Popular in Professional

Human Rights Law

Human Rights and Corruption: Problems and Potential of Individualising a Systemic Problem

Max Planck Institute Anne Peters

Law

A statistical approach to law school citation rankings

University of Virginia Joshua Fischman

Education

High school change

Boston College Andrew Hargreaves

Constitutional Law

What is constitutional ideology?

University of Oxford Nick Barber

Civil Procedure Law

Politics, Identity, and Class Certification on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

University of Pennsylvania Sean Farhang

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

Education

The Role of Education in Reducing Racial Inequality

University of Southern California Pedro A. Noguera

Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America

View more insights in Professional - Law - Socio-legal Studies

View more figures from American University

View the page of Lewis Grossman

Read the Study

Next in Law

Human Rights and Corruption: Problems and Potential of Individualising a Systemic Problem

Anne Peters | Max Planck Institute

Court-Packing in Context

Barry Cushman | University of Notre Dame

Lewis Grossman’s book, Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America covers the history of social movements and legal battles dedicated to ensuring that people can use their preferred therapies and practitioners without government interference.

Image courtesy of interviewee. February 2, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

The speaker is a law professor with a focus on food and drug regulation, who is also a historian. They have been researching and teaching about the Abigail Alliance case, which addresses the question of whether terminally ill patients have the right to access unapproved drugs. This video video issue of medical freedom is deeply rooted in American history, as explored in the speaker's book which spans from the American Revolution to present-day.

The speaker highlights how concepts of medical freedom have evolved, beginning in the Jacksonian era of the 1830s when a movement led by botanical medicine practitioners dismantled the existing medical licensing system, thus prioritizing patient access to alternative treatments. Despite later resurgences of medical licensing, they maintained some protections for non-orthodox medicine.

The speaker discusses significant historical movements, including the 1970s cancer cure craze and the AIDS movement of the 1980s, which sought freedom in medical choices. They also examine the recent success of medical marijuana as part of a broader medical freedom movement.

Through various lenses, including bodily and economic freedoms, religious freedom, and freedom of inquiry, the speaker describes a longstanding American commitment to medical choice, which complicates contemporary healthcare reform efforts. They reveal how historical skepticism towards medical establishment and expertise persists, particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic where calls for access to unproven treatments mirrored earlier movements for medical freedom.

Finally, the speaker critiques the paradox of expecting comprehensive healthcare reform in the context of the persistent demand for therapeutic freedom, and highlights the unusual political coalitions that form around medical freedom rhetoric across the political spectrum. The book aims to show that the current climate of medical skepticism and demand for choice is not new but a return to American norms.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are some key quotes from the video:

1. **Introduction of the Speaker's Background:**
- "I'm a professor of, uh, law, um, who focuses on food and drug regulation. Um, but I'm also a PhD historian, and this topic very much combines my two passions."

2. **Discussion of the Abigail Alliance Case:**
- "This topic... concerns whether or not a person dying of an apparently incurable, uh, terminal illness should have the right to access a drug, um, that is not yet approved by FDA."

3. **Historical Perspective:**
- "As a historian, I became very interested in the question of just how deeply rooted is the commitment to freedom of therapeutic choice in American history and tradition."

4. **Medical Licensing in Early American History:**
- "In early American history... a once robust medical licensing system... was basically, uh, wiped out eviscerated by a medical freedom movement."

5. **Impact of the Cancer Cure Movement:**
- "I review very various episodes, um, in the history of American drug regulation that show the power of the medical freedom movement in the United States, including the quite extraordinary, um, social movement in favor of a, uh, cancer cure."

6. **Themes of Modern Medical Freedom:**
- "During Covid... the anti- um, elitist anti-establishment rhetoric that was directed against... pharmaceutical companies... was in many ways, uh, very typical of American approaches to these issues."

7. **Freedom of Therapeutic Choice:**
- "America's commitment to freedom of therapeutic choice poses a tremendous obstacle to major health reform or any notion or prospect of nationalized medicine in the United States."

8. **Collaboration Across Political Spectrums:**
- "There’s not any kind of obvious correlation throughout American history between progressive and conservative versus, uh, medical freedom advocacy."

9. **Commentary on Covid's Effect on Medical Freedom:**
- "What you saw during Covid was a reversion to the norm. And you see all of the themes that I mentioned... they all popped up."

10. **Final Reflection on Medical Freedom and Health Reform:**
- "I hope that readers... recognize that the modern attitudes regarding anti-establishment skepticism about orthodox medicine and demands for freedom of choice... are in many ways a reversion to the norm."

These quotes encompass the core themes of the video, including the intersections of law, history, medical freedom, and societal attitudes towards drug regulation and therapeutic choice.

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.265 --> 00:04.125
I'm a professor of, law,

00:04.465 --> 00:07.445
who focuses on food and drug regulation.

00:07.985 --> 00:10.205
Um, but I'm also a PhD historian,

00:11.065 --> 00:15.085
and this topic very much combines my two passions.

00:15.825 --> 00:19.525
And for years now, I've been teaching a case

00:19.825 --> 00:22.245
to my students in the food

00:22.245 --> 00:25.485
and drug class called Abigail Alliance,

00:26.135 --> 00:27.525
which concerns whether

00:27.585 --> 00:30.885
or not a person dying of an

00:31.485 --> 00:34.605
apparently incurable, terminal illness

00:35.145 --> 00:39.845
should have the right to access a drug, that is not

00:39.905 --> 00:41.245
yet approved by FDA.

00:41.785 --> 00:46.245
And this, has been a, big issue,

00:46.545 --> 00:47.605
in both the legal

00:47.705 --> 00:50.525
and the political sphere for years in the United States,

00:51.305 --> 00:56.285
and the test that was ultimately embraced by the courts,

00:56.545 --> 00:58.965
to address that right,

00:59.235 --> 01:02.685
asks whether the right is deeply rooted in American

01:02.685 --> 01:03.845
history and tradition.

01:04.505 --> 01:08.285
And as a historian, I became very interested into,

01:08.465 --> 01:13.005
in the question of just how deeply rooted is the

01:13.735 --> 01:14.925
commitment to freedom

01:15.065 --> 01:18.045
of therapeutic choice in American history and tradition.

01:18.665 --> 01:21.165
And that's what got me hooked on this subject.

01:21.475 --> 01:24.885
Well, this book, covers the entire sweep

01:24.905 --> 01:27.725
of American history from the

01:28.285 --> 01:29.405
American Revolution to the present.

01:30.185 --> 01:35.045
And, what struck me when I did my research is

01:35.985 --> 01:38.565
how deeply embedded,

01:38.675 --> 01:41.125
this concept is in the American psyche.

01:41.705 --> 01:44.685
And so to give you an early example,

01:44.905 --> 01:48.365
in early American history, during the, what is known

01:48.365 --> 01:51.525
as the Jacksonian era of the 1830s

01:51.665 --> 01:53.605
and 1840s,

01:53.965 --> 01:58.245
a once robust medical licensing system in America,

01:58.975 --> 02:01.445
which privileged orthodox medicine

02:02.065 --> 02:04.725
and made it difficult for people to access

02:05.235 --> 02:08.405
alternative medical approaches like homeopathy

02:08.405 --> 02:13.045
and botanical medicine, was basically,

02:13.585 --> 02:16.845
wiped out eviscerated by a medical freedom,

02:16.915 --> 02:21.325
freedom movement led by, the Ians

02:21.465 --> 02:24.245
who were a botanical medical school.

02:24.865 --> 02:27.845
Uh, and by school here, I mean medical method, not,

02:27.945 --> 02:30.245
not actual educational institution.

02:30.945 --> 02:35.405
In the early years of the Republic, medical licensing

02:36.265 --> 02:37.685
was very widespread.

02:38.155 --> 02:39.765
Something like 18 out

02:39.765 --> 02:42.885
of the 24 states had medical licensing regimes,

02:43.385 --> 02:47.715
and these medical licensing regimes were supported

02:47.895 --> 02:51.315
by orthodox doctors as a method for

02:52.515 --> 02:56.035
suppressing unorthodox methodologies.

02:56.975 --> 02:58.355
Uh, like,

02:59.325 --> 03:01.555
Homeopathy la a little bit later on,

03:01.615 --> 03:03.315
but also botanical methods

03:04.415 --> 03:09.275
and a medical, movement arose called

03:09.945 --> 03:13.955
Pianism, which was closely connected to Jacksonian democracy

03:14.855 --> 03:16.755
in the 1830s and 1840s.

03:17.855 --> 03:20.475
And in a under examined

03:20.655 --> 03:25.515
but quite extraordinary political movement, the Ians

03:26.145 --> 03:29.715
managed to basically erase medical licensing

03:30.425 --> 03:31.955
from American law.

03:32.055 --> 03:34.875
So by the start of the Civil War in 1860,

03:35.325 --> 03:36.835
there was not a single

03:38.035 --> 03:40.395
functioning medical licensing system in the

03:40.395 --> 03:41.595
United States of America.

03:42.415 --> 03:47.075
Um, I trace the licensing question,

03:47.505 --> 03:50.035
into the later 19th century

03:50.655 --> 03:52.635
and even into the 20th century.

03:53.535 --> 03:57.715
But what's notable is that even as medical licensing

03:58.715 --> 04:02.795
resurged in the late 19th century, it was

04:03.545 --> 04:04.595
both designed

04:04.855 --> 04:09.315
and enforced in ways that continued to protect the practice

04:09.315 --> 04:10.915
of non-Orthodox medicine.

04:11.415 --> 04:13.395
So that's one historical example.

04:14.965 --> 04:18.985
In the 20th century, the questions turned largely

04:19.205 --> 04:23.185
to drug regulation as well as the regulation

04:23.185 --> 04:24.225
of medical practice.

04:25.185 --> 04:29.445
And I review very various episodes,

04:29.905 --> 04:32.485
in the history of American drug regulation

04:33.315 --> 04:34.685
that show the power

04:35.385 --> 04:38.485
of the medical freedom movement in the United States,

04:39.275 --> 04:42.325
including the quite extraordinary,

04:42.665 --> 04:47.445
social movement in favor of a, cancer cure.

04:47.905 --> 04:52.765
Uh, in quotes, called Lail in the 1970s,

04:53.055 --> 04:55.005
which kind of swept the country

04:55.785 --> 05:00.045
and led to, huge fervor in favor

05:00.545 --> 05:05.085
of freedom to access unorthodox therapies.

05:05.925 --> 05:09.525
I have a chapter on the AIDS movement

05:10.105 --> 05:14.525
in the 1980s, which was a slightly different type

05:14.745 --> 05:16.685
of medical freedom movement

05:16.685 --> 05:21.285
because it was people trying to seek freedom to access drugs

05:21.795 --> 05:26.365
developed by the orthodox medical pharmaceutical system,

05:26.745 --> 05:28.485
but nonetheless carried forth.

05:28.795 --> 05:31.605
Many of the themes, that we've seen

05:31.905 --> 05:35.365
or that I I identified earlier in American history.

05:36.065 --> 05:39.245
As you mentioned, I have a chapter on medical marijuana,

05:39.255 --> 05:40.765
which is really one of the most

05:41.565 --> 05:44.165
strikingly successful medical freedom movements.

05:44.425 --> 05:46.165
In recent American history.

05:47.025 --> 05:49.685
Uh, marijuana has gone from

05:50.325 --> 05:54.785
a completely unacceptable, product,

05:55.445 --> 05:59.685
to a, a widely accepted medical product,

06:00.385 --> 06:02.365
in much of the country.

06:02.625 --> 06:03.805
In fact,

06:04.025 --> 06:07.285
it may be rescheduled soon in the United States under the

06:07.285 --> 06:09.365
Controlled Substances Act,

06:09.365 --> 06:12.245
because it is now increasingly recognized,

06:12.245 --> 06:16.365
have some medical uses, it has its own twists and turns

06:16.365 --> 06:19.285
because arguably the biggest challenge

06:19.345 --> 06:21.885
to medical marijuana isn't,

06:22.385 --> 06:24.245
the bans on medical marijuana,

06:24.265 --> 06:28.085
but rather the increasing, legalization

06:28.085 --> 06:31.005
of recreational marijuana, which is kind

06:31.005 --> 06:33.845
of swamping the medical marijuana market.

06:34.625 --> 06:38.005
In the book, I focus on the different strains

06:38.005 --> 06:42.325
of American libertarianism that feed into

06:42.925 --> 06:45.405
American medical freedom philosophy

06:45.405 --> 06:47.005
throughout American history.

06:47.465 --> 06:49.285
And the one that most people are familiar

06:49.315 --> 06:51.325
with is bodily freedom.

06:51.665 --> 06:55.405
And indeed, that's a very prevalent one throughout American

06:55.405 --> 06:59.885
history and the rhetoric of hands off my body.

07:00.545 --> 07:02.725
Uh, it's my body, my choice.

07:03.355 --> 07:05.245
That kind of rhetoric,

07:06.345 --> 07:10.485
is in many people's eyes, the dominant one today.

07:11.385 --> 07:15.805
Um, but there are other strains of medical freedom,

07:16.545 --> 07:20.005
ideology that go all the way back

07:20.005 --> 07:21.205
to the roots of the country.

07:21.745 --> 07:23.805
Uh, one of them is economic freedom.

07:24.625 --> 07:29.565
Uh, sometimes this is, presented,

07:29.705 --> 07:32.085
as a simple free market argument

07:32.195 --> 07:36.045
that people should be allowed to choose the practitioners

07:36.785 --> 07:40.205
and the, therapies that they want

07:40.705 --> 07:42.685
and let the market decide what works.

07:43.025 --> 07:47.445
But there's also a very, significant anti monopolistic,

07:48.305 --> 07:50.085
aspect to it.

07:50.465 --> 07:54.245
Uh, American Independence was partly founded,

07:54.245 --> 07:57.845
founded on anti monopolistic, ideology.

07:58.025 --> 08:01.485
The East India, company was one

08:01.485 --> 08:04.285
of demons in the American vision.

08:04.585 --> 08:08.485
And in fact, the Boston Tea Party was directed against,

08:08.505 --> 08:11.365
the East India company as well as against the, the,

08:11.425 --> 08:14.805
the British, government more broadly.

08:15.425 --> 08:19.365
Um, but that has continued on,

08:19.365 --> 08:20.725
throughout American history,

08:21.145 --> 08:23.365
and it has often taken the shape in the world.

08:23.705 --> 08:27.925
I'm talking about as, allegations

08:27.955 --> 08:30.645
that there is some kind of insidious conspiracy

08:31.275 --> 08:34.085
between organized medicine and

08:34.145 --> 08:37.965
or the pharmaceutical industry to,

08:38.725 --> 08:42.805
restrict medical medical choice in a way that enriches

08:42.945 --> 08:46.045
and empowers, elite forces.

08:47.295 --> 08:51.065
Another quite American strain here is the connection

08:51.065 --> 08:55.145
between American, between freedom of medical choice

08:55.305 --> 08:56.405
and religious freedom.

08:57.025 --> 09:01.845
Um, sometimes if it's not more explicitly religious

09:01.845 --> 09:04.805
freedom of conscience, the longstanding notion

09:04.805 --> 09:08.605
that it is violating American's spiritual,

09:09.085 --> 09:13.645
religious freedom of choice to,

09:14.325 --> 09:16.765
prohibit them from choosing the medical

09:16.955 --> 09:18.845
treatment that they want.

09:19.225 --> 09:21.365
And then finally, there's the general notion

09:21.365 --> 09:22.685
of freedom, of inquiry.

09:23.265 --> 09:28.205
The idea that the way that knowledge advances is by,

09:29.025 --> 09:31.725
unfettered trial

09:31.865 --> 09:36.285
and error experimentation, often

09:36.465 --> 09:39.325
by people who don't have

09:39.865 --> 09:41.645
the highfalutin education

09:41.705 --> 09:46.525
and degrees that, many researchers, have.

09:47.585 --> 09:52.045
And, this is in very obvious tension

09:52.665 --> 09:54.685
in modern times with the notion

09:54.745 --> 09:57.805
of the randomized controlled clinical trial,

09:58.375 --> 10:02.325
which is very far from unrestricted,

10:02.945 --> 10:04.605
experimentation, but actu

10:04.665 --> 10:08.645
but is rather very, very, regulated

10:08.985 --> 10:10.805
and restricted experimentation.

10:11.305 --> 10:14.845
If you look at what happened in America with respect

10:14.865 --> 10:19.445
to covid, that the anti,

10:20.345 --> 10:24.605
elitist anti-establishment rhetoric

10:24.995 --> 10:28.845
that was, directed against

10:29.385 --> 10:31.725
the American government, health bureaucracy

10:32.265 --> 10:34.085
and pharmaceutical companies

10:34.705 --> 10:39.405
and Anthony Fauci, was in many ways,

10:39.825 --> 10:44.765
very typical of American approaches to these issues.

10:45.925 --> 10:50.565
I argue in my book that there was a period in the middle

10:50.625 --> 10:54.445
of the 20th century that was utterly atypical,

10:54.905 --> 10:59.005
in the, level of trust that Americans had

10:59.025 --> 11:02.125
for their establishment institutions, including

11:02.705 --> 11:05.285
pharmaceutical companies and physicians

11:05.545 --> 11:07.565
and health regulators and so forth.

11:08.305 --> 11:11.685
And I think that in many ways, what you saw

11:11.685 --> 11:14.605
during Covid was a reversion to the norm.

11:15.225 --> 11:18.445
And you see all of the themes that I mentioned,

11:18.625 --> 11:21.605
bodily freedom, conspiratorial,

11:22.635 --> 11:26.965
anti conspiratorial, anti monopolistic,

11:27.485 --> 11:31.525
arguments, religious freedom, freedom of inquiry, they,

11:31.525 --> 11:32.645
they all popped up.

11:32.945 --> 11:36.045
One thing that I think is interesting about the covid

11:36.485 --> 11:40.805
epidemic is that part of it was focused on preventing

11:41.975 --> 11:45.285
compulsory medical measures such as

11:45.795 --> 11:47.285
masking and vaccines.

11:47.985 --> 11:52.925
Um, but another aspect of it was demanding access to,

11:52.985 --> 11:55.605
to unproved uses of

11:56.845 --> 12:00.485
approved medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

12:01.105 --> 12:03.965
And this is kind of like a very modern version

12:04.705 --> 12:05.925
of medical freedom,

12:05.925 --> 12:09.845
because it is basically demanding the right to,

12:10.745 --> 12:15.445
access to off-label uses of approved drugs.

12:15.985 --> 12:18.125
Um, but it still has the same kind

12:18.145 --> 12:20.245
of anti-establishment fervor,

12:20.555 --> 12:24.755
because the way it was shaped was that,

12:24.765 --> 12:28.275
while these are off patent cheap uses,

12:28.405 --> 12:29.515
cheap alternatives,

12:29.815 --> 12:32.555
and it's kind of a thumb in the eye to the pharmaceutical

12:33.115 --> 12:36.075
industry to say, we're not going to use your

12:37.125 --> 12:39.195
newfangled expensive vaccines.

12:39.405 --> 12:43.835
We're going to, seek other,

12:44.035 --> 12:45.235
remedies and cures.

12:45.455 --> 12:49.155
Um, even if they don't meet your scientific standards.

12:50.035 --> 12:53.915
I hope that readers, recognize that

12:54.975 --> 12:59.915
the, modern attitudes that they are,

13:00.005 --> 13:04.395
perceiving now regarding anti establishment,

13:05.135 --> 13:09.795
skepticism about orthodox medicine

13:10.455 --> 13:14.675
and demands for freedom of choice are not a

13:15.915 --> 13:20.715
temporary diversion from American normalcy,

13:21.335 --> 13:25.595
but rather are in many ways a reversion to the norm

13:26.225 --> 13:31.035
that those of us old enough to remember America's golden age

13:31.035 --> 13:33.475
of medicine in the forties and fifties

13:33.615 --> 13:35.275
and sixties,

13:36.155 --> 13:39.515
actually experienced an anomalous period in America.

13:39.695 --> 13:42.755
And that this is very much, the way

13:42.755 --> 13:46.835
that America has approached, today is very much the way

13:46.835 --> 13:48.395
that America has approached these issues

13:48.455 --> 13:49.515
for most of its history.

13:50.295 --> 13:54.355
Um, I also think that it identifies

13:55.035 --> 13:58.115
a very important aspect of American ideology

13:58.785 --> 14:01.715
that will always be an obstacle

14:02.295 --> 14:05.595
to thorough going health reform in America,

14:06.225 --> 14:09.955
because the combination of the demand for freedom

14:09.975 --> 14:14.115
of therapeutic choice with the expectation

14:14.905 --> 14:18.715
that, the government will pay for

14:19.835 --> 14:21.995
whatever therapy people want,

14:22.215 --> 14:25.795
is simply an irresolvable paradox.

14:26.335 --> 14:28.595
And in the book, I actually focus on that

14:29.295 --> 14:33.315
in a chapter called, freedom to be reimbursed

14:33.815 --> 14:35.115
or Freedom to be Covered.

14:35.575 --> 14:40.035
So the second message, with presentist implications

14:40.985 --> 14:45.475
that I think people can take from the book is

14:46.305 --> 14:50.635
that America's commitment to freedom of therapeutic choice

14:52.295 --> 14:55.605
poses a tremendous obstacle

14:56.225 --> 15:00.165
to major health reform or any notion

15:00.225 --> 15:04.885
or prospect of nationalized medicine in the United States.

15:05.765 --> 15:09.285
I have a chapter called Freedom to Be Covered,

15:10.245 --> 15:14.275
which is an examination of how freedom

15:14.415 --> 15:19.035
of therapeutic choice rhetoric pervades even situations

15:19.645 --> 15:21.115
where,

15:21.575 --> 15:26.355
the controversy is not over whether people can legally

15:26.815 --> 15:31.035
obtain a therapy, but rather whether the government

15:31.055 --> 15:34.835
or other insurance will pay for the therapy.

15:35.575 --> 15:40.115
And you have conservatives, along with,

15:40.115 --> 15:44.635
people from elsewhere on the spectrum getting enraged when,

15:45.495 --> 15:48.635
a quote unquote death panel

15:48.815 --> 15:50.875
or quote unquote rationale

15:51.655 --> 15:56.315
is preventing people from accessing,

15:56.575 --> 16:00.995
the drugs they want in an insured, insured context.

16:01.855 --> 16:05.715
And if you have even the conservative side

16:06.055 --> 16:09.755
of the political spectrum, who normally are

16:09.755 --> 16:13.515
for small government, saying that, well,

16:13.535 --> 16:15.235
if you are gonna have reimbursement,

16:15.295 --> 16:16.715
you gotta reimburse everything.

16:16.715 --> 16:19.115
That's a, that's basically an unsolvable

16:19.585 --> 16:21.115
problem in the United States.

16:21.975 --> 16:23.835
So one other phenomenon

16:24.105 --> 16:27.035
that I analyzed throughout the book is the notion

16:27.035 --> 16:29.035
of strange bedfellows.

16:29.545 --> 16:31.635
There's not any kind of

16:33.205 --> 16:37.935
obvious correlation throughout American history between

16:38.455 --> 16:43.095
progressive and conservative versus,

16:43.445 --> 16:47.055
medical freedom advocacy or resistance to it.

16:47.755 --> 16:49.935
In fact, I point out episode

16:49.935 --> 16:53.775
after episode where you have people from very different

16:53.865 --> 16:57.615
parts of the political spectrum joining together

16:58.475 --> 17:02.215
in their skepticism of expertise

17:02.915 --> 17:07.855
and the establishment and in favor of medical freedom.

17:08.045 --> 17:10.895
This is most obvious in the 1970s

17:11.305 --> 17:14.095
where you had this kind of coalition

17:14.155 --> 17:16.175
of countercultural hippies

17:16.525 --> 17:21.095
with right wing John Birch society types,

17:21.795 --> 17:26.135
on the same side when it comes to medical freedom.

17:27.075 --> 17:31.665
The, the striking thing to me about,

17:32.005 --> 17:36.985
the Trump era, medical freedom activism,

17:37.085 --> 17:41.885
is not so much the, resistance

17:42.105 --> 17:46.165
to, alleged medical compulsion

17:46.825 --> 17:49.605
and resistance to medical expertise

17:49.785 --> 17:53.445
and to drug companies by the right part

17:53.445 --> 17:55.125
of the American political spectrum.

17:55.825 --> 18:00.165
But the, the rather, striking embrace

18:00.905 --> 18:02.485
of medical compulsion

18:03.185 --> 18:07.325
and, embrace of science

18:07.585 --> 18:11.725
and embrace of the establishment by the progressive side

18:12.425 --> 18:17.125
of the American political spectrum, this is not a given.

18:17.835 --> 18:21.685
It's not necessarily permanent anti-vaccination is,

18:22.145 --> 18:26.405
at its roots, is not a conservative notion.

18:27.105 --> 18:31.205
It draws from skepticism about government

18:31.225 --> 18:33.125
and the establishment from both sides

18:33.185 --> 18:34.485
of the political spectrum.

18:35.305 --> 18:40.125
And I find, I found it very, very striking that,

18:40.745 --> 18:45.495
medical freedom rhetoric aligned with

18:46.155 --> 18:47.815
one part of the political spectrum.

18:48.995 --> 18:53.255
So strikingly so, so obviously in the covid epidemic,

18:53.535 --> 18:56.575
although of course not exclusively, there continue to be

18:57.295 --> 18:59.975
progressive skeptics about the medical establishment

19:00.475 --> 19:02.495
and about vaccines in particular.

American Medical Freedom and Historical Perspectives

00:00:00 - I'm a professor of, law, who focuses on food and drug regulation. but I'm also a PhD historian, and this topic very much combines my two passions. And for years now, I've been teaching a case to my students in the food and drug class called Abigail Alliance, which concerns whether or not a person dying of an
00:00:35 - should have the right to access a drug, that is not yet approved by FDA. And this, has been a, big issue, in both the legal and the political sphere for years in the United States, and the test that was ultimately embraced by the courts, to address that right, asks whether the right is deeply rooted in American
00:01:04 - And as a historian, I became very interested into, in the question of just how deeply rooted is the commitment to freedom of therapeutic choice in American history and tradition. And that's what got me hooked on this subject. Well, this book, covers the entire sweep of American history from the American Revolution to the present. And, what struck me when I did my research is
00:01:38 - this concept is in the American psyche. And so to give you an early example, in early American history, during the, what is known as the Jacksonian era of the 1830s and 1840s, a once robust medical licensing system in America, which privileged orthodox medicine and made it difficult for people to access alternative medical approaches like homeopathy
00:02:13 - wiped out eviscerated by a medical freedom, freedom movement led by, the Ians who were a botanical medical school. and by school here, I mean medical method, not, not actual educational institution. In the early years of the Republic, medical licensing was very widespread. Something like 18 out
00:02:43 - and these medical licensing regimes were supported by orthodox doctors as a method for suppressing unorthodox methodologies. like, Homeopathy la a little bit later on, but also botanical methods and a medical, movement arose called

American Medical Freedom Movements Through History

00:03:14 - in the 1830s and 1840s. And in a under examined but quite extraordinary political movement, the Ians managed to basically erase medical licensing from American law. So by the start of the Civil War in 1860, there was not a single functioning medical licensing system in the
00:03:42 - I trace the licensing question, into the later 19th century and even into the 20th century. But what's notable is that even as medical licensing resurged in the late 19th century, it was both designed and enforced in ways that continued to protect the practice of non-Orthodox medicine.
00:04:14 - In the 20th century, the questions turned largely to drug regulation as well as the regulation of medical practice. And I review very various episodes, in the history of American drug regulation that show the power of the medical freedom movement in the United States, including the quite extraordinary,
00:04:47 - in quotes, called Lail in the 1970s, which kind of swept the country and led to, huge fervor in favor of freedom to access unorthodox therapies. I have a chapter on the AIDS movement in the 1980s, which was a slightly different type
00:05:16 - because it was people trying to seek freedom to access drugs developed by the orthodox medical pharmaceutical system, but nonetheless carried forth. Many of the themes, that we've seen or that I I identified earlier in American history. As you mentioned, I have a chapter on medical marijuana, which is really one of the most strikingly successful medical freedom movements. In recent American history.
00:05:50 - a completely unacceptable, product, to a, a widely accepted medical product, in much of the country. In fact, it may be rescheduled soon in the United States under the Controlled Substances Act, because it is now increasingly recognized, have some medical uses, it has its own twists and turns because arguably the biggest challenge

American Libertarianism and Medical Freedom

00:06:22 - the bans on medical marijuana, but rather the increasing, legalization of recreational marijuana, which is kind of swamping the medical marijuana market. In the book, I focus on the different strains of American libertarianism that feed into American medical freedom philosophy throughout American history. And the one that most people are familiar with is bodily freedom.
00:06:55 - history and the rhetoric of hands off my body. it's my body, my choice. That kind of rhetoric, is in many people's eyes, the dominant one today. but there are other strains of medical freedom, ideology that go all the way back to the roots of the country.
00:07:24 - sometimes this is, presented, as a simple free market argument that people should be allowed to choose the practitioners and the, therapies that they want and let the market decide what works. But there's also a very, significant anti monopolistic, aspect to it. American Independence was partly founded,
00:07:58 - The East India, company was one of demons in the American vision. And in fact, the Boston Tea Party was directed against, the East India company as well as against the, the, the British, government more broadly. but that has continued on, throughout American history, and it has often taken the shape in the world. I'm talking about as, allegations
00:08:31 - between organized medicine and or the pharmaceutical industry to, restrict medical medical choice in a way that enriches and empowers, elite forces. Another quite American strain here is the connection between American, between freedom of medical choice and religious freedom. sometimes if it's not more explicitly religious
00:09:04 - that it is violating American's spiritual, religious freedom of choice to, prohibit them from choosing the medical treatment that they want. And then finally, there's the general notion of freedom, of inquiry. The idea that the way that knowledge advances is by, unfettered trial

Medical Freedom and Anti-Establishment Sentiments

00:09:36 - by people who don't have the highfalutin education and degrees that, many researchers, have. And, this is in very obvious tension in modern times with the notion of the randomized controlled clinical trial, which is very far from unrestricted,
00:10:04 - but is rather very, very, regulated and restricted experimentation. If you look at what happened in America with respect to covid, that the anti, elitist anti-establishment rhetoric that was, directed against the American government, health bureaucracy and pharmaceutical companies
00:10:39 - very typical of American approaches to these issues. I argue in my book that there was a period in the middle of the 20th century that was utterly atypical, in the, level of trust that Americans had for their establishment institutions, including pharmaceutical companies and physicians
00:11:08 - And I think that in many ways, what you saw during Covid was a reversion to the norm. And you see all of the themes that I mentioned, bodily freedom, conspiratorial, anti conspiratorial, anti monopolistic, arguments, religious freedom, freedom of inquiry, they, they all popped up. One thing that I think is interesting about the covid
00:11:41 - compulsory medical measures such as masking and vaccines. but another aspect of it was demanding access to, to unproved uses of approved medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. And this is kind of like a very modern version of medical freedom, because it is basically demanding the right to,
00:12:15 - but it still has the same kind of anti-establishment fervor, because the way it was shaped was that, while these are off patent cheap uses, cheap alternatives, and it's kind of a thumb in the eye to the pharmaceutical industry to say, we're not going to use your newfangled expensive vaccines. We're going to, seek other,

Freedom of Choice in American Medicine

00:12:45 - even if they don't meet your scientific standards. I hope that readers, recognize that the, modern attitudes that they are, perceiving now regarding anti establishment, skepticism about orthodox medicine and demands for freedom of choice are not a
00:13:21 - but rather are in many ways a reversion to the norm that those of us old enough to remember America's golden age of medicine in the forties and fifties and sixties, actually experienced an anomalous period in America. And that this is very much, the way that America has approached, today is very much the way
00:13:48 - for most of its history. I also think that it identifies a very important aspect of American ideology that will always be an obstacle to thorough going health reform in America, because the combination of the demand for freedom of therapeutic choice with the expectation that, the government will pay for
00:14:22 - is simply an irresolvable paradox. And in the book, I actually focus on that in a chapter called, freedom to be reimbursed or Freedom to be Covered. So the second message, with presentist implications that I think people can take from the book is that America's commitment to freedom of therapeutic choice
00:14:56 - to major health reform or any notion or prospect of nationalized medicine in the United States. I have a chapter called Freedom to Be Covered, which is an examination of how freedom of therapeutic choice rhetoric pervades even situations where, the controversy is not over whether people can legally
00:15:31 - or other insurance will pay for the therapy. And you have conservatives, along with, people from elsewhere on the spectrum getting enraged when, a quote unquote death panel or quote unquote rationale is preventing people from accessing, the drugs they want in an insured, insured context.

Coalition for Medical Freedom Across Ideologies

00:16:06 - of the political spectrum, who normally are for small government, saying that, well, if you are gonna have reimbursement, you gotta reimburse everything. That's a, that's basically an unsolvable problem in the United States. So one other phenomenon that I analyzed throughout the book is the notion of strange bedfellows. There's not any kind of
00:16:38 - progressive and conservative versus, medical freedom advocacy or resistance to it. In fact, I point out episode after episode where you have people from very different parts of the political spectrum joining together in their skepticism of expertise and the establishment and in favor of medical freedom.
00:17:11 - where you had this kind of coalition of countercultural hippies with right wing John Birch society types, on the same side when it comes to medical freedom. The, the striking thing to me about, the Trump era, medical freedom activism, is not so much the, resistance
00:17:46 - and resistance to medical expertise and to drug companies by the right part of the American political spectrum. But the, the rather, striking embrace of medical compulsion and, embrace of science and embrace of the establishment by the progressive side
00:18:17 - It's not necessarily permanent anti-vaccination is, at its roots, is not a conservative notion. It draws from skepticism about government and the establishment from both sides of the political spectrum. And I find, I found it very, very striking that, medical freedom rhetoric aligned with
00:19:00 - So strikingly so, so obviously in the covid epidemic, although of course not exclusively, there continue to be progressive skeptics about the medical establishment and about vaccines in particular.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Faculti

Popular in Professional

Human Rights and Corruption: Problems and Potential of Individualising a Systemic Problem

A statistical approach to law school citation rankings

High school change

What is constitutional ideology?

Politics, Identity, and Class Certification on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

The Role of Education in Reducing Racial Inequality

Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America

Next in Law

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Contact Us

FAQs

What is Faculti?

How do you select interviews?

Interview Process

Page Structure

Popular in Professional

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Contact Us

FAQs

What is Faculti?

How do you select interviews?

Interview Process

Accessibility Options

Contrast Adjustment

Text Size Adjustment

Text Spacing Adjustment

Line Height Adjustment

Cursor Size Adjustment

Page Structure Options

Page Structure