflict, the people that best know what the issues are, where they coming from and how to deal with them come from the individuals themselves, right? Sometimes you might need some help from professionals to guide those conversations. It's about helping you to communicate what you want to say better.

"Transforming Conflict through Restorative Justice: Bridging Divides and Fostering Dialogue"

00:12:28 - and this is what you need to do. Right? And transitional justice is very similar. So we have, we have these deep rooted conflicts. So if you think about Rwanda, the Sies and the tootsies, right? If you look back in history, the inverse was true. The tootsies dominated the hoodies. And so conflict has a long history. If we are just dealing with one particular incident, what all we are doing is we are turning the current losers into winners, which means that that animosity and tension still stays there between those communities. And that's, that's a risky, risky, dynamic.
00:13:09 - that we create a situation wherein we're honest about the structural violence in our societies that are creating these kinds of, hierarchies of communities of issues. You know, we see this everywhere, not, not only in in conflict settings, but we need to acknowledge actually what's driving these, these inequalities, these inadequacies, these, I don't know, resentment. The, the kind of narratives, the intergenerational trauma that's passed down that continues to fuel things, to achieve change. And the wonder of restorative justice isn't necessarily
00:13:49 - who have been affected by a particular incident. The value of it, I think is about, it's discursive nature, the fact that we can talk about things, and it's about creating an environment whereby we can talk about things in a non-threatening way. And so one of, one of the examples that I use from America actually, is, is by an author called Co co his colleagues, and they talk about a restorative justice process, community mediation in a community that was having real problems with racism. And they invited the whole community to come to this meeting.
00:14:30 - short amount of time, two minutes to talk about what it was like for them to live in that community, what they felt threaten was threatening in their community, what they were worried about, and actually this type of society that they really wanted to live in. And what was really surprising is that there weren't really distinctions when we're talk, when we're talking about those things. People, regardless of Culture, color, or creed, are basically saying the similar things. So if we could be having those conversations whereby we can move out of senseless violence into something much more productive where everybody's winning, then that is a much better place to be. And that's kind of the arguments in, in, in my work that,
00:15:09 -

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis