Irrational Exuberance: Correcting Bias in Probability Estimates

Recommend to Your Librarian

We rely on recommendations to sustain and expand our platform. If you appreciate what Faculti does and want to power its platform, technology and journalists through another crucial year, please consider recommending us today.



Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider

  • What assumptions does the research make?
  • Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
  • What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness

This research comes from . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Gareth James discusses the common setting where one observes probability estimates for a large number of events, such as default risks for numerous bonds. Unfortunately, even with unbiased estimates, selecting events corresponding to the most extreme probabilities can result in systematically underestimating the true level of uncertainty. James discusses an empirical Bayes approach “excess certainty adjusted probabilities” (ECAP), using a variant of Tweedie’s formula, which updates probability estimates to correct for selection bias.

Image courtesy of interviewee. January 20, 2021

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.
Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2013 - 2025. All rights reserved.
error: