Popular in Life Sciences

Biology

Plasticity and microevolution of diatoms

University of Technology Sydney Martina Doblin

Biology

Analysis of rare coding variants reveals novel genetic risk factors for type 2 diabetes

University College London David Curtis

Life Sciences

The Mouse Cortical Connectome Maintains Specificity by Distinct Connectivity Profiles

Monash University Răzvan Gămănuţ

Life Sciences

Neural control of three-dimensional gaze shifts

York University

Biology

Quantifying nectar production by flowering plants in urban and rural landscapes

University of Bristol

Biology

Morbillivirus cross-species infection: is there a risk for humans?

Queens University Belfast

Life Sciences

Direct Fit to Nature

Princeton University

What are the Limits of Bioethics in a Culturally Pluralistic Society?

View more insights in Sciences - Biology - Natural Sciences

View more figures from University of Toronto

View the page of Kerry Bowman

Read the Study

Next in Biology

Clonal Expansion of Infected CD4+ T Cells in People Living with HIV

John Coffin | Tufts University

Identification of a two-component signal transduction system that regulates maltose genes in Clostridium perfringens

Thomas Hiscox | Monash University

Kerry Bowman discusses the evolution and central tenents of modern bioethics within its broader context.

Image courtesy of interviewee. March 21, 2024

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.

Generating Workspace...

Export as PDF

This video video discusses the complexities and challenges facing the field of bioethics, particularly in the context of increasingly pluralistic societies where diverse cultural perspectives intersect with Western ideals of autonomy and individualism. The speaker highlights that bioethics has traditionally emerged from Western philosophical thought, emphasizing principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. However, the focus on individual rights can be limiting, especially in non-Western cultures where collective values might be more significant.

This video video further elaborates on how these cultural differences impact ethical decision-making in healthcare. It addresses the limitations of autonomy, particularly illustrated during the COVID-19 pandemic when societal pressure and vaccination policies conflicted with individual choices. The speaker criticizes the oversimplification of cultural diversity, arguing against the assumption that increasing diversity within medical institutions automatically resolves underlying cultural tensions.

Ultimately, the speaker advocates for a deeper understanding of cultural influences and complexities within bioethics, suggesting that a broader and more nuanced perspective is needed to navigate the ethical dilemmas presented by emerging technologies and healthcare practices. The discussion calls for a more rigorous examination of cultural beliefs and values, recognizing that ethical considerations must account for varying interpretations across different communities.

Language:

Export as PDF

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:90000

1
00:00:00.255 --> 00:00:02.805
There really are many limits in a lot of ways.

2
00:00:03.105 --> 00:00:07.525
Um, you know, one of the central features of bioethics is,

3
00:00:07.785 --> 00:00:10.485
is the concept of autonomy, meaning the rights

4
00:00:10.485 --> 00:00:12.965
and choices of the individual person.

5
00:00:14.055 --> 00:00:15.635
And you know, the challenge with that

6
00:00:15.815 --> 00:00:17.675
as western societies become more

7
00:00:17.675 --> 00:00:19.235
and more pluralistic is,

8
00:00:19.255 --> 00:00:22.795
is many people are coming from non-Western cultures.

9
00:00:23.415 --> 00:00:25.795
And within those non-Western cultures, the concept

10
00:00:25.975 --> 00:00:27.715
of the individual,

11
00:00:27.895 --> 00:00:30.395
may not be the most dominant, element.

12
00:00:30.695 --> 00:00:33.235
It may be far more about the collective

13
00:00:33.575 --> 00:00:37.035
and moral reasoning may come much more from interdependence

14
00:00:37.065 --> 00:00:38.635
than independence.

15
00:00:39.525 --> 00:00:41.825
You know, I would say mostly, you know,

16
00:00:41.825 --> 00:00:43.385
we have adapted to that.

17
00:00:43.805 --> 00:00:45.545
Uh, it's not always perfect,

18
00:00:46.165 --> 00:00:49.745
but that's one of the big limitations is, is bioethics,

19
00:00:49.805 --> 00:00:52.265
is is really emerging from western cultures,

20
00:00:52.705 --> 00:00:54.665
particularly in North America

21
00:00:54.885 --> 00:00:57.625
to a somewhat lesser extent in Western Europe.

22
00:00:58.245 --> 00:01:02.065
Um, it is very much focused on the concept of the individual

23
00:01:02.325 --> 00:01:05.345
and autonomy, and, and that does present challenges.

24
00:01:05.345 --> 00:01:06.505
There's no question about that.

25
00:01:06.805 --> 00:01:11.225
Modern bioethics exists really from, you know,

26
00:01:11.225 --> 00:01:13.785
western philosophical thought, and,

27
00:01:14.005 --> 00:01:17.825
and it's very, very influenced by the concept of principal.

28
00:01:18.095 --> 00:01:20.905
That would be autonomy, that would be beneficence,

29
00:01:21.085 --> 00:01:22.545
non maleficence and justice.

30
00:01:23.125 --> 00:01:25.745
Uh, there's other ethical, you know, elements

31
00:01:25.745 --> 00:01:26.985
and reasons as well,

32
00:01:27.725 --> 00:01:31.365
but, that is what it is coming from.

33
00:01:31.665 --> 00:01:34.325
And, you know, why do we have bioethics in western

34
00:01:34.435 --> 00:01:36.645
societies generally?

35
00:01:36.955 --> 00:01:38.485
There's many reasons, but,

36
00:01:38.585 --> 00:01:42.365
but, you know, western societies are increasingly

37
00:01:42.385 --> 00:01:45.005
and very often secular by constitution.

38
00:01:45.825 --> 00:01:47.205
And, and so, you know,

39
00:01:47.205 --> 00:01:50.405
western societies are no longer simply a, a Christian

40
00:01:50.405 --> 00:01:51.845
or Judeo-Christian heritage.

41
00:01:52.265 --> 00:01:56.485
Um, there's multi, multi, ways of thinking about things.

42
00:01:56.485 --> 00:02:00.005
There's diverse political views and bioethics.

43
00:02:00.445 --> 00:02:01.925
Remember, ethics is an analysis.

44
00:02:02.075 --> 00:02:04.125
It's not, you know, this is right and wrong.

45
00:02:04.225 --> 00:02:06.885
Ethics is an active inquiry as to

46
00:02:06.885 --> 00:02:09.005
what would make something the best choice,

47
00:02:09.275 --> 00:02:11.765
what would make something the best course of action.

48
00:02:12.105 --> 00:02:16.245
That's what ethics is. So it morally pluralistic societies.

49
00:02:16.625 --> 00:02:19.805
Um, it, it is something that's increasingly used.

50
00:02:19.905 --> 00:02:22.605
But, you know, I do go back to my original statement

51
00:02:22.635 --> 00:02:24.485
that it's focus on autonomy

52
00:02:24.545 --> 00:02:26.125
and the individual can be somewhat

53
00:02:26.445 --> 00:02:27.845
limiting, within that.

54
00:02:28.465 --> 00:02:32.445
But, but bioethics is really a, a way of looking at

55
00:02:32.635 --> 00:02:34.405
what are the tough ethical questions.

56
00:02:34.905 --> 00:02:38.405
And as the 21st century moves along,

57
00:02:39.525 --> 00:02:40.975
it's getting tougher and tougher.

58
00:02:41.475 --> 00:02:43.695
And, one of the real challenges

59
00:02:43.725 --> 00:02:45.655
with emerging biotechnology,

60
00:02:45.795 --> 00:02:48.855
and I speak now of things like artificial intelligence

61
00:02:49.075 --> 00:02:52.615
and, genome mapping and genetic engineering

62
00:02:52.615 --> 00:02:56.415
and these types of things, is, you know, so often

63
00:02:56.885 --> 00:02:58.895
with bioethics, we would look

64
00:02:59.065 --> 00:03:01.725
At what are the risks and what are the benefits?

65
00:03:02.505 --> 00:03:05.285
And in the 20th century, that was challenging enough.

66
00:03:05.665 --> 00:03:10.405
But, in, in 21st century emerging technologies to say,

67
00:03:11.145 --> 00:03:14.005
you know, with something like emerging artificial

68
00:03:14.005 --> 00:03:15.765
intelligence, what are the risks?

69
00:03:15.955 --> 00:03:20.045
What are the benefits? This is very, very hard to quantify.

70
00:03:20.625 --> 00:03:23.805
And, and within what timeframe, we don't know,

71
00:03:23.835 --> 00:03:27.965
with genetic engineering benefits seem to be substantial.

72
00:03:28.055 --> 00:03:30.405
Risks are not really understood very well.

73
00:03:30.865 --> 00:03:32.725
So these are some of the great challenges

74
00:03:32.725 --> 00:03:34.285
of bioethics in western culture.

75
00:03:34.885 --> 00:03:37.605
I think it remains. So what it is, is exactly that.

76
00:03:37.705 --> 00:03:40.485
So principle is what we must keep in mind is it's,

77
00:03:40.635 --> 00:03:41.845
it's not one principle.

78
00:03:41.865 --> 00:03:44.045
It it, it's kind of got four moving parts.

79
00:03:44.465 --> 00:03:47.165
And those moving parts are exactly the autonomy,

80
00:03:47.385 --> 00:03:48.405
the rights choices,

81
00:03:48.545 --> 00:03:50.765
and freedom of the individual, to,

82
00:03:50.825 --> 00:03:52.765
to make an informed decision.

83
00:03:53.195 --> 00:03:55.285
Onus is on the healthcare worker to make sure

84
00:03:55.285 --> 00:03:56.685
that the person is informed.

85
00:03:57.235 --> 00:03:59.005
Beneficence needs to be of benefit.

86
00:03:59.595 --> 00:04:01.405
Maleficence means to do no harm.

87
00:04:01.865 --> 00:04:04.445
And justice is often looking at the larger picture.

88
00:04:04.465 --> 00:04:06.525
Is it fair to larger numbers of people?

89
00:04:07.065 --> 00:04:10.685
It really emerged in the United States as, you know,

90
00:04:11.185 --> 00:04:15.845
in the late 20th century as a model for looking at many

91
00:04:15.845 --> 00:04:18.165
of the ethical dilemmas within hospitals.

92
00:04:19.025 --> 00:04:20.325
I'm gonna speak honestly here.

93
00:04:20.525 --> 00:04:23.245
I I'm a person that's been working in hospitals for decades

94
00:04:23.465 --> 00:04:24.565
as a bioethicist.

95
00:04:24.665 --> 00:04:26.685
I'm also a professor of bioethics.

96
00:04:26.965 --> 00:04:31.045
I don't find principal, I find it useful to

97
00:04:32.035 --> 00:04:34.925
sort of parse and examine the different aspects

98
00:04:34.925 --> 00:04:39.325
of a dilemma, but I don't find it unbelievably helpful

99
00:04:40.145 --> 00:04:42.245
in, in really directing,

100
00:04:42.645 --> 00:04:44.445
a way forward in many, many cases.

101
00:04:45.145 --> 00:04:46.805
Um, you know, one

102
00:04:46.805 --> 00:04:50.005
of the real tensions in bioethics is not just

103
00:04:50.005 --> 00:04:52.165
what ought we do, but who ought decide.

104
00:04:52.345 --> 00:04:54.845
Uh, you know, if if there's someone on life support,

105
00:04:54.845 --> 00:04:58.605
they're not recovering, you know,

106
00:04:58.605 --> 00:05:01.165
they're not showing any significant signs of recovering,

107
00:05:01.165 --> 00:05:02.965
the family is saying, do everything.

108
00:05:03.025 --> 00:05:04.805
The medical team are saying, you know,

109
00:05:04.805 --> 00:05:06.645
that this is not a good investment.

110
00:05:06.675 --> 00:05:08.205
This is futile treatment.

111
00:05:08.705 --> 00:05:11.805
You know, the real tension there is not just

112
00:05:11.805 --> 00:05:14.245
what ought we do, but whose decision should that be?

113
00:05:14.985 --> 00:05:17.165
And, you know, that will play out differently depending on

114
00:05:17.165 --> 00:05:20.165
different countries in, in, you know, Canada, which is

115
00:05:20.165 --> 00:05:23.725
where I am in the United States, it likely will be

116
00:05:24.385 --> 00:05:26.925
in the US it would depend on, on, on the funding,

117
00:05:27.165 --> 00:05:28.165
source funding,

118
00:05:28.165 --> 00:05:31.605
but it would likely be what the fa when I say family,

119
00:05:31.745 --> 00:05:32.765
I'm assuming we have a patient

120
00:05:32.765 --> 00:05:34.925
that can't participate in these decisions.

121
00:05:35.825 --> 00:05:37.965
It would likely be what the family would want us

122
00:05:37.965 --> 00:05:39.245
to do in other countries.

123
00:05:39.465 --> 00:05:42.805
And often, perhaps even in Britain, it would be a model

124
00:05:42.825 --> 00:05:45.725
of best interest, you know, what's in the best interest

125
00:05:45.965 --> 00:05:49.045
of the patient, which would often actually be defined

126
00:05:49.045 --> 00:05:51.165
by doctors, but we wouldn't do that.

127
00:05:51.465 --> 00:05:55.165
So what you're seeing is actual cultural differences in the

128
00:05:55.165 --> 00:05:56.845
interpretation of bioethical

129
00:05:56.885 --> 00:05:57.885
Principles.

130
00:05:58.265 --> 00:06:02.965
Um, so our greatest weight in North America would really,

131
00:06:03.145 --> 00:06:04.765
really be in on autonomy

132
00:06:05.265 --> 00:06:09.205
and in other places, you know, throughout western society

133
00:06:09.265 --> 00:06:10.685
and non-Western society.

134
00:06:11.305 --> 00:06:14.005
Um, you know, when it got into things like what's a benefit,

135
00:06:14.145 --> 00:06:16.885
what's harm, you know, if those things are defined

136
00:06:16.885 --> 00:06:19.245
by a family, it's gonna be very different than if they're

137
00:06:19.245 --> 00:06:20.285
defined by physicians.

138
00:06:21.065 --> 00:06:25.365
So this is, again, is one of the challenges of bioethics.

139
00:06:25.585 --> 00:06:27.365
And, one of the ways it works,

140
00:06:27.595 --> 00:06:29.805
there's other competing bioethical theories.

141
00:06:29.805 --> 00:06:32.285
There's u utilitarianism and deontology

142
00:06:32.425 --> 00:06:35.925
and vir ethics, ethics, you know, they're all tools.

143
00:06:36.035 --> 00:06:39.965
They're all tools. I personally, as a practicing bioethicist

144
00:06:40.515 --> 00:06:43.365
working in hospitals, don't find any of them.

145
00:06:43.945 --> 00:06:47.765
Um, if there's any single theory that I, I really lean into

146
00:06:47.785 --> 00:06:50.485
to give me answers, I, I think that what happens

147
00:06:50.515 --> 00:06:53.565
with complex problems is you need to look at them from

148
00:06:53.565 --> 00:06:55.165
as many angles as possible.

149
00:06:55.705 --> 00:06:59.285
And what bioethical theories do is, is, is it provides

150
00:06:59.925 --> 00:07:03.085
a lens, and you can change that lens depending on the theory

151
00:07:03.185 --> 00:07:05.165
to hopefully deepen and forward your thinking.

152
00:07:05.675 --> 00:07:08.565
What you see with cultural pluralism is, is,

153
00:07:08.565 --> 00:07:10.165
is a term I'm gonna introduce here,

154
00:07:10.185 --> 00:07:12.645
and maybe some people listening know it already an

155
00:07:12.715 --> 00:07:14.965
explanatory model of illness, simply meaning

156
00:07:15.355 --> 00:07:17.485
what do people believe has caused their illness?

157
00:07:18.065 --> 00:07:19.405
How best should it be treated?

158
00:07:19.545 --> 00:07:21.325
What's the significance of it?

159
00:07:21.825 --> 00:07:25.125
Um, and what you see with different cultures is that the,

160
00:07:25.145 --> 00:07:28.125
you know, this is defined differently by different people as

161
00:07:28.125 --> 00:07:32.125
to what the cause and the treatment of an illness should be.

162
00:07:32.785 --> 00:07:34.725
So, so this is very, very tough

163
00:07:34.725 --> 00:07:35.765
because what, what we,

164
00:07:35.785 --> 00:07:38.045
we were always going on the assumption and,

165
00:07:38.105 --> 00:07:41.885
and too often in bioethics that the patients in front

166
00:07:41.885 --> 00:07:46.165
of us have a completely western view of, of,

167
00:07:46.265 --> 00:07:47.965
of medicine that they believe

168
00:07:48.205 --> 00:07:50.805
that medicine is completely a biological process.

169
00:07:51.585 --> 00:07:54.125
Um, you know, it's, it's, it's not highly symbolic.

170
00:07:54.125 --> 00:07:56.285
It's, it's not treated in alternative ways.

171
00:07:56.785 --> 00:07:58.405
And, and that's often not the case.

172
00:07:58.505 --> 00:08:00.405
And that's one of the areas where,

173
00:08:00.415 --> 00:08:02.285
where bioethics can be limiting.

174
00:08:03.065 --> 00:08:05.045
But again, it depends on the bioethicist.

175
00:08:05.205 --> 00:08:08.685
I mean, you know, bioethics can also be the first ones

176
00:08:08.685 --> 00:08:11.845
to say that there's deep cultural, you know,

177
00:08:12.175 --> 00:08:13.685
influences going on here,

178
00:08:14.145 --> 00:08:15.285
and that the perceptions

179
00:08:15.285 --> 00:08:17.485
of illness is very much culturally constructed

180
00:08:17.865 --> 00:08:20.805
and draw the attention of the broader team to these things.

181
00:08:21.225 --> 00:08:24.485
So, so that is, is, is definitely one of the things that,

182
00:08:24.555 --> 00:08:26.125
that, that we see.

183
00:08:26.945 --> 00:08:30.085
But, you know, speaking of alternative, you know, I,

184
00:08:30.185 --> 00:08:33.165
I'm gonna bring up the pandemic, which is, you know,

185
00:08:33.165 --> 00:08:34.405
technically not over,

186
00:08:34.505 --> 00:08:36.525
but hopefully we're through the worst of it.

187
00:08:36.825 --> 00:08:38.765
And when I say the pandemic, I of course, I

188
00:08:38.765 --> 00:08:40.525
of course mean the COVID-19 pandemic.

189
00:08:41.585 --> 00:08:43.925
And here's a real limitation of bioethics,

190
00:08:44.005 --> 00:08:46.325
because bioethics will say the rights

191
00:08:46.325 --> 00:08:47.965
and freedom of the individual.

192
00:08:48.185 --> 00:08:50.845
People can decide for themselves, you know,

193
00:08:50.985 --> 00:08:53.805
let them be informed and let them make their decisions

194
00:08:54.755 --> 00:08:55.755
All over the world.

195
00:08:55.815 --> 00:08:59.145
What was happening is when the vaccines were introduced,

196
00:08:59.485 --> 00:09:02.785
the vaccines I I speak of now, you know, in for,

197
00:09:02.925 --> 00:09:07.105
for COVID-19, there was a subset of people that said,

198
00:09:07.165 --> 00:09:08.785
you know what, I'm not interested.

199
00:09:09.145 --> 00:09:10.905
I, I think the research is too fast.

200
00:09:11.345 --> 00:09:14.665
I, I don't believe what I've been told and I don't want it.

201
00:09:15.405 --> 00:09:18.625
And really what they got was an awful lot

202
00:09:18.625 --> 00:09:20.065
of very aggressive push.

203
00:09:20.385 --> 00:09:23.025
I, I'm pro-vaccine, let me be very clear here,

204
00:09:23.125 --> 00:09:25.225
but I'm just trying to analyze this situation.

205
00:09:25.415 --> 00:09:29.345
What they got was a lot of pushback from society in terms

206
00:09:29.345 --> 00:09:31.825
of, you know, vaccine passports

207
00:09:31.885 --> 00:09:34.265
and people that were denied access to their,

208
00:09:34.365 --> 00:09:35.825
to their place of employment.

209
00:09:36.285 --> 00:09:38.585
And, you know, some people lost their jobs and,

210
00:09:38.605 --> 00:09:39.745
and those types of things.

211
00:09:40.205 --> 00:09:44.025
So autonomy really didn't work well for us at all.

212
00:09:44.485 --> 00:09:46.265
Um, and,

213
00:09:46.285 --> 00:09:48.105
and so what we really learned

214
00:09:48.105 --> 00:09:50.945
during the pandemic is autonomy really

215
00:09:51.005 --> 00:09:52.185
has some serious limits.

216
00:09:52.725 --> 00:09:55.105
Uh, my observation is we all love autonomy.

217
00:09:55.285 --> 00:09:58.505
As long as patients are doing what we think they should do,

218
00:09:59.005 --> 00:10:01.185
we don't love it so much when they come up with something

219
00:10:01.185 --> 00:10:02.785
that we don't think is a good idea.

220
00:10:03.445 --> 00:10:06.145
Um, and so that's always the great limitation with it.

221
00:10:06.445 --> 00:10:09.025
Now, you know, resistance to vaccines, how much of

222
00:10:09.025 --> 00:10:10.465
that was culturally influenced?

223
00:10:10.945 --> 00:10:13.105
A little, not much. I mean, most of the people

224
00:10:13.105 --> 00:10:15.025
that were really against vaccination,

225
00:10:15.315 --> 00:10:17.785
there wasn't complex cultural factors.

226
00:10:17.935 --> 00:10:20.265
They simply did not trust a government.

227
00:10:20.925 --> 00:10:24.145
And in, you know, in, in my country, Canada,

228
00:10:24.145 --> 00:10:25.865
we had some real pushback.

229
00:10:25.865 --> 00:10:28.745
We had some very strong political movements

230
00:10:29.495 --> 00:10:31.065
against vaccination.

231
00:10:31.245 --> 00:10:33.745
And I would argue it, it's led to a level of,

232
00:10:33.805 --> 00:10:35.385
of political polarization

233
00:10:35.815 --> 00:10:37.905
that we're still still dealing with today.

234
00:10:38.245 --> 00:10:41.185
So, you know, I'm, I'm being kind of harshly critical

235
00:10:41.185 --> 00:10:43.505
of bioethics because the mandate of bioethics is

236
00:10:43.505 --> 00:10:47.945
so incredibly difficult, that it's very, very hard

237
00:10:47.945 --> 00:10:50.145
to find models that are always gonna work in

238
00:10:50.145 --> 00:10:51.225
complex problems.

239
00:10:51.765 --> 00:10:54.785
The conclusions and the implications from the work is for

240
00:10:55.695 --> 00:10:57.065
bioethics to work well.

241
00:10:57.575 --> 00:11:01.545
Bioethics needs a much, much deeper,

242
00:11:01.695 --> 00:11:03.105
perspective on culture.

243
00:11:03.885 --> 00:11:06.545
And what has really happened in recent years

244
00:11:06.695 --> 00:11:09.985
with cultural awareness is that cultural awareness.

245
00:11:10.445 --> 00:11:13.065
You know, we, what, we tend to think that

246
00:11:13.065 --> 00:11:14.705
because our medical, I, I'm speaking

247
00:11:14.705 --> 00:11:15.985
of western culture in general,

248
00:11:16.255 --> 00:11:18.385
because our medical schools are now more,

249
00:11:18.535 --> 00:11:20.545
more culturally diverse than they used to be,

250
00:11:20.855 --> 00:11:25.585
because our physicians are male, female is is far better.

251
00:11:25.845 --> 00:11:27.665
Uh, there's greater cultural and,

252
00:11:27.765 --> 00:11:30.785
and racial diversity that we've kind of dealt

253
00:11:30.785 --> 00:11:31.985
with a cultural problem.

254
00:11:32.385 --> 00:11:33.905
I would say we have not.

255
00:11:34.365 --> 00:11:36.785
Um, because we all have culture

256
00:11:36.885 --> 00:11:39.465
and no matter what cultural background someone is from,

257
00:11:39.765 --> 00:11:42.345
we all have cross-cultural blind spots.

258
00:11:42.965 --> 00:11:44.505
And that is one of the problems.

259
00:11:44.505 --> 00:11:46.865
So one of the problems I see is,

260
00:11:46.885 --> 00:11:50.305
and I'm not against diversity, inclusion, equity, I, I,

261
00:11:50.385 --> 00:11:52.705
I think those are, are, are important principles

262
00:11:52.765 --> 00:11:56.125
To live by, but we have had this belief

263
00:11:56.195 --> 00:11:58.325
that following diversity and inclusion

264
00:11:58.425 --> 00:12:01.725
and equity is going to solve cross-cultural problems.

265
00:12:01.985 --> 00:12:03.725
It doesn't, it, it,

266
00:12:03.795 --> 00:12:07.085
it's very important in a democratic society to be inclusive.

267
00:12:07.145 --> 00:12:08.885
And I respect that. But, you know,

268
00:12:08.885 --> 00:12:11.085
culture is not in the conscious mind,

269
00:12:11.225 --> 00:12:13.765
and that's where we really fall down.

270
00:12:14.345 --> 00:12:17.445
And so, you know, people will say, I don't have a problem

271
00:12:17.445 --> 00:12:18.685
with other people's cultures.

272
00:12:18.685 --> 00:12:20.045
I don't have a problem with my own culture.

273
00:12:20.205 --> 00:12:22.765
I don't, but you know, we're not fully conscious of

274
00:12:22.795 --> 00:12:23.885
what culture is.

275
00:12:24.505 --> 00:12:28.245
And I would argue in the last 10 to 15 years, there's less

276
00:12:28.345 --> 00:12:33.005
and less focus on a deeper analysis, almost anthropological

277
00:12:33.345 --> 00:12:35.925
of what's going on with cross-cultural differences

278
00:12:36.075 --> 00:12:39.605
because we're far more focused on, on political inclusion.

279
00:12:39.945 --> 00:12:41.925
And I think the inclusion is a good thing,

280
00:12:42.345 --> 00:12:45.245
but we have to think about what is, what is it that we need

281
00:12:45.245 --> 00:12:47.085
to include and, and how does it work?

Limits of Autonomy in Bioethics

00:00:00 - There really are many limits in a lot of ways. you know, one of the central features of bioethics is, is the concept of autonomy, meaning the rights and choices of the individual person. And you know, the challenge with that as western societies become more and more pluralistic is, is many people are coming from non-Western cultures. And within those non-Western cultures, the concept of the individual, may not be the most dominant, element.
00:00:33 - and moral reasoning may come much more from interdependence than independence. You know, I would say mostly, you know, we have adapted to that. it's not always perfect, but that's one of the big limitations is, is bioethics, is is really emerging from western cultures, particularly in North America to a somewhat lesser extent in Western Europe. it is very much focused on the concept of the individual
00:01:05 - There's no question about that. Modern bioethics exists really from, you know, western philosophical thought, and, and it's very, very influenced by the concept of principal. That would be autonomy, that would be beneficence, non maleficence and justice. there's other ethical, you know, elements and reasons as well, but, that is what it is coming from. And, you know, why do we have bioethics in western
00:01:36 - There's many reasons, but, but, you know, western societies are increasingly and very often secular by constitution. And, and so, you know, western societies are no longer simply a, a Christian or Judeo-Christian heritage. there's multi, multi, ways of thinking about things. There's diverse political views and bioethics. Remember, ethics is an analysis. It's not, you know, this is right and wrong. Ethics is an active inquiry as to
00:02:09 - what would make something the best course of action. That's what ethics is. So it morally pluralistic societies. it, it is something that's increasingly used. But, you know, I do go back to my original statement that it's focus on autonomy and the individual can be somewhat limiting, within that. But, but bioethics is really a, a way of looking at what are the tough ethical questions. And as the 21st century moves along,
00:02:41 - And, one of the real challenges with emerging biotechnology, and I speak now of things like artificial intelligence and, genome mapping and genetic engineering and these types of things, is, you know, so often with bioethics, we would look At what are the risks and what are the benefits? And in the 20th century, that was challenging enough. But, in, in 21st century emerging technologies to say,

Challenges in Modern Bioethics and Autonomy

00:03:14 - intelligence, what are the risks? What are the benefits? This is very, very hard to quantify. And, and within what timeframe, we don't know, with genetic engineering benefits seem to be substantial. Risks are not really understood very well. So these are some of the great challenges of bioethics in western culture. I think it remains. So what it is, is exactly that. So principle is what we must keep in mind is it's, it's not one principle.
00:03:44 - And those moving parts are exactly the autonomy, the rights choices, and freedom of the individual, to, to make an informed decision. Onus is on the healthcare worker to make sure that the person is informed. Beneficence needs to be of benefit. Maleficence means to do no harm. And justice is often looking at the larger picture. Is it fair to larger numbers of people? It really emerged in the United States as, you know, in the late 20th century as a model for looking at many
00:04:19 - I'm gonna speak honestly here. I I'm a person that's been working in hospitals for decades as a bioethicist. I'm also a professor of bioethics. I don't find principal, I find it useful to sort of parse and examine the different aspects of a dilemma, but I don't find it unbelievably helpful in, in really directing, a way forward in many, many cases. you know, one
00:04:50 - what ought we do, but who ought decide. you know, if if there's someone on life support, they're not recovering, you know, they're not showing any significant signs of recovering, the family is saying, do everything. The medical team are saying, you know, that this is not a good investment. This is futile treatment. You know, the real tension there is not just what ought we do, but whose decision should that be? And, you know, that will play out differently depending on
00:05:20 - where I am in the United States, it likely will be in the US it would depend on, on, on the funding, source funding, but it would likely be what the fa when I say family, I'm assuming we have a patient that can't participate in these decisions. It would likely be what the family would want us to do in other countries. And often, perhaps even in Britain, it would be a model of best interest, you know, what's in the best interest of the patient, which would often actually be defined
00:05:51 - So what you're seeing is actual cultural differences in the interpretation of bioethical Principles. so our greatest weight in North America would really, really be in on autonomy and in other places, you know, throughout western society and non-Western society. you know, when it got into things like what's a benefit, what's harm, you know, if those things are defined by a family, it's gonna be very different than if they're

Challenges in Bioethics and Cultural Perspectives

00:06:21 - So this is, again, is one of the challenges of bioethics. And, one of the ways it works, there's other competing bioethical theories. There's u utilitarianism and deontology and vir ethics, ethics, you know, they're all tools. They're all tools. I personally, as a practicing bioethicist working in hospitals, don't find any of them. if there's any single theory that I, I really lean into to give me answers, I, I think that what happens
00:06:53 - as many angles as possible. And what bioethical theories do is, is, is it provides a lens, and you can change that lens depending on the theory to hopefully deepen and forward your thinking. What you see with cultural pluralism is, is, is a term I'm gonna introduce here, and maybe some people listening know it already an explanatory model of illness, simply meaning what do people believe has caused their illness? How best should it be treated? What's the significance of it?
00:07:25 - you know, this is defined differently by different people as to what the cause and the treatment of an illness should be. So, so this is very, very tough because what, what we, we were always going on the assumption and, and too often in bioethics that the patients in front of us have a completely western view of, of, of medicine that they believe that medicine is completely a biological process. you know, it's, it's, it's not highly symbolic.
00:07:56 - And, and that's often not the case. And that's one of the areas where, where bioethics can be limiting. But again, it depends on the bioethicist. I mean, you know, bioethics can also be the first ones to say that there's deep cultural, you know, influences going on here, and that the perceptions of illness is very much culturally constructed and draw the attention of the broader team to these things. So, so that is, is, is definitely one of the things that,
00:08:26 - But, you know, speaking of alternative, you know, I, I'm gonna bring up the pandemic, which is, you know, technically not over, but hopefully we're through the worst of it. And when I say the pandemic, I of course, I of course mean the COVID-19 pandemic. And here's a real limitation of bioethics, because bioethics will say the rights and freedom of the individual. People can decide for themselves, you know, let them be informed and let them make their decisions
00:08:55 - What was happening is when the vaccines were introduced, the vaccines I I speak of now, you know, in for, for COVID-19, there was a subset of people that said, you know what, I'm not interested. I, I think the research is too fast. I, I don't believe what I've been told and I don't want it. And really what they got was an awful lot of very aggressive push. I, I'm pro-vaccine, let me be very clear here, but I'm just trying to analyze this situation.

Limits of Autonomy in Pandemic Responses

00:09:29 - of, you know, vaccine passports and people that were denied access to their, to their place of employment. And, you know, some people lost their jobs and, and those types of things. So autonomy really didn't work well for us at all. and, and so what we really learned during the pandemic is autonomy really has some serious limits. my observation is we all love autonomy. As long as patients are doing what we think they should do,
00:10:01 - that we don't think is a good idea. and so that's always the great limitation with it. Now, you know, resistance to vaccines, how much of that was culturally influenced? A little, not much. I mean, most of the people that were really against vaccination, there wasn't complex cultural factors. They simply did not trust a government. And in, you know, in, in my country, Canada, we had some real pushback. We had some very strong political movements
00:10:31 - And I would argue it, it's led to a level of, of political polarization that we're still still dealing with today. So, you know, I'm, I'm being kind of harshly critical of bioethics because the mandate of bioethics is so incredibly difficult, that it's very, very hard to find models that are always gonna work in complex problems. The conclusions and the implications from the work is for bioethics to work well. Bioethics needs a much, much deeper,
00:11:03 - And what has really happened in recent years with cultural awareness is that cultural awareness. You know, we, what, we tend to think that because our medical, I, I'm speaking of western culture in general, because our medical schools are now more, more culturally diverse than they used to be, because our physicians are male, female is is far better. there's greater cultural and, and racial diversity that we've kind of dealt with a cultural problem.
00:11:34 - because we all have culture and no matter what cultural background someone is from, we all have cross-cultural blind spots. And that is one of the problems. So one of the problems I see is, and I'm not against diversity, inclusion, equity, I, I, I think those are, are, are important principles To live by, but we have had this belief that following diversity and inclusion and equity is going to solve cross-cultural problems. It doesn't, it, it,
00:12:07 - And I respect that. But, you know, culture is not in the conscious mind, and that's where we really fall down. And so, you know, people will say, I don't have a problem with other people's cultures. I don't have a problem with my own culture. I don't, but you know, we're not fully conscious of what culture is. And I would argue in the last 10 to 15 years, there's less and less focus on a deeper analysis, almost anthropological of what's going on with cross-cultural differences

Rethinking Inclusion: What and How?

00:12:45 - And I think the inclusion is a good thing, but we have to think about what is, what is it that we need to include and, and how does it work?

Faculti AI can make mistakes

Research

Policy

Analysis