Overconfidence is universal?

Overconfidence is sometimes assumed to be a human universal, but there remains a dearth of data systematically measuring overconfidence across populations and contexts. Moreover, cross-cultural experiments often fail to distinguish between placement and precision and worse still, often compare population-mean placement estimates rather than individual performance subtracted from placement. Michael Muthukrishna suggests that previous measures of population-level overconfidence may have been misleading; rather than universal, overconfidence is highly context dependent. Our results reveal cross-cultural differences in sensitivity to incentives and differences in overconfidence strategies, with underconfidence, accuracy, and overconfidence.

Publication

Report Infringement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Article

Andy Green on intergenerational inequality

Next Article

Digital Economy in Emerging Markets

×
As a Guest, you have insight(s) remaining for this month. Create a free account to view 300 more annually.
Related Posts
error:

Add the Faculti Web App to your Mobile or Desktop homescreen

Install
×