Bostock was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, and Title VII

Recommend Faculti to your resource manager

In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court held that federal antidiscrimination law prohibits employment discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. Mitchell N. Berman shows that conservative critics of the majority’s reasoning were correct—up to a point.

Read the Study

Image courtesy of interviewee

Log-in or Sign-up to Faculti
Currently viewing this subject insight as a guest. You have insight(s) remaining for this month.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © Faculti Media Limited 2013 - 2024. All rights reserved.
error: