Before the Badge

Key Question Being Explored in This Insight:

Samantha Simon explains how police training creates a context in which patterns of police violence persist and implores readers to re-envision the future of policing in the United States.

View the page of: Samantha Simon

Institution: University of Arizona

Explore more insights in:

Books Ethnicity and Racism Social Sciences Sociology

Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider ▼

What assumptions does the research make?
Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness ▼

This research comes from University of Arizona . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Further Reading ▼

Read the Book

Samantha Simon explains how police training creates a context in which patterns of police violence persist and implores readers to re-envision the future of policing in the United States.

Speaker notes a correction to her response: she collected data in 2018, which was four years – rather than 2 – after the uprisings in Ferguson, MO

Image courtesy of interviewee. March 1, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

The speaker discusses their research on civilian gun ownership and policing conducted during graduate school. Working with a professor on ethnographic research in Texas, they became interested in the training of police officers and how it compared to civilian gun training. The motivation for this study was influenced by experiences with gun ownership and the context of police violence, particularly following events in Ferguson.

The speaker spent a year researching at various police training academies, observing and participating in the training processes. They found that training emphasized a culture that accepts and even encourages using violence, with cadets being punished for insufficient aggression but not for excessive force. This video video dynamic aimed to ensure officers prioritize their safety over de-escalating situations with civilians.

The speaker argues against the "bad apple" theory of police violence, suggesting that systemic issues within police training and hiring contribute to patterns of violence and racial inequality. The frameworks through which candidates are evaluated create a culture where aggression is normalized, and there is little discourse on the historical context of policing or racial disparities in police actions.

Despite some departments implementing de-escalation training, the focus remained on officer safety, and topics like racial inequality were neglected. The speaker expresses skepticism about the potential for reform within policing, advocating for alternative approaches, like reducing civilian gun ownership and exploring abolitionist perspectives, as potential pathways forward. They hope the book contextualizes the issues of police violence and emphasizes the need to address organizational structures rather than just individual behaviors within police departments.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:00.165 --> 00:00:01.445
I was in graduate school when I started

2
00:00:01.465 --> 00:00:02.685
the research for this project.

3
00:00:03.145 --> 00:00:05.685
Um, and I was working with a professor at the time

4
00:00:05.945 --> 00:00:09.125
who was doing a project about civilian gun

5
00:00:09.125 --> 00:00:10.685
ownership, in Texas.

6
00:00:11.725 --> 00:00:13.625
So we were doing ethnographic research,

7
00:00:13.955 --> 00:00:15.665
which means we were participating, of course,

8
00:00:15.665 --> 00:00:17.105
in the research,

9
00:00:17.205 --> 00:00:20.385
or in, in, the social phenomena

10
00:00:20.385 --> 00:00:21.745
that we were interested in understanding.

11
00:00:22.525 --> 00:00:26.945
So we were shooting guns, in fields in Texas.

12
00:00:27.455 --> 00:00:29.545
Lots of kind of interesting experiences there.

13
00:00:30.285 --> 00:00:33.905
Um, but what I found from that research was that a lot

14
00:00:33.925 --> 00:00:38.625
of the instructors for those, courses,

15
00:00:38.725 --> 00:00:41.425
for that training were police officers themselves.

16
00:00:42.545 --> 00:00:45.605
And in those interviews with them, I started

17
00:00:45.625 --> 00:00:48.845
to get really curious about, you know,

18
00:00:48.905 --> 00:00:50.845
how this training was different

19
00:00:51.385 --> 00:00:54.445
or similar to what officers went through.

20
00:00:55.385 --> 00:00:59.885
Um, this was 2018, so this was two years

21
00:01:00.135 --> 00:01:03.885
after, you know, Ferguson uprisings in Ferguson.

22
00:01:04.625 --> 00:01:06.765
So I also, you know, wanted to know

23
00:01:07.475 --> 00:01:09.005
what was going on with policing.

24
00:01:09.465 --> 00:01:13.005
Why were we seeing all of these, you know,

25
00:01:13.005 --> 00:01:15.645
this persistent trend in policing

26
00:01:16.615 --> 00:01:19.685
where officers were engaging in violence,

27
00:01:19.905 --> 00:01:22.845
disproportionately against certain racial communities in

28
00:01:22.845 --> 00:01:24.325
particular against black communities.

29
00:01:24.985 --> 00:01:27.685
Um, so all of that really motivated the study, some

30
00:01:27.685 --> 00:01:29.805
of my experiences with civilian gun ownership, that,

31
00:01:29.805 --> 00:01:32.605
that exposure to policing and to police officers,

32
00:01:32.625 --> 00:01:34.525
and also just, you know, the historical moment

33
00:01:34.525 --> 00:01:38.285
that I was in, in selecting a study, ethnographic work

34
00:01:38.285 --> 00:01:41.325
or ethnographic methods, generally describes a method

35
00:01:41.325 --> 00:01:44.565
where the researcher tries to embed themselves as much

36
00:01:44.565 --> 00:01:47.165
as possible in whatever world they're, they're interested in

37
00:01:47.225 --> 00:01:49.125
or social phenomena that they're wanting to explain.

38
00:01:49.705 --> 00:01:53.405
Um, so for this particular book, what I ended up doing

39
00:01:54.425 --> 00:01:56.485
was going to four different,

40
00:01:56.505 --> 00:01:58.685
or spending time at four different police training

41
00:01:58.715 --> 00:02:00.925
academies, in one southern state.

42
00:02:01.045 --> 00:02:02.725
I don't name the state, in my work

43
00:02:03.065 --> 00:02:04.445
to maintain anonymity.

44
00:02:04.825 --> 00:02:07.765
Um, but what that meant, my, my level of embeddedness,

45
00:02:07.765 --> 00:02:10.485
differed between these academies.

46
00:02:10.485 --> 00:02:12.085
So at some of them, I was able

47
00:02:12.085 --> 00:02:14.445
to participate fully in all of the training.

48
00:02:15.305 --> 00:02:18.645
So that meant I was going on, pretty long runs,

49
00:02:19.025 --> 00:02:20.165
in formation.

50
00:02:20.605 --> 00:02:23.085
I was, you know, shooting along with the, the cadets.

51
00:02:23.125 --> 00:02:24.485
I was doing physical fitness training.

52
00:02:24.925 --> 00:02:26.565
I was doing tactical training, you know,

53
00:02:26.565 --> 00:02:28.765
in their defensive tactics gym,

54
00:02:28.765 --> 00:02:31.685
at other academies I was just allowed to observe.

55
00:02:31.705 --> 00:02:34.325
So I was watching, the cadets go through all

56
00:02:34.325 --> 00:02:36.245
of this training and really spending more time

57
00:02:36.245 --> 00:02:38.645
with the instructors rather than, than the cadets.

58
00:02:38.905 --> 00:02:40.285
Uh, but that really gave me a,

59
00:02:40.405 --> 00:02:42.805
a very hands-on very visceral sense of

60
00:02:42.805 --> 00:02:44.685
what this training is like,

61
00:02:45.435 --> 00:02:46.725
what it feels like physically

62
00:02:47.065 --> 00:02:50.205
and how some of these transformations happen at the academy.

63
00:02:50.965 --> 00:02:53.805
I certainly understand why bad apple arguments are

64
00:02:53.805 --> 00:02:57.325
appealing, particularly in this case,

65
00:02:57.465 --> 00:02:58.965
but in, in many different contexts.

66
00:02:59.185 --> 00:03:02.925
Um, it would be convenient if there were individual,

67
00:03:03.625 --> 00:03:06.525
you know, violent, racist officers,

68
00:03:06.525 --> 00:03:08.885
because then the, the solution would be much easier.

69
00:03:09.065 --> 00:03:12.045
We could simply detect, these officers,

70
00:03:12.075 --> 00:03:15.085
from the outset, try to not, try

71
00:03:15.085 --> 00:03:17.125
to exclude them from entering the institution from

72
00:03:17.395 --> 00:03:18.405
from the beginning.

73
00:03:18.825 --> 00:03:20.965
Um, but if we fail to do that, we could, you know,

74
00:03:20.965 --> 00:03:22.125
create detection systems

75
00:03:22.265 --> 00:03:24.405
and remove them from the institution at some point.

76
00:03:24.865 --> 00:03:27.525
Um, so that's of course a very appealing explanation

77
00:03:27.705 --> 00:03:31.805
for this, you know, very persistent pattern of inequality

78
00:03:31.805 --> 00:03:33.125
that we see in policing.

79
00:03:33.625 --> 00:03:36.605
Um, unfortunately, I, I don't think that's the case.

80
00:03:36.865 --> 00:03:39.325
Um, I don't think that this is simply a bad apple issue.

81
00:03:39.905 --> 00:03:41.645
Uh, from my year, you know,

82
00:03:41.645 --> 00:03:43.725
that I spent at these training academies.

83
00:03:43.725 --> 00:03:46.845
What I really saw was that this was a much more systemic,

84
00:03:47.165 --> 00:03:50.045
a much more, to use the word again, embedded problem,

85
00:03:50.665 --> 00:03:53.445
within these, organizations,

86
00:03:53.445 --> 00:03:55.325
these training academies, really

87
00:03:55.325 --> 00:03:56.925
to get into the institution, the way

88
00:03:56.925 --> 00:03:59.045
that the hiring is structured, the way

89
00:03:59.045 --> 00:04:00.285
that the training plays out,

90
00:04:00.545 --> 00:04:02.845
and really in order to not wash out

91
00:04:02.905 --> 00:04:07.215
and to make it to your, to the graduation itself, these,

92
00:04:07.265 --> 00:04:09.935
applicants and then cadets really needed to align themselves

93
00:04:10.045 --> 00:04:12.495
with an institutional worldview

94
00:04:12.635 --> 00:04:16.415
and approach to policing that really emphasized,

95
00:04:16.615 --> 00:04:18.775
a competence in and also a willingness

96
00:04:18.835 --> 00:04:19.935
to engage in violence.

97
00:04:20.395 --> 00:04:22.975
So at the hiring stage, you know, the,

98
00:04:23.155 --> 00:04:25.575
the hiring process at these police departments

99
00:04:26.315 --> 00:04:27.455
are, is very extensive.

100
00:04:27.475 --> 00:04:29.415
So it can take anywhere from three months to

101
00:04:30.005 --> 00:04:31.815
over a year really to get hired.

102
00:04:32.355 --> 00:04:36.175
Um, and what I argue in this book is that the,

103
00:04:36.175 --> 00:04:40.295
essentially the blueprint of what these, academies

104
00:04:40.295 --> 00:04:44.375
or these departments are looking for in new cadets,

105
00:04:44.995 --> 00:04:47.535
really creates the perfect storm

106
00:04:47.675 --> 00:04:49.575
for who's coming into the institution.

107
00:04:49.575 --> 00:04:52.415
So some of these things seem on the surface, like, you know,

108
00:04:52.885 --> 00:04:55.695
objectively positive traits that someone might have,

109
00:04:56.085 --> 00:04:58.735
someone who's disciplined, someone who's honest, someone

110
00:04:58.755 --> 00:04:59.935
who who's responsible.

111
00:05:00.435 --> 00:05:02.415
Um, these are all, you know, coded

112
00:05:02.415 --> 00:05:03.655
as generally positive things.

113
00:05:03.965 --> 00:05:06.535
What this also means, though, on the flip side, is

114
00:05:06.535 --> 00:05:08.695
that the folks who are coming in to these departments

115
00:05:08.935 --> 00:05:12.535
who are being hired, have, you know, a real respect for

116
00:05:12.715 --> 00:05:15.855
and tendency towards hierarchical structures,

117
00:05:16.205 --> 00:05:18.935
they are willing to kind of do whatever it takes physically,

118
00:05:18.955 --> 00:05:21.055
and that can mean, you know, enduring a lot

119
00:05:21.055 --> 00:05:22.735
of pain for the institution.

120
00:05:22.735 --> 00:05:25.735
So they're really already from the outset, set up to

121
00:05:26.375 --> 00:05:31.055
demonstrate their commitment physically, to the,

122
00:05:31.355 --> 00:05:32.535
the department itself,

123
00:05:33.155 --> 00:05:35.975
and to be, generally protective of the department.

124
00:05:36.635 --> 00:05:38.855
Um, and in the hiring process, they,

125
00:05:38.855 --> 00:05:40.415
they ask each applicant whether

126
00:05:40.415 --> 00:05:42.655
or not, at, at these departments anyway, whether

127
00:05:42.655 --> 00:05:43.895
or not they had been in a fight before.

128
00:05:44.515 --> 00:05:47.135
Um, and if so, to kind of explain the context of that.

129
00:05:47.355 --> 00:05:50.295
And of course, that was very confusing to me initially,

130
00:05:50.635 --> 00:05:52.335
as to what the correct answer to

131
00:05:52.335 --> 00:05:53.415
that kind of a question would be.

132
00:05:53.835 --> 00:05:56.575
Uh, but it became really clear that the correct answer was

133
00:05:56.575 --> 00:05:58.605
that they had been in a fight,

134
00:05:58.715 --> 00:06:00.885
they just didn't necessarily initiate the fight.

135
00:06:01.225 --> 00:06:03.965
So these departments really wanted to know,

136
00:06:03.965 --> 00:06:06.045
and they were, there was a lot of anxiety expressed about

137
00:06:06.045 --> 00:06:07.485
this, both in the hiring units

138
00:06:07.665 --> 00:06:11.565
and at the academies, that it was very important

139
00:06:11.565 --> 00:06:12.765
that someone could demonstrate

140
00:06:12.765 --> 00:06:15.685
that they would stand their ground in a fight,

141
00:06:15.945 --> 00:06:18.005
and engage in the violence,

142
00:06:18.285 --> 00:06:20.245
reciprocate in the violence that was brought to them.

143
00:06:20.585 --> 00:06:23.925
Um, and then at the academy, on the academy side, you know,

144
00:06:23.925 --> 00:06:26.125
some of the things that I saw, for example, were that,

145
00:06:26.785 --> 00:06:28.445
you know, the instructors there would get

146
00:06:28.925 --> 00:06:30.485
absolutely infuriated.

147
00:06:30.725 --> 00:06:31.725
I mean, truly irate.

148
00:06:31.825 --> 00:06:35.925
If the cadets did not use enough force in a scenario,

149
00:06:36.115 --> 00:06:37.805
they would be, you know, disciplined for that.

150
00:06:37.805 --> 00:06:40.445
They would be punished for that, physically, like

151
00:06:40.445 --> 00:06:43.805
through running pushups, things like that, that were,

152
00:06:43.865 --> 00:06:44.885
you know, eventually painful.

153
00:06:45.545 --> 00:06:48.525
Um, but on the flip side, you know, they really did not

154
00:06:49.385 --> 00:06:53.085
get punished in that same way if they used too much

155
00:06:53.085 --> 00:06:54.125
force in a scenario.

156
00:06:54.705 --> 00:06:57.285
Um, so again, sort of the take home messaging

157
00:06:57.545 --> 00:07:00.325
to cadets about the use of force, the use

158
00:07:00.325 --> 00:07:02.405
of violence in the academy was that if you're going

159
00:07:02.405 --> 00:07:05.245
to make a mistake, it ought to be the one

160
00:07:05.255 --> 00:07:07.765
where you overreact or use too much force.

161
00:07:08.385 --> 00:07:12.285
Um, and in doing that, you are prioritizing always,

162
00:07:12.285 --> 00:07:13.605
always officer safety.

163
00:07:13.975 --> 00:07:15.725
There were certainly cadets

164
00:07:15.725 --> 00:07:18.605
or rather applicants at that point in time that were,

165
00:07:18.945 --> 00:07:20.645
you know, removed from the applicant pool

166
00:07:20.645 --> 00:07:23.045
because they had a history of sort of

167
00:07:23.045 --> 00:07:24.565
what was considered egregious violence.

168
00:07:25.105 --> 00:07:27.645
Um, so for example, there was one applicant I remember,

169
00:07:27.745 --> 00:07:30.725
who was removed from the applicant pool,

170
00:07:30.835 --> 00:07:34.005
because, in doing the background investigation

171
00:07:34.005 --> 00:07:35.285
that is part of this hiring process,

172
00:07:35.985 --> 00:07:37.645
the background investigator who's, you know,

173
00:07:37.645 --> 00:07:40.995
a police officer or hiring officer, spoke

174
00:07:40.995 --> 00:07:43.675
to their ex-girlfriend and the ex-girlfriend recounted times

175
00:07:43.675 --> 00:07:45.315
where this applicant had threatened to kill her

176
00:07:45.335 --> 00:07:46.635
and had been, you know, abusive.

177
00:07:47.295 --> 00:07:49.435
So when that kind of thing comes out,

178
00:07:49.495 --> 00:07:51.955
in the hiring process and the background investigations,

179
00:07:52.385 --> 00:07:55.235
certainly it's looked, you know, it's frowned upon

180
00:07:55.495 --> 00:07:56.875
and is taken seriously.

181
00:07:57.495 --> 00:08:01.045
Um, in the academy setting, there are certainly a lot

182
00:08:01.045 --> 00:08:02.485
of mistakes that are made.

183
00:08:02.705 --> 00:08:03.925
Um, in the academy setting.

184
00:08:03.925 --> 00:08:06.805
These cadets are learning, about their authority

185
00:08:06.965 --> 00:08:09.525
to use force, and they're learning it in a hands-on way

186
00:08:09.525 --> 00:08:11.045
through scenario-based training.

187
00:08:11.705 --> 00:08:14.525
Um, and there were certainly situations where cadets,

188
00:08:14.705 --> 00:08:16.005
overreacted.

189
00:08:16.005 --> 00:08:18.165
There was, you know, one, scenario

190
00:08:18.235 --> 00:08:21.125
that the instructors talked about a lot,

191
00:08:21.435 --> 00:08:23.165
that I think they had removed at that point in time,

192
00:08:23.185 --> 00:08:26.805
but had historically used in their academy where,

193
00:08:27.465 --> 00:08:31.765
the cadet was, conducting just a routine traffic stop,

194
00:08:31.945 --> 00:08:34.965
and the driver in the driver's seat would, you know, kind

195
00:08:34.965 --> 00:08:36.325
of whip their hand out of the window

196
00:08:36.395 --> 00:08:37.525
with their driver's license.

197
00:08:38.345 --> 00:08:41.685
Um, and most cadets would end up shooting this person,

198
00:08:42.375 --> 00:08:45.285
based on the fact that they had been going through months

199
00:08:45.905 --> 00:08:48.085
of tactical training that really does, you know,

200
00:08:48.175 --> 00:08:50.365
train your body to react in a certain way

201
00:08:50.655 --> 00:08:53.245
where if someone has their hands in their pockets,

202
00:08:53.245 --> 00:08:54.645
they won't remove them If someone,

203
00:08:55.065 --> 00:08:58.165
Um, engages in what they talk about as furtive movements.

204
00:08:58.165 --> 00:09:00.565
So if I'm avoiding your glance, if I'm looking away,

205
00:09:00.985 --> 00:09:03.965
if I'm walking away, if I'm moving my hands around quickly,

206
00:09:04.505 --> 00:09:06.085
if I'm swinging my arms around, I mean,

207
00:09:06.085 --> 00:09:08.005
there's all these physical markers that they learn about,

208
00:09:08.505 --> 00:09:10.685
that would indicate that their life is,

209
00:09:10.865 --> 00:09:12.045
is potentially end danger

210
00:09:12.045 --> 00:09:13.525
and they need to react accordingly.

211
00:09:14.065 --> 00:09:17.325
Um, so there were certainly situations again where,

212
00:09:17.375 --> 00:09:18.885
where cadets used too much force,

213
00:09:18.905 --> 00:09:20.365
but there was a lot of forgiveness there.

214
00:09:20.985 --> 00:09:23.405
Um, on the side of the instructors, at least from

215
00:09:23.405 --> 00:09:27.285
what I saw, nothing, is the short answer.

216
00:09:27.475 --> 00:09:29.845
Yeah, I mean, there, there's no, at, at least at the time

217
00:09:29.845 --> 00:09:33.965
that I was doing this research, there was really no,

218
00:09:34.025 --> 00:09:38.445
course or part of the training that discussed the history

219
00:09:38.505 --> 00:09:39.925
of policing in the United States.

220
00:09:40.705 --> 00:09:44.685
Um, there was almost no conversation about,

221
00:09:45.105 --> 00:09:47.045
the existence even of patterns

222
00:09:47.045 --> 00:09:49.925
of racial inequality in police actions.

223
00:09:50.865 --> 00:09:53.885
Um, racial discrimination or racial inequity

224
00:09:53.885 --> 00:09:56.405
and police action was not a topic that was taken seriously,

225
00:09:56.865 --> 00:10:01.245
at all in the, training that I witnessed.

226
00:10:01.385 --> 00:10:03.005
Uh, there, there was deescalation,

227
00:10:03.005 --> 00:10:04.725
there was a deescalation class at the time.

228
00:10:05.035 --> 00:10:06.565
This was not state mandated at the time.

229
00:10:06.565 --> 00:10:08.605
This was something that the municipal departments

230
00:10:08.605 --> 00:10:11.645
that I studied opted to, to include in their training.

231
00:10:12.145 --> 00:10:14.125
Um, but you know, I write about this in the book.

232
00:10:14.305 --> 00:10:18.995
The, the, the deescalation training that was included at,

233
00:10:19.015 --> 00:10:22.035
at these training academies really emphasized,

234
00:10:22.035 --> 00:10:23.115
again, officer safety.

235
00:10:23.175 --> 00:10:26.075
So deescalation was really conceptualized as a way

236
00:10:26.075 --> 00:10:30.475
of approaching a civilian politely, of,

237
00:10:30.855 --> 00:10:32.315
you know, discussing

238
00:10:32.315 --> 00:10:34.715
with them in an even tone what's going on.

239
00:10:35.295 --> 00:10:37.835
Uh, but again and again in these deescalation classes,

240
00:10:38.095 --> 00:10:39.595
the instructors emphasized

241
00:10:39.785 --> 00:10:42.915
that at no time should they prioritize deescalation

242
00:10:42.915 --> 00:10:43.995
over officer safety.

243
00:10:44.775 --> 00:10:47.725
Um, you know, there were things that,

244
00:10:47.725 --> 00:10:49.125
the training officers would say.

245
00:10:49.185 --> 00:10:51.965
So something along the lines of, you know, don't make me go

246
00:10:51.965 --> 00:10:54.885
to a funeral because an, an officer funeral

247
00:10:55.155 --> 00:10:57.925
because you were using your words when you shouldn't have.

248
00:10:58.105 --> 00:10:59.845
Um, things like that. And they were, again,

249
00:10:59.905 --> 00:11:01.685
as they did throughout the academy, showing videos

250
00:11:01.905 --> 00:11:05.325
of officers being really brutally beaten

251
00:11:05.585 --> 00:11:10.005
or killed, on duty as again,

252
00:11:10.355 --> 00:11:14.205
sort of warnings that, you know, deescalation should be used

253
00:11:14.205 --> 00:11:15.605
with the utmost caution.

254
00:11:15.905 --> 00:11:18.285
You know, again, officer safety should be the number one

255
00:11:18.565 --> 00:11:21.765
priority at all times, for, you know, these new cadets.

256
00:11:22.465 --> 00:11:25.765
So yeah, there really was no acknowledgement of the origins

257
00:11:25.765 --> 00:11:30.445
of policing nor really of the current state of, of policing.

258
00:11:30.445 --> 00:11:33.045
Yeah, I think that these organizations are, are really

259
00:11:33.655 --> 00:11:34.965
quite adaptable.

260
00:11:35.585 --> 00:11:38.685
Um, and by that I mean that they will continue to do

261
00:11:38.685 --> 00:11:43.405
what they're doing, while incorporating potential sort

262
00:11:43.405 --> 00:11:45.485
of window dressings or adaptations.

263
00:11:45.565 --> 00:11:48.045
I mean, again, these departments had deescalation training,

264
00:11:48.505 --> 00:11:50.725
and you could, you could perceive that as like a pretty,

265
00:11:50.985 --> 00:11:53.365
progressive thing that they had opted to do

266
00:11:53.365 --> 00:11:54.845
that without being mandated by the state.

267
00:11:55.345 --> 00:11:59.365
Um, but there really is very little oversight on

268
00:11:59.955 --> 00:12:01.685
what is included in this training.

269
00:12:02.145 --> 00:12:04.045
Um, there are, you know, state bodies

270
00:12:04.235 --> 00:12:06.085
that approve curriculums,

271
00:12:06.465 --> 00:12:08.045
but it, there's not a ton

272
00:12:08.045 --> 00:12:10.845
of oversight on what's then said in the class

273
00:12:11.185 --> 00:12:12.485
by any particular instructor.

274
00:12:12.675 --> 00:12:14.925
Just sort of mention I am unfortunately not

275
00:12:15.455 --> 00:12:16.805
incredibly optimistic.

276
00:12:16.985 --> 00:12:19.605
Um, I wish I were, you know,

277
00:12:19.705 --> 00:12:21.405
in at least the United States context,

278
00:12:21.825 --> 00:12:22.885
we have been having a lot

279
00:12:22.885 --> 00:12:26.165
of these conversations about the police, about patterns

280
00:12:26.165 --> 00:12:30.445
of inequality, about, misconduct, about brutality,

281
00:12:30.865 --> 00:12:34.125
you know, for about a hundred years really,

282
00:12:34.375 --> 00:12:37.885
presidents have, you know, put together commissions,

283
00:12:37.895 --> 00:12:40.085
since the 1930s, the Wickham Commission,

284
00:12:40.225 --> 00:12:42.965
the Kerner Commission, most recently, you know,

285
00:12:43.155 --> 00:12:45.405
Obama's task force on 21st century policing.

286
00:12:45.785 --> 00:12:50.325
And when you look at the, findings from these reports,

287
00:12:50.465 --> 00:12:53.485
the recommendations that these commissions make over the

288
00:12:53.485 --> 00:12:55.725
course of a hundred years, they look pretty

289
00:12:55.725 --> 00:12:56.765
similar, honestly.

290
00:12:56.785 --> 00:12:59.205
You know, they're talking about the qualifications

291
00:12:59.205 --> 00:13:01.405
for officers, the training for officers, the systems

292
00:13:01.425 --> 00:13:04.285
of accountability that we might have for police departments.

293
00:13:04.905 --> 00:13:07.885
Um, and this isn't to say that policing hasn't changed at

294
00:13:07.885 --> 00:13:09.525
all over the last 100 years.

295
00:13:09.625 --> 00:13:13.605
It certainly has. Um, but these problems are quite enduring.

296
00:13:14.225 --> 00:13:16.005
And for that reason, I'm not,

297
00:13:16.015 --> 00:13:19.085
incredibly optimistic about reform as a way forward.

298
00:13:19.665 --> 00:13:21.525
Uh, in the book, I talk about, you know,

299
00:13:22.125 --> 00:13:26.525
civilian gun ownership, ba basically gun control

300
00:13:26.905 --> 00:13:29.085
as being a potential way forward.

301
00:13:29.425 --> 00:13:32.525
I'm similarly pessimistic about in the US context that,

302
00:13:33.025 --> 00:13:35.685
you know, being, a viable way forward.

303
00:13:36.035 --> 00:13:38.285
However, the police are not wrong here.

304
00:13:38.665 --> 00:13:41.525
Um, in the US when they are fearful of people with guns.

305
00:13:42.065 --> 00:13:44.445
Um, there are a lot of people here with guns.

306
00:13:44.745 --> 00:13:47.245
We have, you know, kind of an astronomical rate

307
00:13:47.265 --> 00:13:48.685
of civilian gun ownership here.

308
00:13:49.305 --> 00:13:52.245
Um, so I do think that there is potential,

309
00:13:52.265 --> 00:13:53.845
if the public was less armed,

310
00:13:53.955 --> 00:13:57.125
that potentially the police would feel less afraid,

311
00:13:57.345 --> 00:13:58.605
and less reactive.

312
00:13:59.655 --> 00:14:02.435
The other pathway forward is engaging in

313
00:14:02.555 --> 00:14:04.155
abolitionist perspectives.

314
00:14:04.615 --> 00:14:05.675
Um, so I, you know, I

315
00:14:05.875 --> 00:14:08.235
provided an, a brief overview of some

316
00:14:08.235 --> 00:14:09.355
of these perspectives in the book.

317
00:14:09.895 --> 00:14:13.075
Um, I'm not, you know, I don't think

318
00:14:13.075 --> 00:14:15.315
that these perspectives are naive or idealistic.

319
00:14:15.895 --> 00:14:18.795
Um, I think that they really do provide a real way

320
00:14:19.015 --> 00:14:21.075
of thinking about a future

321
00:14:21.245 --> 00:14:24.835
where we are not reliant on state law, like the,

322
00:14:24.865 --> 00:14:26.155
like law enforcement

323
00:14:26.375 --> 00:14:29.755
or the state, in being the,

324
00:14:30.625 --> 00:14:33.915
problem solver for how we, how we address harm.

325
00:14:34.435 --> 00:14:36.235
I hope they don't come away too pessimistic.

326
00:14:37.155 --> 00:14:38.795
Although, you know, given the answer I just gave, I don't,

327
00:14:38.795 --> 00:14:40.395
I wouldn't blame them if, if they did.

328
00:14:40.825 --> 00:14:44.475
What I hope is that this book contextualizes some

329
00:14:44.475 --> 00:14:45.715
of the patterns

330
00:14:45.715 --> 00:14:48.555
that we see covered in, you know, news reports.

331
00:14:49.175 --> 00:14:50.755
Um, and

332
00:14:50.915 --> 00:14:55.165
I, I hope that it sort of disuses readers of some

333
00:14:55.165 --> 00:14:59.045
of these really dominant narratives about police violence.

334
00:14:59.545 --> 00:15:01.565
Um, of course I didn't, this book doesn't cover

335
00:15:01.635 --> 00:15:02.925
what happens on patrol, right?

336
00:15:02.925 --> 00:15:05.045
This is about what happens before patrol.

337
00:15:05.925 --> 00:15:08.705
But I do think it really emphasizes

338
00:15:08.705 --> 00:15:11.025
that this is an organizational level problem.

339
00:15:11.845 --> 00:15:14.465
Um, this isn't an individual officer issue.

340
00:15:15.005 --> 00:15:19.105
Uh, and that if we want to address police violence, curb it,

341
00:15:19.285 --> 00:15:23.265
if we want to have an impact on the racial inequality

342
00:15:23.295 --> 00:15:27.385
that happens in, policing in police action, then we have

343
00:15:27.385 --> 00:15:29.985
to take very seriously this organizational lens

344
00:15:30.005 --> 00:15:30.505
to the problem.

Quick Answers

Exploring Police Training and Gun Ownership

00:00:00 - I was in graduate school when I started the research for this project. and I was working with a professor at the time who was doing a project about civilian gun ownership, in Texas. So we were doing ethnographic research, which means we were participating, of course, in the research, or in, in, the social phenomena that we were interested in understanding. So we were shooting guns, in fields in Texas. Lots of kind of interesting experiences there.
00:00:33 - of the instructors for those, courses, for that training were police officers themselves. And in those interviews with them, I started to get really curious about, you know, how this training was different or similar to what officers went through. this was 2018, so this was two years after, you know, Ferguson uprisings in Ferguson.
00:01:07 - what was going on with policing. Why were we seeing all of these, you know, this persistent trend in policing where officers were engaging in violence, disproportionately against certain racial communities in particular against black communities. so all of that really motivated the study, some of my experiences with civilian gun ownership, that, that exposure to policing and to police officers, and also just, you know, the historical moment that I was in, in selecting a study, ethnographic work
00:01:41 - where the researcher tries to embed themselves as much as possible in whatever world they're, they're interested in or social phenomena that they're wanting to explain. so for this particular book, what I ended up doing was going to four different, or spending time at four different police training academies, in one southern state. I don't name the state, in my work to maintain anonymity. but what that meant, my, my level of embeddedness, differed between these academies.
00:02:12 - to participate fully in all of the training. So that meant I was going on, pretty long runs, in formation. I was, you know, shooting along with the, the cadets. I was doing physical fitness training. I was doing tactical training, you know, in their defensive tactics gym, at other academies I was just allowed to observe. So I was watching, the cadets go through all of this training and really spending more time with the instructors rather than, than the cadets. but that really gave me a, a very hands-on very visceral sense of
00:02:45 - what it feels like physically and how some of these transformations happen at the academy. I certainly understand why bad apple arguments are appealing, particularly in this case, but in, in many different contexts. it would be convenient if there were individual, you know, violent, racist officers, because then the, the solution would be much easier. We could simply detect, these officers, from the outset, try to not, try

Systemic Issues in Police Training and Hiring

00:03:17 - from the beginning. but if we fail to do that, we could, you know, create detection systems and remove them from the institution at some point. so that's of course a very appealing explanation for this, you know, very persistent pattern of inequality that we see in policing. unfortunately, I, I don't think that's the case. I don't think that this is simply a bad apple issue. from my year, you know, that I spent at these training academies. What I really saw was that this was a much more systemic,
00:03:50 - within these, organizations, these training academies, really to get into the institution, the way that the hiring is structured, the way that the training plays out, and really in order to not wash out and to make it to your, to the graduation itself, these, applicants and then cadets really needed to align themselves with an institutional worldview and approach to policing that really emphasized, a competence in and also a willingness
00:04:20 - So at the hiring stage, you know, the, the hiring process at these police departments are, is very extensive. So it can take anywhere from three months to over a year really to get hired. and what I argue in this book is that the, essentially the blueprint of what these, academies or these departments are looking for in new cadets, really creates the perfect storm for who's coming into the institution.
00:04:52 - objectively positive traits that someone might have, someone who's disciplined, someone who's honest, someone who who's responsible. these are all, you know, coded as generally positive things. What this also means, though, on the flip side, is that the folks who are coming in to these departments who are being hired, have, you know, a real respect for and tendency towards hierarchical structures, they are willing to kind of do whatever it takes physically, and that can mean, you know, enduring a lot
00:05:22 - So they're really already from the outset, set up to demonstrate their commitment physically, to the, the department itself, and to be, generally protective of the department. and in the hiring process, they, they ask each applicant whether or not, at, at these departments anyway, whether or not they had been in a fight before. and if so, to kind of explain the context of that. And of course, that was very confusing to me initially, as to what the correct answer to
00:05:53 - but it became really clear that the correct answer was that they had been in a fight, they just didn't necessarily initiate the fight. So these departments really wanted to know, and they were, there was a lot of anxiety expressed about this, both in the hiring units and at the academies, that it was very important that someone could demonstrate that they would stand their ground in a fight, and engage in the violence, reciprocate in the violence that was brought to them. and then at the academy, on the academy side, you know,

Police Training: Force Use and Consequences

00:06:26 - you know, the instructors there would get absolutely infuriated. I mean, truly irate. If the cadets did not use enough force in a scenario, they would be, you know, disciplined for that. They would be punished for that, physically, like through running pushups, things like that, that were, you know, eventually painful. but on the flip side, you know, they really did not get punished in that same way if they used too much force in a scenario.
00:06:57 - to cadets about the use of force, the use of violence in the academy was that if you're going to make a mistake, it ought to be the one where you overreact or use too much force. and in doing that, you are prioritizing always, always officer safety. There were certainly cadets or rather applicants at that point in time that were, you know, removed from the applicant pool because they had a history of sort of what was considered egregious violence.
00:07:27 - who was removed from the applicant pool, because, in doing the background investigation that is part of this hiring process, the background investigator who's, you know, a police officer or hiring officer, spoke to their ex-girlfriend and the ex-girlfriend recounted times where this applicant had threatened to kill her and had been, you know, abusive. So when that kind of thing comes out, in the hiring process and the background investigations, certainly it's looked, you know, it's frowned upon
00:07:57 - in the academy setting, there are certainly a lot of mistakes that are made. in the academy setting. These cadets are learning, about their authority to use force, and they're learning it in a hands-on way through scenario-based training. and there were certainly situations where cadets, overreacted. There was, you know, one, scenario that the instructors talked about a lot, that I think they had removed at that point in time, but had historically used in their academy where,
00:08:31 - and the driver in the driver's seat would, you know, kind of whip their hand out of the window with their driver's license. and most cadets would end up shooting this person, based on the fact that they had been going through months of tactical training that really does, you know, train your body to react in a certain way where if someone has their hands in their pockets, they won't remove them If someone, engages in what they talk about as furtive movements.
00:09:00 - if I'm walking away, if I'm moving my hands around quickly, if I'm swinging my arms around, I mean, there's all these physical markers that they learn about, that would indicate that their life is, is potentially end danger and they need to react accordingly. so there were certainly situations again where, where cadets used too much force, but there was a lot of forgiveness there. on the side of the instructors, at least from what I saw, nothing, is the short answer. Yeah, I mean, there, there's no, at, at least at the time

Training Gaps in Police History and Inequality

00:09:34 - course or part of the training that discussed the history of policing in the United States. there was almost no conversation about, the existence even of patterns of racial inequality in police actions. racial discrimination or racial inequity and police action was not a topic that was taken seriously, at all in the, training that I witnessed.
00:10:03 - there was a deescalation class at the time. This was not state mandated at the time. This was something that the municipal departments that I studied opted to, to include in their training. but you know, I write about this in the book. The, the, the deescalation training that was included at, at these training academies really emphasized, again, officer safety. So deescalation was really conceptualized as a way of approaching a civilian politely, of, you know, discussing
00:10:35 - but again and again in these deescalation classes, the instructors emphasized that at no time should they prioritize deescalation over officer safety. you know, there were things that, the training officers would say. So something along the lines of, you know, don't make me go to a funeral because an, an officer funeral because you were using your words when you shouldn't have. things like that. And they were, again, as they did throughout the academy, showing videos of officers being really brutally beaten
00:11:10 - sort of warnings that, you know, deescalation should be used with the utmost caution. You know, again, officer safety should be the number one priority at all times, for, you know, these new cadets. So yeah, there really was no acknowledgement of the origins of policing nor really of the current state of, of policing. Yeah, I think that these organizations are, are really quite adaptable.
00:11:38 - what they're doing, while incorporating potential sort of window dressings or adaptations. I mean, again, these departments had deescalation training, and you could, you could perceive that as like a pretty, progressive thing that they had opted to do that without being mandated by the state. but there really is very little oversight on what is included in this training. there are, you know, state bodies that approve curriculums,
00:12:08 - of oversight on what's then said in the class by any particular instructor. Just sort of mention I am unfortunately not incredibly optimistic. I wish I were, you know, in at least the United States context, we have been having a lot of these conversations about the police, about patterns of inequality, about, misconduct, about brutality, you know, for about a hundred years really, presidents have, you know, put together commissions,

Reforming Policing: Systemic Challenges and Perspectives

00:12:40 - the Kerner Commission, most recently, you know, Obama's task force on 21st century policing. And when you look at the, findings from these reports, the recommendations that these commissions make over the course of a hundred years, they look pretty similar, honestly. You know, they're talking about the qualifications for officers, the training for officers, the systems of accountability that we might have for police departments. and this isn't to say that policing hasn't changed at all over the last 100 years.
00:13:14 - And for that reason, I'm not, incredibly optimistic about reform as a way forward. in the book, I talk about, you know, civilian gun ownership, ba basically gun control as being a potential way forward. I'm similarly pessimistic about in the US context that, you know, being, a viable way forward. However, the police are not wrong here. in the US when they are fearful of people with guns.
00:13:44 - We have, you know, kind of an astronomical rate of civilian gun ownership here. so I do think that there is potential, if the public was less armed, that potentially the police would feel less afraid, and less reactive. The other pathway forward is engaging in abolitionist perspectives. so I, you know, I provided an, a brief overview of some of these perspectives in the book. I'm not, you know, I don't think
00:14:15 - I think that they really do provide a real way of thinking about a future where we are not reliant on state law, like the, like law enforcement or the state, in being the, problem solver for how we, how we address harm. I hope they don't come away too pessimistic. Although, you know, given the answer I just gave, I don't, I wouldn't blame them if, if they did. What I hope is that this book contextualizes some
00:14:45 - that we see covered in, you know, news reports. and I, I hope that it sort of disuses readers of some of these really dominant narratives about police violence. of course I didn't, this book doesn't cover what happens on patrol, right? This is about what happens before patrol. But I do think it really emphasizes that this is an organizational level problem. this isn't an individual officer issue.
00:15:30 - if we want to have an impact on the racial inequality that happens in, policing in police action, then we have to take very seriously this organizational lens to the problem.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis

Data

Originals

Explainers

Podcasts