Legalising assisted dying: cross purposes and unintended consequences

In the UK, assisted dying continues to be unlawful, and pro-legalization campaigners have made use of human rights based applications for judicial review and Private Members Bills in order to try to change the law. Interestingly, however, the proposed statute would not offer an assisted death to many of the litigants who have sought to force Parliament’s hand. Emily Jackson considers whether this a one-off peculiarity, or whether there might be other mismatches between what the law can achieve and what matters most to people who are seeking an assisted death for themselves. It also explores what seems to be a common feature of debates over assisted dying, namely the tendency for one problem to be solved, while another is created.

 

 

Publication

Image courtesy of interviewee

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

×
Guest visitors to the Faculti website can view any insight monthly. You have insight(s) remaining for this month

Register for free as an individual and view thousands of insights in our archive today or subscribe for subject access.

You may already have institutional access to Faculti. Please access Faculti using your institution credentials.

Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2022. All rights reserved.
Recommend Faculti to your librarian

error: