Joshua Angrist on Uber versus Taxi

Recommend to Your Librarian

We rely on recommendations to sustain and expand our platform. If you appreciate what Faculti does and want to power its platform, technology and journalists through another crucial year, please consider recommending us today.



Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider

  • What assumptions does the research make?
  • Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
  • What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness

This research comes from . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Rideshare drivers pay a proportion of their fares to a ride-hailing platform operator, a commission-based compensation model used by many service providers. To Uber drivers, this commission is known as the Uber fee. By contrast, traditional taxi drivers in most US cities make a fixed payment independent of their earnings. Joshua Angrist discusses these compensation models using an experiment that offered random samples of Boston Uber drivers opportunities to lease a virtual taxi medallion that eliminates the Uber fee.

Read the Study

Image © Nobel Prize Outreach. Photo: Risdon Photography

Image courtesy of interviewee. February 17, 2022

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.
Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2013 - 2025. All rights reserved.
error: