Popular in Professional

Business

The Allegory of the Favela: The Multifaceted Effects of Socioeconomic Mobility

University of Pennsylvania Leandro S. Pongeluppe

Architecture

Connecting Cities and Nature

University of Virginia Timothy Beatley

Human Rights Law

Human Rights and Corruption: Problems and Potential of Individualising a Systemic Problem

Max Planck Institute Anne Peters

Finance

Chinese Exchange Rate Policy: Lessons for Global Investors

University of California San Diego Michael Melvin

Law

A statistical approach to law school citation rankings

University of Virginia Joshua Fischman

Education

Firm Performance Pay as Insurance against Promotion Risk

Stockholm School of Economics Alvin Chen

Ready to write? Investigating the writing experiences of pre-service teachers and their readiness to teach writing

View more insights in Professional - Education - Literacy, Language and Communication

View more figures from Curtin University

View the page of Paul Gardner

Read the Study

Next in Education

Posthumanist new materialist pathways for reimagining music education research

Pamela Burnard | University of Cambridge

The Future of Great Universities

Jonathan R. Cole | Columbia University

Paul Gardner discusses the pre-entry writing practices of first year Primary and Early Childhood Education (ECE) BEd students at one Australian university

Image courtesy of interviewee. May 27, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

The speaker discusses the decline in writing achievement over the years as evidenced by standardized national tests in various jurisdictions, including Australia and the United States. They express concern about the emphasis on transcriptional skills (grammar, spelling, punctuation) over compositional skills (creativity, audience engagement) due to these assessments.

The speaker highlights that many teachers and student teachers lack confidence in their writing abilities, which impacts their teaching effectiveness. A study involving over 1200 students revealed that a significant percentage (77%) felt trepidation about writing, with many not having engaged in key writing forms for years.

In response, an innovative curriculum was implemented in which student teachers kept private writing journals and responded to prompts without assessment pressure, allowing them to explore their identities as writers. This video video approach resulted in increased confidence and a rekindling of their love for writing, despite initial anxiety regarding the process.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of viewing children as writers, allowing them to write for personal enjoyment rather than solely for assessment. They argue for diverse audiences for student writing, as well as fostering opportunities for children to engage in writing freely. Overall, the speaker advocates for a shift in focus from formulaic writing and standardized metrics toward a more holistic understanding of writing as a creative and personal process.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.245 --> 00:03.485
A number of academics have found, that,

00:04.635 --> 00:07.325
when we look at, standardized, nationalized,

00:07.565 --> 00:08.845
standardized tests of writing,

00:09.615 --> 00:12.685
there has been a decline in achievement.

00:13.385 --> 00:18.205
Um, I mean, I, I did a study here in Australia of, r

00:18.605 --> 00:20.925
nationalized standardized testing, which is called naplan.

00:21.425 --> 00:24.565
You have SATs in the uk and in, in the US they have nep.

00:24.985 --> 00:27.925
Um, and across all these three jurisdictions,

00:28.465 --> 00:30.805
the same finding has occurred that according

00:30.825 --> 00:33.405
to these nationalized tests, the standard

00:33.405 --> 00:37.565
of writing has declined over a 10 to 12 year period.

00:38.505 --> 00:41.085
Um, so that's cause of concern,

00:41.305 --> 00:43.925
and we need to investigate why that is happening.

00:44.545 --> 00:48.805
Um, in my particular field, ha ha has been investigating,

00:49.465 --> 00:51.085
student teachers as writers

00:51.595 --> 00:53.765
because it, that may be a contributory

00:54.185 --> 00:55.565
factor to this decline.

00:56.035 --> 00:58.485
Okay. Well, I, I personally think that,

00:58.665 --> 01:00.525
and not, well, not just my personal view,

01:00.585 --> 01:03.325
but, a number of, researchers in writing

01:03.505 --> 01:05.405
and writing tends to be an, an area

01:05.465 --> 01:08.085
of the English curriculum that is under research.

01:08.435 --> 01:11.565
There's far more attention given to, to reading

01:11.625 --> 01:13.525
and particularly early reading than writing.

01:13.665 --> 01:15.205
So writing tends to be neglected.

01:15.505 --> 01:17.605
So there are relatively few of us actually

01:18.285 --> 01:19.725
investigating writing and, and,

01:19.745 --> 01:21.165
and the, the problems with writing.

01:21.745 --> 01:24.405
But from my perspective, what I see happening is that

01:24.405 --> 01:28.325
because we have these nationalized, standardized tests,

01:29.225 --> 01:33.805
there is a particular view of writing, that is,

01:34.075 --> 01:37.925
perpetuated that in my view is an erroneous view of writing.

01:38.465 --> 01:40.005
Uh, we can think of writing in terms

01:40.005 --> 01:42.925
of transcriptional skills and compositional skills,

01:43.425 --> 01:46.125
and we can think about, the role of the writer,

01:46.265 --> 01:47.405
the identity of the writer.

01:47.945 --> 01:50.605
Um, what tends to happen with nationalized tests,

01:51.305 --> 01:54.405
and particularly the allied tests around, grammar,

01:54.405 --> 01:56.405
punctuation, and spelling, is

01:56.405 --> 01:59.325
that the transcriptional skills tend to get privileged

01:59.655 --> 02:00.965
above compositional skills.

02:01.505 --> 02:02.525
And this is what's tested,

02:03.225 --> 02:06.045
and these are the things that, that tend to,

02:06.345 --> 02:07.765
get privileged in the classroom.

02:08.425 --> 02:09.525
Um, and both teachers

02:09.525 --> 02:12.965
and students have a concept of writing that is situated

02:12.965 --> 02:16.565
around these transcriptional skills rather than the more

02:16.595 --> 02:19.445
qualitative, compositional skills

02:19.585 --> 02:21.205
and the role of the writer and so on.

02:21.645 --> 02:22.805
I think it's both, actually.

02:22.925 --> 02:27.885
I think there's a, a long term tendency, to,

02:28.025 --> 02:31.885
to view writing in, in terms of writing as a product,

02:32.225 --> 02:36.005
and the, the, the processes of, of, of writing

02:36.745 --> 02:39.965
and the creativity of writing the effect that,

02:40.425 --> 02:44.125
we are trying to get students to, the effects

02:44.125 --> 02:46.765
that we're trying to, to encourage them, to create

02:47.305 --> 02:48.525
for an audience.

02:48.845 --> 02:51.485
I think those kind of things are tending to be neglected.

02:51.585 --> 02:54.765
And I think it's largely because, the majority

02:54.825 --> 02:56.045
of teachers are not writers.

02:57.025 --> 02:58.685
Um, the majority of teachers are

02:58.715 --> 03:00.565
Avid readers, but they don't write.

03:00.625 --> 03:03.645
And I recall going back, probably a decade or more,

03:04.065 --> 03:05.885
and when I would had a, you know,

03:05.945 --> 03:08.525
I'd have 150 students in front of me in a lecture theater,

03:08.865 --> 03:11.925
and I'd ask, how many of you,

03:12.425 --> 03:15.405
get pleasure in reading and, you know, be a forest of hands

03:15.985 --> 03:18.085
and ask the same question about writing?

03:18.195 --> 03:20.045
Well, there's, there's an issue around what we mean

03:20.045 --> 03:23.565
by pleasure, but, there would be maybe four

03:23.565 --> 03:25.165
or five hands went up.

03:25.745 --> 03:27.325
Um, and,

03:27.945 --> 03:31.125
and so I, I, I, I was keen to investigate what

03:32.005 --> 03:34.525
students were coming to university with in, in terms

03:34.525 --> 03:35.805
of their, their writing.

03:36.745 --> 03:40.885
And so, the, the paper that I'm about to talk about

03:41.725 --> 03:42.765
investigated that very thing.

03:43.205 --> 03:46.685
Probably the most, renowned person in this field is

03:46.915 --> 03:50.525
Theresa Kremin, and Deborah Myhill and,

03:50.585 --> 03:54.165
and those kind of people working from the Open University

03:54.745 --> 03:57.285
in the UK and, Exeter.

03:57.865 --> 04:01.125
Um, and they have done quite a lot of work

04:01.125 --> 04:02.245
around teachers as writers.

04:02.385 --> 04:03.485
That's been their focus.

04:04.265 --> 04:08.405
Um, and what they found was that, that teachers,

04:08.825 --> 04:10.045
the majority of teachers tend

04:10.045 --> 04:12.725
to have lack confidence in themselves as writers.

04:13.705 --> 04:17.125
And they instituted a number of programs,

04:17.835 --> 04:20.365
that demonstrated that once teachers are

04:20.365 --> 04:21.445
inside the writing process

04:21.585 --> 04:24.325
and they develop, greater confidence of themselves

04:24.345 --> 04:26.325
as writers, and that they improve their own writing.

04:26.945 --> 04:28.965
So I'm working from that kind of position

04:29.155 --> 04:30.805
with student teachers as writers.

04:31.625 --> 04:34.685
And what I found was, yes, exactly the same thing

04:34.715 --> 04:37.165
that student teachers came to university.

04:37.705 --> 04:39.845
Um, the vast majority of them,

04:39.875 --> 04:42.845
them lacked confidence in themselves as writers.

04:43.465 --> 04:47.285
So, there was a large study, that we did

04:47.745 --> 04:51.005
of over 1200 students,

04:51.425 --> 04:56.285
on NGT University, lacked confidence, 75%,

04:56.765 --> 05:01.485
actually, 77% of them, had trepidations about writing.

05:01.515 --> 05:03.845
They didn't really have full confidence in themselves

05:03.845 --> 05:07.005
as writers, and almost half of those had really

05:07.645 --> 05:09.245
negative views of themselves as writers.

05:09.705 --> 05:11.245
So if we work from that basis, and,

05:11.345 --> 05:13.925
and, we know that,

05:14.155 --> 05:17.285
that teachers teach well when they're enthusiastic about the

05:17.285 --> 05:18.645
subject they're teaching, and

05:18.645 --> 05:20.565
that has a positive effect on student learning.

05:21.105 --> 05:25.765
So if we're saying, 50 to 70% of, of, of our,

05:26.025 --> 05:27.325
beginning teachers

05:27.545 --> 05:30.525
or ongoing teachers lack confidence in themselves

05:30.525 --> 05:33.285
as writers, then it means that they're not

05:33.285 --> 05:34.525
inside that writing process.

05:34.635 --> 05:36.885
They don't understand the writing process, and

05:36.885 --> 05:38.325
therefore that that's bound

05:38.325 --> 05:41.205
to have an impact on their ability to teach writing.

05:41.785 --> 05:46.205
And my view is you wouldn't send a a, a a, you know,

05:46.285 --> 05:48.685
a guitar teacher into school,

05:48.795 --> 05:50.405
without knowing how to play the guitar.

05:50.905 --> 05:54.005
So I think we should be sending teachers into schools

05:54.145 --> 05:56.805
to teach writing who have an insider view of writing.

05:57.235 --> 05:59.685
They understand what writing means,

06:00.465 --> 06:02.685
how you use language to create particular effects.

06:03.185 --> 06:06.645
Uh, and, and, and if they have greater confidence in

06:06.645 --> 06:09.325
themselves as writer writers, they're likely

06:09.325 --> 06:10.845
to have greater efficacy in

06:10.845 --> 06:12.325
themselves as teachers of writing.

06:12.745 --> 06:15.445
So that, that basically is the thesis. Yeah, sure.

06:15.825 --> 06:19.205
So one of the things we asked them was, about the,

06:19.265 --> 06:21.125
the kinds of writing that they had

06:21.125 --> 06:22.245
done over a period of time.

06:22.425 --> 06:25.365
So we, we sort of identified various,

06:25.835 --> 06:29.165
text types ranging from digital texts, like emails

06:29.465 --> 06:33.445
and texting, writing of lists, writing reports,

06:34.005 --> 06:35.925
recounts, persuasive writing, poetry,

06:35.925 --> 06:37.405
narrative writing, and so on.

06:38.105 --> 06:41.885
And we basically asked them, well,

06:42.155 --> 06:45.405
when was the last time you wrote in these particular forms?

06:45.715 --> 06:48.925
Well, as you might expect, all those digital forms,

06:49.275 --> 06:53.085
were very recent, you know, within the day sometimes

06:53.185 --> 06:54.485
or within the week, and so on

06:54.485 --> 06:56.445
and so forth, particularly with, texting

06:56.625 --> 06:58.205
and social media,

06:58.945 --> 07:02.445
and emails, lists was quite high, on the list.

07:03.025 --> 07:07.085
Um, but then when we got to those kind of, texts

07:07.115 --> 07:11.005
that they needed to be able to teach in the classroom, such

07:11.045 --> 07:13.925
as narrative writing, persuasive writing,

07:14.035 --> 07:15.205
informational text

07:15.505 --> 07:19.445
and poetry, we found that,

07:20.655 --> 07:24.605
quite high numbers, between 40 to 70%,

07:25.155 --> 07:26.965
over 70% in the case of poetry

07:27.825 --> 07:31.165
had not written in those forms for more than two years.

07:31.745 --> 07:34.165
And a number of students had not written in those forms

07:34.385 --> 07:35.925
for a significantly longer.

07:36.045 --> 07:38.805
I mean, there was one student who'd not written a narrative

07:38.805 --> 07:42.245
or a poem for 20 years, obviously a mature student, but,

07:42.625 --> 07:44.565
but that was not atypical, you know?

07:44.705 --> 07:48.805
So, quite a number had not written,

07:48.905 --> 07:51.245
in those forms for six to 10 years.

07:51.875 --> 07:54.845
Well, if we add on a four year teaching degree to that,

07:55.355 --> 07:58.365
then we are talking at least a decade for quite a number of

07:58.885 --> 07:59.885
students going into the school.

08:00.145 --> 08:02.285
And some students had never written a poem, for example.

08:03.065 --> 08:07.205
Um, so the question there is how can you go in

08:07.425 --> 08:12.205
and teach confidently if you have not had,

08:12.385 --> 08:15.365
recent experience of writing those particular forms?

08:15.715 --> 08:18.125
Yeah. So what we decided to do, we used that,

08:18.235 --> 08:21.085
that information then to change our curriculum.

08:21.585 --> 08:25.325
So we created a year, one English unit

08:25.865 --> 08:28.885
in which we positioned all our students as writers.

08:29.465 --> 08:34.165
And by that I mean, what we did was we, we, we asked 'em

08:34.165 --> 08:36.605
to keep a writing journal, which was gonna be private

08:36.665 --> 08:38.845
to them, so we wouldn't see it.

08:38.845 --> 08:40.325
It wasn't going to be assessed or anything like that.

08:40.945 --> 08:43.805
Um, but week on week, we gave them writing prompts.

08:44.875 --> 08:47.935
Um, they didn't have to use these writing prompts, but they

08:48.175 --> 08:50.335
provided, you know, a default position as it were.

08:50.555 --> 08:54.495
Anyway, so they created the, we, they, they, they,

08:54.505 --> 08:56.685
wrote in response to these writing prompts

08:56.685 --> 08:59.085
or some other prompt that they, they wanted to adopt.

08:59.385 --> 09:02.725
So by the end of the unit, they had 10 pieces of writing.

09:03.185 --> 09:05.765
We then asked them to polish three pieces of writing.

09:06.225 --> 09:08.685
And their final assessment was around,

09:08.915 --> 09:10.685
what they learned about themselves as writers,

09:11.075 --> 09:15.005
what they learned about the compositional process rather,

09:15.585 --> 09:18.645
and how that knowledge of themselves as writers

09:19.305 --> 09:23.565
and the writing process, came together to inform

09:23.985 --> 09:26.965
how they thought they would teach writing in the classroom.

09:27.625 --> 09:30.925
Um, at the outset, we asked them,

09:30.925 --> 09:32.325
sorry, not at the outset.

09:32.785 --> 09:37.045
At the end of this, process, we asked them,

09:37.345 --> 09:40.165
how they had felt when we, told them

09:40.235 --> 09:41.845
that we were gonna position them as writers,

09:42.225 --> 09:44.365
and they were gonna write creatively over,

09:44.585 --> 09:45.645
the course of the semester.

09:46.765 --> 09:50.665
And, the vast majority of them, felt anxious,

09:50.815 --> 09:52.385
nervous, trepidatious.

09:52.965 --> 09:54.025
Um, very few

09:54.025 --> 09:56.705
of them were really excited about this, this prospect.

09:57.285 --> 10:01.105
Um, however, at the end of, of this process,

10:01.685 --> 10:03.985
we then interviewed,

10:03.985 --> 10:05.505
it was a relatively small scale staff.

10:05.645 --> 10:08.745
We interviewed a number of, students,

10:08.845 --> 10:12.905
to get their feedback on, on the whole experience

10:12.905 --> 10:14.105
of being positioned as writers.

10:14.445 --> 10:16.105
We interviewed about half a dozen students,

10:16.525 --> 10:19.385
and this was, we interviewed them the semester

10:19.385 --> 10:23.025
after they'd done, that particular, piece of work,

10:23.025 --> 10:25.505
because of course, some of that work was assessed,

10:25.645 --> 10:30.185
and we didn't want our, our interviews to kind of taint the,

10:30.205 --> 10:32.225
the assessment process so they,

10:32.225 --> 10:34.025
they'd had their marks back and all the rest of it.

10:34.525 --> 10:38.265
Um, and so, we, we interviewed these students

10:38.725 --> 10:41.505
and they were all, I mean,

10:41.505 --> 10:42.905
it might have been our selection of, or,

10:42.905 --> 10:46.985
or they were self-selecting in fact, which may have,

10:47.245 --> 10:49.225
may have an impact on, on findings.

10:49.405 --> 10:51.585
But nevertheless, these students were very positive

10:51.585 --> 10:52.665
about the whole experience.

10:53.045 --> 10:56.465
And they did say that they had felt, slightly nervous,

10:57.205 --> 11:00.105
and trepidatious about doing this activity.

11:00.325 --> 11:04.785
So they did kind of match with the, the majority, at,

11:04.805 --> 11:05.945
at the beginning of the process.

11:06.765 --> 11:11.205
But, so in one instance,

11:11.265 --> 11:15.885
for example, a student said, it has enabled me

11:15.905 --> 11:17.525
to rekindle my love of writing.

11:18.185 --> 11:22.045
And this student had talked about how, writing

11:22.105 --> 11:24.605
for her at school had been very formulaic.

11:25.265 --> 11:30.205
Um, so it wasn't, wasn't a pleasurable thing, but, she

11:30.205 --> 11:32.485
and a number of other students, said

11:32.485 --> 11:34.965
that they wrote at home quite a lot,

11:34.965 --> 11:36.605
particularly when they're in primary school.

11:36.665 --> 11:38.645
And they used to write stories and used to, so

11:38.645 --> 11:39.965
that was their passion in writing.

11:40.945 --> 11:43.685
School, writing was formulaic and dull,

11:43.865 --> 11:45.725
and they had very little control of it,

11:45.905 --> 11:48.165
but at home, they had much greater freedom

11:48.185 --> 11:49.445
of choice in terms of

11:49.445 --> 11:51.085
what they could write about when they wrote,

11:51.265 --> 11:53.285
how long they took to write, and so on and so forth.

11:53.825 --> 11:56.725
Um, and another study I did on reluctant writers a number

11:56.725 --> 12:00.085
of years ago, I looked at,

12:00.525 --> 12:03.085
reluctant writers from year one to year four.

12:03.105 --> 12:06.725
And this was, this was in England across 19 primary schools.

12:07.495 --> 12:10.595
Um, and what I found was that these children

12:10.655 --> 12:12.875
who were de deemed to be reluctant writers in,

12:12.895 --> 12:17.485
in the school, 98% of them were writing at home.

12:18.305 --> 12:22.325
Um, and so what I deduce from what that was, they had,

12:22.395 --> 12:24.605
they had kind of split writer identities.

12:24.755 --> 12:26.205
They had a school writer identity,

12:26.505 --> 12:27.805
but a home writer identity.

12:28.625 --> 12:31.965
And, the same kind of things emerged from that study.

12:32.025 --> 12:34.925
It was, you know, they had, parents who,

12:35.155 --> 12:37.325
with their audience or their peers or,

12:37.465 --> 12:38.605
or sorry, their siblings

12:38.945 --> 12:42.205
or, in some instances their neighbors.

12:42.625 --> 12:43.885
So they had already made audience.

12:43.885 --> 12:46.765
Whereas in school, often the audience for the child

12:46.825 --> 12:48.285
as a writer is the teacher.

12:49.175 --> 12:51.995
And writing is something that you give the teacher

12:52.295 --> 12:53.555
and you get feedback on it.

12:53.895 --> 12:55.795
So you're constantly being assessed on your writing.

12:55.965 --> 12:58.915
There was no kind of freedom to, to actually write,

12:59.575 --> 13:00.995
for the sake of writing.

13:01.815 --> 13:04.275
Um, and that's what came from these students.

13:04.425 --> 13:05.755
They all talked about writing,

13:05.765 --> 13:07.635
being very formulaic in school.

13:07.985 --> 13:09.795
They didn't enjoy school writing.

13:10.535 --> 13:15.035
Um, but by being positioned as writers in this unit

13:15.575 --> 13:16.755
and being given the freedom

13:16.895 --> 13:19.355
to write in whatever way they wanted,

13:19.555 --> 13:21.515
'cause we didn't stipulate on any text type.

13:21.515 --> 13:22.595
We just gave them a prompt

13:23.095 --> 13:25.355
and told 'em they could write whatever they wanted

13:25.375 --> 13:26.595
and whatever way they wanted,

13:26.945 --> 13:29.355
however much they wanted, and so on and so forth.

13:29.895 --> 13:32.955
And of course, some, some prompts would've captured their

13:32.955 --> 13:34.115
imagination more than others.

13:34.175 --> 13:35.515
And that, that, that was fine.

13:36.255 --> 13:40.995
Um, but they talked about how that freedom to write,

13:41.815 --> 13:45.795
a a kind, a broader, broader kind of joy,

13:46.295 --> 13:48.395
and fulfillment.

13:48.535 --> 13:50.955
And they, they,

13:51.625 --> 13:54.235
realigned their thinking about themselves as writers.

13:54.695 --> 13:55.995
And they all talked about how,

13:56.495 --> 13:58.955
how much more confident they found as writers at the end

13:58.955 --> 14:01.115
of the process than, than at the beginning.

14:01.855 --> 14:06.415
Now, what we don't know, of course, is will that, will

14:06.415 --> 14:07.495
that be sustained?

14:07.815 --> 14:09.615
'cause this was the first year of their course.

14:09.685 --> 14:11.295
They've got three more years to go,

14:11.795 --> 14:13.735
and then of course they're into, into schools.

14:14.285 --> 14:15.495
Will that be sustained?

14:15.675 --> 14:18.335
And, and will they take that into their, their teaching?

14:18.995 --> 14:20.655
Um, and,

14:20.675 --> 14:23.295
and the problem here is I think that there is a kind

14:23.295 --> 14:26.415
of cycle that if school writing is formulaic

14:26.755 --> 14:27.935
and our students are coming

14:28.035 --> 14:32.295
to us in initial teacher education with that kind of concept

14:32.435 --> 14:34.575
of themselves as writers, lacking confidence

14:34.805 --> 14:37.735
because they can't, or they, they dislike writing,

14:38.515 --> 14:41.535
but we change that maybe for a moment.

14:41.915 --> 14:44.695
Who knows, maybe, maybe it does have a long term effect,

14:45.115 --> 14:46.415
but they go back into schools

14:46.475 --> 14:49.575
and they go back into that environment of formulaic writing.

14:50.075 --> 14:53.645
And, and in many ways it's perhaps even more formulaic now

14:53.645 --> 14:57.485
because we've got commercial companies that are selling

14:57.995 --> 15:01.485
writing products to writing programs, to schools,

15:02.025 --> 15:03.565
and then it becomes a whole school policy.

15:03.795 --> 15:06.925
Everybody's got to adopt that, that policy, you know, that

15:06.925 --> 15:08.005
that program rather.

15:08.625 --> 15:12.685
And so there's this almost this cycle that we have,

15:12.995 --> 15:14.805
that I think is leading to greater

15:14.805 --> 15:17.085
and greater deterioration in the writing process.

15:17.395 --> 15:19.285
Okay. Well, my takeaway message is

15:19.635 --> 15:22.725
that this very formulaic approach, this attention,

15:22.745 --> 15:25.885
to detail in relation to transcriptional skills

15:26.425 --> 15:27.485
simply isn't working.

15:28.345 --> 15:32.285
And we need to think of, the student

15:32.425 --> 15:37.205
and the child as a writer and what it means to be a writer.

15:37.485 --> 15:39.085
I mean, I write poetry, for example.

15:39.705 --> 15:42.645
Um, if you ask me to, to, to write a poem here

15:42.645 --> 15:45.165
and now in front of you, I probably couldn't do it.

15:45.425 --> 15:47.845
But we are asking children to do that all of the time.

15:48.145 --> 15:49.765
You know, here's a little prompt.

15:50.185 --> 15:52.845
Uh, we want you to write this for the next 45 minutes.

15:53.625 --> 15:55.085
And there is no warmup.

15:55.085 --> 15:58.205
There is no, they're not able to draw on, on, funds

15:58.225 --> 15:59.285
of knowledge, for example.

15:59.945 --> 16:02.925
Um, but they have vast resources

16:03.465 --> 16:07.525
at if only we identify what those resources are and, and,

16:07.705 --> 16:09.885
and get them to realize what those resources are.

16:10.425 --> 16:14.725
Um, and, so I think focusing on the child

16:14.725 --> 16:16.205
as a writer is really important

16:16.305 --> 16:19.765
and developing their agency as a writer,

16:20.355 --> 16:22.605
eliciting the language that they already have,

16:23.585 --> 16:25.445
and showing them how they can use

16:25.445 --> 16:27.045
that language in powerful ways.

16:27.785 --> 16:31.285
Um, and then there seems to be a great emphasis on,

16:31.385 --> 16:34.485
on feeding vocabulary to children, which is fine,

16:35.305 --> 16:37.685
but vocabulary doesn't make you a good writer.

16:38.485 --> 16:41.805
I mean, Allwell, for example, said, don't go

16:41.885 --> 16:45.845
for long words, use plain language, but use it well.

16:46.505 --> 16:48.125
And I think that's what we should be doing

16:48.125 --> 16:50.445
with students identifying the language that they have

16:51.265 --> 16:54.405
and showing them how they can use that language

16:54.505 --> 16:57.685
for powerful effects to have an impact on the reader.

16:58.505 --> 17:00.565
Um, for example,

17:00.585 --> 17:03.325
we don't get children often talking about their writing

17:03.465 --> 17:05.525
or given the opportunity to talk about the writing

17:05.585 --> 17:06.765
or the writing of other children.

17:07.545 --> 17:10.005
Um, and as I said earlier on, the only audience

17:10.025 --> 17:13.165
for the a writer, child of writer is often the teacher.

17:13.825 --> 17:18.245
Um, and, and some teachers broaden that audience.

17:18.275 --> 17:19.965
They get 'em to write for other children,

17:20.075 --> 17:22.125
perhaps younger children, older children,

17:22.415 --> 17:26.005
which I've done in the past, or write for parents

17:26.305 --> 17:31.005
or write for the school, governing body or whoever.

17:31.585 --> 17:34.205
But they need different audiences for writers,

17:34.205 --> 17:37.965
for their writing, to give them a purpose to, to write,

17:38.625 --> 17:42.485
to have a view of, how they need to pitch language

17:42.545 --> 17:45.085
and the message to that particular audience.

17:45.745 --> 17:49.245
Um, and opportunities just

17:49.245 --> 17:50.845
to write for the sake of writing.

17:51.045 --> 17:53.805
I think, rather than it's always got to be assessed.

Decline of Writing Skills in Education

00:00:00 - A number of academics have found, that, when we look at, standardized, nationalized, standardized tests of writing, there has been a decline in achievement. I mean, I, I did a study here in Australia of, r nationalized standardized testing, which is called naplan. You have SATs in the uk and in, in the US they have nep. and across all these three jurisdictions, the same finding has occurred that according
00:00:33 - of writing has declined over a 10 to 12 year period. so that's cause of concern, and we need to investigate why that is happening. in my particular field, ha ha has been investigating, student teachers as writers because it, that may be a contributory factor to this decline. Okay. Well, I, I personally think that, and not, well, not just my personal view, but, a number of, researchers in writing
00:01:05 - of the English curriculum that is under research. There's far more attention given to, to reading and particularly early reading than writing. So writing tends to be neglected. So there are relatively few of us actually investigating writing and, and, and the, the problems with writing. But from my perspective, what I see happening is that because we have these nationalized, standardized tests, there is a particular view of writing, that is,
00:01:38 - we can think of writing in terms of transcriptional skills and compositional skills, and we can think about, the role of the writer, the identity of the writer. what tends to happen with nationalized tests, and particularly the allied tests around, grammar, punctuation, and spelling, is that the transcriptional skills tend to get privileged above compositional skills. And this is what's tested, and these are the things that, that tend to,
00:02:08 - and both teachers and students have a concept of writing that is situated around these transcriptional skills rather than the more qualitative, compositional skills and the role of the writer and so on. I think it's both, actually. I think there's a, a long term tendency, to, to view writing in, in terms of writing as a product, and the, the, the processes of, of, of writing
00:02:40 - we are trying to get students to, the effects that we're trying to, to encourage them, to create for an audience. I think those kind of things are tending to be neglected. And I think it's largely because, the majority of teachers are not writers. the majority of teachers are Avid readers, but they don't write. And I recall going back, probably a decade or more, and when I would had a, you know, I'd have 150 students in front of me in a lecture theater,

Teacher Confidence and Student Writing Outcomes

00:03:12 - get pleasure in reading and, you know, be a forest of hands and ask the same question about writing? Well, there's, there's an issue around what we mean by pleasure, but, there would be maybe four or five hands went up. and, and so I, I, I, I was keen to investigate what students were coming to university with in, in terms of their, their writing. And so, the, the paper that I'm about to talk about
00:03:43 - Probably the most, renowned person in this field is Theresa Kremin, and Deborah Myhill and, and those kind of people working from the Open University in the UK and, Exeter. and they have done quite a lot of work around teachers as writers. That's been their focus. and what they found was that, that teachers, the majority of teachers tend to have lack confidence in themselves as writers.
00:04:17 - that demonstrated that once teachers are inside the writing process and they develop, greater confidence of themselves as writers, and that they improve their own writing. So I'm working from that kind of position with student teachers as writers. And what I found was, yes, exactly the same thing that student teachers came to university. the vast majority of them, them lacked confidence in themselves as writers. So, there was a large study, that we did
00:04:51 - on NGT University, lacked confidence, 75%, actually, 77% of them, had trepidations about writing. They didn't really have full confidence in themselves as writers, and almost half of those had really negative views of themselves as writers. So if we work from that basis, and, and, we know that, that teachers teach well when they're enthusiastic about the subject they're teaching, and
00:05:21 - So if we're saying, 50 to 70% of, of, of our, beginning teachers or ongoing teachers lack confidence in themselves as writers, then it means that they're not inside that writing process. They don't understand the writing process, and therefore that that's bound to have an impact on their ability to teach writing. And my view is you wouldn't send a a, a a, you know, a guitar teacher into school,
00:05:50 - So I think we should be sending teachers into schools to teach writing who have an insider view of writing. They understand what writing means, how you use language to create particular effects. and, and, and if they have greater confidence in themselves as writer writers, they're likely to have greater efficacy in themselves as teachers of writing. So that, that basically is the thesis. Yeah, sure. So one of the things we asked them was, about the,

Assessing Recent Writing Experiences in Education

00:06:21 - done over a period of time. So we, we sort of identified various, text types ranging from digital texts, like emails and texting, writing of lists, writing reports, recounts, persuasive writing, poetry, narrative writing, and so on. And we basically asked them, well, when was the last time you wrote in these particular forms? Well, as you might expect, all those digital forms,
00:06:53 - or within the week, and so on and so forth, particularly with, texting and social media, and emails, lists was quite high, on the list. but then when we got to those kind of, texts that they needed to be able to teach in the classroom, such as narrative writing, persuasive writing, informational text and poetry, we found that,
00:07:25 - over 70% in the case of poetry had not written in those forms for more than two years. And a number of students had not written in those forms for a significantly longer. I mean, there was one student who'd not written a narrative or a poem for 20 years, obviously a mature student, but, but that was not atypical, you know? So, quite a number had not written, in those forms for six to 10 years.
00:07:55 - then we are talking at least a decade for quite a number of students going into the school. And some students had never written a poem, for example. so the question there is how can you go in and teach confidently if you have not had, recent experience of writing those particular forms? Yeah. So what we decided to do, we used that, that information then to change our curriculum. So we created a year, one English unit
00:08:29 - And by that I mean, what we did was we, we, we asked 'em to keep a writing journal, which was gonna be private to them, so we wouldn't see it. It wasn't going to be assessed or anything like that. but week on week, we gave them writing prompts. they didn't have to use these writing prompts, but they provided, you know, a default position as it were. Anyway, so they created the, we, they, they, they, wrote in response to these writing prompts
00:08:59 - So by the end of the unit, they had 10 pieces of writing. We then asked them to polish three pieces of writing. And their final assessment was around, what they learned about themselves as writers, what they learned about the compositional process rather, and how that knowledge of themselves as writers and the writing process, came together to inform how they thought they would teach writing in the classroom.

Student Writers: Anxiety and Rediscovery

00:09:30 - sorry, not at the outset. At the end of this, process, we asked them, how they had felt when we, told them that we were gonna position them as writers, and they were gonna write creatively over, the course of the semester. And, the vast majority of them, felt anxious, nervous, trepidatious. very few of them were really excited about this, this prospect. however, at the end of, of this process,
00:10:03 - it was a relatively small scale staff. We interviewed a number of, students, to get their feedback on, on the whole experience of being positioned as writers. We interviewed about half a dozen students, and this was, we interviewed them the semester after they'd done, that particular, piece of work, because of course, some of that work was assessed, and we didn't want our, our interviews to kind of taint the, the assessment process so they,
00:10:34 - and so, we, we interviewed these students and they were all, I mean, it might have been our selection of, or, or they were self-selecting in fact, which may have, may have an impact on, on findings. But nevertheless, these students were very positive about the whole experience. And they did say that they had felt, slightly nervous, and trepidatious about doing this activity. So they did kind of match with the, the majority, at,
00:11:06 - But, so in one instance, for example, a student said, it has enabled me to rekindle my love of writing. And this student had talked about how, writing for her at school had been very formulaic. so it wasn't, wasn't a pleasurable thing, but, she and a number of other students, said that they wrote at home quite a lot,
00:11:36 - And they used to write stories and used to, so that was their passion in writing. School, writing was formulaic and dull, and they had very little control of it, but at home, they had much greater freedom of choice in terms of what they could write about when they wrote, how long they took to write, and so on and so forth. and another study I did on reluctant writers a number of years ago, I looked at, reluctant writers from year one to year four. And this was, this was in England across 19 primary schools.
00:12:10 - who were de deemed to be reluctant writers in, in the school, 98% of them were writing at home. and so what I deduce from what that was, they had, they had kind of split writer identities. They had a school writer identity, but a home writer identity. And, the same kind of things emerged from that study. It was, you know, they had, parents who, with their audience or their peers or, or sorry, their siblings

Freedom in Writing: Breaking Formulaic Constraints

00:12:42 - So they had already made audience. Whereas in school, often the audience for the child as a writer is the teacher. And writing is something that you give the teacher and you get feedback on it. So you're constantly being assessed on your writing. There was no kind of freedom to, to actually write, for the sake of writing. and that's what came from these students. They all talked about writing, being very formulaic in school. They didn't enjoy school writing.
00:13:15 - and being given the freedom to write in whatever way they wanted, 'cause we didn't stipulate on any text type. We just gave them a prompt and told 'em they could write whatever they wanted and whatever way they wanted, however much they wanted, and so on and so forth. And of course, some, some prompts would've captured their imagination more than others. And that, that, that was fine. but they talked about how that freedom to write,
00:13:46 - and fulfillment. And they, they, realigned their thinking about themselves as writers. And they all talked about how, how much more confident they found as writers at the end of the process than, than at the beginning. Now, what we don't know, of course, is will that, will that be sustained? 'cause this was the first year of their course. They've got three more years to go, and then of course they're into, into schools.
00:14:15 - And, and will they take that into their, their teaching? and, and the problem here is I think that there is a kind of cycle that if school writing is formulaic and our students are coming to us in initial teacher education with that kind of concept of themselves as writers, lacking confidence because they can't, or they, they dislike writing, but we change that maybe for a moment. Who knows, maybe, maybe it does have a long term effect,
00:14:46 - and they go back into that environment of formulaic writing. And, and in many ways it's perhaps even more formulaic now because we've got commercial companies that are selling writing products to writing programs, to schools, and then it becomes a whole school policy. Everybody's got to adopt that, that policy, you know, that that program rather. And so there's this almost this cycle that we have, that I think is leading to greater and greater deterioration in the writing process.
00:15:19 - that this very formulaic approach, this attention, to detail in relation to transcriptional skills simply isn't working. And we need to think of, the student and the child as a writer and what it means to be a writer. I mean, I write poetry, for example. if you ask me to, to, to write a poem here and now in front of you, I probably couldn't do it. But we are asking children to do that all of the time.

Empowering Young Writers Through Authentic Experiences

00:15:50 - we want you to write this for the next 45 minutes. And there is no warmup. There is no, they're not able to draw on, on, funds of knowledge, for example. but they have vast resources at if only we identify what those resources are and, and, and get them to realize what those resources are. and, so I think focusing on the child as a writer is really important and developing their agency as a writer,
00:16:23 - and showing them how they can use that language in powerful ways. and then there seems to be a great emphasis on, on feeding vocabulary to children, which is fine, but vocabulary doesn't make you a good writer. I mean, Allwell, for example, said, don't go for long words, use plain language, but use it well. And I think that's what we should be doing with students identifying the language that they have
00:16:54 - for powerful effects to have an impact on the reader. for example, we don't get children often talking about their writing or given the opportunity to talk about the writing or the writing of other children. and as I said earlier on, the only audience for the a writer, child of writer is often the teacher. and, and some teachers broaden that audience. They get 'em to write for other children, perhaps younger children, older children,
00:17:51 - or write for the school, governing body or whoever. But they need different audiences for writers, for their writing, to give them a purpose to, to write, to have a view of, how they need to pitch language and the message to that particular audience. and opportunities just to write for the sake of writing. I think, rather than it's always got to be assessed.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis