There Was Nothing There

Key Question Being Explored in This Insight:

Sara Martucci draws on four decades of residents’ memories and experiences, providing insights into the tensions, contradictions, and inequalities brought about by gentrification.

View the page of: Sara Martucci

Institution: City University of New York

Explore more insights in:

Books Social Identities and Divisions Social Sciences Sociology

Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider ▼

What assumptions does the research make?
Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness ▼

This research comes from City University of New York . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Further Reading ▼

Read the Study

Sara Martucci draws on four decades of residents’ memories and experiences, providing insights into the tensions, contradictions, and inequalities brought about by gentrification.

Image courtesy of interviewee. March 25, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video video discusses the gentrification of Williamsburg, Brooklyn, detailing its evolution from a working-class immigrant neighborhood to a trendy area dominated by luxury developments. The speaker shares personal experiences from living in Williamsburg between 2008 and 2018 and highlights the dynamics of gentrification, including its impact on long-term residents and the cultural changes in the neighborhood.

The speaker identifies three types of resident attachment: **necessity attachment**, where residents moved in out of need; **identity attachment**, where residents feel a cultural connection to the neighborhood's artistic vibe; and **investment attachment**, where new residents seek trendy environments for their potential financial value.

The effects of gentrification include rising rents, cultural displacement, and altered social interactions, leading to some long-term residents feeling alienated. Research methods included interviews, archival research, and community observations to reveal these dynamics. The speaker emphasizes the need to understand neighborhood attachments to address the complex realities of gentrification, urging readers to consider their narratives about neighborhoods and recognize the diverse histories and memories they embody. The book ultimately aims to foster a deeper understanding of attachment and belonging within urban sociology.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.225 --> 00:02.085
In some ways, Williamsburg is kind

00:02.085 --> 00:03.845
of the prototype of gentrification.

00:04.635 --> 00:07.205
It's certainly not the first case of gentrification.

00:07.235 --> 00:10.005
It's not even the first case of gentrification in Brooklyn.

00:10.625 --> 00:11.845
Um, but the story,

00:12.475 --> 00:15.205
it's a working class immigrant neighborhood.

00:15.205 --> 00:16.645
It's an industrial neighborhood,

00:17.185 --> 00:21.845
and it gets discovered by 20 somethings who are musicians,

00:21.955 --> 00:23.485
artists, bohemians,

00:24.565 --> 00:26.625
and then it gets turned into their playground

00:26.645 --> 00:29.465
for a few years because it's cheap and there's lots of space

00:29.685 --> 00:31.065
and it's gritty and aesthetic.

00:31.965 --> 00:33.425
Um, and then it gets too cool.

00:33.885 --> 00:36.145
And then Uhoh, the developers come

00:36.965 --> 00:40.025
and, they're ready to package up all

00:40.025 --> 00:41.345
that cultural cachet

00:41.345 --> 00:45.265
and sell it in the form of luxury development developments,

00:45.265 --> 00:46.385
luxury condos.

00:46.885 --> 00:49.305
And then in comes Sephora and Whole Foods.

00:49.855 --> 00:52.825
It's a very cliche story on the surface,

00:53.725 --> 00:55.665
but that's part of what makes it so good

00:55.925 --> 00:58.665
as a comparison case for gentrification.

00:59.735 --> 01:03.155
Um, I was living in Williamsburg at a time when the

01:03.155 --> 01:04.515
gentrification was really heating up.

01:04.775 --> 01:06.475
Um, I started living there in 2008,

01:06.855 --> 01:09.835
and I studied the neighborhood from then until 2018.

01:11.365 --> 01:14.515
There were already many rich historical

01:14.655 --> 01:17.235
and sociological accounts of Williamsburg,

01:17.615 --> 01:19.355
but the pace of gentrification there

01:19.355 --> 01:21.235
and the dynamics of gentrification there,

01:21.715 --> 01:24.755
I felt like necessitated a deeper dive into

01:25.105 --> 01:26.715
what was going on and updating

01:26.935 --> 01:30.285
of the existing accounts at the same time.

01:30.865 --> 01:33.005
Um, it's a great comparison case

01:33.005 --> 01:36.885
because it is so relevant around the world.

01:37.565 --> 01:39.365
I would travel and I would see,

01:39.525 --> 01:41.765
a thrift store named Williamsburg in Madrid,

01:42.045 --> 01:44.125
I would see somebody wearing a T-shirt

01:44.195 --> 01:46.805
that said Williamsburg in the Sahara Desert.

01:47.125 --> 01:50.645
I mean, the name Williamsburg was becoming something that

01:51.665 --> 01:54.405
was emulated around the world.

01:54.585 --> 01:56.285
At one point there was even an app called

01:56.335 --> 01:57.525
Where is Williamsburg?

01:58.105 --> 01:59.485
And you could download on your phone,

01:59.505 --> 02:01.685
you could look at any city you are in

02:01.685 --> 02:03.005
hundreds of cities around the world.

02:03.345 --> 02:06.005
What's the Williamsburg neighborhood of

02:06.005 --> 02:08.645
that city based on the boutiques and the bars

02:08.785 --> 02:12.405
and, coffee shops that were local to that area.

02:13.105 --> 02:16.245
So it just felt like it was, it was a larger than life

02:17.055 --> 02:20.225
reputation, but at the ground level,

02:20.435 --> 02:21.865
there was so much more to it.

02:22.325 --> 02:24.585
Um, the everyday dynamics of the people

02:24.585 --> 02:26.585
who lived in the neighborhood on a micro

02:26.595 --> 02:28.345
level, I was living there.

02:28.465 --> 02:30.065
I was walking that neighborhood every day.

02:30.545 --> 02:33.025
I saw how every new floor

02:33.025 --> 02:36.505
of construction in a luxury building, every business

02:36.505 --> 02:38.665
that disappeared from the local shopping street,

02:39.205 --> 02:41.745
how those mattered to the people who lived there,

02:42.605 --> 02:45.265
how the interactions started changing in the neighborhood,

02:45.445 --> 02:49.905
how places started being labeled sketchy or unwanted.

02:50.485 --> 02:53.265
Um, and so it made me wanna tell as full a story

02:53.285 --> 02:56.425
as possible about what was going on in that neighborhood

02:56.425 --> 02:59.475
because it was to some people, the epitome

02:59.475 --> 03:00.635
of cool to other people.

03:00.795 --> 03:04.595
A shining example of, how to develop a neighborhood

03:04.695 --> 03:06.035
for luxury and for wealth.

03:06.695 --> 03:10.195
Um, and if it was being copied in cities around the world,

03:10.795 --> 03:13.075
I wanted to make sure that we had a better idea of

03:13.075 --> 03:14.355
what was going on,

03:14.455 --> 03:15.635
and understanding how it was

03:15.635 --> 03:16.955
impacting the people that lived there.

03:17.505 --> 03:20.475
This was an ethnography that I began when I was 22.

03:20.795 --> 03:23.115
I was taking my first urban sociology class.

03:23.715 --> 03:24.955
I didn't really know what I was doing.

03:25.155 --> 03:26.835
I was walking around this neighborhood.

03:26.875 --> 03:29.115
I had just moved to, I was observing things,

03:29.195 --> 03:31.435
I was writing things down, I was taking pictures.

03:32.295 --> 03:34.395
Um, but obviously it evolved into something

03:34.395 --> 03:35.555
much larger than that.

03:35.815 --> 03:39.235
Um, it evolved into a multi methods project,

03:39.235 --> 03:40.315
that was very iterative.

03:41.355 --> 03:43.435
I interviewed 50 residents

03:43.655 --> 03:46.715
and 10 business owners in over the course of the project

03:47.335 --> 03:50.075
and another few people, in 2020

03:50.075 --> 03:52.435
because the pandemic hit New York City really hard.

03:52.495 --> 03:55.715
And Williamsburg, was certainly suffering from that.

03:56.535 --> 03:58.715
And so I was continuing to sort

03:58.715 --> 04:00.795
of pull at the different threads and,

04:00.855 --> 04:02.955
and themes going on in the neighborhood over time.

04:04.035 --> 04:05.395
I was also really conscious

04:05.415 --> 04:07.315
of triangulating the data, right?

04:07.315 --> 04:09.355
Neighborhoods, gentrification is such

04:09.355 --> 04:10.475
an emotional topic for us.

04:10.475 --> 04:12.675
Neighborhoods are so important to us,

04:13.055 --> 04:15.835
and the stories that we tell about them are bound up in

04:15.945 --> 04:18.355
nostalgia and identity and memories.

04:19.135 --> 04:22.515
And so people would say things in an interview like,

04:22.635 --> 04:24.515
I moved to the neighborhood in 1988,

04:24.735 --> 04:26.715
and it was a no man's land.

04:26.715 --> 04:29.595
There was nothing there where the title comes from, right?

04:30.215 --> 04:31.835
Um, there were no stores.

04:31.955 --> 04:33.475
There was nowhere to get a cup of coffee.

04:34.415 --> 04:37.635
And then I, that, that kind of comment would send me

04:37.635 --> 04:38.675
to the New York Public Library

04:38.935 --> 04:41.155
for weeks looking at archives of businesses.

04:41.815 --> 04:45.395
And I would find out, actually there were 80 businesses on

04:45.395 --> 04:47.675
that street within one mile in 1988.

04:48.415 --> 04:53.015
And they may not have been places for you to buy records

04:53.315 --> 04:55.575
or sit down and have a cup of coffee at a cafe,

04:56.275 --> 04:58.295
but they were businesses that were serving the needs

04:58.295 --> 04:59.375
of the local residents.

04:59.875 --> 05:02.655
And so the research process was really,

05:03.465 --> 05:05.815
about finding out what people's narratives were,

05:06.155 --> 05:09.975
but then looking at census data, doing a content analysis

05:09.975 --> 05:11.895
of news reports about the neighborhood,

05:11.895 --> 05:15.375
looking at archival data, observing community events

05:15.475 --> 05:17.575
to really try to triangulate all

05:17.575 --> 05:18.735
of the narratives that I was hearing.

05:19.515 --> 05:21.935
The effects of gentrification in Williamsburg have been

05:21.935 --> 05:23.655
massive, and it can't be overstated.

05:23.995 --> 05:27.175
Um, the waterfront is kind of the ground zero

05:27.275 --> 05:28.775
for gentrification in the neighborhood.

05:28.775 --> 05:30.735
It's kinda the most popular part of the neighborhood.

05:31.155 --> 05:34.135
And that area has been completely transformed to the extent

05:34.405 --> 05:37.735
that people who have lived there for 20, 30 years tell me

05:37.735 --> 05:39.495
that they get disoriented walking around.

05:39.725 --> 05:43.655
They don't have their normal, landscapes and,

05:43.655 --> 05:45.575
and areas that they would recognize.

05:46.595 --> 05:49.335
At the same time, when you move away from the waterfront,

05:49.715 --> 05:52.615
aside from a couple of main retail corridors,

05:52.835 --> 05:54.175
you can see that the development in the

05:54.175 --> 05:55.295
neighborhood has been very uneven.

05:55.835 --> 05:57.685
Um, there's still parts of the neighborhood

05:57.895 --> 06:00.685
where landlords are harassing rent stabilized tenants

06:00.825 --> 06:03.965
by not making the necessary repairs to buildings, parts

06:03.965 --> 06:06.445
of the neighborhood that still very much bear the scars

06:06.665 --> 06:09.565
of the city's disinvestment within from the

06:09.725 --> 06:11.205
1970s and the 1980s.

06:12.105 --> 06:15.765
Um, what was important to me was to consider

06:16.785 --> 06:19.205
how did the conditions of the neighborhood

06:19.505 --> 06:23.045
and the reasons that people moved to the neighborhood impact

06:23.425 --> 06:25.525
how they formed an attachment to the place.

06:25.625 --> 06:27.165
And that's really at the core of the book.

06:27.585 --> 06:31.125
How does that attachment map onto their experiences

06:31.125 --> 06:33.325
of Williamsburg, of gentrification, yes,

06:33.385 --> 06:36.845
but also of crime in the neighborhood of,

06:37.305 --> 06:40.205
retail changes in the neighborhood over time of

06:40.225 --> 06:42.725
how they engaged with the community through events,

06:42.825 --> 06:44.765
or through social movements within the neighborhood.

06:46.255 --> 06:48.435
By looking at attachment style, I was able

06:48.435 --> 06:50.555
to really pull out some nuances in

06:50.615 --> 06:52.315
how the changing neighborhood was

06:52.345 --> 06:53.835
perceived differently by people.

06:55.065 --> 06:57.405
So in sociology, when we're looking at gentrification,

06:57.855 --> 06:59.885
we're typically using race or ethnicity

07:00.225 --> 07:02.205
or socioeconomic status,

07:02.385 --> 07:04.845
as the main categories for people's identity.

07:05.905 --> 07:07.245
Um, and when we do that,

07:07.245 --> 07:08.805
those things are obviously very important

07:08.805 --> 07:11.765
for people's experiences of life, in urban places.

07:12.945 --> 07:16.485
But when we look to attachment style as an additional lens

07:16.625 --> 07:17.725
to view residents

07:17.785 --> 07:20.885
and to view their experiences, this reveals some important,

07:21.145 --> 07:22.885
things that I hadn't really seen in

07:22.885 --> 07:24.285
gentrification research before.

07:25.145 --> 07:26.885
So there's three different types of attachment

07:27.715 --> 07:29.045
that I've identified.

07:29.755 --> 07:32.685
Necessity attachment, which are residents who moved

07:32.685 --> 07:34.645
to Williamsburg out of necessity.

07:34.945 --> 07:37.205
Um, maybe they moved there through immigrant networks,

07:37.205 --> 07:41.195
maybe they moved there for jobs, in factories.

07:42.435 --> 07:43.845
They were living in this neighborhood.

07:43.955 --> 07:46.045
They could have moved to any other neighborhood

07:46.045 --> 07:47.125
where those things existed.

07:47.945 --> 07:51.575
And then the neighborhood got kind of weird in terms

07:51.575 --> 07:53.255
of the art and party scene

07:53.255 --> 07:54.935
that was going on there in the eighties and nineties.

07:55.155 --> 07:56.455
And then the neighborhood got fancy,

07:57.355 --> 07:58.695
and that's mostly all okay.

07:59.395 --> 08:01.375
Um, they just are kind of upset

08:01.375 --> 08:02.975
that they can no longer get the things

08:02.975 --> 08:04.255
that they need in the neighborhood

08:04.365 --> 08:07.015
that their children can't move within the neighborhood

08:08.695 --> 08:10.195
for the identity attached.

08:11.145 --> 08:12.275
That neighborhood is something

08:12.275 --> 08:15.115
that they discovered it was very important to who they are.

08:16.495 --> 08:18.795
The grittiness, the coolness, the danger

08:18.935 --> 08:21.875
or precarity that they felt in the neighborhood made it a

08:21.875 --> 08:24.395
place that bolstered their identities as bohemians,

08:24.395 --> 08:25.515
as avant gardes.

08:26.525 --> 08:28.225
And then there's the investment attached.

08:28.725 --> 08:31.265
So those are people mainly who were moving in, in the 2010s.

08:31.925 --> 08:34.305
To them, Williamsburg was too grungy.

08:34.565 --> 08:36.905
The grocery stores weren't up to their standards.

08:36.905 --> 08:37.945
There was graffiti,

08:38.405 --> 08:40.225
but it was a place that they could afford

08:40.225 --> 08:41.545
to buy luxury housing

08:42.805 --> 08:44.185
and that they were confident that

08:44.185 --> 08:46.425
that would increase in value, and it certainly did.

08:47.495 --> 08:49.275
So the book is called, there was Nothing There

08:49.275 --> 08:51.475
because everyone has said that at some point

08:52.835 --> 08:54.855
for the identity attached

08:55.085 --> 08:56.805
People, there was nothing there.

08:56.805 --> 08:59.485
When they got there, they discovered everything.

08:59.795 --> 09:01.485
They brought the cool to the neighborhood,

09:01.485 --> 09:02.965
they brought the culture to the neighborhood

09:03.865 --> 09:05.725
for the investment attached people.

09:06.055 --> 09:08.445
There was nothing in the neighborhood when,

09:08.445 --> 09:11.485
even when they were moving in, in the 2000, in the 2010s,

09:12.255 --> 09:14.965
which for a lot of people was kind of the decline already

09:14.985 --> 09:17.165
of the cool era of Williamsburg.

09:18.015 --> 09:20.435
But they saw nothing there until Whole Foods came,

09:20.445 --> 09:21.555
until Starbucks came.

09:22.335 --> 09:24.875
And now the necessity attached residents are the ones

09:24.875 --> 09:27.115
who are starting to say, there's nothing here for me.

09:27.305 --> 09:31.075
Because these businesses of necessity that they were used

09:31.075 --> 09:34.235
to, and the social groups that they had been part

09:34.235 --> 09:36.515
of are now starting to disappear from the neighborhood.

09:37.625 --> 09:40.365
So we have this assumption that the,

09:40.375 --> 09:41.925
those long-term residents in,

09:41.925 --> 09:43.405
in a classic gentrification work,

09:43.405 --> 09:45.205
the long-term residents are the ones

09:45.205 --> 09:46.885
who view gentrification the most negatively.

09:47.505 --> 09:49.045
But by looking at identity

09:49.345 --> 09:51.885
or by looking at attachment, what surprised me was

09:51.885 --> 09:54.685
that it wasn't those sort of old timers in the neighborhood.

09:54.985 --> 09:56.845
Um, the people who had moved there outta necessity.

09:56.845 --> 10:00.085
It wasn't them who were the most upset about gentrification.

10:00.705 --> 10:02.925
It was the identity attached residents, the ones

10:02.925 --> 10:04.885
who moved there to Williamsburg

10:04.885 --> 10:06.125
because of the artist's scene

10:06.125 --> 10:08.365
and what it meant to them and their identity.

10:09.835 --> 10:12.085
They were the ones who are the most bitter about

10:12.085 --> 10:14.965
gentrification, the necessity attached folks.

10:15.305 --> 10:17.245
Um, they've often lived there much longer.

10:17.835 --> 10:19.965
They see benefits of the changes.

10:20.075 --> 10:21.805
They see benefits of development,

10:22.115 --> 10:23.925
even though they're still largely critical of it.

10:24.065 --> 10:26.445
And they know people who have faced physical,

10:26.765 --> 10:29.365
displacement, from their homes.

10:30.515 --> 10:33.085
They still see more positive aspects

10:33.105 --> 10:34.725
of it than the identity attached.

10:34.745 --> 10:38.765
And so looking at these attachment styles kind of turns some

10:38.765 --> 10:40.605
of the narratives of gentrification.

10:41.645 --> 10:42.845
I won't say it turns it on its head,

10:42.845 --> 10:46.445
but it, it reveals some different patterns,

10:46.475 --> 10:49.725
that are worth examining more in other contexts.

10:50.725 --> 10:53.645
Cultural displacement is really at the core of this book.

10:53.825 --> 10:57.365
So the thing about gentrification in Williamsburg is

10:57.365 --> 11:00.285
that yes, the rents increased and people were pushed out.

11:00.825 --> 11:02.245
Um, but a huge proportion

11:02.245 --> 11:04.405
of the new residents are living in housing

11:04.405 --> 11:06.205
that just didn't exist 15 years ago.

11:06.345 --> 11:08.485
So the neighborhood had a huge population boom,

11:08.785 --> 11:11.525
but a lot of existing residents were also able to stay put.

11:11.525 --> 11:13.565
There's a lot of public housing in the neighborhood.

11:13.835 --> 11:16.285
There's a lot of rent control, home ownership.

11:17.135 --> 11:19.235
And so there's a lot of people who have been able

11:19.235 --> 11:21.275
to evade the physical displacement,

11:21.655 --> 11:24.235
but they've experienced cultural displacement.

11:25.185 --> 11:27.045
The stores are fancy and unaffordable.

11:27.505 --> 11:30.045
The public spaces have long lists of

11:30.045 --> 11:32.045
what behavior is and is not allowed.

11:32.795 --> 11:34.615
The area suddenly much more crowded.

11:35.065 --> 11:37.895
Store signage that used to be in Polish and Spanish

11:38.115 --> 11:40.295
and Italian has steadily decreased.

11:41.265 --> 11:44.365
And all of this adds up to a diminished sense

11:44.365 --> 11:47.925
of belonging in the neighborhood in the book.

11:48.185 --> 11:50.805
In terms of surveillance, I wasn't as much

11:51.345 --> 11:53.805
as much focused on policing,

11:53.825 --> 11:56.285
but rather informal surveillance by neighbors

11:56.385 --> 11:59.605
and how that sometimes did turn into policing,

11:59.705 --> 12:02.725
or state level surveillance comments about

12:02.905 --> 12:04.805
who should be at the public pool,

12:05.265 --> 12:07.285
an argument about the installation

12:07.285 --> 12:08.845
of barbecue pits in a public park

12:09.855 --> 12:12.205
investment attached residents were arguing

12:12.395 --> 12:15.005
that if they allowed barbecue pits

12:15.025 --> 12:19.725
to be installed in this public park, then the,

12:21.165 --> 12:23.485
existing residents, local families grilling in the park,

12:23.715 --> 12:26.565
were going to diminish their dogs experience

12:26.825 --> 12:28.205
of the park, right?

12:28.235 --> 12:29.925
That there would be less space for their dogs

12:30.145 --> 12:32.685
or that their dogs might eat trash

12:32.685 --> 12:35.685
that was left over from the barbecue, these narratives

12:35.985 --> 12:38.725
around who belongs in a space.

12:39.185 --> 12:40.445
Um, there was one example.

12:40.445 --> 12:43.205
There was one story of a young woman who had moved to the,

12:43.205 --> 12:45.325
to a neighborhood, part of the neighborhood,

12:45.475 --> 12:47.565
near a Puerto Rican music store

12:47.755 --> 12:49.325
that had been there for 40 years.

12:49.545 --> 12:50.805
And she lived there for a few months

12:50.985 --> 12:53.725
and she decided that the music was too loud,

12:54.025 --> 12:55.165
at the store.

12:55.225 --> 13:00.165
And so she called 3 1 1, which is, a non-emergency,

13:00.825 --> 13:02.405
hotline for New York City

13:02.405 --> 13:03.725
to make complaints about trash

13:03.725 --> 13:05.045
removal or something like that.

13:06.065 --> 13:08.125
And, she called this line

13:08.125 --> 13:11.365
and eventually these people, who owned the music store

13:11.365 --> 13:13.325
after being there for 40 years, they were ticketed.

13:13.325 --> 13:16.965
They were fined. So these ideas of

13:18.025 --> 13:20.995
the neighborhood culturally changing,

13:22.325 --> 13:23.665
and even when residents

13:23.665 --> 13:25.145
and businesses can stay,

13:26.015 --> 13:28.545
even when long-term establishments remain,

13:29.925 --> 13:33.025
how are the newer residents impacting their ability

13:33.205 --> 13:35.625
to feel like they belong in the neighborhood?

13:36.495 --> 13:38.515
Um, I recall another project I worked on,

13:38.695 --> 13:40.315
not in Williamsburg, but also in New York.

13:40.815 --> 13:44.195
Um, a business owner told me that she would inform,

13:44.195 --> 13:45.315
other shop owners

13:45.535 --> 13:48.555
or local security if she saw someone on the street

13:48.575 --> 13:50.235
who looked like they didn't belong there.

13:50.775 --> 13:53.315
So this was a totally subjective evaluation, right?

13:53.695 --> 13:56.275
So we make spaces where people feel like they don't belong,

13:56.495 --> 13:59.155
so they use them less, and then when they do show up,

13:59.155 --> 14:01.995
their presence is suspicious and worthy of surveillance.

14:03.245 --> 14:05.105
Um, and then that's viewed as a problem

14:05.205 --> 14:07.185
that's sometimes solved with law enforcement.

14:07.365 --> 14:10.705
So the cultural displacement, we can think

14:10.705 --> 14:14.825
of it just in terms of, of businesses, disappearing

14:15.085 --> 14:17.905
or, you know, something that was, a place

14:17.905 --> 14:19.345
where one group felt welcomed.

14:19.455 --> 14:20.545
They no longer feel welcomed,

14:20.605 --> 14:24.105
but it can actually, play out in the neighborhood

14:24.775 --> 14:28.825
into more severe contexts and, into surveillance and,

14:28.825 --> 14:31.825
and law enforcement for academic audiences.

14:31.885 --> 14:33.225
For the academic reader.

14:33.505 --> 14:36.585
I hope that they, read the methodology section,

14:36.725 --> 14:37.985
the appendix,

14:37.985 --> 14:39.305
because there were so much

14:40.015 --> 14:42.305
different methods going into this book,

14:42.325 --> 14:45.425
and I think it can really serve, as an example

14:45.645 --> 14:48.425
for people who are just starting out, doing this kind

14:48.425 --> 14:50.745
of big neighborhood case study. But

14:50.865 --> 14:52.565
I also really hope that this idea

14:52.665 --> 14:55.725
of neighborhood attachment, is something

14:55.725 --> 14:57.605
that gets picked up by other scholars

14:57.825 --> 14:59.925
and can be applied to other contexts.

15:00.175 --> 15:02.165
Maybe it's not necessity, identity

15:02.385 --> 15:04.565
and investment in another location,

15:04.905 --> 15:07.925
but the idea of how we form attachment to place

15:08.585 --> 15:11.045
and how that impacts our experiences

15:11.185 --> 15:15.205
and perceptions, our narratives about that space, I think

15:15.205 --> 15:16.405
that's something that,

15:16.405 --> 15:18.845
we don't see often enough within urban sociology.

15:19.065 --> 15:22.445
And so I, that is the, the concept from the book

15:22.465 --> 15:25.605
or the, the takeaway from the book that I hope to see,

15:26.235 --> 15:29.445
sort of passed down to other academics,

15:29.445 --> 15:30.765
that study gentrification.

15:31.865 --> 15:36.165
And I also feel like in general for anyone

15:36.165 --> 15:37.365
who reads the book, but especially

15:37.365 --> 15:39.885
for a more popular audience, I hope

15:39.885 --> 15:42.205
that people think about the narratives that they use

15:42.205 --> 15:44.845
to describe neighborhoods and their neighbors.

15:45.105 --> 15:47.405
Um, so for anyone who's living in a city

15:47.425 --> 15:50.845
or visiting a city, neighborhoods contain the histories,

15:51.025 --> 15:53.965
the memories, the opportunities, the disappointments

15:53.965 --> 15:55.325
of generations of people.

15:56.245 --> 15:57.465
And so coming in and saying

15:58.175 --> 16:01.105
that grocery store is disgusting, that music is too loud,

16:01.315 --> 16:04.945
these comments lead to the further cultural displacement

16:05.125 --> 16:07.625
of people, their alienation from space,

16:08.075 --> 16:09.385
their lack of belonging.

16:09.385 --> 16:10.825
And then as we've discussed,

16:11.375 --> 16:13.345
potentially increased surveillance.

16:13.725 --> 16:14.905
Um, and,

16:14.965 --> 16:16.465
and just the continued removal

16:17.165 --> 16:19.025
of certain people from public spaces,

16:19.635 --> 16:21.545
which everyone should have access to.

16:22.005 --> 16:25.185
And so I think there's a few different levels,

16:25.255 --> 16:27.065
that I hope that this book gets read at.

Gentrification: The Transformation of Williamsburg

00:00:00 - In some ways, Williamsburg is kind of the prototype of gentrification. It's certainly not the first case of gentrification. It's not even the first case of gentrification in Brooklyn. but the story, it's a working class immigrant neighborhood. It's an industrial neighborhood, and it gets discovered by 20 somethings who are musicians, artists, bohemians, and then it gets turned into their playground for a few years because it's cheap and there's lots of space and it's gritty and aesthetic.
00:00:33 - And then Uhoh, the developers come and, they're ready to package up all that cultural cachet and sell it in the form of luxury development developments, luxury condos. And then in comes Sephora and Whole Foods. It's a very cliche story on the surface, but that's part of what makes it so good as a comparison case for gentrification. I was living in Williamsburg at a time when the
00:01:04 - I started living there in 2008, and I studied the neighborhood from then until 2018. There were already many rich historical and sociological accounts of Williamsburg, but the pace of gentrification there and the dynamics of gentrification there, I felt like necessitated a deeper dive into what was going on and updating of the existing accounts at the same time. it's a great comparison case because it is so relevant around the world.
00:01:39 - a thrift store named Williamsburg in Madrid, I would see somebody wearing a T-shirt that said Williamsburg in the Sahara Desert. I mean, the name Williamsburg was becoming something that was emulated around the world. At one point there was even an app called Where is Williamsburg? And you could download on your phone, you could look at any city you are in hundreds of cities around the world. What's the Williamsburg neighborhood of that city based on the boutiques and the bars
00:02:13 - So it just felt like it was, it was a larger than life reputation, but at the ground level, there was so much more to it. the everyday dynamics of the people who lived in the neighborhood on a micro level, I was living there. I was walking that neighborhood every day. I saw how every new floor of construction in a luxury building, every business that disappeared from the local shopping street,
00:02:42 - how the interactions started changing in the neighborhood, how places started being labeled sketchy or unwanted. and so it made me wanna tell as full a story as possible about what was going on in that neighborhood because it was to some people, the epitome of cool to other people. A shining example of, how to develop a neighborhood for luxury and for wealth. and if it was being copied in cities around the world,

Ethnographic Insights on Williamsburg's Gentrification

00:03:13 - what was going on, and understanding how it was impacting the people that lived there. This was an ethnography that I began when I was 22. I was taking my first urban sociology class. I didn't really know what I was doing. I was walking around this neighborhood. I had just moved to, I was observing things, I was writing things down, I was taking pictures. but obviously it evolved into something much larger than that. it evolved into a multi methods project, that was very iterative.
00:03:43 - and 10 business owners in over the course of the project and another few people, in 2020 because the pandemic hit New York City really hard. And Williamsburg, was certainly suffering from that. And so I was continuing to sort of pull at the different threads and, and themes going on in the neighborhood over time. I was also really conscious of triangulating the data, right? Neighborhoods, gentrification is such an emotional topic for us. Neighborhoods are so important to us,
00:04:15 - nostalgia and identity and memories. And so people would say things in an interview like, I moved to the neighborhood in 1988, and it was a no man's land. There was nothing there where the title comes from, right? there were no stores. There was nowhere to get a cup of coffee. And then I, that, that kind of comment would send me to the New York Public Library for weeks looking at archives of businesses. And I would find out, actually there were 80 businesses on
00:04:48 - And they may not have been places for you to buy records or sit down and have a cup of coffee at a cafe, but they were businesses that were serving the needs of the local residents. And so the research process was really, about finding out what people's narratives were, but then looking at census data, doing a content analysis of news reports about the neighborhood, looking at archival data, observing community events
00:05:17 - of the narratives that I was hearing. The effects of gentrification in Williamsburg have been massive, and it can't be overstated. the waterfront is kind of the ground zero for gentrification in the neighborhood. It's kinda the most popular part of the neighborhood. And that area has been completely transformed to the extent that people who have lived there for 20, 30 years tell me that they get disoriented walking around. They don't have their normal, landscapes and, and areas that they would recognize.
00:05:49 - aside from a couple of main retail corridors, you can see that the development in the neighborhood has been very uneven. there's still parts of the neighborhood where landlords are harassing rent stabilized tenants by not making the necessary repairs to buildings, parts of the neighborhood that still very much bear the scars of the city's disinvestment within from the 1970s and the 1980s. what was important to me was to consider

Exploring Neighborhood Attachment in Gentrification

00:06:19 - and the reasons that people moved to the neighborhood impact how they formed an attachment to the place. And that's really at the core of the book. How does that attachment map onto their experiences of Williamsburg, of gentrification, yes, but also of crime in the neighborhood of, retail changes in the neighborhood over time of how they engaged with the community through events, or through social movements within the neighborhood. By looking at attachment style, I was able
00:06:50 - how the changing neighborhood was perceived differently by people. So in sociology, when we're looking at gentrification, we're typically using race or ethnicity or socioeconomic status, as the main categories for people's identity. and when we do that, those things are obviously very important for people's experiences of life, in urban places. But when we look to attachment style as an additional lens to view residents and to view their experiences, this reveals some important,
00:07:22 - gentrification research before. So there's three different types of attachment that I've identified. Necessity attachment, which are residents who moved to Williamsburg out of necessity. maybe they moved there through immigrant networks, maybe they moved there for jobs, in factories. They were living in this neighborhood. They could have moved to any other neighborhood where those things existed. And then the neighborhood got kind of weird in terms
00:07:53 - that was going on there in the eighties and nineties. And then the neighborhood got fancy, and that's mostly all okay. they just are kind of upset that they can no longer get the things that they need in the neighborhood that their children can't move within the neighborhood for the identity attached. That neighborhood is something that they discovered it was very important to who they are. The grittiness, the coolness, the danger or precarity that they felt in the neighborhood made it a
00:08:24 - as avant gardes. And then there's the investment attached. So those are people mainly who were moving in, in the 2010s. To them, Williamsburg was too grungy. The grocery stores weren't up to their standards. There was graffiti, but it was a place that they could afford to buy luxury housing and that they were confident that that would increase in value, and it certainly did. So the book is called, there was Nothing There because everyone has said that at some point
00:08:55 - People, there was nothing there. When they got there, they discovered everything. They brought the cool to the neighborhood, they brought the culture to the neighborhood for the investment attached people. There was nothing in the neighborhood when, even when they were moving in, in the 2000, in the 2010s, which for a lot of people was kind of the decline already of the cool era of Williamsburg. But they saw nothing there until Whole Foods came, until Starbucks came. And now the necessity attached residents are the ones

Reevaluating Gentrification: Attachment and Displacement Effects

00:09:27 - Because these businesses of necessity that they were used to, and the social groups that they had been part of are now starting to disappear from the neighborhood. So we have this assumption that the, those long-term residents in, in a classic gentrification work, the long-term residents are the ones who view gentrification the most negatively. But by looking at identity or by looking at attachment, what surprised me was that it wasn't those sort of old timers in the neighborhood.
00:09:56 - It wasn't them who were the most upset about gentrification. It was the identity attached residents, the ones who moved there to Williamsburg because of the artist's scene and what it meant to them and their identity. They were the ones who are the most bitter about gentrification, the necessity attached folks. they've often lived there much longer. They see benefits of the changes. They see benefits of development, even though they're still largely critical of it. And they know people who have faced physical,
00:10:30 - They still see more positive aspects of it than the identity attached. And so looking at these attachment styles kind of turns some of the narratives of gentrification. I won't say it turns it on its head, but it, it reveals some different patterns, that are worth examining more in other contexts. Cultural displacement is really at the core of this book. So the thing about gentrification in Williamsburg is
00:11:00 - but a huge proportion of the new residents are living in housing that just didn't exist 15 years ago. So the neighborhood had a huge population boom, but a lot of existing residents were also able to stay put. There's a lot of public housing in the neighborhood. There's a lot of rent control, home ownership. And so there's a lot of people who have been able to evade the physical displacement, but they've experienced cultural displacement. The stores are fancy and unaffordable.
00:11:30 - what behavior is and is not allowed. The area suddenly much more crowded. Store signage that used to be in Polish and Spanish and Italian has steadily decreased. And all of this adds up to a diminished sense of belonging in the neighborhood in the book. In terms of surveillance, I wasn't as much as much focused on policing, but rather informal surveillance by neighbors and how that sometimes did turn into policing,
00:12:02 - who should be at the public pool, an argument about the installation of barbecue pits in a public park investment attached residents were arguing that if they allowed barbecue pits to be installed in this public park, then the, existing residents, local families grilling in the park, were going to diminish their dogs experience of the park, right? That there would be less space for their dogs

Belonging and Displacement in Changing Neighborhoods

00:12:32 - that was left over from the barbecue, these narratives around who belongs in a space. there was one example. There was one story of a young woman who had moved to the, to a neighborhood, part of the neighborhood, near a Puerto Rican music store that had been there for 40 years. And she lived there for a few months and she decided that the music was too loud, at the store. And so she called 3 1 1, which is, a non-emergency,
00:13:02 - to make complaints about trash removal or something like that. And, she called this line and eventually these people, who owned the music store after being there for 40 years, they were ticketed. They were fined. So these ideas of the neighborhood culturally changing, and even when residents and businesses can stay, even when long-term establishments remain, how are the newer residents impacting their ability
00:13:36 - I recall another project I worked on, not in Williamsburg, but also in New York. a business owner told me that she would inform, other shop owners or local security if she saw someone on the street who looked like they didn't belong there. So this was a totally subjective evaluation, right? So we make spaces where people feel like they don't belong, so they use them less, and then when they do show up, their presence is suspicious and worthy of surveillance.
00:14:05 - that's sometimes solved with law enforcement. So the cultural displacement, we can think of it just in terms of, of businesses, disappearing or, you know, something that was, a place where one group felt welcomed. They no longer feel welcomed, but it can actually, play out in the neighborhood into more severe contexts and, into surveillance and, and law enforcement for academic audiences. For the academic reader.
00:14:36 - the appendix, because there were so much different methods going into this book, and I think it can really serve, as an example for people who are just starting out, doing this kind of big neighborhood case study. But I also really hope that this idea of neighborhood attachment, is something that gets picked up by other scholars and can be applied to other contexts. Maybe it's not necessity, identity and investment in another location,
00:15:08 - and how that impacts our experiences and perceptions, our narratives about that space, I think that's something that, we don't see often enough within urban sociology. And so I, that is the, the concept from the book or the, the takeaway from the book that I hope to see, sort of passed down to other academics, that study gentrification. And I also feel like in general for anyone

Understanding Neighborhood Narratives and Displacement

00:15:37 - for a more popular audience, I hope that people think about the narratives that they use to describe neighborhoods and their neighbors. so for anyone who's living in a city or visiting a city, neighborhoods contain the histories, the memories, the opportunities, the disappointments of generations of people. And so coming in and saying that grocery store is disgusting, that music is too loud, these comments lead to the further cultural displacement of people, their alienation from space,
00:16:25 - And then as we've discussed, potentially increased surveillance. and, and just the continued removal of certain people from public spaces, which everyone should have access to. And so I think there's a few different levels, that I hope that this book gets read at.

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis

Data

Originals

Explainers

Podcasts

Faculti

New on Faculti

Idea Explorer

Definition

News Context

Critical Questions and Answers

Research Summaries