Popular in Social Sciences

Political Science

V-Dem’s Conceptions of Democracy and Their Consequences

University of Notre Dame Michael Coppedge

Central Monetary Authorities

Macroeconomic modelling of CBDC: a critical review

European Central Bank Ulrich Bindseil

Social Identities and Divisions

A new explanation of antisemitism: Jew hatred as a civilisational phenomenon

Boston University Liah Greenfeld

Central Monetary Authorities

Financing Private Credit

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Nina Boyarchenko

Economics

Failing Banks

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Emil Verner

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

American Politics

Cross-occupational effects of immigration on native wages in the UK

View more insights in Social Sciences - Economics - Labor Economics

View more figures from Lancaster University

View the page of Marco Alfano

Read the Study

Next in Economics

Measurement and Theory of Core Inflation

Argia Sbordone | Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Do renewable energy investments create local jobs?

Natalia Fabra | University Carlos III Madrid

Marco Alfano estimates the effect of immigration into an occupation on the wages of natives working in other, better-paid occupations.

Image courtesy of interviewee. May 2, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video video discusses research on the impact of migration on UK workers, emphasizing the polarization of the migration debate and its detachment from evidence-based academic analysis. The study notes a steady increase in migrants in the UK, which has been accompanied by rising anti-migrant sentiment and low public knowledge about migration's effects on the labor market.

Key findings include that migrants in the UK tend to be better educated than native workers but often take lower-paying, lower-skilled jobs, leading to a phenomenon where highly qualified individuals perform basic work. This video video can potentially enhance productivity in teams since overqualified migrants may boost the overall performance of their workplace.

The research focuses on how migrant inflows affect native workers' labor market outcomes, concluding that influxes of migrants into lower-level occupations may positively influence wages for natives in higher-level jobs in the same region. Specifically, the study found that while migrant competition can depress wages for similar occupations, there is evidence that migrants can also generate positive spillover effects on native wages in adjacent job categories.

The study utilizes comprehensive and reliable data from the Office for National Statistics in the UK and provides a nuanced approach to understanding the complexities of migration's impacts. It aims to inform public and political discourse with evidence and statistics instead of emotion-driven arguments, particularly highlighted as discussions become politically charged during election cycles.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.215 --> 00:03.875
Our research is on the impact of migration on UK workers.

00:04.575 --> 00:05.715
And I'm sure as you're aware,

00:06.065 --> 00:08.155
migration is a very hotly debated topic.

00:08.455 --> 00:10.755
So it plays a central law role.

00:11.215 --> 00:13.395
In the political discussion,

00:13.395 --> 00:15.835
there was a European parliament to reelection,

00:16.415 --> 00:19.315
and in the US election is likely to play,

00:20.035 --> 00:22.075
a major role as well.

00:22.345 --> 00:26.675
Unfortunately, much of the debate has become very polarized,

00:26.855 --> 00:30.705
and it's become somewhat detached from kind

00:30.705 --> 00:34.225
of evidence-based and kind of, academic work.

00:35.285 --> 00:38.905
Um, in the uk the country we're looking at is a special case

00:38.905 --> 00:41.745
because, in the UK over the last 10

00:41.745 --> 00:44.785
or so years, the number of migrants has been more

00:44.785 --> 00:46.945
or less, steadily increasing.

00:47.605 --> 00:50.345
And this rise in the migrant stock

00:50.365 --> 00:52.145
and the number of migrants in the UK has also been

00:52.145 --> 00:55.945
accompanied by an increase in anti-migrant sentiment,

00:56.315 --> 00:58.945
which again, is likely to, we believe,

00:58.975 --> 01:01.505
play a role in the next general election,

01:02.205 --> 01:03.265
here in the uk.

01:04.165 --> 01:05.825
Um, surprisingly,

01:05.825 --> 01:08.145
however, which you might not think from the kind

01:08.145 --> 01:12.385
of polarization of the debate, there is,

01:12.455 --> 01:16.545
very little knowledge on migration in the UK

01:16.605 --> 01:18.905
and the effects it has on the labor market, especially

01:18.925 --> 01:20.945
as you see it in online chat rooms

01:21.245 --> 01:24.945
or in the political, debate as well, which is a pity

01:24.945 --> 01:28.425
because the Office for National Statistics, which is kind

01:28.425 --> 01:31.585
of the official body to provide data from the uk,

01:31.935 --> 01:34.345
provide extremely high quality data,

01:34.815 --> 01:36.585
data which are reliable, which are official,

01:36.585 --> 01:38.945
which you can use to make informed decisions,

01:39.115 --> 01:42.665
which are also the data that, we end up using.

01:43.485 --> 01:46.625
Um, and if you look at who the migrants are that come

01:46.625 --> 01:48.745
to the uk, the migrants to the UK are very,

01:48.745 --> 01:50.625
very special type of person.

01:51.325 --> 01:53.945
So one thing that mi you might find surprising is

01:53.945 --> 01:55.625
that on average, migrants

01:55.625 --> 01:58.665
to the UK are better educated than UK natives.

01:58.805 --> 01:59.945
So if you take the average migrant,

02:00.615 --> 02:04.105
they have a few years more education compared to the,

02:04.255 --> 02:07.435
average UK born person.

02:07.895 --> 02:10.675
One thing that happens a lot in to migrants in the UK is

02:10.675 --> 02:13.515
that once they arrive into the uk,

02:13.665 --> 02:16.355
they downgrade in terms of occupations.

02:16.455 --> 02:19.315
So in other words, that means that they take up a job

02:19.655 --> 02:20.995
for which they're overqualified.

02:21.535 --> 02:23.835
So their qualification would say, go to job A

02:23.835 --> 02:28.105
and they take a job that's lower paying, than a,

02:28.365 --> 02:31.465
and these two, kind of phenomena together.

02:31.485 --> 02:33.385
So the fact that migrants are highly educated

02:33.525 --> 02:37.545
and the fact that they downgrade upon arrival,

02:37.925 --> 02:39.025
has some unique effects.

02:39.205 --> 02:41.745
So one kind of the very first obvious consequences

02:41.775 --> 02:45.505
that we have a lot of overqualified people doing relatively

02:46.395 --> 02:50.665
basic work, and we believe that, this kind of

02:51.355 --> 02:53.625
extra education that you kind of get for free

02:54.005 --> 02:56.465
by hiring migrant migrants is going

02:56.465 --> 02:58.585
to make the team in which the migrants work more

02:58.585 --> 02:59.585
Productive. So

02:59.585 --> 03:01.685
if you have better educated individuals in the team,

03:01.825 --> 03:04.645
that's more likely to make the team more productive,

03:04.945 --> 03:08.245
and this extra productivity is gonna be benefit the

03:08.245 --> 03:09.605
supervisor of the team, right?

03:09.665 --> 03:11.885
So if you have a team working under you

03:12.185 --> 03:13.765
and that team is more productive, that's going

03:13.765 --> 03:14.765
to reflect well on you.

03:15.265 --> 03:18.005
And the supervisors of these teams tend

03:18.005 --> 03:19.885
to be on average natives.

03:20.145 --> 03:22.525
So we believe that by being more educated,

03:22.705 --> 03:24.805
by increasing the productivity of the team,

03:25.735 --> 03:30.415
migrants can have beneficial effect on UK workers working in

03:30.415 --> 03:33.255
occupations that supervise them, or at least above them.

03:33.955 --> 03:38.335
The kind of the general area that we're looking at is,

03:38.525 --> 03:41.895
kind of big body of research, which asks the question,

03:42.635 --> 03:46.135
what's the impact of migrant inflow on

03:46.795 --> 03:49.775
the labor market outcomes of natives?

03:50.235 --> 03:52.495
So in a, in a certain way, they ask the question,

03:52.595 --> 03:55.655
if migrants come in, is that good or bad for natives?

03:55.655 --> 03:57.935
Or does that have any effect at all?

03:58.195 --> 04:02.055
Now there's a very, very large body of academic work

04:02.605 --> 04:03.975
that analyzes this topic.

04:04.045 --> 04:06.215
It's kind of, it's not just a hotly debated topic.

04:06.395 --> 04:09.535
In policy circles is also a hotly debated topic in,

04:09.915 --> 04:11.935
academic circles.

04:12.435 --> 04:14.055
And one thing to bear in mind is

04:14.055 --> 04:16.295
that migration varies from context to context.

04:16.635 --> 04:18.935
So, you know, what holds for the UK doesn't necessarily hold

04:18.935 --> 04:20.575
in the US or even in other countries.

04:21.075 --> 04:23.055
So it's very, very hard to kind

04:23.055 --> 04:26.055
of make generalizing statements across different countries

04:26.055 --> 04:27.335
and across different time periods.

04:27.605 --> 04:31.935
However, as a very, very stylized overview

04:32.835 --> 04:36.415
of the literature, most papers, again, not all of them,

04:36.425 --> 04:37.615
there are definitely some papers

04:37.685 --> 04:39.215
that find different results,

04:39.355 --> 04:43.455
but kind of the broad average, they find very

04:44.025 --> 04:48.175
small and very short term negative effect of migration.

04:48.965 --> 04:51.585
So, this is the ideas

04:51.585 --> 04:54.505
that the way economists think about migration is

04:54.505 --> 04:56.105
that a migrant worker comes in

04:56.845 --> 04:59.745
and then this migrant worker competes for the same job

05:00.135 --> 05:03.305
with a native worker of similar characteristics.

05:03.565 --> 05:06.065
So if you take a migrant roughly the same education level,

05:06.065 --> 05:09.105
roughly the same age, they are going to compete

05:09.125 --> 05:13.855
for the same job as a native with similar characteristics,

05:13.855 --> 05:15.935
similar qualifications, similar age, et cetera.

05:16.035 --> 05:19.775
Now, this increased competition is very good for employers

05:20.205 --> 05:22.575
because it, they have more people to choose from,

05:22.955 --> 05:25.495
but it's, it does depress wages.

05:25.635 --> 05:28.295
So, a large number of study finds

05:29.055 --> 05:30.255
a negative effect on wages.

05:30.255 --> 05:32.415
So market inflow leads to a decrease.

05:32.415 --> 05:35.895
However, I really want to stress that the vast majority

05:35.895 --> 05:38.895
of papers finds that this effect is very small

05:39.515 --> 05:42.015
and in many, many contexts is absolutely negligible.

05:42.675 --> 05:46.495
And where it is often it disappears after a short.

05:48.275 --> 05:51.735
So I, I really want to stress kind of small

05:51.795 --> 05:55.455
and, short effect

05:57.975 --> 05:59.275
in of migration.

05:59.415 --> 06:03.475
Now in, in the uk,

06:04.045 --> 06:06.235
maybe an example would be that,

06:06.265 --> 06:07.955
imagine you have a worker coming in

06:07.955 --> 06:10.355
and that worker decides they might be overqualified,

06:10.535 --> 06:13.235
but that worker decides to work in the hospitality industry.

06:13.935 --> 06:16.475
So this worker is going to compete

06:16.745 --> 06:18.635
with the natives in that area.

06:18.855 --> 06:21.515
So in London, for example, this migrant moves to London.

06:22.145 --> 06:23.995
This migrant is going to compete

06:23.995 --> 06:25.755
for a job in the hospitality sector

06:25.755 --> 06:28.315
with natives also living in London.

06:28.735 --> 06:32.115
And that can have a short decrease,

06:32.115 --> 06:33.755
depressing effect on wages, which then

06:33.755 --> 06:36.925
after a while, dissipates.

06:38.115 --> 06:39.655
Um, this kind of the setting.

06:40.035 --> 06:42.255
What's new about our study is

06:42.255 --> 06:46.135
that we look at an often overlooked aspect of migration.

06:46.715 --> 06:50.095
So the idea is that migrants flowing into an occupation,

06:50.605 --> 06:52.975
like the, the literature points out that they compete

06:53.175 --> 06:57.355
with nas, which we totally acknowledge and agree with.

06:57.425 --> 07:01.395
However, they can also once hired impact

07:02.335 --> 07:03.635
Nas working around them.

07:03.775 --> 07:06.155
So either in the same occupation or the occupation above,

07:06.215 --> 07:08.965
or even we look at occupation below as well.

07:09.705 --> 07:13.285
So, it is possible, for example, that migrants

07:14.085 --> 07:15.385
in the same job have a different

07:15.385 --> 07:16.865
productivity compared to natives.

07:17.125 --> 07:20.105
In the uk that's particularly likely to be the case

07:20.105 --> 07:21.945
because migrants tend to downgrade.

07:22.005 --> 07:25.865
So there's a, a very famous paper by al showing

07:25.865 --> 07:28.465
that upon arrival migrants take jobs

07:28.565 --> 07:29.825
for which they're overqualified.

07:29.825 --> 07:31.425
So if you have these overqualified workers,

07:31.575 --> 07:34.385
they're more likely to be more productive, not

07:34.385 --> 07:35.785
because they're migrants, but just

07:35.785 --> 07:37.585
because they're over, they're overqualified.

07:38.325 --> 07:42.265
Um, so if you have these overqualified people working in

07:42.265 --> 07:44.625
team, that's likely to increase the productivity

07:44.625 --> 07:46.825
of the team, which is going to benefit

07:47.805 --> 07:49.425
the person supervising the team.

07:50.145 --> 07:53.685
And these supervisory roles, meaning the occupation above,

07:54.475 --> 07:56.925
they tend to be, natives.

07:57.065 --> 08:00.205
So there is a possibility, for migrants

08:00.205 --> 08:02.205
to have a positive spillover effect, so to say,

08:02.505 --> 08:05.285
on on natives and other occupations, as I mentioned

08:05.285 --> 08:08.365
before, they're like in the UK to have

08:08.915 --> 08:12.565
extremely reliable, easily accessible, data.

08:12.705 --> 08:14.925
And I would like to underline again that it's a pity

08:14.925 --> 08:17.045
that these data don't get mentioned more in the,

08:17.145 --> 08:18.165
in the public discourse,

08:18.165 --> 08:19.405
because these have been vetted

08:19.825 --> 08:22.645
by the official statistical authority in the uk.

08:22.645 --> 08:23.805
So we downloaded these data,

08:23.805 --> 08:26.405
which is the annual population survey.

08:26.505 --> 08:29.245
So that's a representative survey of the uk.

08:29.265 --> 08:31.045
So that's a true snapshot

08:32.015 --> 08:34.795
of the UK population by year.

08:34.855 --> 08:37.875
So we choose the years 2004 to 2017.

08:39.135 --> 08:40.675
Um, we stopped because

08:40.675 --> 08:44.355
after that, Brexit complicates, the discussion a lot.

08:44.355 --> 08:47.935
So we wanted kind of a pre Brexit, years.

08:48.395 --> 08:50.895
Uh, this survey, apart from being representative,

08:50.905 --> 08:53.135
which is very important, also contains rich

08:53.135 --> 08:54.775
information on wages.

08:54.775 --> 08:57.285
So much people earn, the employment status,

08:57.285 --> 08:58.965
whether they work where they work,

08:59.215 --> 09:00.725
which occupations they work in,

09:01.115 --> 09:04.165
what education level they have, and the migrant status.

09:04.425 --> 09:06.525
So we know if a person is a migrant,

09:07.065 --> 09:10.765
and we define a migrant as a person that lives in the UK,

09:11.345 --> 09:13.285
was not born in the uk.

09:13.785 --> 09:16.565
So this means at some point they, they move to the uk.

09:17.065 --> 09:19.845
Now, for each region in the uk,

09:20.585 --> 09:23.485
we use the official coding by the Office

09:23.485 --> 09:24.645
of National Statistics

09:25.105 --> 09:27.565
and divide workers into nine occupations.

09:28.105 --> 09:29.685
So you can have i in every area.

09:29.745 --> 09:32.685
So in London, for example, you can be employed in either

09:32.705 --> 09:34.645
of nine occupations, where at the very top

09:35.385 --> 09:37.485
are managers, directors and senior officials.

09:37.665 --> 09:40.165
So they get, they're also the ones that get paid the most.

09:40.545 --> 09:43.085
And at the very bottom you've got elementary occupations,

09:43.085 --> 09:46.645
which on average have much, much lower wages compared to,

09:46.865 --> 09:48.325
the other one.

09:48.585 --> 09:53.365
So once we set up the, the uk so to say, the, the economy

09:53.945 --> 09:58.925
in that way, we relate changes in wages in the same period.

09:59.025 --> 10:02.165
So how do wages of natives change in London, for example,

10:02.165 --> 10:05.485
from one year to the next, what's the yearly change in wages

10:05.785 --> 10:07.205
and how does that relate to

10:08.515 --> 10:11.925
migrant inflows into three types of occupations?

10:12.145 --> 10:16.165
So the first one would be how does, how do wages of

10:17.045 --> 10:19.495
natives change with respect

10:19.495 --> 10:21.415
to inflows into the same occupations?

10:21.955 --> 10:23.455
So that's kind of replicating

10:23.565 --> 10:26.135
what the literature done so far, so to say.

10:26.135 --> 10:27.975
So that's kind of replicating previous studies,

10:28.555 --> 10:31.055
but then we add the number of migrants

10:31.075 --> 10:33.775
who flow into the occupations working

10:33.945 --> 10:36.215
above natives.

10:36.315 --> 10:40.735
And also as a curiosity, we also added below to see,

10:41.315 --> 10:42.815
if anything, changes.

10:42.835 --> 10:44.095
And without getting too technical,

10:44.355 --> 10:47.375
we follow standard procedures to account

10:47.515 --> 10:48.895
for unobservable factors,

10:48.985 --> 10:51.215
which might change from one county,

10:51.485 --> 10:52.655
from one area to another.

10:52.755 --> 10:54.415
So anything London specific

10:54.515 --> 10:56.415
or anything specific to Scotland, for example,

10:56.995 --> 10:58.335
we kind of take account for.

10:58.355 --> 11:00.375
And we also take account of kind

11:00.375 --> 11:02.175
of large macroeconomic fluctuation.

11:02.175 --> 11:05.615
So we, we follow standard practice in the literature.

11:06.035 --> 11:07.135
The first one, we kind of,

11:07.135 --> 11:10.135
we were curious if we could replicate previous findings.

11:10.835 --> 11:12.495
And on average, although our,

11:12.995 --> 11:16.375
our replication is much simpler, it does fit with,

11:16.795 --> 11:18.095
a lot of other studies.

11:18.235 --> 11:20.825
So we find that changes in wages

11:20.825 --> 11:23.545
for natives have basically no relationship

11:23.545 --> 11:25.705
to changes in, migrants.

11:26.245 --> 11:29.625
So we find no effect of,

11:30.175 --> 11:34.465
migrant inflows into one occupation, into wages

11:34.525 --> 11:37.265
of natives working in the same occupations as well.

11:37.365 --> 11:39.185
So in a certain way, that's hardly surprising

11:39.185 --> 11:41.105
because that's what a, a large number.

11:42.685 --> 11:46.465
Now what's completely new is that we found that if we relate

11:47.205 --> 11:51.425
native wages to migrants flowing into the occupations below,

11:51.685 --> 11:52.785
always in the same region,

11:53.265 --> 11:55.925
We find that that significantly increases wages,

11:56.625 --> 11:57.645
for natives.

11:57.705 --> 11:59.205
So I know this is all very abstract,

11:59.265 --> 12:02.805
so maybe an example would be, one kind

12:02.805 --> 12:06.525
of middle level occupation is administrative occupations,

12:06.525 --> 12:09.005
and the one above that would be associate professions.

12:09.505 --> 12:11.645
That's in our ranking. That's the way it is.

12:12.145 --> 12:14.485
So for example, if a lot

12:14.485 --> 12:17.805
of migrants flow into these administrative occupations

12:18.805 --> 12:22.105
in one region in London, for example, then what we find is

12:22.105 --> 12:25.025
that that increases the wages

12:25.025 --> 12:27.745
of natives working in associate professionals,

12:27.875 --> 12:32.625
which is the occupation above in the same, region.

12:32.765 --> 12:35.745
So we, we clearly find that natives benefit from

12:36.385 --> 12:39.185
migrants working the occupations below them.

12:40.385 --> 12:42.845
Uh, we, we can't identify whether they actually work

12:42.845 --> 12:44.845
physically together, these people.

12:44.905 --> 12:49.125
But on average, we find that, we find that

12:49.785 --> 12:52.125
we give some kind of ideas of the mechanisms.

12:52.125 --> 12:53.645
We're still thinking about the mechanisms,

12:53.705 --> 12:55.205
but we kind of wanted to give a flavor

12:55.205 --> 12:56.805
of the mechanisms that we have in mind.

12:57.345 --> 12:58.565
So one is peer effects,

12:58.935 --> 13:02.605
which is a longstanding literature in economics that shows

13:02.635 --> 13:04.205
that the productivity of one worker

13:04.835 --> 13:07.125
affects the productivity of other workers around.

13:08.605 --> 13:11.065
So the idea is that if you get these overqualified

13:11.065 --> 13:14.785
individuals, then their extra productivity somehow might

13:15.095 --> 13:17.665
reflect or might be reflected in in other,

13:18.485 --> 13:19.625
native workers.

13:20.045 --> 13:23.505
And that's kind of corroborated by the fact that we find

13:23.895 --> 13:28.745
that natives are, have lower educational attainment compared

13:28.765 --> 13:30.385
to migrants.

13:30.385 --> 13:32.505
So we believe peer effects,

13:32.565 --> 13:34.185
are the most likely mechanisms,

13:34.465 --> 13:36.265
although we can't say for sure, we kind of

13:36.715 --> 13:38.025
below was our main focus

13:38.025 --> 13:42.905
because kind of the, it fits with the literature broader

13:43.095 --> 13:45.145
with previous studies, and we kind thought that it fits.

13:45.445 --> 13:48.945
We also wanted to check whether anything happens above which

13:49.995 --> 13:52.405
intuitively you wouldn't think that there should be much

13:52.405 --> 13:53.925
of an effect, but it could be that kind

13:53.925 --> 13:56.845
of if your boss is more productive, then that might affect,

13:57.585 --> 13:59.205
kind of people working under them.

13:59.545 --> 14:02.565
We found a, again, a negligible effect of native

14:03.225 --> 14:04.725
slight, slight negative.

14:04.905 --> 14:08.125
So it's, it's, it's kind of, it's on the negative side,

14:08.345 --> 14:12.205
but very small and, very imprecisely estimated.

14:12.345 --> 14:15.765
So, I wouldn't feel confident saying there is a kind

14:15.765 --> 14:17.605
of significant effect to wrap up.

14:17.865 --> 14:21.405
Uh, our analysis provides evidence that migration

14:22.595 --> 14:26.605
into one occupation that positively affects native workers

14:27.265 --> 14:29.805
in the same area working in other occupations.

14:29.905 --> 14:34.045
So specifically we find that the wages of natives

14:34.925 --> 14:36.605
increase if there is an inflow

14:36.605 --> 14:40.305
of migrants in the occupations below them, in,

14:40.525 --> 14:41.665
the same region.

14:41.805 --> 14:46.095
So as such, our analysis provides evidence

14:46.835 --> 14:49.095
of positive spillovers effect of migrants.

14:49.095 --> 14:50.295
So migrants can have

14:50.745 --> 14:52.645
These kind of additional effects

14:52.645 --> 14:53.925
that maybe we haven't thought about.

14:53.925 --> 14:57.435
They can benefit native workers in ways that maybe

14:57.575 --> 15:00.475
so far we haven't really, thought about.

15:01.095 --> 15:02.915
And there is very little evidence on

15:02.915 --> 15:03.955
this kind of extra effect.

15:03.955 --> 15:05.955
There's a lot of evidence on how to

15:05.955 --> 15:10.055
what extent migrants compete with natives for the same jobs.

15:10.325 --> 15:11.695
There's a lot of work done on that,

15:11.695 --> 15:13.655
but there's relatively little work on this kind

15:13.655 --> 15:16.375
of extra spillovers effect on other

15:16.375 --> 15:17.775
occupations in the same area.

15:18.565 --> 15:19.705
Uh, of course.

15:20.125 --> 15:24.705
So we hope that our findings contribute to more constructive

15:24.845 --> 15:28.945
and more fact-based discussion around migration and beyond.

15:29.085 --> 15:33.225
And we realized that in an election years, tempers are high

15:33.225 --> 15:34.225
and the stakes are high.

15:34.885 --> 15:36.825
But we really hope that migration,

15:36.825 --> 15:39.905
which is a very important topic for the uk,

15:40.845 --> 15:43.705
we really hope that the debate focuses on findings

15:43.845 --> 15:47.305
and on official data from reliable and official sources.

Migration's Impact on UK Labor Market

00:00:00 - Our research is on the impact of migration on UK workers. And I'm sure as you're aware, migration is a very hotly debated topic. So it plays a central law role. In the political discussion, there was a European parliament to reelection, and in the US election is likely to play, a major role as well. Unfortunately, much of the debate has become very polarized, and it's become somewhat detached from kind
00:00:35 - in the uk the country we're looking at is a special case because, in the UK over the last 10 or so years, the number of migrants has been more or less, steadily increasing. And this rise in the migrant stock and the number of migrants in the UK has also been accompanied by an increase in anti-migrant sentiment, which again, is likely to, we believe, play a role in the next general election,
00:01:04 - surprisingly, however, which you might not think from the kind of polarization of the debate, there is, very little knowledge on migration in the UK and the effects it has on the labor market, especially as you see it in online chat rooms or in the political, debate as well, which is a pity because the Office for National Statistics, which is kind of the official body to provide data from the uk, provide extremely high quality data,
00:01:36 - which you can use to make informed decisions, which are also the data that, we end up using. and if you look at who the migrants are that come to the uk, the migrants to the UK are very, very special type of person. So one thing that mi you might find surprising is that on average, migrants to the UK are better educated than UK natives. So if you take the average migrant, they have a few years more education compared to the, average UK born person.
00:02:10 - that once they arrive into the uk, they downgrade in terms of occupations. So in other words, that means that they take up a job for which they're overqualified. So their qualification would say, go to job A and they take a job that's lower paying, than a, and these two, kind of phenomena together. So the fact that migrants are highly educated and the fact that they downgrade upon arrival,
00:02:39 - So one kind of the very first obvious consequences that we have a lot of overqualified people doing relatively basic work, and we believe that, this kind of extra education that you kind of get for free by hiring migrant migrants is going to make the team in which the migrants work more Productive. So if you have better educated individuals in the team, that's more likely to make the team more productive, and this extra productivity is gonna be benefit the

Migrant Impact on UK Labor Market Outcomes

00:03:09 - So if you have a team working under you and that team is more productive, that's going to reflect well on you. And the supervisors of these teams tend to be on average natives. So we believe that by being more educated, by increasing the productivity of the team, migrants can have beneficial effect on UK workers working in occupations that supervise them, or at least above them. The kind of the general area that we're looking at is,
00:03:42 - what's the impact of migrant inflow on the labor market outcomes of natives? So in a, in a certain way, they ask the question, if migrants come in, is that good or bad for natives? Or does that have any effect at all? Now there's a very, very large body of academic work that analyzes this topic. It's kind of, it's not just a hotly debated topic. In policy circles is also a hotly debated topic in,
00:04:12 - And one thing to bear in mind is that migration varies from context to context. So, you know, what holds for the UK doesn't necessarily hold in the US or even in other countries. So it's very, very hard to kind of make generalizing statements across different countries and across different time periods. However, as a very, very stylized overview of the literature, most papers, again, not all of them, there are definitely some papers that find different results, but kind of the broad average, they find very
00:04:48 - So, this is the ideas that the way economists think about migration is that a migrant worker comes in and then this migrant worker competes for the same job with a native worker of similar characteristics. So if you take a migrant roughly the same education level, roughly the same age, they are going to compete for the same job as a native with similar characteristics, similar qualifications, similar age, et cetera.
00:05:20 - because it, they have more people to choose from, but it's, it does depress wages. So, a large number of study finds a negative effect on wages. So market inflow leads to a decrease. However, I really want to stress that the vast majority of papers finds that this effect is very small and in many, many contexts is absolutely negligible. And where it is often it disappears after a short.
00:05:51 - and, short effect in of migration. Now in, in the uk, maybe an example would be that, imagine you have a worker coming in and that worker decides they might be overqualified, but that worker decides to work in the hospitality industry. So this worker is going to compete with the natives in that area.

Migration's Impact on UK Labor Dynamics

00:06:22 - This migrant is going to compete for a job in the hospitality sector with natives also living in London. And that can have a short decrease, depressing effect on wages, which then after a while, dissipates. this kind of the setting. What's new about our study is that we look at an often overlooked aspect of migration. So the idea is that migrants flowing into an occupation,
00:06:53 - with nas, which we totally acknowledge and agree with. However, they can also once hired impact Nas working around them. So either in the same occupation or the occupation above, or even we look at occupation below as well. So, it is possible, for example, that migrants in the same job have a different productivity compared to natives. In the uk that's particularly likely to be the case because migrants tend to downgrade.
00:07:25 - that upon arrival migrants take jobs for which they're overqualified. So if you have these overqualified workers, they're more likely to be more productive, not because they're migrants, but just because they're over, they're overqualified. so if you have these overqualified people working in team, that's likely to increase the productivity of the team, which is going to benefit the person supervising the team. And these supervisory roles, meaning the occupation above,
00:07:57 - So there is a possibility, for migrants to have a positive spillover effect, so to say, on on natives and other occupations, as I mentioned before, they're like in the UK to have extremely reliable, easily accessible, data. And I would like to underline again that it's a pity that these data don't get mentioned more in the, in the public discourse, because these have been vetted by the official statistical authority in the uk. So we downloaded these data, which is the annual population survey.
00:08:29 - So that's a true snapshot of the UK population by year. So we choose the years 2004 to 2017. we stopped because after that, Brexit complicates, the discussion a lot. So we wanted kind of a pre Brexit, years. this survey, apart from being representative, which is very important, also contains rich information on wages. So much people earn, the employment status,
00:08:59 - which occupations they work in, what education level they have, and the migrant status. So we know if a person is a migrant, and we define a migrant as a person that lives in the UK, was not born in the uk. So this means at some point they, they move to the uk. Now, for each region in the uk, we use the official coding by the Office of National Statistics and divide workers into nine occupations.

Migrants and Wage Dynamics in London Jobs

00:09:29 - So in London, for example, you can be employed in either of nine occupations, where at the very top are managers, directors and senior officials. So they get, they're also the ones that get paid the most. And at the very bottom you've got elementary occupations, which on average have much, much lower wages compared to, the other one. So once we set up the, the uk so to say, the, the economy in that way, we relate changes in wages in the same period.
00:10:02 - from one year to the next, what's the yearly change in wages and how does that relate to migrant inflows into three types of occupations? So the first one would be how does, how do wages of natives change with respect to inflows into the same occupations? So that's kind of replicating what the literature done so far, so to say. So that's kind of replicating previous studies, but then we add the number of migrants
00:10:33 - above natives. And also as a curiosity, we also added below to see, if anything, changes. And without getting too technical, we follow standard procedures to account for unobservable factors, which might change from one county, from one area to another. So anything London specific or anything specific to Scotland, for example, we kind of take account for. And we also take account of kind of large macroeconomic fluctuation.
00:11:06 - The first one, we kind of, we were curious if we could replicate previous findings. And on average, although our, our replication is much simpler, it does fit with, a lot of other studies. So we find that changes in wages for natives have basically no relationship to changes in, migrants. So we find no effect of, migrant inflows into one occupation, into wages
00:11:37 - So in a certain way, that's hardly surprising because that's what a, a large number. Now what's completely new is that we found that if we relate native wages to migrants flowing into the occupations below, always in the same region, We find that that significantly increases wages, for natives. So I know this is all very abstract, so maybe an example would be, one kind of middle level occupation is administrative occupations,
00:12:09 - That's in our ranking. That's the way it is. So for example, if a lot of migrants flow into these administrative occupations in one region in London, for example, then what we find is that that increases the wages of natives working in associate professionals, which is the occupation above in the same, region. So we, we clearly find that natives benefit from migrants working the occupations below them.

Peer Effects of Migrants on Native Workers

00:12:42 - physically together, these people. But on average, we find that, we find that we give some kind of ideas of the mechanisms. We're still thinking about the mechanisms, but we kind of wanted to give a flavor of the mechanisms that we have in mind. So one is peer effects, which is a longstanding literature in economics that shows that the productivity of one worker affects the productivity of other workers around. So the idea is that if you get these overqualified
00:13:15 - reflect or might be reflected in in other, native workers. And that's kind of corroborated by the fact that we find that natives are, have lower educational attainment compared to migrants. So we believe peer effects, are the most likely mechanisms, although we can't say for sure, we kind of below was our main focus because kind of the, it fits with the literature broader
00:13:45 - We also wanted to check whether anything happens above which intuitively you wouldn't think that there should be much of an effect, but it could be that kind of if your boss is more productive, then that might affect, kind of people working under them. We found a, again, a negligible effect of native slight, slight negative. So it's, it's, it's kind of, it's on the negative side, but very small and, very imprecisely estimated. So, I wouldn't feel confident saying there is a kind
00:14:17 - our analysis provides evidence that migration into one occupation that positively affects native workers in the same area working in other occupations. So specifically we find that the wages of natives increase if there is an inflow of migrants in the occupations below them, in, the same region. So as such, our analysis provides evidence
00:14:49 - So migrants can have These kind of additional effects that maybe we haven't thought about. They can benefit native workers in ways that maybe so far we haven't really, thought about. And there is very little evidence on this kind of extra effect. There's a lot of evidence on how to what extent migrants compete with natives for the same jobs. There's a lot of work done on that, but there's relatively little work on this kind of extra spillovers effect on other occupations in the same area.
00:15:43 - So we hope that our findings contribute to more constructive and more fact-based discussion around migration and beyond. And we realized that in an election years, tempers are high and the stakes are high. But we really hope that migration, which is a very important topic for the uk, we really hope that the debate focuses on findings and on official data from reliable and official sources.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis