From pains-taking to pains-giving comparisons

David Nelken distinguishes between three ideal-type contexts in which comparisons are used: comparison as a contribution to disciplinary enquiry, as part of deliberately trying to learn lessons and as an essential element of a new form of governmentality concerned with ranking places in terms of social indicators. David Nelken PHD, LLD (Cambridge) taught at Cambridge, Edinburgh and University College, London before moving to Italy in 1989 as Distinguished Professor of Legal Institutions and Social Change at the University of Macerata. From 1995 to 2013 he was Distinguished Research Professor of Law at Cardiff University, and since 2010 he has been the Visiting Professor of Criminology at Oxford University. His work, covering both theoretical enquiry and empirical investigation, is in the areas of comparative sociology of law, criminology, and legal and social theory.

Publication

 

Image courtesy of the interviewee


Report Infringement

Sign-up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
As a Guest, you have insight(s) remaining for this month. Create a free account to get started.
Related Posts

Stop accounting myopia

Trevor Hopper suggests accountants, whether professionals in practice or in academia, should broaden their vision of accounting and accountability…
error:

Add the Faculti Web App to your Mobile or Desktop homescreen

Install
×