Popular in Sociology

Social Identities and Divisions

A new explanation of antisemitism: Jew hatred as a civilisational phenomenon

Boston University Liah Greenfeld

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

Culture and Society

Carceral Entrapments: Views from the Prison/Street Interface in India

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Mahuya Bandyopadhya

Culture and Society

Pre-problem families: predictive analytics and the future as the present

University of Southampton Rosalind Edwards

Ethnicity and Racism

Were Muslim Barbarians Really Knocking On the Gates of Ontario?

University of Ottawa Natasha Bakht

Culture and Society

Poor People’s Survival Strategies

The University of Texas at Austin Javier Auyero

Ethnicity and Racism

Sociology of Whiteness

Arizona State University Monica McDermott

Learning about inequality in unequal America

View more insights in Social Sciences - Sociology - Social Identities and Divisions

View more figures from Boston University

View the page of Jonathan

Read the Study

Next in Social Identities and Divisions

Death to Realism! Toward a Social Psychology of Palestinian Resistance

Mohammed A Bamyeh | University of Pittsburgh

A new explanation of antisemitism: Jew hatred as a civilisational phenomenon

Liah Greenfeld | Boston University

As Western nations are increasingly divided by socioeconomic fault lines, how do we learn about the lives of others? Scholarship documents correlates of inequality beliefs but lacks a theoretical framework for studying belief formation. Jonathan Mijs develops an “institutional inference” model describing how adolescents learn about inequality in racially and socioeconomically homogeneous or heterogeneous institutional contexts.

Image courtesy of interviewee. June 18, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

The discussion revolves around economic inequality in the United States, especially since the rise of neoliberal policies in the late 20th century. Jonathan, an academic, discusses how perceptions of inequality differ from objective realities, with many Americans holding a meritocratic belief that success stems solely from individual effort, which overlooks systemic issues.

The research aims to understand how individuals learn about inequality, particularly through their experiences in diverse or homogeneous settings like college. Drawing upon a large dataset from freshmen and their responses before graduation, the study examines how students' beliefs about meritocracy and racial discrimination evolve based on their educational environment and interactions.

Key findings reveal that students often become more skeptical of meritocratic assumptions and more aware of racial discrimination when exposed to diverse peers, especially those from different racial or ethnic backgrounds. However, the changes in belief are more pronounced among ethnic and racial minorities.

The implications call into question whether colleges are fulfilling their mission to prepare students for a diverse society, especially in light of recent Supreme Court rulings on affirmative action that may further limit campus diversity. Future research directions include exploring other social environments beyond college and how early experiences shape beliefs about inequality.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.245 --> 00:02.725
Economic inequalities in many Western countries,

00:02.725 --> 00:06.285
and certainly in the United States, have grown,

00:06.465 --> 00:10.365
almost exponentially, since the, about the 1970s

00:10.365 --> 00:14.205
and 1980s, the advent of neoliberal policies in particular,

00:14.705 --> 00:18.245
to the point where around the two thousands,

00:18.645 --> 00:22.685
I would say, inequalities peaked to, to,

00:23.115 --> 00:25.645
basically where they hadn't been,

00:25.775 --> 00:29.285
since the Great Depression of the 1920s and thirties, right?

00:29.285 --> 00:32.605
So really ballooning, economic inequalities,

00:32.605 --> 00:34.845
income inequalities, wealth, concentration of wealth

00:34.855 --> 00:38.085
among just a, a handful of, of individuals.

00:38.505 --> 00:39.565
Um, and, and,

00:39.625 --> 00:44.085
and, meanwhile, America is also a society

00:44.085 --> 00:45.645
that's, that's highly segregated.

00:45.985 --> 00:49.365
Um, it's segregated along economic lines,

00:49.425 --> 00:53.165
and is second segregated along ethnic and, racial lines.

00:53.745 --> 00:56.645
Um, so that's sort of the objective reality

00:56.795 --> 00:59.565
that social scientists are, are, are documenting.

01:00.105 --> 01:01.965
But when you ask people about their,

01:01.965 --> 01:05.085
their beliefs about inequality, their views,

01:05.085 --> 01:07.845
their perspectives, you get a completely different picture

01:07.945 --> 01:09.725
of the society that they live in.

01:09.865 --> 01:14.685
Um, you get this fairly, meritocratic view,

01:15.035 --> 01:19.045
meaning a society where people who work hard are rewarded,

01:19.465 --> 01:22.285
and, you know, are become successful.

01:22.785 --> 01:26.605
And, the other side of that coin is that people

01:26.905 --> 01:31.045
who are struggling financially, who find themselves,

01:31.045 --> 01:35.605
down in the dumps must, be themselves to blame for it.

01:35.945 --> 01:40.405
Um, so that, that that continues to be, the kind

01:40.405 --> 01:43.445
of prevalence belief among many Americans,

01:43.705 --> 01:46.645
and it's no longer an American idiosyncrasy.

01:46.645 --> 01:51.005
We, we see, a growing, belief that, that,

01:51.035 --> 01:52.965
that people live in meritocratic society.

01:52.965 --> 01:56.045
We see that across societies in the western world really

01:56.215 --> 02:00.005
going hand in hand with, these, these growing

02:00.065 --> 02:01.925
and ballooning levels of inequality.

02:02.305 --> 02:04.485
My starting point is it's,

02:04.915 --> 02:06.325
it's a combination of factors.

02:06.515 --> 02:10.445
It's, in one sense it's,

02:10.605 --> 02:12.245
people really underestimate just

02:12.245 --> 02:13.925
how unequal their societies are.

02:14.155 --> 02:16.725
They just don't know. Uh, that's a big part of it.

02:16.905 --> 02:20.365
And one of the reasons why people don't know, is that,

02:20.545 --> 02:25.125
institutions, major institutions in, in society,

02:25.385 --> 02:27.125
think about neighborhoods, schools,

02:27.335 --> 02:31.885
workplaces have become increasingly segregated,

02:32.145 --> 02:34.645
not just in, in, in an ethnic and racial sense.

02:34.645 --> 02:36.525
That's the, that's the sense in which we tend

02:36.525 --> 02:38.885
to think about when we hear the word segregation,

02:39.105 --> 02:41.205
but in an economic sense, meaning that rich

02:41.205 --> 02:42.325
and poor,

02:42.535 --> 02:45.765
university educated versus non university educated people

02:45.825 --> 02:48.885
are, are no longer, interacting.

02:49.035 --> 02:51.565
They are working in separate workplaces altogether.

02:51.745 --> 02:52.965
Uh, they're their, they

02:52.985 --> 02:55.325
or their kids are going to separate schools altogether.

02:55.325 --> 02:57.285
They're living in different neighborhoods, even their,

02:57.375 --> 03:00.045
their social networks, not just online,

03:00.065 --> 03:02.605
but offline, who they know,

03:02.825 --> 03:04.325
who they date romantically.

03:04.665 --> 03:07.365
Uh, that has become to be marked, more

03:07.365 --> 03:08.965
and more, by,

03:08.965 --> 03:11.125
basically a fault line between rich and poor.

03:11.345 --> 03:14.365
So if this is the reality, I wondered,

03:14.505 --> 03:18.085
how do people even learn about the life of others?

03:18.225 --> 03:22.165
On one hand, literature, in sociology, economics,

03:22.195 --> 03:24.965
political science kind of describes this reality

03:24.965 --> 03:26.525
of growing economic inequalities.

03:26.945 --> 03:28.205
Um, there's also more

03:28.205 --> 03:29.525
and more research that,

03:29.615 --> 03:31.565
shows this increasing socioeconomic

03:31.885 --> 03:33.445
segregation, in society.

03:33.705 --> 03:36.045
Uh, so that's sort of the background really to the project.

03:36.625 --> 03:40.485
Um, now, how does that impact the way that people,

03:40.985 --> 03:43.925
see themselves, see others, and understand

03:43.945 --> 03:45.165
and make sense of their society?

03:45.165 --> 03:46.685
That's really the question I'm interested in,

03:46.985 --> 03:48.765
and that's something that hasn't been studied,

03:49.025 --> 03:50.085
all that much.

03:50.505 --> 03:53.085
Uh, there's a handful of studies that, that I,

03:53.315 --> 03:54.485
take inspiration from.

03:54.905 --> 03:56.445
Uh, so there's, there's some research

03:56.445 --> 04:00.405
that situates people's beliefs about inequality,

04:00.465 --> 04:02.965
by looking at, the neighborhoods that people live in.

04:03.265 --> 04:06.045
Uh, and they find generally that,

04:06.185 --> 04:07.565
the more economically diverse,

04:07.825 --> 04:10.565
the neighborhood a person lives in, the more aware they are

04:10.825 --> 04:13.885
of economic inequalities, not just in their immediate sort

04:13.885 --> 04:17.365
of social setting, but also the more unequal day they think,

04:17.745 --> 04:20.525
their society to be, at large.

04:20.945 --> 04:23.605
Uh, so there's this link between kind of what people see

04:23.605 --> 04:27.045
around them and how they think the, the society looks more,

04:27.045 --> 04:29.085
more generally, which is, I think, an intuitive link.

04:29.545 --> 04:32.085
Um, there's some research that the same may be true

04:32.185 --> 04:36.965
for schools, particularly, when people go to,

04:37.025 --> 04:38.485
in their kind of formative stages

04:38.505 --> 04:39.645
of their life in their youth

04:39.645 --> 04:44.125
and early adolescents, a a school setting that is,

04:44.555 --> 04:49.045
kind of, exposes them to, people from,

04:49.195 --> 04:51.805
from kind of all rungs of life,

04:51.825 --> 04:53.485
or ones in a social letter, I should say.

04:53.825 --> 04:57.725
Uh, then, that may be something that also, shapes

04:57.725 --> 04:58.925
and understand and sort of their

04:58.925 --> 05:00.045
understanding of inequality.

05:00.065 --> 05:02.445
And that's, that's really the intuition that I am working

05:02.445 --> 05:03.965
with in my paper,

05:04.065 --> 05:07.405
by looking specifically at one institution, which is,

05:07.705 --> 05:11.685
college, which is this, this, this,

05:11.685 --> 05:14.765
this institution that obviously is, has always been kind

05:14.765 --> 05:16.605
of considered the path into the middle class.

05:16.825 --> 05:18.325
So it's important in that sense.

05:18.905 --> 05:23.245
Uh, it, it, it really kind of provides not just,

05:23.955 --> 05:26.085
it's not just the, the kind of the instruction,

05:26.085 --> 05:28.845
like the things that we learned, the skills we develop in,

05:28.905 --> 05:32.725
in college, but it's also a social space in which students

05:32.995 --> 05:35.565
sometimes, up to, you know, four years

05:35.665 --> 05:38.765
or more years kind of spend surrounding themselves

05:38.765 --> 05:43.485
with others, on a campus that, is not,

05:43.605 --> 05:46.565
a reflection perfect, you know, reflection

05:46.565 --> 05:49.645
of their society at large, but it becomes their society.

05:49.865 --> 05:53.525
So I was really interested to see, how do people kind

05:53.525 --> 05:56.605
of, based on those experiences come to,

05:57.205 --> 05:59.945
Uh, develop an understanding of the society they live in,

05:59.965 --> 06:02.105
in this very, very formative stage of their life.

06:02.345 --> 06:03.945
A theoretical starting point is,

06:04.125 --> 06:08.745
is just this pretty simple model where I posit that,

06:09.245 --> 06:11.265
it is through our own experiences,

06:11.405 --> 06:14.585
and it's through our kind of vicarious experiences, meaning,

06:15.045 --> 06:17.985
the experiences of the people that are close to us,

06:18.375 --> 06:20.785
that we come to kind of understand,

06:21.365 --> 06:25.025
how inequality works, how much inequality there is,

06:25.205 --> 06:27.185
and what are the causes of those inequality.

06:27.565 --> 06:29.225
So it's, it's kind of information

06:29.225 --> 06:32.465
and experiences that reach us by our, our own experiences

06:32.485 --> 06:35.985
and by the people that we surround ourselves with,

06:36.275 --> 06:40.625
which means that, that it's crucial, to look at the kind

06:40.625 --> 06:43.625
of settings that, that, that form,

06:43.845 --> 06:48.425
or that constitute this importance, setting to,

06:48.525 --> 06:49.665
to our, to our early life,

06:49.735 --> 06:51.385
like the neighborhoods in which we grow up,

06:52.085 --> 06:53.145
the schools we attend,

06:53.145 --> 06:56.065
and then later, the workplaces that, that come to,

06:56.285 --> 06:58.385
you know, sort of be, be a site

06:58.385 --> 07:00.105
where we spend much of our, much of our time.

07:00.605 --> 07:03.905
Um, so how are those settings configured? Really?

07:04.365 --> 07:07.025
Are these settings that expose us to a wide variety

07:07.085 --> 07:09.505
of people from across our society?

07:09.885 --> 07:13.825
Or are they more homogeneous settings in which we only

07:13.895 --> 07:17.665
encounter others who share our economic position?

07:18.125 --> 07:20.585
Um, same levels of education, same levels of income,

07:20.765 --> 07:21.865
thereabouts.

07:22.245 --> 07:23.505
And, and, and if it,

07:23.565 --> 07:26.545
and distinguishing between the two, like the diverse

07:26.645 --> 07:28.345
and the non-diverse, the homogeneous

07:28.345 --> 07:31.545
or the heterogeneous setting, how does that, how does

07:31.545 --> 07:34.225
that impact the way that we come to understand our society?

07:34.585 --> 07:39.305
I am, drawn here on a, very large data set

07:39.305 --> 07:42.665
that I kind of put together, from two sources.

07:43.205 --> 07:48.105
Uh, one is a, a survey called the Freshmen Survey,

07:48.315 --> 07:51.265
which is, a series of questions fairly short

07:51.265 --> 07:54.785
that are asked to students in their first year, often

07:55.125 --> 07:57.785
around freshman orientation, really at the beginning

07:57.885 --> 07:59.305
of their college trajectory.

07:59.965 --> 08:03.305
Um, and, and then I have another, questionnaire

08:03.335 --> 08:06.745
that is asked to those very same students about four years

08:06.755 --> 08:09.465
later, before they graduate college.

08:10.005 --> 08:13.305
Um, and there's a few questions that are repeated such

08:13.305 --> 08:17.495
that I can directly compare people's responses, right,

08:17.495 --> 08:19.335
as they're starting their college journey

08:19.795 --> 08:22.135
and their responses by the time they graduate.

08:22.555 --> 08:25.215
So I can look at, whether people kind of

08:25.725 --> 08:27.895
hold onto their init initial beliefs

08:28.315 --> 08:30.215
or whether they change their beliefs.

08:30.275 --> 08:32.335
And specifically I'm interested in,

08:32.335 --> 08:33.655
their views about inequality.

08:33.795 --> 08:35.175
So there's two dimensions to this.

08:35.515 --> 08:37.535
One is, do they believe that,

08:37.595 --> 08:40.055
the United States is a society where,

08:40.085 --> 08:42.095
working hard is, is rewarded?

08:42.155 --> 08:44.495
And, and that's what, what, what leads to success?

08:45.115 --> 08:49.415
And do they believe that, racial discrimination is,

08:49.575 --> 08:52.695
a major problem, in their society, contemporarily,

08:53.075 --> 08:54.855
or if, if that's the thing of the past?

08:55.425 --> 08:59.365
Um, so I'm looking at basically belief change in those two,

08:59.825 --> 09:03.565
important views, about American society.

09:03.675 --> 09:07.045
It's about 150,000 students across about four

09:07.465 --> 09:10.885
to 500 universities, really, across the country.

09:10.905 --> 09:13.485
So these are really highly selective universities,

09:13.605 --> 09:16.125
private universities, they're also public universities.

09:16.125 --> 09:18.565
They're, they're also much less selective universities.

09:18.585 --> 09:21.885
But what they all share is, they, they have a,

09:21.965 --> 09:24.565
a they provide a, a, a campus experience.

09:24.625 --> 09:26.245
And oftentimes,

09:26.315 --> 09:29.285
most ca cases students are living on campus as well.

09:29.625 --> 09:33.005
So what I'm looking at then is, first of all,

09:33.265 --> 09:36.325
how does the, overall kind of composition

09:36.385 --> 09:40.925
of the student body, so who, are attending this college,

09:41.305 --> 09:43.845
how does that influence people's beliefs?

09:43.945 --> 09:46.005
And, and can that account for the belief change

09:46.235 --> 09:47.245
that, that I observe?

09:47.905 --> 09:52.585
And then specifically, I'm looking at one aspect of the,

09:52.585 --> 09:54.505
college setting, which is the roommate

09:54.535 --> 09:56.105
that a person has in college.

09:56.445 --> 09:59.745
Uh, so oftentimes in the first year, students are more

09:59.745 --> 10:01.905
or less, randomly assigned to a student,

10:02.325 --> 10:04.305
or there may be a particular algorithm

10:04.325 --> 10:06.225
or particular approach that the administrators take.

10:06.445 --> 10:07.985
But the important, the important thing is

10:07.985 --> 10:10.745
that students themselves tend to have no

10:10.805 --> 10:13.585
or very little say in who gets to be their roommate.

10:13.845 --> 10:15.945
Uh, now, later they can, they can often,

10:15.945 --> 10:17.585
provide their preferences and, and,

10:17.605 --> 10:19.545
and roommate configurations change.

10:20.045 --> 10:23.545
But, but there's an important aspect to who,

10:23.545 --> 10:25.945
people room with that is beyond their control.

10:25.945 --> 10:28.145
And that makes it a really interesting,

10:28.465 --> 10:29.945
variable in, in my analysis.

10:30.245 --> 10:32.705
Uh, so, so that's the one I really zoom in on.

10:33.085 --> 10:34.905
Um, and specifically,

10:35.005 --> 10:38.065
I'm looking at whether over those four years of, of college,

10:38.775 --> 10:39.865
whether,

10:40.105 --> 10:42.505
students find themselves in a roommate situation

10:42.655 --> 10:44.105
with someone from a different ethnic

10:44.105 --> 10:46.105
or ratio group from their own,

10:46.445 --> 10:49.225
and whether that really has an impact on their

10:49.225 --> 10:50.265
beliefs about the inequality.

10:50.965 --> 10:51.985
Now, what do I find?

10:52.245 --> 10:56.665
Um, I find evidence, pretty much in, in, in line

10:56.665 --> 10:59.265
with what I, what I hypothesize,

10:59.365 --> 11:03.225
but with some really, really important, and, and, and,

11:03.225 --> 11:06.905
and, problematic, really,

11:06.995 --> 11:08.185
unexpected findings.

11:08.365 --> 11:11.925
So the general pattern is that,

11:12.435 --> 11:15.325
over the four years of college, students tend

11:15.325 --> 11:17.925
to become a little bit less believing in meritocracy.

11:18.185 --> 11:22.045
Uh, generally, they become more critical of the notion

11:22.045 --> 11:24.245
that racial discrimination is a thing of the past,

11:24.665 --> 11:27.965
and they become less believing that, success is,

11:28.065 --> 11:31.165
is something that you can make, that, that, that,

11:31.165 --> 11:33.205
that hard work is always rewarded in society.

11:33.505 --> 11:34.885
Uh, so that's a general trend,

11:35.105 --> 11:38.005
but I find it really, really, really matters what kind

11:38.005 --> 11:41.685
of college you go to specifically who your,

11:41.905 --> 11:43.245
we interact with in that college.

11:43.465 --> 11:45.365
And it really, really matters who your roommate is.

11:45.625 --> 11:50.165
So generally, if you are exposed to,

11:50.285 --> 11:51.325
a person from a different ethnic

11:51.325 --> 11:54.245
and racial group through your roommate, configuration,

11:54.505 --> 11:57.045
and, and, and I, and I argue that this is not just kind of,

11:57.045 --> 12:00.245
sort of an, ephemeral, contact

12:00.465 --> 12:02.405
or interaction, you know, this is a person you really get

12:02.405 --> 12:05.405
to know because you're sharing a space with them, often

12:05.505 --> 12:07.045
for, for an extended period.

12:07.425 --> 12:11.645
So it's through that, experience I find in my research

12:12.035 --> 12:14.325
that people tend to become,

12:14.595 --> 12:16.125
less believing in meritocracy.

12:16.265 --> 12:18.605
So there's something in that experience,

12:18.665 --> 12:19.885
and less believing that racial

12:19.885 --> 12:21.405
discrimination is a problem of the past.

12:21.745 --> 12:23.885
So there's something in that experience that, that sort of,

12:23.905 --> 12:28.165
inter-ethnic interracial, encounter and, and, and,

12:28.165 --> 12:31.885
and extended, contact that people,

12:32.195 --> 12:35.085
that makes people, lose, some

12:35.085 --> 12:36.365
of their faith in meritocracy

12:36.585 --> 12:39.325
and become more, more critical, about the state

12:39.325 --> 12:40.605
of inequality in our society.

12:41.345 --> 12:43.725
Now, this is something that in a way,

12:44.145 --> 12:45.285
could be a good thing.

12:45.425 --> 12:49.165
Uh, if you, to the extent that people have kind

12:49.165 --> 12:50.165
of misperceptions

12:50.185 --> 12:53.085
and underestimate inequality in their society, it, it,

12:53.105 --> 12:56.205
it could be very welcome for them to have something kind

12:56.205 --> 12:57.605
of correct that misperception

12:57.745 --> 12:59.725
and actually, start

12:59.725 --> 13:01.565
to see society really for what it's right.

13:01.565 --> 13:04.165
That's, that's sort of perhaps what I was, I was hoping

13:04.185 --> 13:06.525
to find as a, as a sociologist concerned

13:06.525 --> 13:07.845
about, about inequalities.

13:08.265 --> 13:10.205
Now, what I find, though, is that

13:10.835 --> 13:14.765
this general pattern is especially true, for ethnic

13:14.765 --> 13:15.805
and racial minorities.

13:16.225 --> 13:20.765
So it's their exposure to a white roommate that makes them,

13:21.105 --> 13:25.525
especially, lose faith in meritocracy, and,

13:25.865 --> 13:28.805
and, and especially, critical of the state

13:28.805 --> 13:31.045
of racial inequality in their society,

13:31.115 --> 13:32.725
looking just at white students.

13:32.725 --> 13:35.365
However, I still find evidence of,

13:35.365 --> 13:37.525
of them losing faith in meritocracy,

13:37.525 --> 13:40.925
but it's not, by any means as large of an effect

13:41.105 --> 13:43.005
as I find for ethnic and racial minorities.

13:43.025 --> 13:46.245
So I find very minimal belief change among white students,

13:46.665 --> 13:50.485
and quite, quite big shifts in beliefs across ethnic

13:50.485 --> 13:52.165
and racial minorities, whereas,

13:52.645 --> 13:54.245
I suppose I would've maybe expected

13:54.305 --> 13:57.165
or even hoped to find the reverse, there's something in

13:57.165 --> 14:01.705
that, encounter that I think could be, eye-opening.

14:02.245 --> 14:04.985
Um, it could be kind of an enriching experience

14:05.045 --> 14:07.425
to really get to know a person from kind

14:07.425 --> 14:10.545
of an older other different walk of life,

14:11.205 --> 14:16.025
and learn to start to empathize with that person, start

14:16.045 --> 14:18.265
to see the world through their eyes.

14:18.645 --> 14:23.185
Uh, but that same experience for, a, a person who is,

14:23.285 --> 14:26.385
in an ethnic or racial minority

14:26.725 --> 14:28.185
or who grew up poor for instance,

14:28.275 --> 14:30.825
could also be a very painful experience to be exposed

14:30.925 --> 14:33.705
and confronted with the privilege, of another person,

14:34.125 --> 14:36.345
to, to be reminded,

14:36.405 --> 14:39.345
and confronted with all the things that you, you didn't have

14:39.735 --> 14:40.945
that they took for granted.

14:41.365 --> 14:43.665
Uh, right. So there's something in that experience,

14:43.665 --> 14:46.385
that my research suggests that is really, really powerful,

14:46.685 --> 14:49.025
and a catalyst for people to change their beliefs.

14:49.345 --> 14:51.805
I guess the first thing that I wanted to sort of,

14:52.115 --> 14:57.045
reflect on is do colleges, fulfill their kind

14:57.045 --> 15:01.125
of civic mission to pair students for, for, you know,

15:01.125 --> 15:05.165
life in American societies, in society, singular,

15:05.545 --> 15:08.765
do they, kind of,

15:09.835 --> 15:11.385
train the leaders of tomorrow?

15:11.385 --> 15:12.905
Right? These are kind of the mission statements

15:12.905 --> 15:14.465
of many, many colleges.

15:14.925 --> 15:18.625
Um, and I find that, to the extent

15:18.695 --> 15:23.185
that they do expose students to, you know, a, a a a,

15:23.465 --> 15:26.585
a broad spectrum of society, cross-section, really,

15:26.605 --> 15:28.225
of society, then, then yes,

15:28.415 --> 15:29.585
they are fulfilling their mission.

15:30.005 --> 15:32.705
But often, the reality is that that's not

15:32.895 --> 15:34.625
what the college campus resembles.

15:34.625 --> 15:36.865
That's not what the student body looks like.

15:37.205 --> 15:41.585
Uh, student bodies, tend to actually be much more,

15:42.005 --> 15:46.265
homogeneous, much less diverse than,

15:46.545 --> 15:47.745
American society at large.

15:48.045 --> 15:52.545
And as such university settings, colleges are actually,

15:52.815 --> 15:57.705
hindering people from really, seeing the society

15:57.725 --> 16:01.625
for what it is and are not, not quite, contributing

16:01.845 --> 16:05.265
to their or, or kind of, living up to the goal

16:05.485 --> 16:08.985
of preparing students, for, for, you know,

16:08.985 --> 16:12.665
important, important, work or roles

16:12.805 --> 16:15.585
or responsibilities, in American society.

16:15.925 --> 16:17.345
Uh, so that's the first thing that,

16:17.345 --> 16:18.745
that I, that I, looked at.

16:18.925 --> 16:22.385
The second is, and that's very, very, very current.

16:22.965 --> 16:25.225
Um, what does something like the,

16:25.525 --> 16:28.865
the Supreme Court's ruling on affirmative action?

16:29.215 --> 16:30.705
What does that mean? Or,

16:30.805 --> 16:33.105
or, what would be the consequence of

16:33.105 --> 16:34.985
that in the light of my findings?

16:35.405 --> 16:37.985
Um, and, and, and there, I'm, I'm really troubled

16:37.985 --> 16:41.945
because, my research suggests just, just how important,

16:42.605 --> 16:47.025
and, and kind of, you know, mind, mind changing,

16:47.115 --> 16:50.105
these experiences, across ethnic

16:50.105 --> 16:51.385
and racial fault lines could be.

16:51.725 --> 16:55.225
Um, while at the same time, this ruling means

16:55.225 --> 16:58.865
that universities, colleges have fewer, tools

16:59.005 --> 17:03.345
and ways to create a more diverse, campus space.

17:03.845 --> 17:07.345
Uh, meaning that these, experiences are gonna be,

17:07.595 --> 17:11.265
fewer, not, not more, more frequent in, in the past.

17:11.725 --> 17:14.425
Uh, and, and the exactly the kind of belief change

17:14.615 --> 17:17.105
that I think could be, could be constructive,

17:17.105 --> 17:19.145
could be eye-opening, are likely

17:19.205 --> 17:20.905
to become, more rare.

17:21.055 --> 17:23.145
This is just, one study

17:23.375 --> 17:25.585
that looks at one particular setting,

17:25.805 --> 17:27.985
but a lot of people in the United States

17:27.985 --> 17:29.185
have not gone to college.

17:29.685 --> 17:32.825
Uh, in fact, we don't know where, where we're heading,

17:32.885 --> 17:35.145
but, but maybe college becomes a less important

17:35.145 --> 17:36.665
institution in the future.

17:37.125 --> 17:39.865
So, it's really important to, I think,

17:39.865 --> 17:41.865
study other, settings, right?

17:41.865 --> 17:45.225
So I've mentioned the neighborhood as an important space

17:45.245 --> 17:46.945
and place in which people,

17:46.945 --> 17:48.225
learn about themselves and others.

17:48.565 --> 17:50.765
Uh, the same goes for the workplace,

17:50.825 --> 17:52.965
but maybe social networks more generally,

17:52.995 --> 17:54.325
both online networks

17:54.345 --> 17:58.885
and offline networks, is where, I think, we,

17:58.945 --> 18:01.125
we can, we can learn a lot, from

18:01.715 --> 18:04.005
what constitutes a person's social settings.

18:04.005 --> 18:07.245
Where do they draw their, their, their, understanding

18:07.305 --> 18:08.565
of their society from,

18:08.985 --> 18:12.685
and what are the particular experiences that are really,

18:13.345 --> 18:16.445
that really inform their views about their societies?

18:16.465 --> 18:18.605
And what are the kind of turning points,

18:18.605 --> 18:21.725
where people may really come to reevaluate their views?

18:22.145 --> 18:25.045
Is indeed sort of their, adolescence, is that sort

18:25.045 --> 18:26.685
of the most important stage?

18:27.065 --> 18:30.925
Uh, do beliefs about inequality get formed even earlier?

18:30.975 --> 18:32.405
There are some research that shows

18:32.405 --> 18:35.245
that even small children have really strong,

18:35.645 --> 18:36.645
fairness beliefs, right?

18:36.645 --> 18:38.405
They can, they can, they can really feel that

18:38.465 --> 18:39.845
and sense that something is unjust,

18:40.025 --> 18:43.725
and they can also really pick up on, inequalities.

18:43.795 --> 18:45.725
Like, like they can recognize

18:45.925 --> 18:47.125
affluence, they can recognize poverty.

18:47.785 --> 18:51.165
So, so basically, did I look at the right stage

18:51.165 --> 18:53.085
of people's lives, or should we be looking earlier

18:53.785 --> 18:56.565
and then later in adulthood, do people's beliefs,

18:56.745 --> 18:58.205
do they continue to be malleable?

18:58.625 --> 19:02.205
Um, are people open to some extent to change their minds?

19:02.585 --> 19:06.945
Or, do people's beliefs kind of, you know,

19:07.245 --> 19:08.705
get stuck in place at some point?

19:09.165 --> 19:11.265
Um, and that I think will really, really help.

19:11.525 --> 19:13.465
Um, also think about,

19:13.605 --> 19:17.705
if we are concerned about people's, misunderstanding

19:17.725 --> 19:20.345
of equality, their underestimation of inequalities

19:20.345 --> 19:23.145
and such, if we're concerned about misinformation,

19:23.145 --> 19:24.585
misperceptions,

19:24.605 --> 19:27.345
and the likes, then where do we target our,

19:27.405 --> 19:28.425
our interventions?

19:28.765 --> 19:31.105
How can we de develop, I think,

19:31.295 --> 19:33.025
effective information campaigns?

19:33.245 --> 19:35.825
And by we, I mean, that could be a nonprofit organization

19:35.825 --> 19:38.865
that could be, schools as part of their mission,

19:38.955 --> 19:41.705
could be government, it could be, could be any kind of body.

19:41.765 --> 19:44.225
But I think it's really, really important to,

19:44.375 --> 19:48.145
have this kind of research to, guide, those efforts.

"Examining Economic Inequality and Perceptions of Meritocracy in Western Societies"

00:00:00 - Economic inequalities in many Western countries, and certainly in the United States, have grown, almost exponentially, since the, about the 1970s and 1980s, the advent of neoliberal policies in particular, to the point where around the two thousands, I would say, inequalities peaked to, to, basically where they hadn't been, since the Great Depression of the 1920s and thirties, right? So really ballooning, economic inequalities, income inequalities, wealth, concentration of wealth among just a, a handful of, of individuals. and, and, and, meanwhile, America is also a society
00:00:45 - it's segregated along economic lines, and is second segregated along ethnic and, racial lines. so that's sort of the objective reality that social scientists are, are, are documenting. But when you ask people about their, their beliefs about inequality, their views, their perspectives, you get a completely different picture of the society that they live in. you get this fairly, meritocratic view, meaning a society where people who work hard are rewarded, and, you know, are become successful. And, the other side of that coin is that people
00:01:31 - down in the dumps must, be themselves to blame for it. so that, that that continues to be, the kind of prevalence belief among many Americans, and it's no longer an American idiosyncrasy. We, we see, a growing, belief that, that, that people live in meritocratic society. We see that across societies in the western world really going hand in hand with, these, these growing and ballooning levels of inequality. My starting point is it's, it's a combination of factors. It's, in one sense it's,
00:02:12 - how unequal their societies are. They just don't know. that's a big part of it. And one of the reasons why people don't know, is that, institutions, major institutions in, in society, think about neighborhoods, schools, workplaces have become increasingly segregated, not just in, in, in an ethnic and racial sense. That's the, that's the sense in which we tend to think about when we hear the word segregation, but in an economic sense, meaning that rich and poor, university educated versus non university educated people are, are no longer, interacting. They are working in separate workplaces altogether.
00:02:52 - or their kids are going to separate schools altogether. They're living in different neighborhoods, even their, their social networks, not just online, but offline, who they know, who they date romantically. that has become to be marked, more and more, by, basically a fault line between rich and poor. So if this is the reality, I wondered, how do people even learn about the life of others? On one hand, literature, in sociology, economics, political science kind of describes this reality of growing economic inequalities. there's also more and more research that, shows this increasing socioeconomic
00:03:33 - so that's sort of the background really to the project. now, how does that impact the way that people, see themselves, see others, and understand and make sense of their society? That's really the question I'm interested in, and that's something that hasn't been studied, all that much. there's a handful of studies that, that I, take inspiration from. so there's, there's some research that situates people's beliefs about inequality, by looking at, the neighborhoods that people live in. and they find generally that, the more economically diverse, the neighborhood a person lives in, the more aware they are of economic inequalities, not just in their immediate sort

"Formative Experiences and Social Perceptions: The Impact of Educational Settings on Understanding Inequality"

00:04:17 - their society to be, at large. so there's this link between kind of what people see around them and how they think the, the society looks more, more generally, which is, I think, an intuitive link. there's some research that the same may be true for schools, particularly, when people go to, in their kind of formative stages of their life in their youth and early adolescents, a a school setting that is, kind of, exposes them to, people from, from kind of all rungs of life, or ones in a social letter, I should say. then, that may be something that also, shapes
00:04:58 - understanding of inequality. And that's, that's really the intuition that I am working with in my paper, by looking specifically at one institution, which is, college, which is this, this, this, this institution that obviously is, has always been kind of considered the path into the middle class. So it's important in that sense. it, it, it really kind of provides not just, it's not just the, the kind of the instruction, like the things that we learned, the skills we develop in, in college, but it's also a social space in which students sometimes, up to, you know, four years or more years kind of spend surrounding themselves
00:05:43 - a reflection perfect, you know, reflection of their society at large, but it becomes their society. So I was really interested to see, how do people kind of, based on those experiences come to, develop an understanding of the society they live in, in this very, very formative stage of their life. A theoretical starting point is, is just this pretty simple model where I posit that, it is through our own experiences, and it's through our kind of vicarious experiences, meaning, the experiences of the people that are close to us, that we come to kind of understand,
00:06:25 - and what are the causes of those inequality. So it's, it's kind of information and experiences that reach us by our, our own experiences and by the people that we surround ourselves with, which means that, that it's crucial, to look at the kind of settings that, that, that form, or that constitute this importance, setting to, to our, to our early life, like the neighborhoods in which we grow up, the schools we attend, and then later, the workplaces that, that come to, you know, sort of be, be a site where we spend much of our, much of our time. so how are those settings configured? Really?
00:07:07 - of people from across our society? Or are they more homogeneous settings in which we only encounter others who share our economic position? same levels of education, same levels of income, thereabouts. And, and, and if it, and distinguishing between the two, like the diverse and the non-diverse, the homogeneous or the heterogeneous setting, how does that, how does that impact the way that we come to understand our society? I am, drawn here on a, very large data set that I kind of put together, from two sources. one is a, a survey called the Freshmen Survey,
00:07:51 - that are asked to students in their first year, often around freshman orientation, really at the beginning of their college trajectory. and, and then I have another, questionnaire that is asked to those very same students about four years later, before they graduate college. and there's a few questions that are repeated such that I can directly compare people's responses, right, as they're starting their college journey and their responses by the time they graduate. So I can look at, whether people kind of hold onto their init initial beliefs

"Examining Belief Changes in Inequality: The Impact of College Roommate Dynamics on Students' Perspectives"

00:08:30 - And specifically I'm interested in, their views about inequality. So there's two dimensions to this. One is, do they believe that, the United States is a society where, working hard is, is rewarded? And, and that's what, what, what leads to success? And do they believe that, racial discrimination is, a major problem, in their society, contemporarily, or if, if that's the thing of the past? so I'm looking at basically belief change in those two, important views, about American society. It's about 150,000 students across about four to 500 universities, really, across the country.
00:09:13 - private universities, they're also public universities. They're, they're also much less selective universities. But what they all share is, they, they have a, a they provide a, a, a campus experience. And oftentimes, most ca cases students are living on campus as well. So what I'm looking at then is, first of all, how does the, overall kind of composition of the student body, so who, are attending this college, how does that influence people's beliefs? And, and can that account for the belief change that, that I observe? And then specifically, I'm looking at one aspect of the,
00:09:54 - that a person has in college. so oftentimes in the first year, students are more or less, randomly assigned to a student, or there may be a particular algorithm or particular approach that the administrators take. But the important, the important thing is that students themselves tend to have no or very little say in who gets to be their roommate. now, later they can, they can often, provide their preferences and, and, and roommate configurations change. But, but there's an important aspect to who, people room with that is beyond their control. And that makes it a really interesting, variable in, in my analysis. so, so that's the one I really zoom in on.
00:10:35 - I'm looking at whether over those four years of, of college, whether, students find themselves in a roommate situation with someone from a different ethnic or ratio group from their own, and whether that really has an impact on their beliefs about the inequality. Now, what do I find? I find evidence, pretty much in, in, in line with what I, what I hypothesize, but with some really, really important, and, and, and, and, problematic, really, unexpected findings. So the general pattern is that, over the four years of college, students tend
00:11:18 - generally, they become more critical of the notion that racial discrimination is a thing of the past, and they become less believing that, success is, is something that you can make, that, that, that, that hard work is always rewarded in society. so that's a general trend, but I find it really, really, really matters what kind of college you go to specifically who your, we interact with in that college. And it really, really matters who your roommate is. So generally, if you are exposed to, a person from a different ethnic and racial group through your roommate, configuration, and, and, and I, and I argue that this is not just kind of,
00:12:00 - or interaction, you know, this is a person you really get to know because you're sharing a space with them, often for, for an extended period. So it's through that, experience I find in my research that people tend to become, less believing in meritocracy. So there's something in that experience, and less believing that racial discrimination is a problem of the past. So there's something in that experience that, that sort of, inter-ethnic interracial, encounter and, and, and, and extended, contact that people, that makes people, lose, some of their faith in meritocracy and become more, more critical, about the state

"Challenging Meritocracy: The Impact of Interracial Roommate Experiences on Beliefs About Inequality in College Settings"

00:12:41 - Now, this is something that in a way, could be a good thing. if you, to the extent that people have kind of misperceptions and underestimate inequality in their society, it, it, it could be very welcome for them to have something kind of correct that misperception and actually, start to see society really for what it's right. That's, that's sort of perhaps what I was, I was hoping to find as a, as a sociologist concerned about, about inequalities. Now, what I find, though, is that this general pattern is especially true, for ethnic and racial minorities. So it's their exposure to a white roommate that makes them,
00:13:25 - and, and especially, critical of the state of racial inequality in their society, looking just at white students. However, I still find evidence of, of them losing faith in meritocracy, but it's not, by any means as large of an effect as I find for ethnic and racial minorities. So I find very minimal belief change among white students, and quite, quite big shifts in beliefs across ethnic and racial minorities, whereas, I suppose I would've maybe expected or even hoped to find the reverse, there's something in that, encounter that I think could be, eye-opening.
00:14:05 - to really get to know a person from kind of an older other different walk of life, and learn to start to empathize with that person, start to see the world through their eyes. but that same experience for, a, a person who is, in an ethnic or racial minority or who grew up poor for instance, could also be a very painful experience to be exposed and confronted with the privilege, of another person, to, to be reminded, and confronted with all the things that you, you didn't have that they took for granted. right. So there's something in that experience,
00:14:46 - and a catalyst for people to change their beliefs. I guess the first thing that I wanted to sort of, reflect on is do colleges, fulfill their kind of civic mission to pair students for, for, you know, life in American societies, in society, singular, do they, kind of, train the leaders of tomorrow? Right? These are kind of the mission statements of many, many colleges. and I find that, to the extent that they do expose students to, you know, a, a a a, a broad spectrum of society, cross-section, really,
00:15:28 - they are fulfilling their mission. But often, the reality is that that's not what the college campus resembles. That's not what the student body looks like. student bodies, tend to actually be much more, homogeneous, much less diverse than, American society at large. And as such university settings, colleges are actually, hindering people from really, seeing the society for what it is and are not, not quite, contributing to their or, or kind of, living up to the goal of preparing students, for, for, you know,
00:16:12 - or responsibilities, in American society. so that's the first thing that, that I, that I, looked at. The second is, and that's very, very, very current. what does something like the, the Supreme Court's ruling on affirmative action? What does that mean? Or, or, what would be the consequence of that in the light of my findings? and, and, and there, I'm, I'm really troubled because, my research suggests just, just how important, and, and kind of, you know, mind, mind changing, these experiences, across ethnic

"The Impact of Institutional Diversity on Beliefs About Inequality: A Call for Broader Research and Intervention"

00:16:51 - while at the same time, this ruling means that universities, colleges have fewer, tools and ways to create a more diverse, campus space. meaning that these, experiences are gonna be, fewer, not, not more, more frequent in, in the past. and, and the exactly the kind of belief change that I think could be, could be constructive, could be eye-opening, are likely to become, more rare. This is just, one study that looks at one particular setting, but a lot of people in the United States have not gone to college. in fact, we don't know where, where we're heading,
00:17:35 - institution in the future. So, it's really important to, I think, study other, settings, right? So I've mentioned the neighborhood as an important space and place in which people, learn about themselves and others. the same goes for the workplace, but maybe social networks more generally, both online networks and offline networks, is where, I think, we, we can, we can learn a lot, from what constitutes a person's social settings. Where do they draw their, their, their, understanding of their society from, and what are the particular experiences that are really,
00:18:16 - And what are the kind of turning points, where people may really come to reevaluate their views? Is indeed sort of their, adolescence, is that sort of the most important stage? do beliefs about inequality get formed even earlier? There are some research that shows that even small children have really strong, fairness beliefs, right? They can, they can, they can really feel that and sense that something is unjust, and they can also really pick up on, inequalities. Like, like they can recognize affluence, they can recognize poverty. So, so basically, did I look at the right stage of people's lives, or should we be looking earlier
00:18:56 - do they continue to be malleable? are people open to some extent to change their minds? Or, do people's beliefs kind of, you know, get stuck in place at some point? and that I think will really, really help. also think about, if we are concerned about people's, misunderstanding of equality, their underestimation of inequalities and such, if we're concerned about misinformation, misperceptions, and the likes, then where do we target our, our interventions? How can we de develop, I think, effective information campaigns? And by we, I mean, that could be a nonprofit organization
00:19:44 - could be government, it could be, could be any kind of body. But I think it's really, really important to, have this kind of research to, guide, those efforts.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Faculti

Popular in Sociology

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

Carceral Entrapments: Views from the Prison/Street Interface in India

Pre-problem families: predictive analytics and the future as the present

Were Muslim Barbarians Really Knocking On the Gates of Ontario?

Poor People’s Survival Strategies

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Contact Us

FAQs

What is Faculti?

How do you select interviews?

Interview Process

Page Structure

Popular in Sociology

Guide

Platform and Category Pages

Contact Us

FAQs

What is Faculti?

How do you select interviews?

Interview Process

Accessibility Options

Contrast Adjustment

Text Size Adjustment

Text Spacing Adjustment

Line Height Adjustment

Cursor Size Adjustment

Page Structure Options

Page Structure