Bayesian methods for improved legal reasoning

Bayesian reasoning (which incorporates the likelihood ratio and Bayes’ theorem) is a logical framework for reasoning about uncertainty. Experts (including statisticians and forensic scientists) have argued for many years that Bayesian reasoning has the potential to improve the efficiency, transparency and fairness of the justice system, and to avoid the kind of fallacies in probabilistic reasoning that have not only troubled the appellate courts but are also likely to have misled tribunals of fact in many trials.

The use of Bayesian reasoning in investigative and evaluative forensic science and the law is, however, the subject of much confusion. It is deployed in the adduction of DNA evidence, but expert witnesses and lawyers struggle to articulate the underlying assumptions and results of Bayesian reasoning in a way that is understandable to lay people.  The extent to which Bayesian reasoning could benefit the justice system by being deployed more widely, and how it is best presented, is unclear and requires clarification. Norman Fenton, discusses here.

Image courtesy of interviewee

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

×
You may have unlimited institutional access to Faculti. Many colleges and universities have institutional memberships. If you are affiliated with a subscribing institution, please access this site through your SSO/EZproxy/IP address. This should permit you with unlimited views. However, you will not be able to view non-subscribed to content.

If you are not affiliated with a subscribing institution, you can register for free as an individual and view thousands of insights in our archive today or subscribe for subject access.

In addition, all guest visitors to the Faculti website can view any insight monthly. You have insight(s) remaining for this month.
Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2022. All rights reserved.
error:

Add the Faculti Web App to your Mobile or Desktop homescreen

Install
×