Corrective justice, coherence, and Kantian right

Recommend to Your Librarian

We rely on recommendations to sustain and expand our platform. If you appreciate what Faculti does and want to power its platform, technology and journalists through another crucial year, please consider recommending us today.



Media Literacy Toolkit

Faculti's Media Literacy Toolkit helps viewers critically engage with academic insights by analyzing the research context, identifying perspectives, and encouraging thoughtful evaluation.

Critical Questions to Consider

  • What assumptions does the research make?
  • Are there alternative perspectives not explored?
  • What are the limitations of the research method?

Bias and Perspective Awareness

This research comes from . Reflect on how the institution's academic focus and research partnerships may shape the questions being explored.

Ernest Weinrib has argued, influentially, that private law must only do ‘corrective justice’ and that corrective justice is coextensive with the Kantian principle of right. Andrew Fell discusses reasons for rejecting the premise that private law must be ‘coherent’ and Weinrib’s understanding of the ‘equality’ that corrective justice maintains.

Read the Study

Image courtesy of interviewee. May 17, 2022

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month. Login to view 8000+ figures on the platform.
Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2013 - 2025. All rights reserved.
error: